Cardiopulmonary-related patient-reported outcomes in a randomized clinical trial of radiation therapy for breast cancer

Hilde Van Parijs, Vincent Vinh-Hung, Christel Fontaine, Guy Storme, Claire Verschraegen, Dung M Nguyen, Nele Adriaenssens, Nam P Nguyen, Olena Gorobets, Mark De Ridder, Hilde Van Parijs, Vincent Vinh-Hung, Christel Fontaine, Guy Storme, Claire Verschraegen, Dung M Nguyen, Nele Adriaenssens, Nam P Nguyen, Olena Gorobets, Mark De Ridder

Abstract

Background: Long-term prospective patient-reported outcomes (PRO) after breast cancer adjuvant radiotherapy is scarce. TomoBreast compared conventional radiotherapy (CR) with tomotherapy (TT), on the hypothesis that TT might reduce lung-heart toxicity.

Methods: Among 123 women consenting to participate, 64 were randomized to CR, 59 to TT. CR delivered 50 Gy in 25 fractions/5 weeks to breast/chest wall and regional nodes if node-positive, with a sequential boost (16 Gy/8 fractions/1.6 weeks) after lumpectomy. TT delivered 42 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks to breast/chest wall and regional nodes if node-positive, 51 Gy simultaneous-integrated-boost in patients with lumpectomy. PRO were assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire QLQ-C30. PRO scores were converted into a symptom-free scale, 100 indicating a fully symptom-free score, 0 indicating total loss of freedom from symptom. Changes of PRO over time were analyzed using the linear mixed-effect model. Survival analysis computed time to > 10% PRO-deterioration. A post-hoc cardiorespiratory outcome was defined as deterioration in any of dyspnea, fatigue, physical functioning, or pain.

Results: At 10.4 years median follow-up, patients returned on average 9 questionnaires/patient, providing a total of 1139 PRO records. Item completeness was 96.6%. Missingness did not differ between the randomization arms. The PRO at baseline were below the nominal 100% symptom-free score, notably the mean fatigue-free score was 64.8% vs. 69.6%, pain-free was 75.4% vs. 75.3%, and dyspnea-free was 84.8% vs. 88.5%, in the TT vs. CR arm, respectively, although the differences were not significant. By mixed-effect modeling on early ≤2 years assessment, all three scores deteriorated, significantly for fatigue, P ≤ 0.01, without effect of randomization arm. By modeling on late assessment beyond 2 years, TT versus CR was not significantly associated with changes of fatigue-free or pain-free scores but was associated with a significant 8.9% improvement of freedom from dyspnea, P = 0.035. By survival analysis of the time to PRO deterioration, TT improved 10-year survival free of cardiorespiratory deterioration from 66.9% with CR to 84.5% with TT, P = 0.029.

Conclusion: Modern radiation therapy can significantly improve long-term PRO.

Trial registration: Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00459628 , April 12, 2007 prospectively.

Keywords: Dyspnea; Fatigue; Pain; Patient reported outcome measures; Quality of life.

Conflict of interest statement

The Radiation Oncology department of the Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel under the direction of Guy Storme and Mark De Ridder had a research agreement with Tomotherapy Inc., Madison, WI, unrelated to the present study.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consort 2010 flow diagram of the TomoBreast trial
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patient reported outcome (PRO) specific deterioration free survival
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Patient reported outcome (PRO) specific survival free from deterioration in any of dyspnea, fatigue, pain, or physical functioning scales, by randomization arm. TT: tomotherapy. CR: conventional radiotherapy

