Improving calculation, interpretation and communication of familial colorectal cancer risk: protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Nicky Dekker, Rosella P M G Hermens, Glyn Elwyn, Trudy van der Weijden, Fokko M Nagengast, Peter van Duijvendijk, Simone Salemink, Eddy Adang, J Han J M van Krieken, Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge, Nicky Dekker, Rosella P M G Hermens, Glyn Elwyn, Trudy van der Weijden, Fokko M Nagengast, Peter van Duijvendijk, Simone Salemink, Eddy Adang, J Han J M van Krieken, Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge

Abstract

Background: Individuals with multiple relatives with colorectal cancer (CRC) and/or a relative with early-onset CRC have an increased risk of developing CRC. They are eligible for preventive measures, such as surveillance by regular colonoscopy and/or genetic counselling. Currently, most at-risk individuals do not follow the indicated follow-up policy. In a new guideline on familial and hereditary CRC, clinicians have new tasks in calculating, interpreting, and communicating familial CRC risk. This will lead to better recognition of individuals at an increased familial CRC risk, enabling them to take effective preventive measures. This trial compares two implementation strategies (a common versus an intensive implementation strategy), focussing on clinicians' risk calculation, interpretation, and communication, as well as patients' uptake of the indicated follow-up policy.

Methods: A clustered randomized controlled trial including an effect, process, and cost evaluation will be conducted in eighteen hospitals. Nine hospitals in the control group will receive the common implementation strategy (i.e., dissemination of the guideline). In the intervention group, an intensive implementation strategy will be introduced. Clinicians will receive education and tools for risk calculation, interpretation, and communication. Patients will also receive these tools, in addition to patient decision aids. The effect evaluation includes assessment of the number of patients for whom risk calculation, interpretation, and communication is performed correctly, and the number of patients following the indicated follow-up policy. The actual exposure to the implementation strategies and users' experiences will be assessed in the process evaluation. In a cost evaluation, the costs of the implementation strategies will be determined.

Discussion: The results of this study will help determine the most effective method as well as the costs of improving the recognition of individuals at an increased familial CRC risk. It will provide insight into the experiences of both patients and clinicians with these strategies.The knowledge gathered in this study can be used to improve the recognition of familial and hereditary CRC at both the national and international level, and will serve as an example to improve care for patients and their relatives worldwide. Our results may also be useful in improving healthcare in other diseases.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00929097.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intensive implementation strategy for the intervention group, aimed at both patients and clinicians. The rhombuses in this figure represent the tasks clinicians have in calculation, interpretation and communication of the familial colorectal cancer (CRC) risk in CRC patients. It also shows the various elements of the intensive implementation strategy aimed at both patients and clinicians (in yellow and green, respectively) that will be compared to dissemination of the guideline on familial and hereditary colorectal cancer only. Familial CRC risk: cumulative lifetime risk of developing CRC for first-degree relatives of CRC patients.

References

    1. The Netherlands Cancer Registry and Statistics 1999-2003. Netherlands. 2003.
    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.20006.
    1. Lynch HT, de la Chapelle A. Hereditary colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:919–932. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra012242.
    1. Grover S, Stoffel EM, Bussone L, Tschoegl E, Syngal S. Physician assessment of family cancer history and referral for genetic evaluation in colorectal cancer patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:813–819. doi: 10.1016/S1542-3565(04)00352-0.
    1. de Jong AE, Vasen HF. The frequency of a positive family history for colorectal cancer: a population-based study in the Netherlands. Neth J Med. 2006;64:367–370.
    1. Dove-Edwin I, Sasieni P, Adams J, Thomas HJ. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic surveillance in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer: 16 year, prospective, follow-up study. BMJ. 2005;331:1047. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38606.794560.EB.
    1. Jarvinen HJ, Aarnio M, Mustonen H, Aktan-Collan K, Aaltonen LA, Peltomaki P, de la Chapelle A, Mecklin JP. Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2000;118:829–834. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(00)70168-5.
    1. Sijmons RH, Boonstra AE, Reefhuis J, Hordijk-Hos JM, de Walle HE, Oosterwijk JC, Cornel MC. Accuracy of family history of cancer: clinical genetic implications. Eur J Hum Genet. 2000;8:181–186. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200441.
    1. Church J, McGannon E. Family history of colorectal cancer: how often and how accurately is it recorded? Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1540–1544. doi: 10.1007/BF02236735.
    1. Foo W, Young JM, Solomon MJ, Wright CM. Family history? The forgotten question in high-risk colorectal cancer patients. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:450–455. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01898.x.
    1. Ruo L, Cellini C, La-Calle JP Jr, Murray M, Thaler HT, Quan SH, Guillem JG. Limitations of family cancer history assessment at initial surgical consultation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:98–103. doi: 10.1007/BF02234829.
    1. Alberto VO, Harocopos CJ, Patel AA, Clark SK. Family and personal history in colorectal cancer patients: what are we missing? Colorectal Dis. 2006;8:612–614. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01047.x.
    1. van Dijk DA, Oostindier MJ, Kloosterman-Boele WM, Krijnen P, Vasen HF. Family history is neglected in the work-up of patients with colorectal cancer: a quality assessment using cancer registry data. Fam Cancer. 2007;6:131–134. doi: 10.1007/s10689-006-9114-8.
    1. Overbeek LI, Hoogerbrugge N, van Krieken JH, Nagengast FM, Ruers TJ, Ligtenberg MJ, Hermens RP. Most patients with colorectal tumors at young age do not visit a cancer genetics clinic. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1249–1254. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9345-x.
    1. Staal-Rosier PM, Rabeling-Keus IM, Kruyt M. [Inadequate referral for genetic evaluations of patients with colorectal carcinoma] Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009;153:124–128.
    1. Mak T, Speake D, Lalloo F, Hill J, Evans DG. Familial colorectal cancer referral to regional genetics department--a single centre experience. Fam Cancer. 2007;6:81–87. doi: 10.1007/s10689-006-9108-6.
    1. Williams GL, Gray J, Beynon J. Cancer genetics clinics and the surgeon: a valuable role for family history screening. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89:127–129. doi: 10.1308/003588407X155789.
    1. Dutch Society for Clinical Genetics. CBO Guideline Hereditary Colorectal Cancer, 2008. . Oisterwijk. 2008.
    1. Casparie M, Tiebosch AT, Burger G, Blauwgeers H, Pol A van de, van Krieken JH, Meijer GA. Pathology databanking and biobanking in The Netherlands, a central role for PALGA, the nationwide histopathology and cytopathology data network and archive. Cell Oncol. 2007;29:19–24.
    1. Barratt A, Trevena L, Davey HM, McCaffery K. Use of decision aids to support informed choices about screening. BMJ. 2004;329:507–510. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7464.507.
    1. O'Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Rovner D, Holmes-Rovner M, Tait V, Tetroe J, Fiset V, Barry M. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003. p. CD001431.
    1. Ziogas A, Anton-Culver H. Validation of family history data in cancer family registries. Am J Prev Med. 2003;24:190–198. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00593-7.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다