Improving Patient Prioritization During Hospital-Homecare Transition: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study of a Clinical Decision Support Tool Implementation

Maryam Zolnoori, Margaret V McDonald, Yolanda Barrón, Kenrick Cato, Paulina Sockolow, Sridevi Sridharan, Nicole Onorato, Kathryn Bowles, Maxim Topaz, Maryam Zolnoori, Margaret V McDonald, Yolanda Barrón, Kenrick Cato, Paulina Sockolow, Sridevi Sridharan, Nicole Onorato, Kathryn Bowles, Maxim Topaz

Abstract

Background: Homecare settings across the United States provide care to more than 5 million patients every year. About one in five homecare patients are rehospitalized during the homecare episode, with up to two-thirds of these rehospitalizations occurring within the first 2 weeks of services. Timely allocation of homecare services might prevent a significant portion of these rehospitalizations. The first homecare nursing visit is one of the most critical steps of the homecare episode. This visit includes an assessment of the patient's capacity for self-care, medication reconciliation, an examination of the home environment, and a discussion regarding whether a caregiver is present. Hence, appropriate timing of the first visit is crucial, especially for patients with urgent health care needs. However, nurses often have limited and inaccurate information about incoming patients, and patient priority decisions vary significantly between nurses. We developed an innovative decision support tool called Priority for the First Nursing Visit Tool (PREVENT) to assist nurses in prioritizing patients in need of immediate first homecare nursing visits.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the PREVENT tool on process and patient outcomes and to examine the reach, adoption, and implementation of PREVENT.

Methods: Employing a pre-post design, survival analysis, and logistic regression with propensity score matching analysis, we will test the following hypotheses: compared with not using the tool in the preintervention phase, when homecare clinicians use the PREVENT tool, high-risk patients in the intervention phase will (1) receive more timely first homecare visits and (2) have decreased incidence of rehospitalization and have decreased emergency department use within 60 days. Reach, adoption, and implementation will be assessed using mixed methods including homecare admission staff interviews, think-aloud observations, and analysis of staffing and other relevant data.

Results: The study research protocol was approved by the institutional review board in October 2019. PREVENT is currently being integrated into the electronic health records at the participating study sites. Data collection is planned to start in early 2021.

Conclusions: Mixed methods will enable us to gain an in-depth understanding of the complex socio-technological aspects of the hospital to homecare transition. The results have the potential to (1) influence the standardization and individualization of nurse decision making through the use of cutting-edge technology and (2) improve patient outcomes in the understudied homecare setting.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04136951; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04136951.

International registered report identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/20184.

Keywords: PREVENT; RE-AIM framework; clinical decision support system; effective implementation; homecare agencies; rehospitalization.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: KB and MT are co-inventors of a decision support tool called “Priority for the First Nursing Visit Tool” (PREVENT), which under governing University policy is Clinical Trial intellectual property being studied in this research (“I Interest”). The intellectual property is assigned to the University of Pennsylvania.

©Maryam Zolnoori, Margaret V McDonald, Yolanda Barrón, Kenrick Cato, Paulina Sockolow, Sridevi Sridharan, Nicole Onorato, Kathryn Bowles, Maxim Topaz. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 22.01.2021.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study workflow and design. PREVENT: Priority for the First Nursing Visit Tool; RE-AIM: Reach, Effective-ness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance; VNSNY: Visiting Nurse Service of New York.