References

    1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–E386. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210.
    1. Ginsburg O, Bray F, Coleman MP, Vanderpuye V, Eniu A, Kotha SR, Sarker M, Huong TT, Allemani C, Dvaladze A, Gralow J, Yeates K, Taylor C, Oomman N, Krishnan S, Sullivan R, Kombe D, Blas MM, Parham G, Kassami N, Conteh L. The global burden of women's cancers: a grand challenge in global health. Lancet. 2017;389(10071):847–860. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31392-7.
    1. Van de Steene J, Soete G, Storme G. Adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer significantly improves overall survival: the missing link. Radiother Oncol. 2000;55(3):263–272. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8140(00)00204-8.
    1. Vinh-Hung V, Verschraegen C. The breast conserving surgery project. Breast-conserving surgery with or without radiotherapy: pooled-analysis for risks of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(2):115–121. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh013.
    1. Carver JR, Shapiro CL, Ng A, Jacobs L, Schwartz C, Virgo KS, Hagerty KL, Somerfield MR, Vaughn DJ, ASCO Cancer Survivorship Expert Panel American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical evidence review on the ongoing care of adult cancer survivors: cardiac and pulmonary late effects. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(25):3991–4008. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.9777.
    1. Verellen D, Ridder MD, Linthout N, Tournel K, Soete G, Storme G. Innovations in image-guided radiotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7(12):949–960. doi: 10.1038/nrc2288.
    1. Mackie TR, Kapatoes J, Ruchala K, Lu W, Wu C, Olivera G, Forrest L, Tome W, Welsh J, Jeraj R, Harari P, Reckwerdt P, Paliwal B, Ritter M, Keller H, Fowler J, Mehta M. Image guidance for precise conformal radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56(1):89–105. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00090-7.
    1. Storme G, Verellen D, Soete G, Linthout N, Van De SJ, Voordeckers M, et al. From linac to tomotherapy: new possibilities for cure? AdvExpMedBiol. 2006;587:303–308. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5133-3_23.
    1. Heymann S, Dipasquale G, Nguyen NP, San M, Gorobets O, Leduc N, Verellen D, Storme G, van Parijs H, de Ridder M, Vinh-Hung V. Two-level factorial pre-TomoBreast pilot study of Tomotherapy and conventional radiotherapy in breast cancer: post hoc utility of a mean absolute dose deviation penalty score. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2020;19:1533033820947759. doi: 10.1177/1533033820947759.
    1. Van Parijs H, Miedema G, Vinh-Hung V, Verbanck S, Adriaenssens N, Kerkhove D, et al. Short course radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for stage I-II breast cancer, early toxicities of a randomized clinical trial. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7(1). 10.1186/1748-717x-7-80.
    1. Verbanck S, Hanon S, Schuermans D, Van Parijs H, Vinh-Hung V, Miedema G, et al. Mild lung restriction in breast cancer patients after hypofractionated and conventional radiation therapy: a 3-year follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;95(3):937–945. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.02.008.
    1. Versmessen H, Vinh-Hung V, Van Parijs H, Miedema G, Voordeckers M, Adriaenssens N, et al. Health-related quality of life in survivors of stage I-II breast cancer: randomized trial of post-operative conventional radiotherapy and hypofractionated tomotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2012;12(1). 10.1186/1471-2407-12-495.
    1. Kerkhove D, Fontaine C, Droogmans S, De Greve J, Tanaka K, Van De Veire N, et al. How to monitor cardiac toxicity of chemotherapy: time is muscle! Heart. 2014;100(15):1208–1217. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-303815.
    1. Adriaenssens N, Vinh-Hung V, Miedema G, Versmessen H, Lamote J, Vanhoeij M, et al. Early contralateral shoulder-arm morbidity in breast cancer patients enrolled in a randomized trial of post-surgery radiation therapy. Breast Cancer : Basic and Clinical Research. 2012;6:79–93. doi: 10.4137/bcbcr.s9362.
    1. Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF. Toxicity criteria of the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31(5):1341–1346. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-C.
    1. Sobin LH, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant Tumours. 6. New-York: Wiley; 2002.
    1. Reynders T, Tournel K, De Coninck P, Heymann S, Vinh-Hung V, Van Parijs H, et al. Dosimetric assessment of static and helical TomoTherapy in the clinical implementation of breast cancer treatments. Radiother Oncol. 2009;93(1):71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.07.005.
    1. Efron B. Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced. Biometrika. 1971;58(3):403–417. doi: 10.1093/biomet/58.3.403.
    1. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(5):365–76. 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
    1. Giesinger JM, Kieffer JM, Fayers PM, Groenvold M, Petersen MA, Scott NW, Sprangers MA, Velikova G, Aaronson NK, EORTC Quality of Life Group Replication and validation of higher order models demonstrated that a summary score for the EORTC QLQ-C30 is robust. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;69:79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.007.
    1. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67(1):48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
