The effectiveness of the Guy's Rapid Diagnostic Clinic (RDC) in detecting cancer and serious conditions in vague symptom patients
Saoirse Olivia Dolly, Geraint Jones, Paula Allchorne, Daniel Wheeler, Sunnyath Ali, Yaseen Mukadam, Sifan Zheng, Loay Rahman, Jan Sindhar, Charlotte Louise Moss, Danielle Harari, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Anthony Cunliffe, Luigi Vincenzo De Michele, Saoirse Olivia Dolly, Geraint Jones, Paula Allchorne, Daniel Wheeler, Sunnyath Ali, Yaseen Mukadam, Sifan Zheng, Loay Rahman, Jan Sindhar, Charlotte Louise Moss, Danielle Harari, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Anthony Cunliffe, Luigi Vincenzo De Michele
Abstract
Background: Rapid Diagnostic Clinics (RDC) are being expanded nationally by NHS England. Guy's RDC established a pathway for GPs and internal referrals for patients with symptoms concerning for malignancy not suitable for a site-specific 2WW referral. However, little data assessing the effectiveness of RDC models are available in an English population.
Methods: We evaluated all patients referred to Guy's RDC between December 2016 and June 2019 (n = 1341) to assess the rate of cancer diagnoses, frequency of benign conditions and effectiveness of the service.
Results: There were 96 new cancer diagnoses (7.2%): lung (16%), haematological (13%) and colorectal (12%)-with stage IV being most frequent (40%). Median time to definitive cancer diagnosis was 28 days (IQR 15-47) and treatment 56 days (IQR 32-84). In all, 75% were suitable for treatment: surgery (26%), systemic (24%) and radiotherapy (14%). Over 180 serious non-neoplastic conditions were diagnosed (35.8%) of patients with no significant findings in two-third of patients (57.0%).
Conclusions: RDCs provide GPs with a streamlined pathway for patients with complex non-site-specific symptoms that can be challenging for primary care. The 7% rate of cancer diagnosis exceeds many 2WW pathways and a third of patients presented with significant non-cancer diagnoses, which justifies the need for rapid diagnostics. Rapid Diagnostic Centres (RDCs) are being rolled out nationally by NHS England and NHS Improvement as part of the NHS long-term plan. The aim is for a primary care referral pathway that streamlines diagnostics, patient journey, clinical outcomes and patient experience. This pilot study of 1341 patients provides an in-depth analysis of the largest single RDC in England. Cancer was diagnosed in 7% of patients and serious non-cancer conditions in 36%-justifying the RDC approach in vague symptom patients.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare no support from any organisation for the submitted work, no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures
References
- Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, Harewood R, Matz M, Niksic M, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet. 2018;391:1023–1075. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33326-3.
- De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, Francisci S, Baili P, Pierannunzio D, et al. Cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5-a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:23–34. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70546-1.
- Abdel-Rahman M, Stockton D, Rachet B, Hakulinen T, Coleman MP. What if cancer survival in Britain were the same as in Europe: how many deaths are avoidable? Br. J. Cancer. 2009;101:S115–S124. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605401.
- Coleman MP, Forman D, Bryant H, Butler J, Rachet B, Maringe C, et al. Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995-2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data. Lancet. 2011;377:127–138. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62231-3.
- Pedersen AF, Forbes L, Brain K, Hvidberg L, Wulff CN, Lagerlund M, et al. Negative cancer beliefs, recognition of cancer symptoms and anticipated time to help-seeking: an international cancer benchmarking partnership (ICBP) study. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:363. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4287-8.
- Neal RD, Tharmanathan P, France B, Din NU, Cotton S, Fallon-Ferguson J, et al. Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic cancer associated with poorer outcomes? Systematic review. Br. J. Cancer. 2015;112:S92–S107. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.48.
- Dahl T. L., Vedsted P. & Jensen H. The effect of standardised cancer pathways on Danish cancer patients’ dissatisfaction with waiting time. Dan Med. J.64, A5322 (2017).
- Mendonca SC, Abel GA, Lyratzopoulos G. Pre-referral GP consultations in patients subsequently diagnosed with rarer cancers: a study of patient-reported data. Br. J. Gen. Pr. 2016;66:e171–e181. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X683977.
- Robinson KM, Christensen KB, Ottesen B, Krasnik A. Diagnostic delay, quality of life and patient satisfaction among women diagnosed with endometrial or ovarian cancer: a nationwide Danish study. Qual. Life Res. 2012;21:1519–1525. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0077-3.
- Torring ML, Murchie P, Hamilton W, Vedsted P, Esteva M, Lautrup M, et al. Evidence of advanced stage colorectal cancer with longer diagnostic intervals: a pooled analysis of seven primary care cohorts comprising 11 720 patients in five countries. Br. J. Cancer. 2017;117:888–897. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.236.
- The NHS Cancer Plan. A plan for investment. A plan for reform. Available from: (2000).
- Swann R, McPhail S, Witt J, Shand B, Abel GA, Hiom S, et al. Diagnosing cancer in primary care: results from the National Cancer Diagnosis Audit. Br. J. Gen. Pr. 2018;68:e63–e72. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X694169.
