The Impact of OnabotulinumtoxinA vs. Placebo on Efficacy Outcomes in Headache Day Responder and Nonresponder Patients with Chronic Migraine

Stephen D Silberstein, Hans-Christoph Diener, David W Dodick, Aubrey Manack Adams, Ronald E DeGryse, Richard B Lipton, Stephen D Silberstein, Hans-Christoph Diener, David W Dodick, Aubrey Manack Adams, Ronald E DeGryse, Richard B Lipton

Abstract

Introduction: The phase 3 PREEMPT trials demonstrated efficacy and tolerability of onabotulinumtoxinA for headache prevention in adults with chronic migraine. OnabotulinumtoxinA significantly reduced headache frequency from baseline vs. placebo at 24 weeks; however, this measure may not fully capture the benefits of treatment. We evaluated the impact of onabotulinumtoxinA on patient-reported outcomes according to headache responder status.

Methods: A post hoc analysis pooled 24-week data from the placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind treatment phases of the PREEMPT trials. Patients were stratified by randomized treatment (onabotulinumtoxinA vs. placebo) and headache day responder status (responder vs. nonresponder). Headache day responders had a ≥ 50% headache day reduction from baseline measured at weeks 21-24. Outcomes evaluated were patient-reported reductions in moderate-to-severe headache days, Headache Impact Test, and Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. Missing values were estimated using a modified last-observation-carried-forward approach.

Results: In the pooled analysis population (N = 1384; onabotulinumtoxinA, n = 688; placebo, n = 696), headache day responder rates were 308/688 (45%) for onabotulinumtoxinA- and 238/696 (34%) for placebo-treated patients. At 24 weeks compared with baseline, onabotulinumtoxinA nonresponders showed significantly (all P < 0.01) greater mean (standard error) reductions vs. placebo nonresponders in moderate-to-severe headache days (- 3.5 [0.2] vs. - 2.4 [0.2]) and Headache Impact Test scores (- 2.3 [0.3] vs. - 0.8 [0.2]), and greater mean improvements in Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire domains (Restrictive, 8.8 [1.0] vs. 2.9 [0.8]; Preventive, 6.0 [1.0] vs. 1.8 [0.8]; Emotional, 8.5 [1.3] vs. 2.8 [1.1]). Moderate-to-severe headache day and headache impact differences between nonresponder groups were evident at week 4 and sustained through week 24.

Conclusions: Relative to placebo nonresponders, onabotulinumtoxinA nonresponders experienced significant reductions in moderate-to-severe headache days and disability and improvement in quality of life, implying that the full benefits of onabotulinumtoxinA are not captured by headache day reduction.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT00156910 (PREEMPT 1) and NCT00168428 (PREEMPT 2).

Keywords: Botulinum toxin type A; Chronic migraine; Headache; Quality of life.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean (SE) change from baseline in moderate-to-severe headache days. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; P values for between-treatment comparisons (e.g., placebo responder vs. onabotulinumtoxinA-treated responder). P < 0.001 for all within-treatment comparisons (responder vs. nonresponder). SE standard error
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean (SE) change from baseline in total HIT-6 scores. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; P values for between-treatment comparisons (e.g., placebo responder vs. onabotulinumtoxinA-treated responder). P < 0.001 for all within-treatment comparisons (responder vs. nonresponder). HIT-6 6-item Headache Impact Test, SE standard error
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean (SE) change from baseline in MSQv2.1 domain scores: a Role Function-Restrictive, b Role Function-Preventive, and c Emotional Function. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; P values for between-treatment comparisons (e.g., placebo responder vs. onabotulinumtoxinA-treated responder). MSQv2.1 Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire version 2.1, SE standard error

