Scaling up context-tailored clinical guidelines and training to improve childbirth care in urban, low-resource maternity units in Tanzania: A protocol for a stepped-wedged cluster randomized trial with embedded qualitative and economic analyses (The PartoMa Scale-Up Study)

Nanna Maaløe, Natasha Housseine, Jane Brandt Sørensen, Josephine Obel, Brenda Sequeira DMello, Monica Lauridsen Kujabi, Haika Osaki, Thomas Wiswa John, Rashid Saleh Khamis, Zainab Suleiman Said Muniro, Daniel Joseph Nkungu, Britt Pinkowski Tersbøl, Flemming Konradsen, Sangeeta Mookherji, Columba Mbekenga, Tarek Meguid, Jos van Roosmalen, Ib Christian Bygbjerg, Thomas van den Akker, Andreas Kryger Jensen, Morten Skovdal, Hussein L Kidanto, Dan Wolf Meyrowitsch, Nanna Maaløe, Natasha Housseine, Jane Brandt Sørensen, Josephine Obel, Brenda Sequeira DMello, Monica Lauridsen Kujabi, Haika Osaki, Thomas Wiswa John, Rashid Saleh Khamis, Zainab Suleiman Said Muniro, Daniel Joseph Nkungu, Britt Pinkowski Tersbøl, Flemming Konradsen, Sangeeta Mookherji, Columba Mbekenga, Tarek Meguid, Jos van Roosmalen, Ib Christian Bygbjerg, Thomas van den Akker, Andreas Kryger Jensen, Morten Skovdal, Hussein L Kidanto, Dan Wolf Meyrowitsch

Abstract

While facility births are increasing in many low-resource settings, quality of care often does not follow suit; maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity remain unacceptably high. Therefore, realistic, context-tailored clinical support is crucially needed to assist birth attendants in resource-constrained realities to provide best possible evidence-based and respectful care. Our pilot study in Zanzibar suggested that co-created clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and low-dose, high-frequency training (PartoMa intervention) were associated with improved childbirth care and survival. We now aim to modify, implement, and evaluate this multi-faceted intervention in five high-volume, urban maternity units in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (approximately 60,000 births annually). This PartoMa Scale-up Study will include four main steps: I. Mixed-methods situational analysis exploring factors affecting care; II. Co-created contextual modifications to the pilot CPGs and training, based on step I; III. Implementation and evaluation of the modified intervention; IV. Development of a framework for co-creation of context-specific CPGs and training, of relevance in comparable fields. The implementation and evaluation design is a theory-based, stepped-wedged cluster-randomised trial with embedded qualitative and economic assessments. Women in active labour and their offspring will be followed until discharge to assess provided and experienced care, intra-hospital perinatal deaths, Apgar scores, and caesarean sections that could potentially be avoided. Birth attendants' perceptions, intervention use and possible associated learning will be analysed. Moreover, as further detailed in the accompanying article, a qualitative in-depth investigation will explore behavioural, biomedical, and structural elements that might interact with non-linear and multiplying effects to shape health providers' clinical practices. Finally, the incremental cost-effectiveness of co-creating and implementing the PartoMa intervention is calculated. Such real-world scale-up of context-tailored CPGs and training within an existing health system may enable a comprehensive understanding of how impact is achieved or not, and how it may be translated between contexts and sustained.Trial registration number: NCT04685668.

Keywords: Africa; Obstetrics; co-creation; cost-effectiveness; de-colonizing; intervention; low dose high frequency training; perinatal death; programme theory; respectful maternity care; stillbirth; urbanization.

