Prioritising referrals of individuals at-risk of RA: guidance based on results of a 10-year national primary care observational study

Leticia Garcia-Montoya, Jacqueline L Nam, Laurence Duquenne, Catalina Villota-Eraso, Andrea Di Matteo, Collette Hartley, Kulveer Mankia, Paul Emery, Leticia Garcia-Montoya, Jacqueline L Nam, Laurence Duquenne, Catalina Villota-Eraso, Andrea Di Matteo, Collette Hartley, Kulveer Mankia, Paul Emery

Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal (MSK) symptoms are among the commonest reasons for primary care assessments; however, few individuals will be diagnosed with an inflammatory arthritis (IA) within the following year. The purpose of this study was to investigate, in individuals with new MSK symptoms, the association between patient factors and risk of progression to IA, in order to optimise primary care referrals to rheumatology.

Methods: Individuals ≥16 years old with new non-specific MSK symptoms and no clinical synovitis were recruited by primary care across the UK from July 2007 until May 2019. Those testing positive for the anti-CCP2 assay (anti-CCP+) were invited to Leeds for follow-up. Subjects with a negative result (anti-CCP-) were sent a 1-year questionnaire, and general practitioners were contacted to confirm whether the individual had been diagnosed with an IA by a rheumatologist. Predictors for progression were assessed using multivariable regression analysis.

Results: Six thousand seven hundred eighty individuals were recruited: 3% were anti-CCP+, of whom 45% progressed to IA, predominantly rheumatoid arthritis. Anti-CCP+ participants with high antibody levels had an odds ratio (OR) for progression to IA of 9.42 [P < 0.001, 95% CI (3.13-28.30)], hand pain, OR 2.74 [P = 0.043, 95% CI (1.03-7.27)] and foot pain, OR 4.10 [P = 0.003, 95% CI (1.59-10.54)]. In low-level anti-CCP+ individuals, absence of pain in hands or feet had a negative predictive value of 96% for progression to IA. One-year follow-up data were available for 5640 anti-CCP- individuals, of whom 53 were diagnosed with IA (0.93%). Pain in hands, OR 2.51 [P = 0.018, 95% CI (1.17-5.39)] or knees, OR 3.03 [P = 0.003, 95% CI (1.47-6.25)] were associated with development of IA within 12 months.

Conclusions: This is the largest prospective primary care study of individuals at risk of IA, and the first one to prospectively investigate the outcome of MSK symptoms in a large anti-CCP- cohort. High anti-CCP levels and pain in hands/feet indicated an increased likelihood of progression to IA. In patients with low anti-CCP level and no pain in the hands/feet, progression is unlikely. In anti-CCP- patients, those with hand or knee pain were at increased risk of progression. This study demonstrates that routinely available tests and joint symptoms provide useful discrimination that may be used to prioritise referrals to rheumatology and avoid a delayed diagnosis.

Trial registration: NCT, NCT02012764 . Registered 25 January 2007.

Keywords: ACPA; Anti-CCP; Autoantibodies; Epidemiology; Inflammatory arthritis; Joint pain; Primary care; Progression; Rheumatoid arthritis; Risk.

Conflict of interest statement

Kulveer Mankia reports personal fees from Abbvie, UCB and Lilly, outside the submitted work. Paul Emery reports consultant fees from BMS, AbbVie, MSD, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Samsung outside the submitted work. He also reports research grants from AbbVie, BMS and Lilly, outside the submitted work. Leticia Garcia-Montoya, Jacqueline L.Nam, Laurence Duquenne, Catalina Villota-Eraso, Andrea Di Matteo and Collette Hartley have no disclosures.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Reasons for exclusion from analysis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A Symptomatic joints at baseline in anti-CCP− and anti-CCP+ individuals. B Symptomatic joints at baseline in anti-CCP- and anti-CCP+ individuals who progressed to an IA. Symptomatic joints in > 50% of the subjects are highlighted in red
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Time for progression to IA according to anti-CCP titre and pain in hands/feet
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Proposed primary care anti-CCP positive pathway