References

    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1–211.
    1. Natoli JL, Manack A, Dean B, et al. Global prevalence of chronic migraine: a systematic review. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:599–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01941.x.
    1. Lipton RB, Manack Adams A, Buse DC, Fanning KM, Reed ML. A Comparison of the chronic migraine epidemiology and outcomes (CaMEO) study and American migraine prevalence and prevention (AMPP) Study: demographics and headache-related disability. Headache. 2016;56:1280–1289. doi: 10.1111/head.12878.
    1. Blumenfeld AM, Varon SF, Wilcox TK, et al. Disability, HRQoL and resource use among chronic and episodic migraineurs: results from the international burden of migraine study (IBMS) Cephalalgia. 2011;31:301–315. doi: 10.1177/0333102410381145.
    1. Buse DC, Manack A, Serrano D, Turkel C, Lipton RB. Sociodemographic and comorbidity profiles of chronic migraine and episodic migraine sufferers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:428–432. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.192492.
    1. Lanteri-Minet M, Duru G, Mudge M, Cottrell S. Quality of life impairment, disability and economic burden associated with chronic daily headache, focusing on chronic migraine with or without medication overuse: a systematic review. Cephalalgia. 2011;31:837–850. doi: 10.1177/0333102411398400.
    1. Aurora SK, Dodick DW, Turkel CC, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 1 trial. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:793–803. doi: 10.1177/0333102410364676.
    1. Diener HC, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 2 trial. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:804–814. doi: 10.1177/0333102410364677.
    1. Dodick DW, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phases of the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache. 2010;50:921–936. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01678.x.
    1. Lipton RB, Rosen NL, Ailani J, DeGryse RE, Gillard PJ, Varon SF. OnabotulinumtoxinA improves quality of life and reduces impact of chronic migraine over one year of treatment: pooled results from the PREEMPT randomized clinical trial program. Cephalalgia. 2016;36:899–908. doi: 10.1177/0333102416652092.
    1. Tfelt-Hansen P, Block G, Dahlof C, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: second edition. Cephalalgia. 2000;20:765–786. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2000.00117.x.
    1. Tassorelli C, Diener HC, Dodick DW, et al. Guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled trials of preventive treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:815–832. doi: 10.1177/0333102418758283.
    1. Dodick DW, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, et al. Assessing clinically meaningful treatment effects in controlled trials: chronic migraine as an example. J Pain. 2015;16:164–175. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.11.004.
    1. Matharu M, Halker R, Pozo-Rosich P, DeGryse R, Manack Adams A, Aurora SK. The impact of onabotulinumtoxinA on severe headache days: PREEMPT 56-week pooled analysis. J Headache Pain. 2017;18:78. doi: 10.1186/s10194-017-0784-4.
    1. Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, Bjorner JB, et al. A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: the HIT-6. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:963–974. doi: 10.1023/A:1026119331193.
    1. Jhingran P, Davis SM, LaVange LM, Miller DW, Helms RW. MSQ: Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. Further investigation of the factor structure. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;13:707–717. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813060-00007.
    1. Rendas-Baum R, Bloudek LM, Maglinte GA, Varon SF. The psychometric properties of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire version 2.1 (MSQ) in chronic migraine patients. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:1123–1133. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0230-7.
    1. Lampl C, Rudolph M, Bräutigam E. OnabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of refractory chronic cluster headache. J Headache Pain. 2018;19:45. doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0874-y.
    1. Bendtsen L, Sacco S, Ashina M, et al. Guideline on the use of onabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine: a consensus statement from the European Headache Federation. J Headache Pain. 2018;19:91. doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0921-8.
    1. Tassorelli C, Aguggia M, De Tommaso M, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for the management of chronic migraine in current clinical practice: results of a survey of sixty-three Italian headache centers. J Headache Pain. 2017;18:66. doi: 10.1186/s10194-017-0773-7.
    1. Ornello R, Guerzoni S, Baraldi C, et al. Sustained response to onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with chronic migraine: real-life data. J Headache Pain. 2020;21:40. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01113-6.
    1. Torres-Ferrus M, Gallardo VJ, Alpuente A, Pozo-Rosich P. Influence of headache pain intensity and frequency on migraine-related disability in chronic migraine patients treated with onabotulinumtoxinA. J Headache Pain. 2020;21:88. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01157-8.
    1. Buse DC, Lipton RB, Hallstrom Y, et al. Migraine-related disability, impact, and health-related quality of life among patients with episodic migraine receiving preventive treatment with erenumab. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1622–1631. doi: 10.1177/0333102418789072.
    1. Brossner G, Reuter U, Bonner JH, et al. MTIS2018-074. Efficacy outcomes in responder and non-responder patients with episodic migraine treated preventively with erenumab in STRIVE [abstract] Cephalalgia. 2018;38:55–56.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다