Determinants of breastfeeding discontinuation in an Italian cohort of mother-infant dyads in the first six months of life: a randomized controlled trial

Fabio Mosca, Paola Roggero, Francesca Garbarino, Daniela Morniroli, Beatrice Bracco, Laura Morlacchi, Domenica Mallardi, Maria Lorella Gianni, Dario Consonni, Fabio Mosca, Paola Roggero, Francesca Garbarino, Daniela Morniroli, Beatrice Bracco, Laura Morlacchi, Domenica Mallardi, Maria Lorella Gianni, Dario Consonni

Abstract

Background: Among breastfeeding determinants, the marketing of breast milk substitutes might contribute to suboptimal breastfeeding rates. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of receiving information on breast milk substitutes on breastfeeding rates.

Methods: We conducted a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial from 2012 to 2014 in a northern Italian maternity ward. We enrolled 802 Caucasian mothers who gave birth to healthy, full-term singletons with a birth weight > 2500 g and who were exclusively breastfeeding from delivery to discharge. Mothers who gave birth to infants with congenital diseases, chromosomal abnormalities, perinatal infections and/or cardio-respiratory instability and/or mothers being affected by endocrine and/or metabolic and/or gastrointestinal and/or renal diseases were excluded. Mothers were randomized to either receive (group A, n = 405) or not (group B, n = 397) written information on a breast milk substitute at discharge. Breastfeeding was promoted and supported in all mother-infant pairs equally. The mode of feeding for up to 6 months after delivery was determined by phone interview. To detect a 10% difference between groups in the discontinuation rate of exclusive breastfeeding at three months of age at 5% significance and 80% power, a total of 356 mother-infant pairs per group were needed.

Results: The exclusive breastfeeding prevalence was 91% and 92% at 7 days, 79% and 70% at 1 month, 75% and 66% at 2 months, 72% and 62% at 3 months, and 3% and 2% at 6 months in groups A and B, respectively. The relative risk (95% confidence interval) of exclusive breastfeeding (group A vs B) at 7 days and at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months was as follows: 0.99 (0.95-1.03), 1.12 (1.03-1.21), 1.13 (1.03-1.24), 1.15 (1.04-1.27), and 1.49 (0.62-3.61). Nutritional, lifestyle and lactational factors were the primary contributing determinants to early breastfeeding discontinuation.

Conclusions: The present findings indicate that receiving written information on breast milk substitutes at hospital discharge, provided that breastfeeding support and education are offered, does not negatively affect breastfeeding rates.

Trial registration: NCT03208114. Registered 5 July 2017.

Keywords: Breast milk substitutes; Breastfeeding; Breastfeeding rates; Term infant.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Protocol was approved by the institutional Ethics Committee of the Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Ca′ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan. Informed written consent was obtained from the participants before enrolment.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of the study

