Development of an Implementation Intervention Using Intervention Mapping to Increase Mammography Among Low Income Women

Linda Highfield, Melissa A Valerio, Maria E Fernandez, L K Eldridge-Bartholomew, Linda Highfield, Melissa A Valerio, Maria E Fernandez, L K Eldridge-Bartholomew

Abstract

Background: Although much work has begun to elucidate contextual factors influencing implementation, the specific processes that facilitate and hinder adoption, implementation, and maintenance of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) in clinical settings remains poorly understood. Intervention Mapping (IM) is a systematic process that facilitates planning and design for dissemination, implementation and maintenance of EBIs in practice. IM has been used to guide the design of many health interventions, focusing on program implementation. Less studied is its use to adapt and scale screening interventions within the healthcare clinic setting. This paper describes the development of an implementation intervention using IM to facilitate the adoption, implementation, and maintenance of an EBI designed to increase mammography adherence in healthcare clinics, the adapted Peace of Mind Program (PMP). Methods: IM framework, Step 5, was used to guide the implementation intervention planning. IM guided identification of specific adoption, implementation, and maintenance performance objectives. We formed an implementation intervention planning group consisting of members of the academic team, our community partner and community health workers (CHWs) with substantial experience working on mammography screening programs in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and charity clinics. Results: Results are presented by Intervention Mapping task for Step 5 (Program Implementation Plan). We describe how the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) informed the selection of performance objectives, determinants, methods, and practical applications in the final implementation intervention. Conclusions: This paper provides an example of the use of Intervention Mapping Step 5 and CFIR to create an implementation intervention to support EBI scale up of an evidence-based mammography intervention within a specific setting. Clinical trials registration number: NCT02296177.

Keywords: consolidated framework for implementation research; implementation intervention; intervention mapping; mammography; underserved women.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual framework for development of PMP.