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The PartoMa intervention’s programme theory. It is hypothesized that the intervention, with embedded co-creation, improves clinical practice and the desired health and health system outcomes through a reconfiguration of interacting mediators, which are divided into practice theory’s five analytical domains [47]: 1. Meaning (changed norms and values that circulate within the maternities, including an increased participatory/self-directed approach to development and use of guidelines and training, critical dialogue, teamwork and supervision); 2. Materiality (provision of PartoMa pocket booklets with guidelines, as well as changed use of existing medical equipment, medicines, infrastructures and the body); 3. Competence (increased understanding of clinical deficiencies and abilities, evidence- and context-informed re-negotiation of what is best possible practice, and increased clinical knowledge and skills in intrapartum care); 4. Motivation (Increased intrinsic motivation among health providers that enjoin and direct to use the intervention); 5. Relations (Increased sense of being heard and understood by intervention developers and colleagues, facilitation of a blame-free, social space for learning through critical dialogue and supervision). In addition, other life practices refer to social practices, such as family obligations, that may be influenced by the work environment. These hypothesized mechanisms are further unfolded separately [32].
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Map of the five maternity units in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. In 2019, they had been the five highest volume maternity units for more than a decade. Source: open street map.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Overall implementation design for the pragmatic stepped-wedged cluster-randomized trial in five maternity units, divided into three clusters. Stars indicate when quarterly PartoMa seminars will be conducted in each facility. At the seminars, attendees’ perceptions and learning curves will be assessed. Quality of care (QoC) assessments through criterion-based audits and structured postpartum interviews with women will be conducted during baseline and the 7th to 9th intervention month at each maternity unit. Structured observations of infrastructure, equipment, data management and usage of the PartoMa guidelines will be conducted every three month. Birth outcome data, cost data and qualitative data will be collected continuously.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9009913/bin/ZGHA_A_2034135_UF0001_OC.jpg