References

    1. Bartick MC, Jegier BJ, Green BD, Schwarz EB, Reinhold AG, Stuebe AM. Disparities in breastfeeding: impact on maternal and child health outcomes and costs. J Pediatr. 2017;181:49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.10.028.
    1. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, França GV, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387:475–490. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7.
    1. World Health Organization. Global strategy for infant and young child feeding, 2003. ; Accessed 16 March 2018.
    1. Rollins NC, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N, Horton S, Lutter CK, Martines JC, et al. Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? Lancet. 2016;387:491–504. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01044-2.
    1. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica Accessed 16 March 2018.
    1. Regione Lombardia Sanità . Accessed 24 August 2018.
    1. Mason F, Rawe K, Wright S. Superfood for babies: how overcoming barriers to breastfeeding will save lives. London: Save the Children; 2013.
    1. Baker P, Smith J, Salmon L, Friel S, Kent G, Iellamo A, et al. Global trends and patterns of commercial milk-based formula sales: is an unprecedented infant and young child feeding transition underway? Public Health Nutr. 2016;19:2540–2550. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016001117.
    1. McFadden A, Mason F, Baker J, Begin F, Dykes F, Grummer-Strawn L, et al. Spotlight on infant formula: coordinated global action needed. Lancet. 2016;387:413–415. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00103-3.
    1. World Health Organization . International code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1981.
    1. Piwoz EG, Huffman SL. The impact of marketing of breast-milk substitutes on WHO-recommended breastfeeding practices. Food Nutr Bull. 2015;36:373–386. doi: 10.1177/0379572115602174.
    1. Sobel HL, Iellamo A, Raya RR, Padilla AA, Olivé JM, Nyunt-U S. Is unimpeded marketing for breast milk substitutes responsible for the decline in breastfeeding in the Philippines? An exploratory survey and focus group analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73:1445–1448. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.029.
    1. UNICEF. . Accessed 16 Jan 2018.
    1. Mordini B, Bortoli E, Pagano R, Barozzi G, Ferrari F. Correlations between welfare initiatives and breastfeeding rates: a 10-year follow-up study. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98:80–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00986.x.
    1. Cattaneo A, Bettinelli ME, Chapin E, Macaluso A, Córdova do Espírito Santo L, Murante AM et al Effectiveness of the Baby Friendly Community Initiative in Italy Effectiveness of the baby friendly community initiative in Italy A non-randomised controlled study. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010232. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010232.
    1. World Health Organization. The World Health Organization's infant feeding recommendation. Accessed 16 March 2018.
    1. Odom EC, Li R, Scanlon KS, Perrine CG, Grummer-Strawn L. Reasons for earlier than desired cessation of breastfeeding. Pediatrics. 2013;131:e726–e732. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1295.
    1. Nilsson Ingrid M. S., Strandberg-Larsen Katrine, Knight Christopher H., Hansen Anne Vinkel, Kronborg Hanne. Focused breastfeeding counselling improves short- and long-term success in an early-discharge setting: A cluster-randomized study. Maternal & Child Nutrition. 2017;13(4):e12432. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12432.
    1. Danielsen B, Castles AG, Damberg CL, Gould JB. Newborn discharge timing and readmissions: California, 1992-1995. Pediatrics. 2000;106:31–39. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.1.31.
    1. Flaherman VJ, Aby J, Burgos AE, Lee KA, Cabana MD, Newman TB. Effect of early limited formula on duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding in at-risk infants: an RCT. Pediatrics. 2013;131:1059–1065. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2809.
    1. Dewey KG. Maternal and fetal stress are associated with impaired lactogenesis in humans. J Nutr. 2001;131:3012S–3015S. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.11.3012S.
    1. Cato K, Sylvén SM, Lindbäck J, Skalkidou A, Rubertsson C. Risk factors for exclusive breastfeeding lasting less than two months-identifying women in need of targeted breastfeeding support. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0179402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179402.
    1. Prior E, Santhakumaran S, Gale C, Philipps LH, Modi N, Hyde MJ. Breastfeeding after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of world literature. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95:1113–1135. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.030254.
    1. Save the Children . Breastfeeding and IGBM Code Violations Survey. London: Save the Children; 2013.
    1. Pries A, Huffman S, Champeny M. Assessment of promotion of foods consumed by infants and young children in Nepal: assessment and research on child feeding (ARCH) Washington, DC: Helen Keller International; 2014.
    1. Davanzo R, Romagnoli C, Corsello G. Position statement on breastfeeding from the Italian pediatric societies. Ital J Pediatr. 2015;41:80. doi: 10.1186/s13052-015-0191-x.
    1. Alves E, Magano R, Amorim M, Nogueira C, Silva S. Factors influencing parent reports of facilitators and barriers to human milk supply in neonatal intensive care units. J Hum Lact. 2016;32:695–703. doi: 10.1177/0890334416664071.
    1. Giannì ML, Bezze E, Sannino P, Stori E, Plevani L, Roggero P, et al. Facilitators and barriers of breastfeeding late preterm infants according to mothers’ experiences. BMC Pediatr. 2016;16:179. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0722-7.
    1. Colombo L, Crippa BL, Consonni D, Bettinelli ME, Agosti V, Mangino G et al. Breastfeeding Determinants in Healthy Term Newborns. Nutrients. 2018;10.pii: E48.
    1. Burt RA. Investigational treatments: process, payment, and priorities. JAMA. 1997;278:1402. doi: 10.1001/jama.1997.03550170032019.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다