    1. Awad L, Zuber E, Mesbah M. Applying survival data methodology to analyze longitudinal quality of life data. In: Mesbah M, Cole BF, Lee M-LT, editors. Statistical methods for quality of life studies: design, measurements and analysis. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media; 2002. pp. 231–243.
    1. King MT. The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res. 1996;5(6):555–567. doi: 10.1007/BF00439229.
    1. Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, Zee B, Pater J. Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(1):139–144. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.139.
    1. Schunemann HJ, Akl EA, Guyatt GH. Interpreting the results of patient reported outcome measures in clinical trials: the clinician's perspective. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4(1):62. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-62.
    1. Fiteni F, Ray IL, Ousmen A, Isambert N, Anota A, Bonnetain F. Health-related quality of life as an endpoint in oncology phase I trials: a systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5579-3.
    1. Gamper EM, Musoro JZ, Coens C, Stelmes JJ, Falato C, Groenvold M, Velikova G, Cocks K, Flechtner HH, King MT, Bottomley A, on behalf of the EORTC Genito-Urinary Tract Cancer Group and Quality of Life Groups Minimally important differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in prostate cancer clinical trials. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):1083. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08609-7.
    1. Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, Crapo RO, Burgos F, Casaburi R, et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2005;26(5):948–968. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00035205.
    1. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for statistical Computing; 2017.
    1. Therneau TM, Grambsch PM. Modeling survival data: extending the Cox model (statistics for biology and health) New York: NY Springer-Verlag; 2000.
    1. Verbanck S, Hanon S, Schuermans D, Van Parijs H, Vinh-Hung V, Miedema G, et al. Small airways function in breast cancer patients before and after radiotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;135(3):857–865. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2201-7.
    1. Treacher DF, Leach RM. Oxygen transport-1. Basic principles BMJ. 1998;317(7168):1302–1306. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1302.
    1. Burtscher M. Exercise limitations by the oxygen delivery and utilization systems in aging and disease: coordinated adaptation and deadaptation of the lung-heart muscle axis - a mini-review. Gerontology. 2013;59(4):289–296. doi: 10.1159/000343990.
    1. Mahler DA, O'Donnell DE. Recent advances in dyspnea. Chest. 2015;147(1):232–241. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0800.
    1. Petersen S, von Leupoldt A, Van den Bergh O. Geriatric dyspnea: doing worse, feeling better. Ageing Res Rev. 2014;15:94–99. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2014.03.001.
    1. Brims FJ, Davies HE, Lee YC. Respiratory chest pain: diagnosis and treatment. Med Clin North Am. 2010;94(2):217–232. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2010.01.003.
    1. Park JS, Cha KS, Shin D, Lee DS, Lee HW, Oh JH, Choi JH, Lee HC, Hong TJ, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, Chae SC, Kim YJ, Korea Working Group on Myocardial Infarction Investigators Impact of non-chest pain complaint as a presenting symptom on door-to-balloon time and clinical outcomes in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114(12):1801–1809. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.09.017.
    1. Chen YW, Camp PG, Coxson HO, Road JD, Guenette JA, Hunt MA, Reid WD. Comorbidities that cause pain and the contributors to pain in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(8):1535–1543. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.10.016.
    1. Hareendran A, Leidy NK. Measurement of Dyspnea in Clinical Trials. In: Mahler DA, O'Donnell DE, editors. Dyspnea: Mechanisms, Measurement, and Management. Third Edition ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2014. p. 111–127.
    1. Gupta A, Ohri N, Haffty BG. Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation is cost-effective-but is that enough to change practice? Transl Cancer Res. 2018;7(Suppl 4):S469–SS72. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2018.03.20.
    1. Wang SL, Fang H, Song YW, Wang WH, Hu C, Liu YP, Jin J, Liu XF, Yu ZH, Ren H, Li N, Lu NN, Tang Y, Tang Y, Qi SN, Sun GY, Peng R, Li S, Chen B, Yang Y, Li YX. Hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated postmastectomy radiotherapy for patients with high-risk breast cancer: a randomised, non-inferiority, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(3):352–360. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30813-1.
    1. Vinh-Hung V, Nguyen NP, Verschraegen C. Hypofractionated nodal irradiation for breast cancer: a case for caution. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(1):13–14. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5061.
    1. Wang X, Fargier-Bochaton O, Dipasquale G, Laouiti M, Kountouri M, Gorobets O, Nguyen NP, Miralbell R, Vinh-Hung V. Is prone free breathing better than supine deep inspiration breath-hold for left whole-breast radiotherapy? A dosimetric analysis. Strahlenther Onkol. 2021;197(4):317–331. doi: 10.1007/s00066-020-01731-8.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다