Social media usage pattern and its influencing factors among celiac patients and their families

Ahmed Al Sarkhy, Ahmed Al Sarkhy

Abstract

Background/aim: The aim of this study was to investigate social media usage patterns among celiac patients and explore the potential factors that may influence the frequency of its usage.

Patients and methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted, in which an online questionnaire was sent to celiac patients registered in the Saudi celiac patients' support group through email and its related social media accounts. Eligible participants included all patients with biopsy-confirmed celiac disease or their parents.

Results: In total, 221 participants completed the survey. The majority (96%, n = 212/221) reported using social media networks for their disease management. We included only those participants in the analysis. The median age was 36 years (range; 18-60 years). The majority of respondents (59.4%) were female. Most participants (65.6%) were patients with celiac disease and 34.4% were parents of celiac patients. The median duration of the disease was three years (range; 1 month-26 years). The three most frequently visited social media platforms were WhatsApp by 175 (82.5%) participants, Instagram by 132 (62.3%), and Twitter by 124 (58.5%) participants. The median time spent on social media was 60 min per day (range; 10-720 min). Multivariate logistic regression showed that celiac disease patients used social media two times more than the parents of celiac patients (OR 2.37, 95% CI: 1.19 - 4.72; P = 0.014).

Conclusions: Celiac patients are highly involved in social media activities for purposes related to their disease. We encourage healthcare providers to be available online to provide trustable and high-quality educational materials.

Keywords: Celiac disease; gluten-free diet; social media.

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Social Media Platforms. Participants were allowed to choose more than one option
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reasons for Social Media Usage

References

    1. Al-Hussaini A, Alharthi H, Osman A, Eltayeb-Elsheikh N, Chentoufi A. Genetic susceptibility for celiac disease is highly prevalent in the Saudi population. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2018;24:268–73.
    1. Reich J, Guo L, Groshek J, Weinberg J, Chen W, Martin C, et al. Social media use and preferences in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019;25:587–91.
    1. Baptist AP, Thompson M, Grossman KS, Mohammed L, Sy A, Sanders GM. Social media, text messaging, and email-preferences of asthma patients between 12 and 40 years old. J Asthma. 2011;48:824–30.
    1. Shaffer-Hudkins E, Johnson N, Melton S, Wingert A. Social media use among individuals with diabetes. Int J Commun Health. 2014;4:38–43.
    1. Hamm MP, Shulhan J, Williams G, Milne A, Scott SD, Hartling L. A systematic review of the use and effectiveness of social media in child health. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:138.
    1. Park K, Harris M, Khavari N, Khosla C. Rationale for using social media to collect patient-reported outcomes in patients with celiac disease. J Gastrointest Dig Syst. 2014;4:pii: 166.
    1. Fisher J, Clayton M. Who gives a tweet: Assessing patients' interest in the use of social media for health care. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2012;9:100–8.
    1. Chretien KC, Kind T. Social media and clinical care: Ethical, professional, and social implications. Circulation. 2013;127:1413–21.
    1. Sainsbury K, Mullan B, Sharpe L. A randomized controlled trial of an online intervention to improve gluten-free diet adherence in celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:811–7.
    1. Haas K, Martin A, Park KT. Text message intervention (TEACH) improves quality of life and patient activation in celiac disease: A randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr. 2017;185:62–7.e2.
    1. McNally SL, Donohue MC, Newton KP, Ogletree SP, Conner KK, Ingegneri SE, et al. Can consumers trust web-based information about celiac disease? Accuracy, comprehensiveness, transparency, and readability of information on the Internet. Interact J Med Res. 2012;1:e1.
    1. Nadasan V, Moldovan O. The completeness and accuracy of information about coeliac disease on Romanian websites. J Appl Quant Meth. 2016;11:70–6.
    1. Bosslet GT, Torke AM, Hickman SE, Terry CL, Helft PR. The patient-doctor relationship and online social networks: Results of a national survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:1168–74.
    1. Al Nofaie ND, Al Ahmadi JR, Saadah OI. Health related quality of life among Saudi children and adolescents with celiac disease. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2019 DOI: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_74_19.
    1. Lee AR, Wolf R, Contento I, Verdeli H, Green PH. Coeliac disease: The association between quality of life and social support network participation. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2016;29:383–90.

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다