Self-management education for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review

E Monninkhof, P van der Valk, J van der Palen, C van Herwaarden, M R Partridge, G Zielhuis, E Monninkhof, P van der Valk, J van der Palen, C van Herwaarden, M R Partridge, G Zielhuis

Abstract

Background: The idea of self-management is to teach patients how to carry out the activities of daily living optimally in the face of their physiological impairment, and to prevent or decrease the severity of exacerbations by means of life style adaptation. In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) the value of self-management education is not clear. This review was undertaken to clarify the effectiveness of self-management programmes in COPD.

Methods: A search was made of the Cochrane Airways Group trial registers, Medline, reference lists, and abstracts of medical conferences for controlled trials of self-management education in patients with COPD. Two reviewers independently assessed each paper for methodological quality and extracted the data.

Results: The reviewers included 12 articles describing eight randomised controlled trials and one controlled clinical trial in which self-management education was compared with usual care. The studies assessed a broad spectrum of outcome measures with different follow up times so meta-analysis could not be undertaken. Self-management education had no effect on hospital admissions, emergency room visits, days lost from work, and lung function. Inconclusive results were observed on health related quality of life, COPD symptoms, and use of healthcare facilities such as doctor and nurse visits. Self-management education reduced the need for rescue medication and led to increased use of courses of oral steroids and antibiotics for respiratory symptoms.

Conclusions: Insufficient data were obtained to make recommendations because of the wide variation in outcome measures used and other limitations to generalisations in the current published literature. Further research in this area is needed.

References

    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Dec;160(6):2000-5
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Mar;159(3):812-7
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Aug 15;164(4):590-6
    1. Thorax. 2002 May;57(5):412-6
    1. Respir Med. 2000 Mar;94(3):279-87
    1. Br Med J. 1977 Jun 25;1(6077):1645-8
    1. Chest. 1986 Aug;90(2):233-8
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Jan 24;294(6566):225-8
    1. Fam Med. 1990 Sep-Oct;22(5):365-70
    1. Thorax. 1991 Aug;46(8):559-64
    1. Thorax. 1994 Feb;49(2):162-70
    1. Lancet. 1994 Nov 19;344(8934):1394-7
    1. Chest. 1995 Mar;107(3):724-9
    1. BMJ. 1996 Mar 23;312(7033):748-52
    1. Thorax. 1996 Jan;51(1):39-43
    1. Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12
    1. Science. 1996 Nov 1;274(5288):740-3
    1. Eur Respir J. 1997 Jun;10(6):1267-71
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 May;157(5 Pt 1):1418-22
    1. Health Psychol. 1998 May;17(3):232-40
    1. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 1998 Sep-Oct;38(5):574-85
    1. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 1998 Sep-Oct;38(5):586-97
    1. Eur Respir J. 2001 Mar;17(3):386-94

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다