References

    1. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the UNPD. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.
    1. Hug L, You D, Blencowe H, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates and trends in stillbirths from 2000 to 2019: a systematic assessment. Lancet. 2021;398:772–14.
    1. UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation . Levels & trends in child mortality. New York: UN; 2020.
    1. Lee ACC, Kozuki N, Blencowe H, et al. Intrapartum-related neonatal encephalopathy incidence and impairment at regional and global levels for 2010 with trends from 1990. Pediatr Res. 2013;74:50–72.
    1. Howard LM, Molyneaux E, Dennis CL, et al. Non-psychotic mental disorders in the perinatal period. Lancet. 2014;384:1775–1788.
    1. Kyu HH, Abate D, Abate KH, et al. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 359 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018. Nov 10;392:1859–1922.
    1. Roberton T, Carter E, Chou V, et al. Early estimates of the indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and child mortality in low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study. Lancet Glob Heal. 2020;8:e901–8.
    1. Campbell OMR, Calvert C, Testa A, et al. The scale, scope, coverage, and capability of childbirth care. Lancet. 2016;388:2193–2208.
    1. Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, et al. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet. 2016;388:2176–2192.
    1. Save the Children . State of the World’s Mothers 2015: the urban disadvantage | resource Centre. 2015.
    1. Thomas S, Donkin A, Bell R. Creating healthy cities in Tanzania - using the social determinants of health framework to understand how urbanisation impacts on human development in Tanzanian cities [Internet]. 2016. [cited 2020 Sep 28]. Available from:
    1. Mberu BU, Haregu TN, Kyobutungi C, et al. Health and health-related indicators in slum, rural, and urban communities: a comparative analysis. Glob Health Action. 2016;9:33163.
    1. Sobhy S, Arroyo-Manzano D, Murugesu N, et al. Maternal and perinatal mortality and complications associated with caesarean section in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2019. May 11;393:1973–1982.
    1. Souza J, Oladapo O, Fawole B, et al. Cervical dilatation over time is a poor predictor of severe adverse birth outcomes: a diagnostic accuracy study. BJOG 2018;125:991–1000.
    1. Koblinsky M, Moyer CA, Calvert C, et al. Quality maternity care for every woman, everywhere: a call to action. Lancet. 2016;388:2307–2320.
    1. de Bernis L, Kinney MV, Stones W, et al. Stillbirths: ending preventable deaths by 2030. Lancet. 2016;387:703–716.
    1. Yoshida S, Martines J, Lawn JE, et al. Setting research priorities to improve global newborn health and prevent stillbirths by 2025. J Glob Health. 2016;6:010508.
    1. McAuliffe E, Galligan M, Revill P, et al. Factors influencing job preferences of health workers providing obstetric care: results from discrete choice experiments in Malawi, Mozambique and Tanzania. Global Health. 2016;12:86.
    1. Heckman J. The Heckman Curve - The Heckman Equation [Internet]. 2018. [cited 2018 Jan 23]. Available from:
    1. Norris SL, Ford N. Improving the quality of WHO guidelines over the last decade: progress and challenges. Vol. 5. The Lancet Global Health; 2017. p. e855–6.
    1. World Health Organization . WHO handbook for guideline development – 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
    1. Maaløe N, Marie A, Ørtved R, et al. The injustice of unfit clinical practice guidelines in low-resource realities. Lancet Glob Heal. 2021;9:e875–9.
    1. Maaløe N, Meguid T, Housseine N, et al. Local adaption of intrapartum clinical guidelines, United Republic of Tanzania. Bull World Heal Organ. 2019;97:365–370.
    1. Maaløe N, Housseine N, Meguid T, et al. Effect of locally-tailored labour management guidelines on intrahospital stillbirths and birth asphyxia at the referral hospital of Zanzibar: a quasi-experimental pre-post-study (The PartoMa study). BJOG. 2017;125:235–245.
    1. Maaløe N, Andersen CB, Housseine N, et al. Effect of locally-tailored clinical guidelines on intrapartum management of severe hypertensive disorders at Zanzibar’s tertiary hospital (The PartoMa study). Int J Gynaecol Obs. 2018;144:27–36.
    1. Maaløe N, Housseine N, van Roosmalen J, et al. Labour management guidelines for a Tanzanian referral hospital: the participatory development process and birth attendants’ perceptions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17. DOI:10.1186/s12884-017-1360-2.
    1. Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, et al. Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement. BMJ. 2017. Mar 6;356:i6795.
    1. Craig P, Di Ruggiero E, Frohlich KL, et al. Taking account of context in population health intervention research: guidance for producers, users and funders of research. National Institute of Health Research; 2018.
    1. Ministry of Health and Social Welfare - United Republic of . Tanzania. Health Sector Strategic Plan V: July 2021 - June 2026. Dar es Salaam; 2021.
    1. Kruk ME, Kujawski S, Moyer CA, et al. Next generation maternal health: external shocks and health-system innovations. Lancet. 2016. Nov 5;388:2296–2306.
    1. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c869.
    1. Sørensen JB, Housseine N, Maaløe N, et al. Scaling up locally adapted clinical practice guidelines for improving childbirth care in Tanzania: a protocol for programme theory and qualitative methods of The PartoMa Scale-Up Study. Glob Health Action. 2021.