References

    1. Brownson RC, Baker EA, Deshpande AD, Gillespie KN. Evidence-Based Public Health. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; (2017).
    1. Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Maylahn CM. Evidence-based public health: a fundamental concept for public health practice. Annu Rev Public Health. (2009) 30:175–201. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100134
    1. Chaudoir SR, Dugan AG, Barr CH. Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implement Sci. (2013) 8:22. 10.1186/1748-5908-8-22
    1. Highfield L, Bartholomew LK, Hartman MA, Ford MM, Balihe P. Grounding evidence-based approaches to cancer prevention in the community: a case study of mammography barriers in underserved African American women. Health Promot Pract. (2014) 15:904–14. 10.1177/1524839914534685
    1. Burgio LD. Disentangling the translational sciences: a social science perspective. Res Theory Nurs Pract. (2010) 24:56–63. 10.1891/1541-6577.24.1.56
    1. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. (2009) 4:50. 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
    1. Wandersman A, Duffy J, Flaspohler P, Noonan R, Lubell K, Stillman L, et al. . Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. Am J Community Psychol. (2008) 41:171–81. 10.1007/s10464-008-9174-z
    1. Kessler R, Glasgow RE. A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: dramatic change is needed. Am J Prev Med. (2011) 40:637–44. 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.023
    1. Kerner JF. Integrating research, practice, and policy: what we see depends on where we stand. J Public Health Manage Pract. (2008) 14:193–8. 10.1097/01.PHH.0000311899.11197.db
    1. Ramanadhan S, Crisostomo J, Alexander-Molloy J, Gandelman E, Grullon M, Lora V, et al. . Perceptions of evidence-based programs among community-based organizations tackling health disparities: a qualitative study. Health Educ Res. (2011) 27:717–28. 10.1093/her/cyr088
    1. Stetler CB, McQueen L, Demakis J, Mittman BS. An organizational framework and strategic implementation for system-level change to enhance research-based practice: QUERI Series. Implement Sci. (2008) 3:30. 10.1186/1748-5908-3-30
    1. Highfield L, Hartman MA, Mullen PD, Rodriguez SA, Fernandez ME, Bartholomew LK. Intervention mapping to adapt evidence-based interventions for use in practice: increasing mammography among African American women. Biomed Res Int. (2015) 2015:160103. 10.1155/2015/160103
    1. Davies P, Walker AE, Grimshaw JM. A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implement Sci. (2010) 5:14. 10.1186/1748-5908-5-14
    1. Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. (2013) 8:139. 10.1186/1748-5908-8-139
    1. Byers TE, Wolf HJ, Bauer KR, Bolick-Aldrich S, Chen VW, Finch JL, et al. . The impact of socioeconomic status on survival after cancer in the United States. Cancer. (2008) 113:582–91. 10.1002/cncr.23567
    1. Onitilo AA, Engel JM, Liang H, Stankowski RV, Miskowiak DA, Broton M, et al. . Mammography utilization: patient characteristics and breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Am J Roentgenol. (2013) 201:1057–63. 10.2214/AJR.13.10733
    1. Yano EM, Green LW, Glanz K, Ayanian JZ, Mittman BS, Chollette V, et al. . Implementation and spread of interventions into the multilevel context of routine practice and policy: implications for the cancer care continuum. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. (2012) 2012:86–99. 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs004
    1. Watson DP, Young J, Ahonen E, Xu H, Henderson M, Shuman V, et al. . Development and testing of an implementation strategy for a complex housing intervention: protocol for a mixed methods study. Implement Sci. (2014) 9:138. 10.1186/s13012-014-0138-4
    1. Eldredge LKB, Markham CM, Ruiter RA, Kok G, Parcel GS. Planning Health Promotion Programs: An Intervention Mapping Approach. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons; (2016).
    1. Brownson RC, Jacobs JA, Tabak RG, Hoehner CM, Stamatakis KA. Designing for dissemination among public health researchers: findings from a national survey in the United States. Am J Public Health. (2013) 103:1693–9. 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301165
    1. Harris JR, Cheadle A, Hannon PA, Lichiello P, Forehand M, Mahoney E, et al. . A framework for disseminating evidence-based health promotion practices. Prev Chronic Dis. (2012) 9:110081. 10.5888/pcd9.110081
    1. Neta G, Glasgow RE, Carpenter CR, Grimshaw JM, Rabin BA, Fernandez ME, et al. . A framework for enhancing the value of research for dissemination and implementation. Am J Public Health. (2015) 105:49–57. 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302206
    1. Highfield L, Hartman MA, Bartholomew LK, Balihe P, Ausborn VA. Evaluation of the effectiveness and implementation of an adapted evidence-based mammography intervention for African American women. Biomed Res Int. (2015) 2015:240240. 10.1155/2015/240240
    1. Highfield L, Rajan SS, Valerio MA, Walton G, Fernandez ME, Bartholomew LK. A non-randomized controlled stepped wedge trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-level mammography intervention in improving appointment adherence in underserved women. Implement Sci. (2015) 10:143. 10.1186/s13012-015-0334-x
    1. Damschroder LJ, Hagedorn HJ. A guiding framework and approach for implementation research in substance use disorders treatment. Psychol Addict Behav. (2011) 25:194. 10.1037/a0022284
    1. Bandura A. Social Foundation of Thought and Action: A Social-Cognitive View. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; (1986).
    1. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. (2001) 52:1–26. 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
    1. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 3rd ed New York, NY: Free Press; (1983).
    1. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed New York, NY: Free Press; (1995).
    1. Abraham C, Albarracín D, Araújo-Soares V. WIDER Recommendations to Improve Reporting of the Content of Behaviour Change Interventions. Abraham C. (2009).
    1. Hoffmann TC, Erueti C, Glasziou PP. Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials. BMJ (2013) 347:f3755. 10.1136/bmj.f3755
    1. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. . Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ (2014) 348:g1687. 10.1136/bmj.g1687
    1. Lloyd JJ, Logan S, Greaves CJ, Wyatt KM. Evidence, theory and context-using intervention mapping to develop a school-based intervention to prevent obesity in children. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity (2011) 8:73. 10.1186/1479-5868-8-73
    1. Kirk MA, Kelley C, Yankey N, Birken SA, Abadie B, Damschroder L. A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implement Sci. (2016) 11:72. 10.1186/s13012-016-0437-z
    1. Lau R, Stevenson F, Nio B, Ong K, Dziedzic ST, Eldridge S, et al. . Achieving change in primary care-causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews. Implement Sci. (2016) 11:40. 10.1186/s13012-016-0396-4

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다