Relationship between HbA1c and continuous glucose monitoring in Chinese population: a multicenter study

Jian Zhou, Yifei Mo, Hong Li, Xingwu Ran, Wenying Yang, Qiang Li, Yongde Peng, Yanbing Li, Xin Gao, Xiaojun Luan, Weiqing Wang, Yun Xie, Weiping Jia, Jian Zhou, Yifei Mo, Hong Li, Xingwu Ran, Wenying Yang, Qiang Li, Yongde Peng, Yanbing Li, Xin Gao, Xiaojun Luan, Weiqing Wang, Yun Xie, Weiping Jia

Abstract

Objective: Since there is a paucity of reference data in the literature to indicate the relationship between HbA1c, and 24 h mean blood glucose (MBG) from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in Chinese populations, we described the above relationship in adult Chinese subjects with different glucose tolerance status.

Methods: Seven-hundred-and-forty-two individuals without history of diabetes were included to the study at 11 hospitals in urban areas across China from 2007-2009 and data of 673 subjects were included into the final analysis. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) classified the participants as nondiabetic subjects, including those with normal glucose regulation (NGR; n = 121) and impaired glucose regulation (IGR; n = 209), or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (n = 343). All participants completed testing for HbA1c levels and wore a CGM system for three consecutive days. The 24 h MBG levels were calculated. Spearman correlations and linear regression analyses were applied to quantify the relationship between glucose markers.

Results: The levels of HbA1c and 24 h MBG significantly increased with presence of glucose intolerance (NGR<IGR<type 2 diabetes; both, P<0.001). Analysis of the total population indicated that HbA1c was strongly correlated with 24 h MBG (r = 0.735). The correlation was also found to be significant for the subgroup of participants with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (r = 0.694, P<0.001). Linear regression analysis of the total study population yielded the following equation: 24 h MBG(mmol/L )= 1.198×HbA1c-0.582 (24 h MBG(mg/dL )= 21.564×HbA1c-10.476) (R(2)= 0.670, P<0.001). The model fit was not improved by application of exponential or quadratic modeling. When HbA1c was 6.5%, the calculated 24 h MBG was 7.2 (6.4-8.1) mmol/L (130 (115-146) mg/dL); and when HbA1c was 7.0%, the 24 h MBG was 7.8 (6.9-8.7) mmol/L (140 (124-157) mg/dL).

Conclusions: Our study provided the reference data of the relationship between HbA1c and CGM in Chinese subjects.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Correlation analysis of 24( n…
Figure 1. Correlation analysis of 24(n = 673).
A significant positive correlation exists between the 24(r = 0.735, P<0.001).

References

    1. Yang W, Lu J, Weng J, Jia W, Ji L, et al. (2010) Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China. N Engl J Med 362: 1090–1101.
    1. Xu Y, Wang L, He J, Bi Y, Li M, et al. (2013) Prevalence and control of diabetes in Chinese adults. JAMA 310: 948–959.
    1. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group (1993) The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 329: 977–986.
    1. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, et al. (2000) Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 321: 405–412.
    1. Bao Y, Ma X, Li H, Zhou M, Hu C, et al. (2010) Glycated haemoglobin A1c for diagnosing diabetes in Chinese population: cross sectional epidemiological survey. BMJ 340: c2249.
    1. Chinese Diabetes Society (2012) Chinese clinical guideline for continuous glucose monitoring (2012). Chin Med J (Engl) 125: 4167–4174.
    1. Chinese Diabetes Society (2011) Clinical application guide of blood glucose monitoring in China (Edition 2011). Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 91: 656–664.
    1. Poolsup N, Suksomboon N, Kyaw AM (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glucose control in diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr 5: 39.
    1. Szypowska A, Ramotowska A, Dzygalo K, Golicki D (2012) Beneficial effect of real-time continuous glucose monitoring system on glycemic control in type 1 diabetic patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur J Endocrinol 166: 567–574.
    1. Chetty VT, Almulla A, Odueyungbo A, Thabane L (2008) The effect of continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGMS) versus intermittent whole blood finger-stick glucose monitoring (SBGM) on hemoglobin A1c (HBA1c) levels in Type I diabetic patients: a systematic review. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 81: 79–87.
    1. Zhou J, Li H, Ran X, Yang W, Li Q, et al. (2009) Reference values for continuous glucose monitoring in Chinese subjects. Diabetes Care 32: 1188–1193.
    1. Rohlfing CL, Wiedmeyer HM, Little RR, England JD, Tennill A, et al. (2002) Defining the relationship between plasma glucose and HbA(1c): analysis of glucose profiles and HbA(1c) in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care 25: 275–278.
    1. Makris K, Spanou L, Rambaouni-Antoneli A, Koniari K, Drakopoulos I, et al. (2008) Relationship between mean blood glucose and glycated haemoglobin in Type 2 diabetic patients. Diabet Med 25: 174–178.
    1. Nathan DM, Kuenen J, Borg R, Zheng H, Schoenfeld D, et al. (2008) Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values. Diabetes Care 31: 1473–1478.
    1. American Diabetes Association (2007) Standards of medical care in diabetes–2007. Diabetes Care 30 Suppl 1S4–4S41.
    1. American Diabetes Association (2010) Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 33 Suppl 1S62–69.
    1. Wilson DM, Kollman (2008) Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group (2008) Relationship of A1C to glucose concentrations in children with type 1 diabetes: assessments by high-frequency glucose determinations by sensors. Diabetes Care 31: 381–385.
    1. Herman WH, Ma Y, Uwaifo G, Haffner S, Kahn SE, et al. (2007) Differences in A1C by race and ethnicity among patients with impaired glucose tolerance in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Diabetes Care 30: 2453–2457.
    1. Yudkin JS, Forrest RD, Jackson CA, Ryle AJ, Davie S, et al. (1990) Unexplained variability of glycated haemoglobin in non-diabetic subjects not related to glycaemia. Diabetologia 33: 208–215.
    1. Kilpatrick ES, Maylor PW, Keevil BG (1998) Biological variation of glycated hemoglobin. Implications for diabetes screening and monitoring. Diabetes Care 21: 261–264.
    1. Selvin E, Steffes MW, Ballantyne CM, Hoogeveen RC, Coresh J, et al. (2011) Racial differences in glycemic markers: a cross-sectional analysis of community-based data. Ann Intern Med 154: 303–309.
    1. Virtue MA, Furne JK, Nuttall FQ, Levitt MD (2004) Relationship between GHb concentration and erythrocyte survival determined from breath carbon monoxide concentration. Diabetes Care 27: 931–935.
    1. Snieder H, Sawtell PA, Ross L, Walker J, Spector TD, et al. (2001) HbA(1c) levels are genetically determined even in type 1 diabetes: evidence from healthy and diabetic twins. Diabetes 50: 2858–2863.
    1. Knopp RH, d'Emden M, Smilde JG, Pocock SJ (2006) Efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in the prevention of cardiovascular end points in subjects with type 2 diabetes: the Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (ASPEN). Diabetes Care 29: 1478–1485.
    1. Colhoun HM, Betteridge DJ, Durrington PN, Hitman GA, Neil HA, et al. (2004) Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 364: 685–696.
    1. Buse JB, Ginsberg HN, Bakris GL, Clark NG, Costa F, et al. (2007) Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in people with diabetes mellitus: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association. Circulation 115: 114–126.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다