A single-arm, open-label study to assess the immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of etanercept manufactured using the serum-free, high-capacity manufacturing process administered to patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Pavol Polák, Porin Peric, Ingrid Louw, Stefanie M Gaylord, Theresa Williams, Jean-Claude Becker, Ron Pedersen, Joan Korth-Bradley, Bonnie Vlahos, Pavol Polák, Porin Peric, Ingrid Louw, Stefanie M Gaylord, Theresa Williams, Jean-Claude Becker, Ron Pedersen, Joan Korth-Bradley, Bonnie Vlahos

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of etanercept (ETN) manufactured using the serum-free, high-capacity manufacturing (SFHCM) process in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: In this global, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study (NCT02378506), 187 adult patients with moderate to severe RA received ETN 50 mg once weekly for 24 weeks manufactured using the SFHCM process. Immunogenicity (presence of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs)) was assessed at 12 and 24 weeks. Safety and efficacy were evaluated at 4, 12, and 24 weeks.

Results: Eight (4.5%) patients tested positive for ADA, and there were no NAbs detected at any time throughout the study. Ninety (48.1%) patients reported treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), of which 27 (14.4%) reported injection-site reactions, and 43 (23.0%) reported infections. The majority of AEs were mild or moderate in severity, and the drug was well tolerated. Throughout the duration of the study (week 4 to week 24), there was a progressive increase in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-defined responses (ACR20: 55.9%-82.0%, ACR50: 16.1%-57.8%, and ACR70: 3.2%-26.7%) from baseline and the proportion of patients achieving low disease activity and remission, with a corresponding decrease in measures of disease activity.

Conclusion: The immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of ETN manufactured using the SFHCM process were similar to the current approved ETN formulation. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02378506.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: P. Polák is the primary external reviewer and a consultant for Pfizer on this study and principal investigator. P. Peric is a principal investigator and a consultant for Pfizer on this study. I.L. is an advisor in rheumatology for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche, and a principal investigator on clinical studies sponsored by Amgen, AstraZeneca, Baxalta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Coherus, Eli Lilly, Janssen, and Pfizer. J.C.B. is an employee of Becker Clinical Research Consulting LLC, who was a paid consultant to Pfizer in connection with the development of this manuscript and owns stock in Pfizer. S.M.G., T.W., R.P., J.K.B., B.V. are employees of Pfizer and own stock in Pfizer.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition ADA: antidrug antibody
Figure 2. a–c
Figure 2. a–c
Clinical responses Proportions of patients achieving ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 (b); DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP scores (b); proportions of patients achieving LDA and remission according to the DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP criteria at 24 weeks (c). For composite measures, missing component values were imputed using the last observation carried forward ACR20; ACR50; ACR70: American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA, CRP: C-reactive protein, DAS28: disease activity score based on 28 joint count, ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, LDA: low disease activity, SD: standard deviation
Figure 3. a–c
Figure 3. a–c
Clinical responses by the ADA status Proportions of ADA+ and ADA− patients achieving ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 (a); DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP scores in ADA+ and ADA− patients (b); proportions of ADA+ and ADA− patients achieving LDA and remission according to the DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP criteria at 24 weeks (c). For composite measures, missing component values were imputed using the last observation carried forward ACR20; ACR50; ACR70: American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA, ADA: antidrug antibody, CRP: C-reactive protein, DAS28: disease activity score based on 28 joint count, ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, LDA: low disease activity, SD: standard deviation
Figure 4
Figure 4
Summary of efficacy assessments at 24 weeks HAQ-DI: Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, PGA: Physician Global Assessment, PtGA: Patient Global Assessment, SD: standard deviation, SJC: swollen joint count, TJC: tender joint count, VAS: Visual Analog Scale

