Central Blood Pressure and Pulse Wave Velocity Changes Post Renal Denervation in Patients With Stages 3 and 4 Chronic Kidney Disease: The Regina RDN Study

Bhanu Prasad, Warren Berry, Kunal Goyal, Payam Dehghani, Raymond R Townsend, Bhanu Prasad, Warren Berry, Kunal Goyal, Payam Dehghani, Raymond R Townsend

Abstract

Background: Central aortic blood pressures and arterial stiffness are better indicators of cardiovascular outcomes than brachial blood pressures. However, their response to renal denervation (RDN) in patients with Stage 3 and Stage 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) has not yet been examined.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of RDN on central blood pressures (CBP), brachial (office and ambulatory) blood pressures, arterial stiffness, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), 24-hour urine protein, and selective cardiac parameters observed on echocardiograms.

Design: Single-center, single-arm with pre-/post-RDN follow-up.

Setting: Patients were recruited from the multidisciplinary CKD clinic, Regina General Hospital, Canada.

Patients: About 25 consecutive patients with Stage 3 or Stage 4 CKD and resistant hypertension, with no radiological or laboratory evidence of secondary causes of hypertension.

Measurements: The key measurements were CBP, pulse wave velocity, ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure, office blood pressures on BP Tru, GFR, 24-hour urine protein and sodium, dose and number of blood pressure medication and doses.

Methods: The primary outcome measure was the change in CBP from baseline to 6 months post-RDN. Secondary outcome measures included changes in CBP, office blood pressure, 24-hour ambulatory pressures, pulse wave velocity, kidney function (eGFR and 24-hour protein excretion), and the change in the number and dose of medications during the 2-year follow-up period. The primary outcome and the secondary outcomes were evaluated using a Friedman's analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for changes from post RDN procedure. Bonferroni correction was used to adjust P values for multiple testing. A two-sided alpha of .05 was used.

Results: Median central blood pressures (mm Hg) were 127/75 at baseline versus 118/70 at 6 months and 118/67 at 24 months (P = .13). Median office blood pressures (mm Hg) were 148/76 at baseline versus 135/75 at 6 months and 133/75 at 24 months (P ≤ .001). Median ambulatory 24-hour day (mm Hg) was 148/64 at baseline and 146/68 at 6 months and 152/67 at 24 months (P = .60). Median pulse wave velocity (m/s) at baseline was 13.8 at baseline versus 13.3 m/s at 6 months and 12.3 at 12 months' time (P = .62). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73m2) at baseline was 37, at 6 months was 36 and 34 at 24 months (P = .33).

Limitations: Single-center study, with no sham arm.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that there was a significant improvement in office blood pressures from baseline to 6 months, maintained to 24 months. There was a numerical improvement in central pressures, and pulse wave velocity at 6 and 24 months, with no sustained changes noted in 24-hour blood pressure. Kidney function remained at or near baseline throughout the 24 months of observation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01832233).

Keywords: central blood pressure; chronic kidney disease; chronic renal failure; renal denervation; resistant hypertension.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr. Raymond Townsend is a Consultant for Medtronic. No other authors have any conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study flowchart. Note. CKD = chronic kidney disease; BP = blood pressures; CT= computerized tomography; TSH= thyroid stimulating hormone; ECHO= echocardiogram; ABPM = ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mean Office BP Tru Blood pressures at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. (b) Mean Central blood pressures at baseline, 3, 6,12,18, and 24 months. (c) Mean day time ambulatory blood pressures at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. (d) Mean night-time ambulatory pressure at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Pulse wave velocity at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.

References

    1. Converse RL, Jr, Jacobsen TN, Toto RD, et al. Sympathetic overactivity in patients with chronic renal failure. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:1912-1918.
    1. Hausberg M, Kosch M, Harmelink P, et al. Sympathetic nerve activity in end-stage renal disease. Circulation. 2002;106:1974-1979.
    1. Sata Y, Schlaich MP. The potential role of catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation in chronic and end-stage kidney disease. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2016;21:344-352.
    1. Schlaich MP, Sobotka PA, Krum H, Whitbourn R, Walton A, Esler MD. Renal denervation as a therapeutic approach for hypertension: novel implications for an old concept. Hypertension. 2009;54:1195-1201.
    1. Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Asmar R, et al. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 2001;37:1236-1241.
    1. Weber T, Auer J, O’Rourke MF, et al. Arterial stiffness, wave reflections, and the risk of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2004;109:184-189.
    1. Sutton-Tyrrell K, Najjar SS, Boudreau RM, et al. Elevated aortic pulse wave velocity, a marker of arterial stiffness, predicts cardiovascular events in well-functioning older adults. Circulation. 2005;111:3384-3390.
    1. Safar ME, Blacher J, Pannier B, et al. Central pulse pressure and mortality in end-stage renal disease. Hypertension. 2002;39:735-738.
    1. Brandt MC, Reda S, Mahfoud F, Lenski M, Bohm M, Hoppe UC. Effects of renal sympathetic denervation on arterial stiffness and central hemodynamics in patients with resistant hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1956-1965.
    1. Laurent S, Schlaich M, Esler M. New drugs, procedures, and devices for hypertension. Lancet. 2012;380:591-600.
    1. Bakris G, Nathan S. Renal denervation and left ventricular mass regression: a benefit beyond blood pressure reduction? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1924-1925.
    1. Townsend RR, Chirinos JA, Parsa A, et al. Central pulse pressure in chronic kidney disease: a chronic renal insufficiency cohort ancillary study. Hypertension. 2010;56:518-524.
    1. Townsend RR, Wimmer NJ, Chirinos JA, et al. Aortic PWV in chronic kidney disease: a CRIC ancillary study. Am J Hypertens. 2010;23:282-289.
    1. Krum H, Schlaich M, Whitbourn R, et al. Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: a multicentre safety and proof-of-principle cohort study. Lancet. 2009;373:1275-1281.
    1. Symplicity HTN-2 Investigators, Esler MD, Krum H, et al. Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension (The Symplicity HTN-2 Trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:1903-1909.
    1. Hackam DG, Quinn RR, Ravani P, et al. The 2013 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, prevention, and treatment of hypertension. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29:528-542.
    1. Pauca AL, O’Rourke MF, Kon ND. Prospective evaluation of a method for estimating ascending aortic pressure from the radial artery pressure waveform. Hypertension. 2001;38:932-937.
    1. Chen CH, Nevo E, Fetics B, et al. Estimation of central aortic pressure waveform by mathematical transformation of radial tonometry pressure. Validation of generalized transfer function. Circulation. 1997;95:1827-1836.
    1. Hering D, Mahfoud F, Walton AS, et al. Renal denervation in moderate to severe CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:1250-1257.
    1. Ott C, Mahfoud F, Schmid A, et al. Renal denervation preserves renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease and resistant hypertension. J Hypertens. 2015;33:1261-1266.
    1. Kiuchi MG, Chen S, Andrea BR, et al. Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with hypertension and chronic kidney disease: does improvement in renal function follow blood pressure control? J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014;16:794-800.
    1. Azizi M, Sapoval M, Gosse P, et al. Optimum and stepped care standardised antihypertensive treatment with or without renal denervation for resistant hypertension (DENERHTN): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385:1957-1965.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다