Predicting the immediate impact of national lockdown on neovascular age-related macular degeneration and associated visual morbidity: an INSIGHT Health Data Research Hub for Eye Health report

Susan P Mollan, Dun Jack Fu, Ching-Yi Chuo, Jacqueline G Gannon, Wen Hwa Lee, J Jill Hopkins, Cian Hughes, Alastair K Denniston, Pearse A Keane, Ronald Cantrell, Susan P Mollan, Dun Jack Fu, Ching-Yi Chuo, Jacqueline G Gannon, Wen Hwa Lee, J Jill Hopkins, Cian Hughes, Alastair K Denniston, Pearse A Keane, Ronald Cantrell

Abstract

Objective: Predicting the impact of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) service disruption on visual outcomes following national lockdown in the UK to contain SARS-CoV-2.

Methods and analysis: This retrospective cohort study includes deidentified data from 2229 UK patients from the INSIGHT Health Data Research digital hub. We forecasted the number of treatment-naïve nAMD patients requiring anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) initiation during UK lockdown (16 March 2020 through 31 July 2020) at Moorfields Eye Hospital (MEH) and University Hospitals Birmingham (UHB). Best-measured visual acuity (VA) changes without anti-VEGF therapy were predicted using post hoc analysis of Minimally Classic/Occult Trial of the Anti-VEGF Antibody Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Neovascular AMD trial sham-control arm data (n=238).

Results: At our centres, 376 patients were predicted to require anti-VEGF initiation during lockdown (MEH: 325; UHB: 51). Without treatment, mean VA was projected to decline after 12 months. The proportion of eyes in the MEH cohort predicted to maintain the key positive visual outcome of ≥70 ETDRS letters (Snellen equivalent 6/12) fell from 25.5% at baseline to 5.8% at 12 months (UHB: 9.8%-7.8%). Similarly, eyes with VA <25 ETDRS letters (6/96) were predicted to increase from 4.3% to 14.2% at MEH (UHB: 5.9%-7.8%) after 12 months without treatment.

Conclusions: Here, we demonstrate how combining data from a recently founded national digital health data repository with historical industry-funded clinical trial data can enhance predictive modelling in nAMD. The demonstrated detrimental effects of prolonged treatment delay should incentivise healthcare providers to support nAMD patients accessing care in safe environments.

Trial registration number: NCT00056836.

Keywords: COVID-19; clinical trial; neovascularisation.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Period trends of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment initiation for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Actual (solid line) and predicted (solid line with CIs) number of patients per week needing to initiate anti-VEGF therapy for nAMD at Moorfields Eye Hospital (MEH) (top panel; blue) and University Hospitals Birmingham (UHB) (bottom panel; green); 95% (grey) CI are depicted.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sampling and matching process to generate cohorts for predicting visual acuity (VA) changes. Flow diagram outlining how patient profiles were generated to model VA changes during a national lockdown. In brief, profiles for the number of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients forecasted to initiate anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy between 16 March 2020 and 31 July 2020 were randomly selected from the pool of patients who initiated therapy in the same period in the two preceding years at Moorfields Eye Hospital (MEH) and University Hospitals Birmingham (UHB). These profiles were matched to patients in the sham-control arm of the Minimally Classic/Occult Trial of the Anti-VEGF Antibody Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Neovascular AMD (MARINA) study on sex, age, VA, VA ≥70 and VA ≤20 at treatment initiation. Some MEH and UHB patients could not be matched to MARINA patient profiles, due to the trial exclusion criteria. Predicted changes in these patients were based on a linear model of VA changes developed from the trial population and extrapolated to the unmatched population. The number of matched and unmatched patients for both NHS Trusts is shown.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Projected visual acuity (VA) thresholds. Bar charts representing the proportion of study eyes for the Moorfields Eye Hospital (MEH) (blue) and University Hospitals Birmingham (UHB) (green) predicted cohorts over time to (A) achieve a VA of ≥70 ETDRS, (B) fall below a VA of 25 ETDRS letters and (C) have a VA of ≤20 ETDRS letters. Matched and unmatched cohorts were combined for this analysis. Last observation was carried over to keep constant denominators.

