Training of radiology specialists in local staging of primary rectal cancer on MRI: a prospective intervention study exploring the impact of various educational elements on the interpretive performance

Sidse Bregendahl, Peter Bondeven, Therese Koops Grønborg, Gina Brown, Søren Laurberg, Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen, Sidse Bregendahl, Peter Bondeven, Therese Koops Grønborg, Gina Brown, Søren Laurberg, Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen

Abstract

Background: MRI interpretation and accurate radiological staging are crucial to the important treatment decisions and a consequent successful patient outcome in rectal cancer.

Aims: To investigate the effect of intensive training on rectal cancer MRI staging performance of radiologists and the impact of different course elements on learning outcomes.

Methods: In this prospective intervention study, 17 radiology specialists and 1 radiology registrar participated in a training programme including a 6-hour imaging workshop, a 3-hour session of individual feedback and independent MRI readings of primary rectal cancer cases. Their rectal MRI interpretive performance was evaluated through repeated readings of 30 training cases before and after each course element and a time interval with no educational intervention. A proforma template for MRI staging of primary rectal cancer was used and the results were compared with a reference standard of an expert panel. Participants repeatedly reported on confidence scores and self-assessed learning outcome. Outcomes were analysed using mixed-effects models.

Results: At baseline the quality of rectal MRI assessment varied significantly, with a higher interpretive performance among participants with shorter radiological experience (10.2 years vs 19.9 years, p=0.02). The ability to perform correct treatment allocation improved from 72% to 82% (adjusted OR=2.36, 95% CI 1.64 to 3.39). The improvement was largely driven by the participants with lower performance at baseline and by prevention of overstaging. Individual feedback had a significant impact on the improved interpretive performance (adjusted OR=1.82, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.63), whereas no significant change was seen after workshop or case readings only. Confidence scores increased significantly during training.

Conclusions: Targeted and individualised training improves the rectal cancer MRI interpretive performance essential to successful patient treatment, especially among radiology specialists with lower performance at baseline.

Keywords: Continuing education, continuing professional development; Health professions education; Healthcare quality improvement; Quality improvement.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of training programme.

