The association between unexpected weight loss and cancer diagnosis in primary care: a matched cohort analysis of 65,000 presentations

Brian D Nicholson, Willie Hamilton, Constantinos Koshiaris, Jason L Oke, F D Richard Hobbs, Paul Aveyard, Brian D Nicholson, Willie Hamilton, Constantinos Koshiaris, Jason L Oke, F D Richard Hobbs, Paul Aveyard

Abstract

Background: We aimed to understand the time period of cancer diagnosis and the cancer types detected in primary care patients with unexpected weight loss (UWL) to inform cancer guidelines.

Methods: This retrospective matched cohort study used cancer registry linked electronic health records from the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink from between 2000 and 2014. Univariable and multivariable time-to-event analyses examined the association between UWL, and all cancers combined, cancer site and stage.

Results: In all, 63,973 patients had UWL recorded, of whom 1375 (2.2%) were diagnosed with cancer within 2 years (days-to-diagnosis: mean 181; median 80). Men with UWL (HR 3.28 (2.88-3.73)) and women (1.87 (1.68-2.08)) were more likely than comparators to be diagnosed with cancer within 3 months. The association was greatest in men aged ≥50 years and women ≥70 years. The commonest cancers were pancreas, cancer of unknown primary, gastro-oesophageal, lymphoma, hepatobiliary, lung, bowel and renal-tract. The majority were late-stage, but there was some evidence of association with stage II and stage III cancers. In the 3-24 months after presenting with UWL, cancer diagnosis was less likely than in comparators.

Conclusion: UWL recorded in primary care is associated with a broad range of cancer sites of early and late-stage.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1. Study population flow diagram.
Fig. 1. Study population flow diagram.
This flow diagram details the source population, cohort entry criteria, exclusion criteria, the frequency of the eligible population with and without unexpected weight loss, and the study exit criteria.
Fig. 2. Risk of cancer diagnosis over…
Fig. 2. Risk of cancer diagnosis over time.
Univariate smoothed hazard rate and cumulative hazard of cancer diagnosis by unexpected weight loss status.
Fig. 3. Risk of cancer over time…
Fig. 3. Risk of cancer over time by gender.
Univariate smoothed hazard rate and cumulative hazard of cancer diagnosis by gender in patients with and without unexpected weight loss. In men, 441 cancers (1.7%) were diagnosed in 25,551 men with unexpected weight loss in the first 3 months rising to 548 (2.1%) cases over the first 6 months compared with 575 (0.5%) in 10,7706 men without unexpected weight loss in the first 3 months rising to 1215 (1.1%) by 6 months. In women, 282 cancers (0.8%) were diagnosed in 36,057 women with unexpected weight loss in the first 3 months rising to 360 (1.0%) over 6 months compared with 630 (0.4%) in 145,203 women without unexpected weight loss over 3 months rising to 1305 (0.9%) over 6 months.
Fig. 4. Predicted hazard ratios by age…
Fig. 4. Predicted hazard ratios by age and gender.
Population level predictions of the hazard ratio for cancer in the next three months for people with unexpected weight loss by age and gender using marginal effects at representative values.
Fig. 5. Risk of cancer by site…
Fig. 5. Risk of cancer by site and stage.
Adjusted hazard ratios for cancer in people with unexpected weight loss in men (5a) and women (5b) in the 6 months following presentation derived using cox regression adjusted for all covariates.
Fig. 6. Risk of cancer over time…
Fig. 6. Risk of cancer over time by cancer stage.
Univariate smoothed hazard rate and cumulative hazard by cancer stage in patients with and without unexpected weight loss. In men, 54 cancers (0.2%) were diagnosed with late-stage cancer in 25,551 men with unexpected weight loss in the first 3 months rising to 66 (0.3%) cases over the first 6 months compared with 46 (0.04%) of 10,7706 men without unexpected weight loss in the first 3 months rising to 88 (0.08%) by 6 months. In women, 37 late-stage cancers (0.1%) were diagnosed in 36,057 women with unexpected weight loss in the first 3 months rising to 52 (0.1%) over 6 months compared with 38 (0.02%) in 145,203 women without unexpected weight loss over 3 months rising to 75 (0.05%) over 6 months.