References

    1. The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission . Report to the Congress- Medicare Payment Policy. Washington, DC: Home Health Care Services; 2018.
    1. Basic Statistics About Home Care. 2010. [2020-09-17]. .
    1. The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Home Health Care Services. 2018. [2020-09-17].
    1. O'Connor M, Hanlon A, Bowles KH. Impact of frontloading of skilled nursing visits on the incidence of 30-day hospital readmission. Geriatr Nurs. 2014;35(2 Suppl):S37–44. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2014.02.018.
    1. Home Health Compare. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2016. [2020-09-17]. .
    1. Rosati RJ, Huang L. Development and testing of an analytic model to identify home healthcare patients at risk for a hospitalization within the first 60 days of care. Home Health Care Serv Q. 2007;26(4):21–36. doi: 10.1300/J027v26n04_03.
    1. Vasquez MS. Preventing Rehospitalization through effective home health nursing care. Prof Case Manag. 2009;14(1):32–8. doi: 10.1097/01.PCAMA.0000343145.81635.e3.
    1. Murtaugh CM, Deb P, Zhu C, Peng TR, Barrón Y, Shah S, Moore SM, Bowles KH, Kalman J, Feldman PH, Siu AL. Reducing readmissions among heart failure patients discharged to home health care: effectiveness of early and intensive nursing services and early physician follow-up. Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug;52(4):1445–72. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12537.
    1. Topaz M, Trifilio M, Maloney D, Bar-Bachar O, Bowles KH. Improving patient prioritization during hospital-homecare transition: a pilot study of a clinical decision support tool. Res Nurs Health. 2018 Oct;41(5):440–7. doi: 10.1002/nur.21907.
    1. Markley J, Sabharwal K, Wang Z, Bigbee C, Whitmire L. A community-wide quality improvement project on patient care transitions reduces 30-day hospital readmissions from home health agencies. Home Healthc Nurse. 2012 Mar;30(3):E1–11. doi: 10.1097/NHH.0b013e318246d540.
    1. McDonald MV, King LJ, Moodie M, Feldman PH. Exploring diabetic care deficiencies and adverse events in home healthcare. J Healthc Qual. 2008;30(6):5–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2008.tb01164.x.
    1. Sockolow P, Wojciechowicz C, Holmberg A, Bass EJ, Potashnik S, Yang Y, Bowles KH. Home care admission information: what nurses need and what nurses have. A mixed methods study. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;250:164–8.
    1. Sockolow P, Bass EJ, Eberle CL, Bowles KH. Homecare nurses' decision-making during admission care planning. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;225:28–32.
    1. Irani E, Hirschman K, Cacchione P, Bowles K. Home health nurse decision-making regarding visit intensity planning for newly admitted patients: a qualitative descriptive study. Home Health Care Serv Q. 2018;37(3):211–31. doi: 10.1080/01621424.2018.1456997.
    1. Jones C, Jones J, Richard A, Bowles K, Lahoff D, Boxer R, Masoudi FA, Coleman EA, Wald HL. 'Connecting the dots': a qualitative study of home health nurse perspectives on coordinating care for recently discharged patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Oct;32(10):1114–21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4104-0.
    1. Hirdes J, Poss J, Curtin-Telegdi N. The method for assigning priority levels (MAPLe): a new decision-support system for allocating home care resources. BMC Med. 2008 Mar 26;6:9. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-6-9.
    1. Maly MB, Lawrence S, Jordan MK, Davies WJ, Weiss MJ, Deitrick L, Salas-Lopez D. Prioritizing partners across the continuum. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Nov;13(9):811–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.08.009.
    1. Topaz M. Developing a Tool to Support Decisions on Patient Prioritization at Admission to Home Health Care. University of Pennsylvania. 2014. [2020-09-17].
    1. Topaz M. The hitchhiker's guide to nursing informatics theory: using the data-knowledge-information-wisdom framework to guide informatics research. Online J Nurs Informatics. 2013;17(3):-. doi: 10.1201/b13617-7.
    1. Bowles KH, Ratcliffe S, Potashnik S, Topaz M, Holmes J, Shih N, Naylor MD. Using electronic case summaries to elicit multi-disciplinary expert knowledge about referrals to post-acute care. Appl Clin Inform. 2016;7(2):368–79. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-11-RA-0161.
    1. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant R. Applied Logistic Regression. 3rd ed. Wiley. 2013:-. doi: 10.1002/9781118548387.
    1. Ma C, Shang J, Miner S, Lennox L, Squires A. The prevalence, reasons, and risk factors for hospital readmissions among home health care patients: a systematic review. Home Health Care Manag Pract. 2017 Nov 15;30(2):83–92. doi: 10.1177/1084822317741622.
    1. O'Connor M. Hospitalization among medicare-reimbursed skilled home health recipients. Home Health Care Manag Pract. 2012 Feb;24(1):27–37. doi: 10.1177/1084822311419498.
    1. Eccles D, Arsal G. The think aloud method: what is it and how do I use it? Qual Res Sport Exerc Heal. 2017;9(4):514–31.
    1. Bakken S, Ruland CM. Translating clinical informatics interventions into routine clinical care: how can the RE-AIM framework help? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(6):889–97. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3085.
    1. Leveille SG, Walker J, Ralston JD, Ross SE, Elmore JG, Delbanco T. Evaluating the impact of patients' online access to doctors' visit notes: designing and executing the OpenNotes project. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Apr 13;12:32. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-32.
    1. Tullai-McGuinness S, Madigan EA, Fortinsky RH. Validity testing the outcomes and assessment information set (OASIS) Home Health Care Serv Q. 2009;28(1):45–57. doi: 10.1080/01621420802716206.
    1. Johnson S, Friedman C, Cimino JJ, Clark T, Hripcsak G, Clayton PD. Conceptual data model for a central patient database. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1991:381–5.
    1. Hripcsak G, Cimino JJ, Sengupta S. WebCIS: large scale deployment of a web-based clinical information system. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:804–8.
    1. Qualitative Research Software. Qualtrics Research Core. 2020. [2020-09-17].
    1. Doll WJ, Torkzadeh G. The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Q. 1988 Jun;12(2):259. doi: 10.2307/248851.
    1. Doll WJ, Deng X, Raghunathan T, Torkzadeh G, Xia W. The meaning and measurement of user satisfaction: a multigroup invariance analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. J Manag Inf Syst. 2014 Dec 8;21(1):227–62. doi: 10.1080/07421222.2004.11045789.
    1. Doll WJ, Xia W, Torkzadeh G. A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Q. 1994 Dec;18(4):453. doi: 10.2307/249524.
    1. Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399–424. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786.
    1. Austin PC. A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score. Stat Med. 2014 Mar 15;33(6):1057–69. doi: 10.1002/sim.6004. doi: 10.1002/sim.6004.
    1. Someren MV. The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes. New York, USA: Academic Press; 1994.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006 Jan;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    1. Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013 Sep;15(3):398–405. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12048.
    1. NVivo Qualitative data Analysis Software. QSR International Pty Ltd. 2018. [2020-09-17]. .
    1. Byrne M. Data analysis strategies for qualitative research. AORN J. 2001 Dec;74(6):904–5. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2092(06)61511-1.
    1. Hemming K, Haines TP, Chilton PJ, Girling AJ, Lilford RJ. The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting. Br Med J. 2015 Feb 6;350:h391. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h391.
    1. Office of National Coordinator for Information Technology. Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems among U.S. Non-Federal Acute Care Hospitals - 2016:2016–2015.
    1. Landers S, Madigan E, Leff B, Rosati R, McCann B, Hornbake R. The Future of Home Health Care. Home Health Care Manag Pract. SAGE PublicationsSage CA: Los Angeles, CA; 2016. p. 262.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다