Assistive artificial intelligence for ultrasound image interpretation in regional anaesthesia: an external validation study

James S Bowness, David Burckett-St Laurent, Nadia Hernandez, Pearse A Keane, Clara Lobo, Steve Margetts, Eleni Moka, Amit Pawa, Meg Rosenblatt, Nick Sleep, Alasdair Taylor, Glenn Woodworth, Asta Vasalauskaite, J Alison Noble, Helen Higham, James S Bowness, David Burckett-St Laurent, Nadia Hernandez, Pearse A Keane, Clara Lobo, Steve Margetts, Eleni Moka, Amit Pawa, Meg Rosenblatt, Nick Sleep, Alasdair Taylor, Glenn Woodworth, Asta Vasalauskaite, J Alison Noble, Helen Higham

Abstract

Background: Ultrasonound is used to identify anatomical structures during regional anaesthesia and to guide needle insertion and injection of local anaesthetic. ScanNav Anatomy Peripheral Nerve Block (Intelligent Ultrasound, Cardiff, UK) is an artificial intelligence-based device that produces a colour overlay on real-time B-mode ultrasound to highlight anatomical structures of interest. We evaluated the accuracy of the artificial-intelligence colour overlay and its perceived influence on risk of adverse events or block failure.

Methods: Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia experts acquired 720 videos from 40 volunteers (across nine anatomical regions) without using the device. The artificial-intelligence colour overlay was subsequently applied. Three more experts independently reviewed each video (with the original unmodified video) to assess accuracy of the colour overlay in relation to key anatomical structures (true positive/negative and false positive/negative) and the potential for highlighting to modify perceived risk of adverse events (needle trauma to nerves, arteries, pleura, and peritoneum) or block failure.

Results: The artificial-intelligence models identified the structure of interest in 93.5% of cases (1519/1624), with a false-negative rate of 3.0% (48/1624) and a false-positive rate of 3.5% (57/1624). Highlighting was judged to reduce the risk of unwanted needle trauma to nerves, arteries, pleura, and peritoneum in 62.9-86.4% of cases (302/480 to 345/400), and to increase the risk in 0.0-1.7% (0/160 to 8/480). Risk of block failure was reported to be reduced in 81.3% of scans (585/720) and to be increased in 1.8% (13/720).

Conclusions: Artificial intelligence-based devices can potentially aid image acquisition and interpretation in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia. Further studies are necessary to demonstrate their effectiveness in supporting training and clinical practice.

Clinical trial registration: NCT04906018.

Keywords: anatomy; artificial intelligence; machine learning; regional anaesthesia; translational AI; ultrasonography; ultrasound.

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Example of the colour overlay produced by ScanNav when scanning during a supraclavicular-level brachial plexus block. Blue, first rib; purple, pleura; red, subclavian artery; and yellow, supraclavicular-level brachial plexus nerves (trunks/divisions).
Fig 2
Fig 2
Summary of study workflow. AI, artificial intelligence; PNB, peripheral nerve block; UGRA, ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Examples of the artificial-intelligence colour overlay for each peripheral nerve block studied. ALM, adductor longus muscle; AS, anterior scalene; BPN, brachial plexus nerves (trunks/divisions); CPN, common peroneal (fibular) nerve; CTf, fascia overlying conjoint tendon; C5, C5 nerve root; C6, C6 nerve root; DCIA, deep circumflex iliac artery; ESM, erector spinae muscle group (and overlying muscles); FA, femoral artery; FI, fascia iliaca; H, humerus; I, ilium; IM, iliacus/iliopsoas muscle; McN, musculocutaneous nerve; MN, median nerve; Pe, peritoneum and contents; Pl, pleura; R, first rib; RA, rectus abdominis muscle; RN, radial nerve; RSa, anterior layer of rectus sheath; RSp, posterior layer of rectus sheath; SaN, saphenous nerve/nerve complex; ScA, subclavian artery; SCM, sternocleidomastoid muscle; SM, sartorius muscle; TN, tibial nerve; TP, transverse process; UN, ulnar nerve; UT, upper trunk of the brachial plexus.