References

    1. Rubin G, Berendsen A, Crawford SM, Dommett R, Earle C, Emery J, et al. The expanding role of primary care in cancer control. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1231–1272.
    1. Hamilton W, Walter FM, Rubin G, Neal RD. Improving early diagnosis of symptomatic cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2016;13:740–749.
    1. NICE. Suspected cancer: recognition and referral (NG12). (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2015)
    1. Din NU, Ukoumunne OC, Rubin G, Hamilton W, Carter B, Stapley S, et al. Age and gender variations in cancer diagnostic intervals in 15 cancers: analysis of data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0127717.
    1. Neal RD, Din NU, Hamilton W, Ukoumunne OC, Carter B, Stapley S, et al. Comparison of cancer diagnostic intervals before and after implementation of NICE guidelines: analysis of data from the UK General Practice Research Database. Br. J. Cancer. 2014;110:584–592.
    1. Koo MM, Hamilton W, Walter FM, Rubin GP, Lyratzopoulos G. Symptom signatures and diagnostic timeliness in cancer patients: a review of current evidence. Neoplasia. 2018;20:165–174.
    1. Lyratzopoulos G, Neal RD, Barbiere JM, Rubin GP, Abel GA. Variation in number of general practitioner consultations before hospital referral for cancer: findings from the 2010 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in England. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:353–365.
    1. Zhou Y, Abel GA, Hamilton W, Pritchard-Jones K, Gross CP, Walter FM, et al. Diagnosis of cancer as an emergency: a critical review of current evidence. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2017;14:45–56.
    1. Zhou Y, Mendonca SC, Abel GA, Hamilton W, Walter FM, Johnson S, et al. Variation in ‘fast-track’ referrals for suspected cancer by patient characteristic and cancer diagnosis: evidence from 670 000 patients with cancers of 35 different sites. Br. J. Cancer. 2018;118:24–31.
    1. Walter FM, Mills K, Mendonça SC, Abel GA, Basu B, Carroll N, et al. Symptoms and patient factors associated with diagnostic intervals for pancreatic cancer (SYMPTOM pancreatic study): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016;1:298–306.
    1. Forster AS, Renzi C, Lyratzopoulos G. Diagnosing cancer in patients with ‘non-alarm’ symptoms: learning from diagnostic care innovations in Denmark. Cancer Epidemiol. 2018;54:101–103.
    1. Vedsted P, Olesen F. A differentiated approach to referrals from general practice to support early cancer diagnosis - the Danish three-legged strategy. Br. J. Cancer. 2015;112(Suppl 1):S65–S69.
    1. Nicholson BD, Oke J, Friedemann Smith C, Phillips JA, Lee J, Abel L, et al. The Suspected CANcer (SCAN) pathway: protocol for evaluating a new standard of care for patients with non-specific symptoms of cancer. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e018168.
    1. ACE Programme. Multidisciplinary Diagnostic Centre (MDC) based pathways for patients with non-specific but concerning symptoms. Interim report. (Cancer Research UK, Macmillan Cancer Support, NHS England, London, 2018)
    1. Nicholson BD, Hamilton W, O’Sullivan J, Aveyard P, Hobbs FR. Weight loss as a predictor of cancer in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Gen. Pr. 2018;68:e311–e322.
    1. Lyratzopoulos G. Electronic patient records research to aid diagnostic reasoning for possible cancer in primary care. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2018;68:408–409.
    1. Herrett E, Gallagher AM, Bhaskaran K, Forbes H, Mathur R, van Staa T, et al. Data resource profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Int. J. Epidemiol. 2015;44:827–836.
    1. Nicholson BD, Aveyard P, Hobbs FDR, Smith M, Fuller A, Perera R, et al. Weight loss as a predictor of cancer and serious disease in primary care: an ISAC-approved CPRD protocol for a retrospective cohort study using routinely collected primary care data from the UK. Diagn. Progn. Res. 2018;2:1.
    1. Nicholson BD, Aveyard P, Hamilton W, Bankhead CR, Koshiaris C, Stevens S, et al. The internal validation of weight and weight change coding using weight measurement data within the UK primary care Electronic Health Record. Clin. Epidemiol. 2019;11:145–155.
    1. Nicholson BD, Aveyard P, Bankhead CR, Hamilton W, Hobbs FD, Lay-Flurrie S. Determinants and extent of weight recording in UK prima.ry care: an analysis of 5 million adult’s electronic health records from 2000 to 2017. BMC Med. 2019;17:222.
    1. Weller D, Vedsted P, Rubin G, Walter FM, Emery J, Scott S, et al. The Aarhus statement: improving design and reporting of studies on early cancer diagnosis. Br. J. Cancer. 2012;106:1262–1267.
    1. Kleinbaum D. G., Klein M. Survival Analysis: A Self-Learning Text. (New York Springer, 2012)
    1. Royston, P. & Lambert, P. C. Flexible Parametric Survival Analysis Using Stata: Beyond the Cox Model 1st edn. (Stata Press, Texas, 2011) .
    1. Sjolander A, Greenland S. Ignoring the matching variables in cohort studies - when is it valid and why? Stat. Med. 2013;32:4696–4708.
