Stepwise strategy to improve Cervical Cancer Screening Adherence (SCAN-CC): automated text messages, phone calls and face-to-face interviews: protocol of a population-based randomised controlled trial

João Firmino-Machado, Romeu Mendes, Amélia Moreira, Nuno Lunet, João Firmino-Machado, Romeu Mendes, Amélia Moreira, Nuno Lunet

Abstract

Introduction: Screening is highly effective for cervical cancer prevention and control. Population-based screening programmes are widely implemented in high-income countries, although adherence is often low. In Portugal, just over half of the women adhere to cervical cancer screening, contributing for greater mortality rates than in other European countries. The most effective adherence raising strategies are based on patient reminders, small/mass media and face-to-face educational programmes, but sequential interventions targeting the general population have seldom been evaluated. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a stepwise approach, with increasing complexity and cost, to improve adherence to organised cervical cancer screening: step 1a-customised text message invitation; step 1b-customised automated phone call invitation; step 2-secretary phone call; step 3-family health professional phone call and face-to-face appointment.

Methods: A population-based randomised controlled trial will be implemented in Portuguese urban and rural areas. Women eligible for cervical cancer screening will be randomised (1:1) to intervention and control. In the intervention group, women will be invited for screening through text messages, automated phone calls, manual phone calls and health professional appointments, to be applied sequentially to participants remaining non-adherent after each step. Control will be the standard of care (written letter). The primary outcome is the proportion of women adherent to screening after step 1 or sequences of steps from 1 to 3. The secondary outcomes are: proportion of women screened after each step (1a, 2 and 3); proportion of text messages/phone calls delivered; proportion of women previously screened in a private health institution who change to organised screening. The intervention and control groups will be compared based on intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses.

Ethics and dissemination: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Northern Health Region Administration and National Data Protection Committee. Results will be disseminated through communications in scientific meetings and peer-reviewed journals.

Trial number: NCT03122275.

Keywords: directive counselling; early detection of cancer; mass screening; reminder systems; text messaging; uterine cervical neoplasms.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design of the stepwise strategy to improve cervical cancer screening adherence. *Outcome assessment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Content for text messages and phone calls.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flow of step 1 interventions: written letter, text messages and automated phone calls.

References

    1. Wang H, Naghavi M, Allen C, et al. . Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016;388:1459–544. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31012-1
    1. WHO. Cancer Control - Early detection. 2007:1–50.
    1. IARC. Cervical Cancer and Screening, Chapter 1 In: IARC Handbook of Cancer Prevention, 2005;10.
    1. Harper DM, Franco EL, Wheeler C, et al. . Efficacy of a bivalent L1 virus-like particle vaccine in prevention of infection with human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in young women: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:1757–65. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17398-4
    1. Portuguese Directorate-General of Health. Avaliação e Monitorização dos Rastreios Oncológicos Organizados de Base Populacional de Portugal Continental 2014.
    1. Oliveira M, Peleteiro B, Lunet N. Cytology use for cervical cancer screening in Portugal : results from the 2005 / 2006 National Health Survey. Eur J Public Health 2013:1–6.
    1. Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. . Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer 2013;49:1374–403. 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027
    1. Lantz PM, Stencil D, Lippert MT, et al. . Breast and cervical cancer screening in a low-income managed care sample: the efficacy of physician letters and phone calls. Am J Public Health 1995;85:834–6. 10.2105/AJPH.85.6.834
    1. Buehler SK, Parsons WL. Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: A randomized controlled trial. Cmaj 1997;157:521–6.
    1. Morrell S, Taylor R, Zeckendorf S, et al. . How much does a reminder letter increase cervical screening among under-screened women in NSW? Aust N Z J Public Health 2005;29:78–84. 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2005.tb00753.x
    1. Eaker S, Adami H, Granath F. Wilander E. A Large Population-Based Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Attendance at Screening for Cervical Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:346–55.
    1. Tm V, Glass A, Re G, et al. . The safety net: a cost-effective approach to improving breast and cervical cancer screening. J Women’s Heal 2003;12:789–98.
    1. Jensen H, Svanholm H, Stovring H, et al. . A primary healthcare-based intervention to improve a Danish cervical cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Heal 2009;63:510–5. 10.1136/jech.2008.077636
    1. Broberg G, Jonasson JM, Ellis J, et al. . Increasing participation in cervical cancer screening: Telephone contact with long-term non-attendees in Sweden. Results from RACOMIP, a randomized controlled trial. Int J Cancer 2013;133:164–71. 10.1002/ijc.27985
    1. Women L, Randomized A, Trial C, et al. . Telephone Care Management To Improve Cancer Screening among low-income women. Ann Intern Med 2006:563–71.
    1. Marhayu R, Rashid A, Ramli S, et al. . Cost Effective Analysis of Recall Methods for Cervical Cancer Screening in Selangor - Results from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:1–5.
    1. Byles JE, Redman S, Sanson-fisher RW, et al. . Effectiveness of two direct-mail strategies to encourage women to have cervical (Pap) smears. Health Promot Int 1995;10:5–16. 10.1093/heapro/10.1.5
    1. Rimer BK, Conaway M, Lyna P, et al. . The impact of tailored interventions on a community health center population. Patient Educ Couns 1999;37:125–40. 10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00122-0
    1. Taylor VM. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Interventions to Promote Cervical Cancer Screening Among Chinese Women in North America. CancerSpectrum Knowl Environ 2002;94:670–7. 10.1093/jnci/94.9.670
    1. McAvoy BR, Raza R. Can health education increase uptake of cervical smear testing among Asian women? BMJ 1991;302:833–6. 10.1136/bmj.302.6780.833
    1. Howe A, Owen-Smith V, Richardson J. The impact of a television soap opera on the NHS Cervical Screening Programme in the North West of England. J Public Health 2002;24:299–304. 10.1093/pubmed/24.4.299
    1. Valanis BG, Glasgow RE, Mullooly J, et al. . Screening HMO women overdue for both mammograms and pap tests. Prev Med 2002;34:40–50. 10.1006/pmed.2001.0949
    1. Baron RC, Rimer BK, Breslow RA, et al. . Client-Directed Interventions to Increase Community Demand for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening - A systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2008;35.
    1. Arora S, Burner E, Terp S, et al. . Improving attendance at post-emergency department follow-up via automated text message appointment reminders: A randomized controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med 2015;22:31–7. 10.1111/acem.12503
    1. Leong KC, Chen WS, Leong KW, et al. . The use of text messaging to improve attendance in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract 2006;23:699–705. 10.1093/fampra/cml044
    1. Riley WT, Rivera DE, Atienza AA, et al. . Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? Transl Behav Med 2011;1:53–71. 10.1007/s13142-011-0021-7
    1. Posadzki P, Mastellos N, Ryan R, et al. . Automated telephone communication systems for preventive healthcare and management of long-term conditions. Cochrane database Syst Rev 2016;2016.
    1. Hidalgo JL, Sánchez MP, Rabanales J, et al. . Effectiveness of three interventions in improving adherence to cervical cancer screening. 2015:1–7.
    1. Project F, Paskett ED, Tatum CM, et al. . Community-based Interventions to Improve Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening : Results of the Forsyth County Cancer Screening. 1999;8:453–9.
    1. Direct Extraction from SIARS software. 20/09/2016, at 14:00h.
    1. Rothman AJ, Bartels RD, Wlaschin J, et al. . The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. J Commun 2006;56:S202–20. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00290.x

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다