French Registry on Acute ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction 2015 (FAST-MI 2015). Design and baseline data
Loïc Belle, Guillaume Cayla, Yves Cottin, Pierre Coste, Khalife Khalife, Jean-Noël Labèque, Bruno Farah, Thibaut Perret, Patrick Goldstein, Pierre-Yves Gueugniaud, François Braun, Jacques Gauthier, Martine Gilard, Jean-Yves Le Heuzey, Nicolas Naccache, Elodie Drouet, Vincent Bataille, Jean Ferrières, Etienne Puymirat, François Schiele, Tabassome Simon, Nicolas Danchin, FAST-MI 2015 investigators, Loïc Belle, Guillaume Cayla, Yves Cottin, Pierre Coste, Khalife Khalife, Jean-Noël Labèque, Bruno Farah, Thibaut Perret, Patrick Goldstein, Pierre-Yves Gueugniaud, François Braun, Jacques Gauthier, Martine Gilard, Jean-Yves Le Heuzey, Nicolas Naccache, Elodie Drouet, Vincent Bataille, Jean Ferrières, Etienne Puymirat, François Schiele, Tabassome Simon, Nicolas Danchin, FAST-MI 2015 investigators
Abstract
Background: The FAST-MI programme, consisting of 1-month surveys of patients admitted to hospital for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in France, has run since 2005.
Aim: To gather data on the characteristics, management and outcomes of patients hospitalized for AMI at the end of 2015 in France and to provide comparisons with the previous surveys.
Methods: Consecutive adults with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) with symptom onset≤48hours were included over a 1-month period, with a possible extension of recruitment for 1 additional month. Patients with AMI following cardiovascular procedures were excluded. In all, 204 centres participated in the survey (114 community hospitals, 40 academic, 48 private clinics, 2 army hospitals), representing 78% of French centres managing AMI patients. Inclusion started from 5 October 2015. Data were collected on-site from source files by external research technicians, using an electronic case record form with automatic quality checks. Centralized biology was organized in voluntary centres to collect RNA and DNA samples, serum and stools. Long-term follow-up was organized centrally with interrogation of municipal registry offices, physicians and by direct contact with the patients or their families.
Results: A total of 5291 patients were included over the entire recruitment period, with 3813 included during the first month (STEMI: 49%, NSTEMI: 51%). Mean age was 66±14 years, 29% were≥75 years of age, 28% were women; 80% presented with typical chest pain. In STEMI patients, 6% received intravenous fibrinolysis and 71% underwent primary PCI. The hospital death rate was 2.7% (STEMI: 2.8%, NSTEMI: 2.5%).
Conclusions: Recruitment was in line with expectations and the first data show that management has continued to evolve since the 2010 survey, with continued improvement in hospital outcomes.
Keywords: Complications; Infarctus du myocarde; Management; Myocardial infarction; Outcomes; Prise en charge; Registre; Registry.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
Source: PubMed