References

    1. Bressler NM. Age-Related macular degeneration is the leading cause of blindness. JAMA 2004;291:1900–1. 10.1001/jama.291.15.1900
    1. Jager RD, Mieler WF, Miller JW. Age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2606–17. 10.1056/NEJMra0801537
    1. Owen CG, Fletcher AE, Donoghue M, et al. . How big is the burden of visual loss caused by age related macular degeneration in the United Kingdom? Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:312–7. 10.1136/bjo.87.3.312
    1. Wood JM, Lacherez P, Black AA, et al. . Risk of falls, injurious falls, and other injuries resulting from visual impairment among older adults with age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:5088–92. 10.1167/iovs.10-6644
    1. Lotery A, Xu X, Zlatava G, et al. . Burden of illness, visual impairment and health resource utilisation of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results from the UK cohort of a five-country cross-sectional study. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:1303–7. 10.1136/bjo.2007.116939
    1. Cox TM, ffytche DH. Negative outcome charles bonnet syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol 2014;98:1236–9. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-304920
    1. Owen CG, Jarrar Z, Wormald R, et al. . The estimated prevalence and incidence of late stage age related macular degeneration in the UK. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:752–6. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-301109
    1. Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, et al. . Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1419–31. 10.1056/NEJMoa054481
    1. Heier JS, Brown DM, Chong V, et al. . Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF trap-eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2012;119:2537–48. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.006
    1. Solomon SD, Lindsley K, Vedula SS, et al. . Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;2019. 10.1002/14651858.CD005139.pub4
    1. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists . RCOphth: management of ophthalmology services during the Covid pandemic, 2020. Available: [Accessed 13 May 2020].
    1. Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust . Moorfields eye hospital nhs foundation trust ophthalmological risk stratification & implementation guidance v2.0, 2020. Available: [Accessed 13 May 2020].
    1. NHS . National data opt-out operational policy guidance document v4.0, 2020. Available: [Accessed 04 Aug 2020].
    1. Thomas DS, Warwick A, Olvera-Barrios A. Estimating excess visual loss in people with neovascular age-related macular degeneration during the COVID-19 pandemic. MedRxiv 2020. 10.1101/2020.06.02.20120642
    1. National institute for health and care excellence . Age-related macular degeneration NICE guideline [NG82], 2018. Available: [Accessed 08 Jan 2021].
    1. Gregori NZ, Feuer W, Rosenfeld PJ. Novel method for analyzing snellen visual acuity measurements. Retina 2010;30:1046–50. 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181d87e04
    1. Fontenot JL, Bona MD, Kaleem MA, Olsen TW, Harris J, Mizuiri D, et al. . Vision rehabilitation preferred practice pattern®. Ophthalmology 2018;125:P228–78. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.09.030
    1. Visual standards: aspects and ranges of vision loss with emphasis on population surveys : report prepared for the international council of ophthalmology at the 29th international congress of ophthalmology, 2002. International Council of ophthalmology. Available:
    1. Bron AM, Viswanathan AC, Thelen U, et al. . International vision requirements for driver licensing and disability pensions: using a milestone approach in characterization of progressive eye disease. Clin Ophthalmol 2010;4:1361–9. 10.2147/OPTH.S15359
    1. Lamoureux EL, Hassell JB, Keeffe JE. The impact of diabetic retinopathy on participation in daily living. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:84–8. 10.1001/archopht.122.1.84
    1. Team R . Rstudio: Integrated development environment for r [Computer software manual]. Boston, MA, 2016.
    1. Holt CC. Forecasting trends and seasonals by exponentially weighted moving averages, ONR research memorandum, carnegie Institute of technology 52. PR Winters (1960) forecasting sales by exponentially weighted moving averages. Manage Sci 1957;6:324–42. 10.1287/mnsc.6.3.324
    1. Winters PR. Forecasting sales by exponentially weighted moving averages. Manage Sci 1960;6:324–42. 10.1287/mnsc.6.3.324
    1. Patel PJ, Bunce C, Tufail A, et al. . A randomised, double-masked phase III/IV study of the efficacy and safety of avastin(R) (Bevacizumab) intravitreal injections compared to standard therapy in subjects with choroidal neovascularisation secondary to age-related macular degeneration: clinical trial design. Trials 2008;9:56. 10.1186/1745-6215-9-56
    1. Dugel PU, Koh A, Ogura Y, et al. . Hawk and harrier: phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-masked trials of Brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2020;127:72–84. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.04.017
    1. Kim JH, Chang YS, Kim JW. Natural course of patients discontinuing treatment for age-related macular degeneration and factors associated with visual prognosis. Retina 2017;37:2254–61. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001494
    1. Fu DJ, Keenan TD, Faes L, et al. . Insights from survival analyses during 12 years of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. JAMA Ophthalmol 2021;139:57–67. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.5044
    1. Almeida DRP, Ruzicki J, Xu K, et al. . Vision recovery velocity, momentum and acceleration: advanced vitreoretinal analytics as measure of treatment efficacy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Clin Ophthalmol 2021;15:189–94. 10.2147/OPTH.S288621
    1. Yang K-B, Feng H, Zhang H. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment in China. Front Med 2020;7:576275. 10.3389/fmed.2020.576275
    1. Thaller M, Tsermoulas G, Sun R, et al. . Negative impact of COVID-19 lockdown on papilloedema and idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2021;92:795–7. 10.1136/jnnp-2020-325519
    1. Ball S, Banerjee A, Berry C, et al. . Monitoring indirect impact of COVID-19 pandemic on services for cardiovascular diseases in the UK. Heart 2020;106:1890–7. 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317870
    1. Sim SS, Yip MY, Wang Z, et al. . Digital technology for AMD management in the post-COVID-19 new normal. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol 2021;10:39–48. 10.1097/APO.0000000000000363
    1. American Society of Retina Specialists . COVID-19: patient update. Available: [Accessed 08 Jan 2021].

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다