The Influence of Disease Perceptions on the Participation of Melanoma Patients and their Partners in Skin Self-Examination Education

Gaber Rikki, Hultgren Brittney, Stapleton Jerod, A Mallett Kimberly, Turrisi Rob, Hernandez Claudia, Bilmoria Karl, D Wayne Jeffrey, C Martini Mary, K Robinson June, Gaber Rikki, Hultgren Brittney, Stapleton Jerod, A Mallett Kimberly, Turrisi Rob, Hernandez Claudia, Bilmoria Karl, D Wayne Jeffrey, C Martini Mary, K Robinson June

Abstract

By examining differences between patients who enroll or decline to enroll in a partner-based study, future research can benefit and adapt recruitment strategies to reduce sampling biases. This study examined differences between melanoma patients' who either declined or enrolled in an intervention aimed at increasing skin self-examination (SSE) with partner assistance. Specifically, differences were assessed for gender, age, perception of likelihood of getting another melanoma, benefits of early detection, and severity of the disease. Additionally, reasons for declining were examined. Among 368 melanoma patients interviewed during their appointment with the treating physician, 187 enrolled in the study and 181 declined to participate. No significant age or gender differences between enrolled and declined patients were observed. However, enrolled participants had significantly higher reports on the likelihood of getting another melanoma, severity of melanoma, and early detection as being beneficial (p<0.001). Among those declining to participate, males reported being "too busy and can't make follow-up appointments" whereas females reported their "partner won't assist". Results indicate perceptions of the benefits of early detection, the severity of melanoma, and patients' increased risk of developing a melanoma may have influenced patients' decision to participate. Future studies may benefit by highlighting these topics in order to motivate more patients to participant in partner studies.

Keywords: Disease perception; Early detection; Melanoma; Partner assistance.

References

    1. Seeman TE. Social ties and health: the benefits of social integration. Ann Epidemiol. 1996;6:442–451.
    1. Tucker J, Mueller J. Spouses’ Social Control of Health Behaviors: Use and Effectiveness of Specific Strategies. Society for Personality and Social Psychology. 2000;26:1120–1129.
    1. Robinson JK, Stapleton J, Turrisi R. Relationship and partner moderator variables increase self-efficacy of performing skin self-examination. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58:755–762.
    1. Robinson JK, Turrisi R. Skills training to learn discrimination of ABCDE criteria by those at risk of developing melanoma. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:447–452.
    1. Robinson JK, Fisher SG, Turrisi RJ. Predictors of skin self-examination performance. Cancer. 2002;95:135–146.
    1. Bowen DJ, Hay JL, Mayer J, Kuniyuki A, Meischke H, et al. Predictors of recruited melanoma families into a behavioral intervention project. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012;33:85–92.
    1. Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK. Health Behavior and Health Education: theory, research, and practice. 3. John Wiley and Sons, Inc; San Francisco CA: 2002.
    1. Christie KM, Meyerowitz BE, Stanton AL, Rowland JH, Ganz PA. Characteristics of breast cancer survivors that predict partners’ participation in research. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46:107–113.
    1. Kim AE, Towers A, Renaud J, Zhu J, Shea JA, et al. Application of the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the impact of a worksite-based financial incentive intervention for smoking cessation. J Occup Environ Med. 2012;54:610–614.
    1. Preloran HM, Browner CH, Lieber E. Strategies for motivating Latino couples’ participation in qualitative health research and their effects on sample construction. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:1832–1841.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다