    1. Williams R. Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. Stata J. 2012;12:308–331.
    1. Mitchell M. N. Interpreting and Visualizing Regression Models Using Stata. (Stata Press, 2012)
    1. Petersen I, Welch CA, Nazareth I, Walters K, Marston L, Morris RW, et al. Health indicator recording in UK primary care electronic health records: key implications for handling missing data. Clin. Epidemiol. 2019;11:157–167.
    1. McLaughlin JC, Hamilton K, Kipping R. Epidemiology of adult overweight recording and management by UK GPs: a systematic review. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2017;67:e676–e683.
    1. Usher-Smith JA, Sharp SJ, Griffin SJ. The spectrum effect in tests for risk prediction, screening, and diagnosis. BMJ. 2016;353:i3139.
    1. Hamilton W. The CAPER studies: five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying the risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patients. Br. J. Cancer. 2009;101(Suppl. 2):S80–S86.
    1. Stapley S, Peters TJ, Neal RD, Rose PW, Walter FM, Hamilton W. The risk of pancreatic cancer in symptomatic patients in primary care: a large case–control study using electronic records. Br. J. Cancer. 2012;106:1940.
    1. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C. Symptoms and risk factors to identify women with suspected cancer in primary care: derivation and validation of an algorithm. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2013;63:e11–e21.
    1. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C. Symptoms and risk factors to identify men with suspected cancer in primary care: derivation and validation of an algorithm. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2013;63:e1–e10.
    1. Wong CJ. Involuntary weight loss. Med. Clin. North Am. 2014;98:625–643.
    1. Ewing M, Naredi P, Zhang C, Mansson J. Identification of patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer in primary care: a case-control study. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2016;66:e880–e886.
    1. Shephard EA, Neal RD, Rose PW, Walter FM, Hamilton W. Symptoms of adult chronic and acute leukaemia before diagnosis: large primary care case-control studies using electronic records. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2016;66:e182–e188.
    1. Koo MM, Swann R, McPhail S, Abel GA, Elliss-Brookes L, Rubin GP, et al. Presenting symptoms of cancer and stage at diagnosis: evidence from a cross-sectional, population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:73–79.
    1. Lim AWW, Mesher D, Gentry-Maharaj A, Balogun N, Jacobs I, Menon U, et al. Predictive value of symptoms for ovarian cancer: comparison of symptoms reported by questionnaire, interview, and general practitioner notes. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:114–124.
    1. Walker S, Hyde C, Hamilton W. Risk of breast cancer in symptomatic women in primary care: a case-control study using electronic records. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2014;64:e788–e793.
    1. Hamilton W, Sharp DJ, Peters TJ, Round AP. Clinical features of prostate cancer before diagnosis: a population-based, case-control study. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2006;56:756–762.
    1. Koshiaris C, Van den Bruel A, Oke JL, Nicholson BD, Shephard E, Braddick M, et al. Early detection of multiple myeloma in primary care using blood tests: a case-control study in primary care. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2018;68:e586–e593.
    1. Nielsen N, Vedsted P, Jensen H. Risk of cancer and repeated urgent referral after negative investigation for cancer. Fam. Pract. 2018;35:582–588.
    1. Nicholson BD, Perera R, Thompson MJ. The elusive diagnosis of cancer: testing times. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2018;68:510–511.
    1. ACE Programme. Key messages from the evaluation of Multidisciplinary Diagnostic Centres (MDC): a new approach to the diagnosis of cancer. (Cancer Research UK, London, 2019)
    1. Nicholson BD, Aveyard P, Hamilton W, Hobbs FDR. When should unexpected weight loss warrant further investigation to exclude cancer? BMJ. 2019;366:l5271.
    1. Bhatia RS, Levinson W, Shortt S, Pendrith C, Fric-Shamji E, Kallewaard M, et al. Measuring the effect of Choosing Wisely: an integrated framework to assess campaign impact on low-value care. BMJ Qual. Saf. 2015;24:523–531.
    1. Lyu H, Xu T, Brotman D, Mayer-Blackwell B, Cooper M, Daniel M, et al. Overtreatment in the United States. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0181970.
    1. Shenbagaraj L, Thomas-Gibson S, Stebbing J, Broughton R, Dron M, Johnston D, et al. Endoscopy in 2017: a national survey of practice in the UK. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019;10:7–15.
    1. Vulliamy P, McCluney S, Raouf S, Banerjee S. Trends in urgent referrals for suspected colorectal cancer: an increase in quantity, but not in quality. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2016;98:564–567.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다