- Zhou Y, Mendonca SC, Abel GA, Hamilton W, Walter FM, Johnson S, et al. Variation in ‘fast-track’ referrals for suspected cancer by patient characteristic and cancer diagnosis: evidence from 670 000 patients with cancers of 35 different sites. Br. J. Cancer. 2018;118:24–31. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.381.
- Meechan D, Gildea C, Hollingworth L, Richards MA, Riley D, Rubin G. Variation in use of the 2-week referral pathway for suspected cancer: a cross-sectional analysis. Br. J. Gen. Pr. 2012;62:e590–e597. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X654551.
- Hawkes N. Emergency cancer diagnoses in England fall from in 24% to 20% in 10 years. BMJ. 2018;360:k264. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k264.
- Public Health England. Routes to Diagnosis 2006-2016 workbook: Version b. (2017)
- Cancer Research UK. Key messages from the evaluation of Multidisciplinary Diagnostic Centres (MDC). (2019)
- Shephard EA, Neal RD, Rose P, Walter FM, Litt EJ, Hamilton WT. Quantifying the risk of multiple myeloma from symptoms reported in primary care patients: a large case-control study using electronic records. Br. J. Gen. Pr. 2015;65:e106–e113. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X683545.
- Shephard EA, Neal RD, Rose PW, Walter FM, Hamilton W. Symptoms of adult chronic and acute leukaemia before diagnosis: large primary care case-control studies using electronic records. Br. J. Gen. Pr. 2016;66:e182–e188. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X683989.
- Shephard EA, Neal RD, Rose PW, Walter FM, Hamilton WT. Quantifying the risk of Hodgkin lymphoma in symptomatic primary care patients aged >/=40 years: a case-control study using electronic records. Br. J. Gen. Pr. 2015;65:e289–e294. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X684805.
- Koo MM, Hamilton W, Walter FM, Rubin GP, Lyratzopoulos G. Symptom signatures and diagnostic timeliness in cancer patients: a review of current evidence. Neoplasia. 2018;20:165–174. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2017.11.005.
- Nicholson BD, Aveyard P, Hamilton W, Hobbs FDR. When should unexpected weight loss warrant further investigation to exclude cancer? BMJ. 2019;366:l5271. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5271.
- McPhail S, Elliss-Brookes L, Shelton J, Ives A, Greenslade M, Vernon S, et al. Emergency presentation of cancer and short-term mortality. Br. J. Cancer. 2013;109:2027–2034. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.569.
- Vedsted P, Olesen F. A differentiated approach to referrals from general practice to support early cancer diagnosis - the Danish three-legged strategy. Br. J. Cancer. 2015;112:S65–S69. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.44.
- Ingeman ML, Christensen MB, Bro F, Knudsen ST, Vedsted P. The Danish cancer pathway for patients with serious non-specific symptoms and signs of cancer-a cross-sectional study of patient characteristics and cancer probability. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:421. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1424-5.
- Achieving world- class cancer outcome: A strategy for England 2015–2020—Progress Report 2016–2016. .
- Cancer Research UK. Accelerate, Coordinate, Evaluate ACE programme projects. (2016).
- Cancer Research UK. Accelerate, Coordinate, Evaluate (ACE) programme. (2017).
- Nicholson BD, Oke J, Friedemann Smith C, Phillips JA, Lee J, Abel L, et al. The Suspected CANcer (SCAN) pathway: protocol for evaluating a new standard of care for patients with non-specific symptoms of cancer. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e018168. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018168.
- Universal Personalised Care. (2019).
- Pedersen AF, Andersen CM, Ingeman ML, Vedsted P. Patient-physician relationship and use of gut feeling in cancer diagnosis in primary care: a cross-sectional survey of patients and their general practitioners. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e027288. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027288.
- Improvement NEaN. Rapid Diagnostic Centres. Vision and 2019/20 Implementation Specification. › wp-content › uploads › 2019/07 › rdc-vision (2019).
- NHS Long term plan. (2019).
- Sandager M, Jensen H, Lipczak H, Sperling CD, Vedsted P. Cancer patients’ experiences with urgent referrals to cancer patient pathways. Eur. J. Cancer Care (Engl.) 2019;28:e12927. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12927.
- Next steps on the NHS Five Year Forward View. (2017).
- NHS Digital Statistics on Smoking, England. https://digitalnhsuk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/statistics-on-smoking/statistics-on-smoking-england-2019 (2019).
- Sewell B, Jones M, Gray H, Wilkes H, Lloyd-Bennett C, Beddow K, et al. Rapid cancer diagnosis for patients with vague symptoms: a cost-effectiveness study. Br. J. Gen. Pr. 2020;70:e186–e192. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X708077.
- IMPARTS project. . 2020.
- Aslam MI, Chaudhri S, Singh B, Jameson JS. The “two-week wait” referral pathway is not associated with improved survival for patients with colorectal cancer. Int J. Surg. 2017;43:181–185. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.05.046.
- Christopher J, Flint TR, Ahmed H, Dhir N, Li R, Macfarland K, et al. Straight-to-test for the two-week-wait colorectal cancer pathway under the updateMICE guidelines reduces time to cancer diagnosis and treatment. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2019;101:333–339. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0022.
- Spicer J, Chamberlain C, Papa S. Provision of cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17:321–331. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-0370-6.
- Mayor S. COVID-19: impact on cancer workforce and delivery of care. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:633. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30240-0.
Source: PubMed