References

    1. Ting P.L., Sivagnanaratnam V. Ultrasonographic study of the spread of local anaesthetic during axillary brachial plexus block. Br J Anaesth. 1989;63:326–329.
    1. Neal J.M., Brull R., Horn J.L., et al. The second American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine evidence-based medicine assessment of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: executive summary. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:181–194.
    1. Bowness J., Taylor A. Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia: visualising the nerve and needle. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1235:19–34.
    1. Hutton M., Brull R., Macfarlane A.J.R. Regional anaesthesia and outcomes. BJA Educ. 2018;18:52–56.
    1. Aitken E., Jackson A., Kearns R., et al. Effect of regional versus local anaesthesia on outcome after arteriovenous fistula creation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388:1067–1074.
    1. Turbitt L.R., Mariano E.R., El-Boghdadly K. Future directions in regional anaesthesia: not just for the cognoscenti. Anaesthesia. 2020;75:293–297.
    1. Sites B.D., Chan V.W., Neal J.M., et al. The American society of regional anesthesia and pain medicine and the European society of regional anaesthesia and pain Therapy joint committee recommendations for education and training in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:40–46.
    1. Bowness J., El-Boghdadly K., Burckett-St Laurent D. Artificial intelligence for image interpretation in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2021;76:602–607.
    1. Bowness J.S., El-Boghdadly K., Woodworth G., Noble J.A., Higham H., Burckett-St Laurent D. Exploring the utility of assistive artificial intelligence for ultrasound scanning in regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022;47:375–379.
    1. Ronneberger O., Fischer P., Brox T. 2015. U-Net: convolutional neural networks for biomedical image segmentation. arXiv 2015, 1505.04597.
    1. Bowness J., Macfarlane A.J.R., Noble J.A., Higham H.A., Burckett-St Laurent D. Anaesthesia, nerve blocks and artificial intelligence. Anaesth News. 2021;408:4–6.
    1. Bowness J., Varsou O., Turbitt L., Burkett-St Laurent D. Identifying anatomical structures on ultrasound: assistive artificial intelligence in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Clin Anat. 2021;34:802–809.
    1. Bowness J.S., Pawa A., Turbitt L., et al. International consensus on anatomical structures to identify on ultrasound for the performance of basic blocks in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022;47:106–112.
    1. Liu X., Cruz Rivera S., Moher D., et al. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2:e537–e548.
    1. Gungor I., Gunaydin B., Oktar S.O., et al. A real-time anatomy identification via tool based on artificial intelligence for ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block procedures: an accuracy study. J Anesth. 2021;35:591–594.
    1. Williams L., Carrigan A., Auffermann W., et al. The invisible breast cancer: experience does not protect against inattentional blindness to clinically relevant findings in radiology. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021;28:503–511.
    1. Drew T., Vo M.L., Wolfe J.M. The invisible gorilla strikes again: sustained inattentional blindness in expert observers. Psychol Sci. 2013;24:1848–1853.
    1. Bowness J., Turnbull K., Taylor A., et al. Identifying variant anatomy during ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia: opportunities for clinical improvement. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122:e75–e77.
    1. Munirama S., McLeod G. A systematic review and meta-analysis of ultrasound versus electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve location and blockade. Anaesthesia. 2015;70:1084–1091.
    1. El-Boghdadly K., Wolmarans M., Stengel A.D., et al. Standardizing nomenclature in regional anesthesia: an ASRA-ESRA Delphi consensus study of abdominal wall, paraspinal, and chest wall blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021;46:571–580.
    1. Royal College of Anaesthetists . 2021. Curriculum structure and learning syllabus 2021. Available from: accessed.
    1. Ultrasound guidelines: emergency, point-of-care and clinical ultrasound guidelines in medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;69:e27–e54.
    1. Diaz-Gomez J.L., Mayo P.H., Koenig S.J. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1593–1602.
    1. Hareendranathan A.R., Chahal B., Ghasseminia S., Zonoobi D., Jaremko J.L. Impact of scan quality on AI assessment of hip dysplasia ultrasound. J Ultrasound. 2022;25:145–153.
    1. Le E.P.V., Wang Y., Huang Y., Hickman S., Gilbert F.J. Artificial intelligence in breast imaging. Clin Radiol. 2019;74:357–366.
    1. Kainz B., Heinrich M.P., Makropoulos A., et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis from ultrasound imaging with machine learning. NPJ Digit Med. 2021;4:137.
    1. Qin Z.Z., Ahmed S., Sarker M.S., et al. Tuberculosis detection from chest x-rays for triaging in a high tuberculosis-burden setting: an evaluation of five artificial intelligence algorithms. Lancet Digit Health. 2021;3:e543–e554.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Computer-assisted detection devices applied to radiology images and radiology device data—premarket notification [510(k)] submissions 2012. Available from: (accessed 18 May 2022).
    1. Germanson T. Screening for HIV: can we afford the confusion of the false positive rate? J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:1235–1237.

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다