    1. Sequeira Dmello B, Sellah Z, Magembe G, et al. Learning from changes concurrent with implementing a complex and dynamic intervention to improve urban maternal and perinatal health in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania, 2011-2019. BMJ Glob Heal. 2021;6:4022.
    1. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Metro Area Population 1950-2020 | MacroTrends [Internet] . [cited 2020 Sep 28]. Available from:
    1. Ministry of Health and Social Welfare - United Republic of Tanzania. Tanzania. Tanzania 2015-16 Demogr Heal Surv Malar Indic Surv. 2015;
    1. The United Republic of Tanzania - Population and housing census: Population Distribution by Administrative Areas. Dar es Salaam ; 2013.
    1. Bohren MA, Mehrtash H, Fawole B, et al. How women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: a cross-sectional study with labour observations and community-based surveys. Lancet. 2019. Nov 9;394:1750–1763.
    1. Sando D, Ratcliffe H, McDonald K, et al. The prevalence of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth in urban Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016. Dec;16. DOI:10.1186/s12884-016-1019-4
    1. Shimoda K, Horiuchi S, Leshabari S, et al. Midwives’ respect and disrespect of women during facility-based childbirth in urban Tanzania: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2018;15:8.
    1. Housseine N, Punt MC, Mohamed AG, et al. Quality of intrapartum care: direct observations in a low-resource tertiary hospital. Reprod Health. 2020. Mar 14;17:36.
    1. COVID-19 in an Urban World [Internet] . 2020. [cited 2021 Apr 28]. Available from:
    1. Ministry of Health and Social Welfare - United Republic of Tanzania, World Health Organization. Tanzania steps survey report. Dar es Salaam ; 2013.
    1. Dmello BS, Housseine N, van den Akker T, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on maternal and child health. Lancet Glob Heal. 2020;8:e1259.
    1. Chmielewska B, Barratt I, Townsend R, et al. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Heal. 2021. Jun;9(6):e759–e772.
    1. Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey and Malaria Indicator Survey . 2015.
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.
    1. Skovdal M, Wringe A, Seeley J, et al. Using theories of practice to understand HIV-positive persons varied engagement with HIV services: a qualitative study in six Sub-Saharan African countries. Sex Transm Infect. 2017. Jul 1;93:e052977.
    1. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44:166–206.
    1. Leask CF, Sandlund M, Skelton DA, et al. Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions. Res Involv Engagem. 2019. Jan 9;5:2.
    1. Copas AJ, Lewis JJ, Thompson JA, et al. Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches. Trials. 2015;16:352.
    1. Standards for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities . Geneva; 2016.
    1. Maaløe N, Bygbjerg IC, Onesmo R, et al. Disclosing doubtful indications for emergency cesarean sections in rural hospitals in Tanzania: a retrospective criterion-based audit. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91:1069–1076.
    1. Maaløe N, Sorensen BL, Onesmo R, et al. Prolonged labour as indication for emergency caesarean section: a quality assurance analysis by criterion-based audit at two Tanzanian rural hospitals. BJOG. 2012;119:605–613.
    1. Sando D, Ratcliffe H, McDonald K, et al. The prevalence of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth in urban Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016. Dec 19 [cited 2018 May 26];16:236. [Internet]. Available from:
    1. Ratcliffe HL, Sando D, Lyatuu GW, et al. Mitigating disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Tanzania: an exploratory study of the effects of two facility-based interventions in a large public hospital. Reprod Health. 2016. Jul 18;13:79.
    1. Skovdal M, Cornish F. Qualitative research for development. Rugby (UK):Practical Action Publishing Ltd; 2015.
    1. Drummond M, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Sep;60(9):822–823.
    1. Stenberg K, Sweeny K, Axelson H, et al. Returns on investment in the continuum of care for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health. In: Disease control priorities, 3rd ed. Vol. 2, Reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2016.
    1. Black RE, Levin C, Walker N, et al. Reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health: key messages from Disease Control Priorities 3rd Edition. Lancet. 2016;388:2811–2824.
    1. Afnan-Holmes H, Magoma M, John T, et al. Tanzania’s Countdown to 2015: an analysis of two decades of progress and gaps for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health, to inform priorities for post-2015. Lancet Glob Heal. 2015;3:e396–409.
    1. Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW. Achieving Integration in Mixed Methods Designs—Principles and Practices. Health Serv Res. 2013. Dec 1 [cited 2021 Nov 2];48:2134–2156. [Internet]. Available from:
    1. Housseine N, Rijken MJ, Punt MC, et al. Mistreatment during childbirth. Lancet. 2020;396:816–817. Lancet Publishing Group.
    1. Theobald S, Brandes N, Gyapong M, et al. Implementation research: new imperatives and opportunities in global health. Lancet. 2018;392:2214–2228. Lancet Publishing Group.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다