Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for severe deep endometriosis: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (ROBEndo trial)

Anna Maria Terho, Johanna Mäkelä-Kaikkonen, Pasi Ohtonen, Outi Uimari, Terhi Puhto, Tero Rautio, Sari Koivurova, Anna Maria Terho, Johanna Mäkelä-Kaikkonen, Pasi Ohtonen, Outi Uimari, Terhi Puhto, Tero Rautio, Sari Koivurova

Abstract

Introduction: Endometriosis is a common gynaecological disease affecting around 10% of fertile-aged women, causing severe pain symptoms. Deep endometriosis is defined as endometriotic implants that infiltrate the underlying organs more than 5 mm in depth. Surgery for deep endometriosis requires advanced multidisciplinary surgical technique, often in very difficult surgical conditions, with increased risks of complications. Robotic surgery offers a high-definition three-dimensional view and articulating instruments that may allow more precise dissection than conventional laparoscopy in the pelvic area. The superiority of robotic surgery has not, however, been provedin randomised controlled studies, and there is a lack of long-term outcome data. Advanced endometriosis surgery offers an excellent platform to study the feasibility and long-term outcomes of robotic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopy.

Methods and analysis: ROBEndo is a prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial in a single-centre setting. Patients with deep endometriosis verified by MRI needing surgery at Oulu University Hospital (Oulu, Finland) will be considered eligible. 70 patients will be allocated 1:1 to receive either robotic-assisted or conventional laparoscopic surgery in two strata: radical surgery (with the removal of the uterus and adnexae) and gynaecological organ-sparing surgery. The primary outcome will be the surgical outcome as regards to pain symptoms measured on numeric rating scale (NRS) questionnaires at 24 hours and 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. As secondary outcomes, intraoperative measures, enhanced recovery after surgery factors, complications, cost and long-term quality of life measured with Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and 15-dimensional (15D) questionnaires will be compared.

Ethics and dissemination: This study has been approved by the Northern Ostrobothnian Hospital District Ethical Committee at Oulu University Hospital (212/2021). Informed consent will be obtained during the preoperative check-up by the operating gynaecologist. The results will be published in peer-reviewed international journals.

Trial registration number: NCT05179109.

Keywords: Adult surgery; GYNAECOLOGY; Minimally invasive surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1244–56. 10.1056/NEJMra1810764
    1. Sinha R, Sanjay M, Rupa B, et al. . Robotic surgery in gynecology. J Minim Access Surg 2015;11:50–9. 10.4103/0972-9941.147690
    1. Lawrie TA, Liu H, Lu D, et al. . Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;4:CD011422. 10.1002/14651858.CD011422.pub2
    1. Lee SJ, Calderon B, Gardner GJ, et al. . The feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after robotic-assisted hysterectomy alone or with other procedures for benign and malignant indications. Gynecol Oncol 2014;133:552–5. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.04.006
    1. Nezhat C, Lewis M, Kotikela S, et al. . Robotic versus standard laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2010;94:2758–60. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.031
    1. Nezhat FR, Sirota I. Perioperative outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopy surgery for advanced-stage endometriosis. JSLS 2014;18:e2014.00094. 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00094
    1. Magrina JF, Espada M, Kho RM, et al. . Surgical excision of advanced endometriosis: perioperative outcomes and impacting factors. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015;22:944–50. 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.04.016
    1. Nezhat CR, Stevens A, Balassiano E, et al. . Robotic-assisted laparoscopy vs conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of advanced stage endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015;22:40–4. 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.06.002
    1. Le Gac M, Ferrier C, Touboul C, et al. . Comparison of robotic versus conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of colorectal endometriosis: pilot study of an expert center. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2020:101885. 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101885
    1. Soto E, Luu TH, Liu X, et al. . Laparoscopy vs. robotic surgery for endometriosis (LAROSE): a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2017;107:996–1002. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.033
    1. Restaino S, Mereu L, Finelli A, et al. . Robotic surgery vs laparoscopic surgery in patients with diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg 2020;14:687–94. 10.1007/s11701-020-01061-y
    1. Keckstein J, Becker CM, et al. , Working group of ESGE, ESHRE, and WES . Recommendations for the surgical treatment of endometriosis. Part 2: deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open 2020;1:1–25.
    1. Riley K, Benton A, Deimling T. Surgical excision versus ablation for superficial endometriosis-associated pain: a randomized, controlled trial. JMIG 2019;26:71–7.
    1. Roh HF, Nam SH, Kim JM. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2018;13:e0191628. 10.1371/journal.pone.0191628
    1. Gkegkes ID, Iavazzo C, Iatrakis G, et al. . Robotic management of endometriosis: discussion of use, criteria and advantages: a review of the literature. Acta Medica 2019;62:147–9. 10.14712/18059694.2020.3
    1. Carvalho L, Abrão MS, Deshpande A, et al. . Robotics as a new surgical minimally invasive approach to treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review. Int J Med Robot 2012;8:160–5. 10.1002/rcs.451

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다