Intact Brain Network Function in an Unresponsive Patient with COVID-19
David Fischer, Zachary D Threlkeld, Yelena G Bodien, John E Kirsch, Susie Y Huang, Pamela W Schaefer, Otto Rapalino, Leigh R Hochberg, Bruce R Rosen, Brian L Edlow, David Fischer, Zachary D Threlkeld, Yelena G Bodien, John E Kirsch, Susie Y Huang, Pamela W Schaefer, Otto Rapalino, Leigh R Hochberg, Bruce R Rosen, Brian L Edlow
Abstract
Many patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remain unresponsive after surviving critical illness. Although several structural brain abnormalities have been described, their impact on brain function and implications for prognosis are unknown. Functional neuroimaging, which has prognostic significance, has yet to be explored in this population. Here we describe a patient with severe COVID-19 who, despite prolonged unresponsiveness and structural brain abnormalities, demonstrated intact functional network connectivity, and weeks later recovered the ability to follow commands. When prognosticating for survivors of severe COVID-19, clinicians should consider that brain networks may remain functionally intact despite structural injury and prolonged unresponsiveness. ANN NEUROL 2020;88:851-854.
Conflict of interest statement
Nothing to report.
© 2020 American Neurological Association.
Figures
References
- Kandemirli S, Dogan L, Sarikaya Z, et al. Brain MRI findings in patients in the intensive care unit with COVID‐19 infection. Radiology 2020;20:201697. 10.1148/radiol.2020201697.
- Koenig MA, Holt JL, Ernst T, et al. MRI default mode network connectivity is associated with functional outcome after cardiopulmonary arrest. Neurocrit Care 2014;20:348–357.
- Norton L, Hutchison RM, Young GB, et al. Disruptions of functional connectivity in the default mode network of comatose patients. Neurology 2012;78:175–181.
- Song M, Yang Y, He J, et al. Prognostication of chronic disorders of consciousness using brain functional networks and clinical characteristics. Elife 2018;7:e36173.
- Silva S, De Pasquale F, Vuillaume C, et al. Disruption of posteromedial large‐scale neural communication predicts recovery from coma. Neurology 2015;85:1–9.
- Pugin D, Hofmeister J, Gasche Y, et al. Resting‐state brain activity for early prediction outcome in postanoxic patients in a coma with indeterminate clinical prognosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:1022–1030.
- Sair HI, Hannawi Y, Li S, et al. Early functional connectome integrity and 1‐year recovery in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. Radiology 2018;287:247–255.
- Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, et al. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:9673–9678.
- Rosazza C, Andronache A, Sattin D, et al. Multimodal study of default‐mode network integrity in disorders of consciousness. Ann Neurol 2016;79:841–853.
- Fernández‐Espejo D, Soddu A, Cruse D, et al. A role for the default mode network in the bases of disorders of consciousness. Ann Neurol 2012;72:335–343.
- Buckner RL, DiNicola LM. The brain's default network: updated anatomy, physiology and evolving insights. Nat Rev Neurosci 2019;20:593–608.
- Threlkeld ZD, Bodien YG, Rosenthal ES, et al. Functional networks reemerge during recovery of consciousness after acute severe traumatic brain injury. Cortex 2018;106:299–308.
- Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J, The JFK. Coma Recovery Scale‐Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:2020–2029.
- Thibaut A, Bodien YG, Laureys S, Giacino JT. Minimally conscious state “plus”: diagnostic criteria and relation to functional recovery. J Neurol 2020;267:1245–1254.
- Giacino J, Kalmar K. The vegetative and minimally conscious states: a comparison of clinical features and functional outcome. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1997;12:36–51.
Source: PubMed