References

    1. MERCURY Study Group . Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study. BMJ 2006;333:779. 10.1136/bmj.38937.646400.55
    1. MERCURY Study Group . Extramural depth of tumor invasion at thin-section MR in patients with rectal cancer: results of the mercury study. Radiology 2007;243:132–9. 10.1148/radiol.2431051825
    1. Bregendahl S, Emmertsen KJ, Lous J, et al. . Bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection with and without neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study. Colorectal Dis 2013;15:n/a–9. 10.1111/codi.12244
    1. Chen TY-T, Wiltink LM, Nout RA, et al. . Bowel function 14 years after preoperative short-course radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2015;14:106–14. 10.1016/j.clcc.2014.12.007
    1. Bregendahl S, Emmertsen KJ, Lindegaard JC, et al. . Urinary and sexual dysfunction in women after resection with and without preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study. Colorectal Dis 2015;17:26–37. 10.1111/codi.12758
    1. Lange MM, van de Velde CJH. Urinary and sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment. Nat Rev Urol 2011;8:51–7. 10.1038/nrurol.2010.206
    1. Marijnen CAM, van de Velde CJH, Putter H, et al. . Impact of short-term preoperative radiotherapy on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1847–58. 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.256
    1. Jørgensen JB, Bondeven P, Iversen LH, et al. . Pelvic insufficiency fractures frequently occur following preoperative chemo-radiotherapy for rectal cancer - a nationwide MRI study. Colorectal Dis 2018;20:873–80. 10.1111/codi.14224
    1. Pedersen BG, Blomqvist L, Brown G, et al. . Postgraduate multidisciplinary development program: impact on the interpretation of pelvic MRI in patients with rectal cancer: a clinical audit in West Denmark. Dis Colon Rectum 2011;54:328–34. 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3182031e83
    1. Danish Colorectal Cancer Group . National guidelines for the diagnosis and the management of colorectal cancer (in Danish). Available: [Accessed 15 Jun 2021].
    1. Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res 2007;77:81–112. 10.3102/003465430298487
    1. Brown G, Daniels IR, Richardson C, et al. . Techniques and trouble-shooting in high spatial resolution thin slice MRI for rectal cancer. Br J Radiol 2005;78:245–51. 10.1259/bjr/33540239
    1. Taylor FGM, Swift RI, Blomqvist L, et al. . A systematic approach to the interpretation of preoperative staging MRI for rectal cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:1827–35. 10.2214/AJR.08.1004
    1. Laghi A, Ferri M, Catalano C, et al. . Local staging of rectal cancer with MRI using a phased array body coil. Abdom Imaging 2002;27:425–31. 10.1007/s00261-001-0123-7
    1. Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, Vliegen RF, et al. . Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery. Lancet 2001;357:497–504. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04040-X
    1. Scheele J, Schmidt SA, Tenzer S, et al. . Overstaging: a challenge in rectal cancer treatment. Visc Med 2018;34:301–6. 10.1159/000488652
    1. Berlin L. Pitfalls of the vague radiology report. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1511–8. 10.2214/ajr.174.6.1741511
    1. Martling AL, Holm T, Rutqvist LE, et al. . Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm colorectal cancer Study Group, Basingstoke bowel cancer research project. Lancet 2000;356:93–6. 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02469-7
    1. Kapiteijn E, Putter H, van de Velde CJH, et al. . Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in the Netherlands. Br J Surg 2002;89:1142–9. 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02196.x
    1. Wibe A, Eriksen MT, Syse A, et al. . Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer--what can be achieved by a national audit? Colorectal Dis 2003;5:471–7. 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00506.x
    1. Bernhoff R, Martling A, Sjövall A, et al. . Improved survival after an educational project on colon cancer management in the county of Stockholm--a population based cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015;41:1479–84. 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.07.019
    1. Munkedal DLE, West NP, Iversen LH, et al. . Implementation of complete mesocolic excision at a university hospital in Denmark: an audit of consecutive, prospectively collected colon cancer specimens. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014;40:1494–501. 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.04.004
    1. Patel A, Rockall A, Guthrie A, et al. . Can the completeness of radiological cancer staging reports be improved using proforma reporting? A prospective multicentre non-blinded interventional study across 21 centres in the UK. BMJ Open 2018;8:e018499. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018499
    1. Rafaelsen SR, Sørensen T, Jakobsen A, et al. . Transrectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of rectal cancer. Effect of experience. Scand J Gastroenterol 2008;43:440–6. 10.1080/00365520701745842
    1. Akin O, Riedl CC, Ishill NM, et al. . Interactive dedicated training curriculum improves accuracy in the interpretation of Mr imaging of prostate cancer. Eur Radiol 2010;20:995–1002. 10.1007/s00330-009-1625-x
    1. Rosenkrantz AB, Ayoola A, Hoffman D, et al. . The learning curve in prostate MRI interpretation: Self-directed learning versus continual reader feedback. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017;208:W92–100. 10.2214/AJR.16.16876
    1. Leeuwenburgh MMN, Wiarda BM, Bipat S, et al. . Acute appendicitis on abdominal MR images: training readers to improve diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 2012;264:455–63. 10.1148/radiol.12111896
    1. Nordgren Rogberg A, Nyrén S, Westerlund E, et al. . How to train radiology residents to diagnose pulmonary embolism using a dedicated MRI protocol. Acta Radiol Open 2017;6:205846011773424. 10.1177/2058460117734244
    1. Tielbeek JAW, Bipat S, Boellaard TN, et al. . Training readers to improve their accuracy in grading Crohn's disease activity on MRI. Eur Radiol 2014;24:1059–67. 10.1007/s00330-014-3111-3

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다