References

    1. Emery P, Breedveld FC, Dougados M, Kalden JR, Schiff MH, Smolen JS. Early referral recommendation for newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis: evidence based development of a clinical guide. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61(4):290–297. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.4.290.
    1. Gwinnutt JM, Symmons DPM, MacGregor AJ, Chipping JR, Marshall T, Lunt M, et al. Twenty-year outcome and association between early treatment and mortality and disability in an inception cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the Norfolk Arthritis Register. Arthritis Rheum. 2017;69(8):1566–1575. doi: 10.1002/art.40090.
    1. National Audit Office . Services for people with rheumatoid arthritis. 2009.
    1. Guide to NHS waiting times in England. . Accessed 30 Sep 2020.
    1. Mankia K, Di Matteo A, Emery P. Prevention and cure: the major unmet needs in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. J Autoimmun. 2020;110:102399.
    1. Raza K, Breese M, Nightingale P, Kumar K, Potter T, Carruthers DM, et al. Predictive value of antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptide in patients with very early inflammatory arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(2):231–238.
    1. van Gaalen FA, Linn-Rasker SP, van Venrooij WJ, de Jong BA, Breedveld FC, Verweij CL, et al. Autoantibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptides predict progression to rheumatoid arthritis in patients with undifferentiated arthritis: a prospective cohort study. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(3):709–715. doi: 10.1002/art.20044.
    1. Rantapaa-Dahlqvist S, de Jong BA, Berglin E, Hallmans G, Wadell G, Stenlund H, et al. Antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide and IgA rheumatoid factor predict the development of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(10):2741–2749. doi: 10.1002/art.11223.
    1. Tasliyurt T, Kisacik B, Kaya SU, Yildirim B, Pehlivan Y, Kutluturk F, et al. The frequency of antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptides and rheumatoid factor in healthy population: a field study of rheumatoid arthritis from northern Turkey. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33(4):939–942. doi: 10.1007/s00296-012-2458-5.
    1. van Zanten A, Arends S, Roozendaal C, Limburg PC, Maas F, Trouw LA, et al. Presence of anticitrullinated protein antibodies in a large population-based cohort from the Netherlands. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(7):1184–1190. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209991.
    1. Nam JL, Hunt L, Hensor EM, Emery P. Enriching case selection for imminent RA: the use of anti-CCP antibodies in individuals with new non-specific musculoskeletal symptoms - a cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(8):1452–1456. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207871.
    1. Hider SL, Muller S, Helliwell T, Prior JA, Scott I, Lawton SA, et al. Symptoms associated with inflammatory arthritis are common in the primary care population: results from the joint symptoms survey. Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 2019;58(11):2009–2014. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez184.
    1. Muller S, Hider S, Machin A, Stack R, Hayward RA, Raza K, et al. Searching for a prodrome for rheumatoid arthritis in the primary care record: A case-control study in the clinical practice research datalink. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019;48(5):815–820. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.06.008.
    1. Almoallim H, Janoudi N, Attar SM, Garout M, Algohary S, Siddiqui MI, et al. Determining early referral criteria for patients with suspected inflammatory arthritis presenting to primary care physicians: a cross-sectional study. Open Access Rheumatol: Res Rev. 2017;9:81–90. doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S134780.
    1. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO, 3rd, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(9):1580–1588. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.138461.
    1. NHS England. Elective Care Transformation Programme: helping people with painful bone and joint conditions see the right person. . Accessed 16 Feb 2021.
    1. Rakieh C, Nam JL, Hunt L, Hensor EM, Das S, Bissell LA, et al. Predicting the development of clinical arthritis in anti-CCP positive individuals with non-specific musculoskeletal symptoms: a prospective observational cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(9):1659–1666. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205227.
    1. Bos WH, Wolbink GJ, Boers M, Tijhuis GJ, de Vries N, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, et al. Arthritis development in patients with arthralgia is strongly associated with anti-citrullinated protein antibody status: a prospective cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(3):490–494. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.105759.
    1. van de Stadt LA, Witte BI, Bos WH, van Schaardenburg D. A prediction rule for the development of arthritis in seropositive arthralgia patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(12):1920–1926. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202127.
    1. van Steenbergen HW, Mangnus L, Reijnierse M, Huizinga TW, van der Helm-van Mil AH. Clinical factors, anticitrullinated peptide antibodies and MRI-detected subclinical inflammation in relation to progression from clinically suspect arthralgia to arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(10):1824–1830. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208138.
    1. Ford JA, Liu X, Marshall AA, Zaccardelli A, Prado MG, Wiyarand C, et al. Impact of cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody level on progression to rheumatoid arthritis in clinically tested CCP-positive patients without RA. Arthritis Care Res. 2019;71(12):1583-92.
    1. Ten Brinck RM, van Steenbergen HW, van Delft MAM, Verheul MK, Toes REM, Trouw LA, et al. The risk of individual autoantibodies, autoantibody combinations and levels for arthritis development in clinically suspect arthralgia. Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 2017;56(12):2145–2153. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex340.
    1. Brennan P, Silman A. Why the gender difference in susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis? Ann Rheum Dis. 1995;54(9):694–695. doi: 10.1136/ard.54.9.694.
    1. Ishikawa Y, Ikari K, Hashimoto M, Ohmura K, Tanaka M, Ito H, et al. Shared epitope defines distinct associations of cigarette smoking with levels of anticitrullinated protein antibody and rheumatoid factor. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(11):1480–1487. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215463.
    1. Hedstrom AK, Stawiarz L, Klareskog L, Alfredsson L. Smoking and susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis in a Swedish population-based case-control study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(4):415–423. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0360-5.
    1. Gadeholt O, Hausotter K, Eberle H, Klink T, Pfeil A. Differing X-ray patterns in seronegative and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2019;38(9):2403–2410. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04602-5.
    1. Beers-Tas MV, Nielen MM, Twisk JWR, Korevaar J, van Schaardenburg D. Increased primary care use for musculoskeletal symptoms, infections and comorbidities in the years before the diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis. RMD Open. 2020;6(2):1-9.
    1. van de Stadt LA, de Koning MH, van de Stadt RJ, Wolbink G, Dijkmans BA, Hamann D, et al. Development of the anti-citrullinated protein antibody repertoire prior to the onset of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(11):3226–3233. doi: 10.1002/art.30537.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다