References

    1. Schneider CK. Biosimilars in rheumatology: the wind of change. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:315–8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202941.
    1. European Medicines Agency: Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Non-clinical and clinical issues. London, UK: European Medicines Agency; 2007. Guideline on comparability of biotechnology-derived medicinal products after a change in the manufacturing process.
    1. Amgen. Enbrel® (etanercept) [Prescribing Information] 1998. Available from: .
    1. Scallon B, Cai A, Solowski N, Rosenberg A, Song XY, Shealy D, et al. Binding and functional comparisons of two types of tumor necrosis factor antagonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002;301:418–26. doi: 10.1124/jpet.301.2.418.
    1. Hassett B, Singh E, Mahgoub E, O’Brien J, Vicik SM, Fitzpatrick B. Manufacturing history of etanercept innovator product: Description of changes to impact overall safety profile and process performance. J Clin Rheumatol. 2016;22:108–63.
    1. Klareskog L, van der Heijde D, de Jager JP, Gough A, Kalden J, Malaise M, et al. Therapeutic effect of the combination of etanercept and methotrexate compared with each treatment alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;363:675–81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15640-7.
    1. Dore RK, Mathews S, Schechtman J, Surbeck W, Mandel D, Patel A, et al. The immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of etanercept liquid administered once weekly in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007;25:40–6.
    1. van der Heijde D, Klareskog L, Landewé R, Bruyn GAW, Cantagrel A, Durez P, et al. Disease remission and sustained halting of radiographic progression with combination etanercept and methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:3928–39. doi: 10.1002/art.23141.
    1. Conti F, Ceccarelli F, Massaro L, Cipriano E, Di Franco M, Alessandri C, et al. Biological therapies in rheumatic diseases. Clin Ter. 2013;164:e413–28.
    1. Krieckaert CL, Bartelds GM, Lems WF, Wolbink GJ. The effect of immunomodulators on the immunogenicity of TNF-blocking therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: a review. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12:217. doi: 10.1186/ar3147.
    1. Anderson PJ. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: clinical implications of their different immunogenicity profiles. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2005;34:19–22. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2005.01.005.
    1. Hwang WY, Foote J. Immunogenicity of engineered antibodies. Methods. 2005;36:3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.01.001.
    1. Hsu L, Snodgrass BT, Armstrong AW. Antidrug antibodies in psoriasis: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol. 2014;170:261–73. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12654.
    1. Garcês S, Demengeot J, Benito-Garcia E. The immunogenicity of anti-TNF therapy in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1947–55. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202220.
    1. Mok CC, Tsai WC, Chen DY, Wei JC. Immunogenicity of anti-TNF biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2016;16:201–11. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2016.1118457.
    1. van Schouwenburg PA, Rispens T, Wolbink GJ. Immunogenicity of anti-TNF biologic therapies for rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013;9:164–72. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.4.
    1. Vincent FB, Morand EF, Murphy K, Mackay F, Mariette X, Marcelli C. Antidrug antibodies (ADAb) to tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-specific neutralising agents in chronic inflammatory diseases: a real issue, a clinical perspective. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:165–78. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202545.
    1. Bendtzen K, Geborek P, Svenson M, Larsson L, Kapetanovic MC, Saxne T. Individualized monitoring of drug bioavailability and immunogenicity in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with the tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor infliximab. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:3782–9. doi: 10.1002/art.22214.
    1. Korswagen LA, Bartelds GM, Krieckaert CL, Turkstra F, Nurmohamed MT, van Schaardenburg D, et al. Venous and arterial thromboembolic events in adalimumab-treated patients with antiadalimumab antibodies: a case series and cohort study. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63:877–83. doi: 10.1002/art.30209.
    1. Moots RJ, Xavier RM, Mok CC, Rahman MU, Tsai W-C, Al-Maini MH, et al. The impact of anti-drug antibodies on drug concentrations and clinical outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab: Results from a multinational, real-world clinical practice, non-interventional study. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0175207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175207.
    1. de Vries MK, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, Nurmohamed MT, Aarden LA, Stapel SO, Peters MJ, et al. Immunogenicity does not influence treatment with etanercept in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:531–5. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.089979.
    1. Wadhwa M, Knezevic I, Kang HN, Thorpe R. Immunogenicity assessment of biotherapeutic products: An overview of assays and their utility. Biologicals. 2015;43:298–306. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2015.06.004.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다