Effect of intravenous lidocaine on the ED50 of propofol for inserting gastroscope without body movement in adult patients: a randomized, controlled study

Xiu-Ru Qi, Jing-Yi Sun, Li-Xin An, Ke Zhang, Xiu-Ru Qi, Jing-Yi Sun, Li-Xin An, Ke Zhang

Abstract

Background: Circulatory and respiratory depression are common problems that occur in propofol alone sedation during gastroscopy. As a widely used analgesic adjuvant, intravenous lidocaine can reduce the consumption of propofol during Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or colonoscopy. However, it is still unknown the median effective dose (ED50) of propofol when combined with lidocaine intravenously. This study aimed to compare the ED50 of propofol with or without intravenous lidocaine for inserting gastrointestinal endoscope successfully.

Methods: Fifty nine patients undergoing gastroscopy or gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy were randomly divided into control group (Group C, normal saline + propofol) or lidocaine group (Group L, lidocaine + propofol). Patients were initially injected a bolus of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine in Group L, whereas equivalent volume of 0.9% saline in Group C. Anaesthesia was then induced with a single bolus of propofol in all subjects. The induction dose of propofol was determined by the modified Dixon's up-and-down method, and the initial dose was 1.5 mg/kg in both groups. The primary outcome was the ED50 of propofol induction dose with or without intravenous lidocaine. The secondary outcomes were the induction time, the first propofol bolus time (FPBT: from MOAA/S score ≤ 1 to first rescue bolus propofol), and adverse events (AEs: hypoxemia, bradycardia, hypotension, and body movements).

Results: Totally, 59 patients were enrolled and completed this study. The ED50 of propofol combined with lidocaine was 1.68 ± 0.11 mg/kg, significantly reduced compared with the normal saline group, 1.88 ± 0.13 mg/kg (P = 0.002). There was no statistical difference in induction time (P = 0.115) and the FPBT (P = 0.655) between the two groups. There was no significantly difference about the AEs between the two groups.

Conclusion: The ED50 of propofol combined with intravenous lidocaine for successful endoscope insertion in adult patients, was 1.68 ± 0.11 mg/kg significantly reduced compared with the control group.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, No: ChiCTR2200059450. Registered on 29 April 2022. Prospective registration. http://www.chictr.org.cn .

Keywords: ED50; Gastroscope; Lidocaine; Propofol.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of allocation of patients
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Response of patients with the modifiled Dixon’s up-and-down method in Group L. Responses of 30 consecutive patients in Group L to endoscope insertion and their initial doses of propofol are shown. Arrow indicates the midpoint dose of all independent pairs of patients who manifested crossover from ‘movement’ (○) to ‘no movement’ (●) responses
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Response of patients with the modifiled Dixon’s up-and-down method in Group C. Responses of 29 consecutive patients in Group C to endoscope insertion and their initial doses of propofol are shown. Arrow indicates the midpoint dose of all independent pairs of patients who manifested crossover from ‘movement’ (○) to ‘no movement’ (●) responses
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Dose-response curves of propofol for successful endoscope insertion

References

    1. Zheng HR, Zhang XQ, Li LZ, et al. Multicentre prospective cohort study evaluating gastroscopy without sedation in China. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121(2):508–511. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.027.
    1. Stogiannou D, Protopapas A, Protopapas A, et al. Is propofol the optimal sedative in gastrointestinal endoscopy? Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2018;81(4):520–524.
    1. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. Early DS, Lightdale JR, et al. Guidelines for sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(2):327–337. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.018.
    1. Hinkelbein J, Lamperti M, Akeson J, et al. European Society of Anaesthesiology and European Board of Anaesthesiology guidelines for procedural sedation and analgesia in adults. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018;35(1):6–24. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000683.
    1. Li DN, Zhao GQ, Su ZB. Propofol target-controlled infusion in anesthesia induction during painless gastroscopy. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019;29:604–607. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2019.07.604.
    1. Delgado AAA, de Moura DTH, Ribeiro IB, et al. Propofol vs traditional sedatives for sedation in endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;11(12):573–588. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i12.573.
    1. Vaessen HH, Knape JT. Considerable variability of procedural sedation and analgesia practices for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures in Europe. Clin Endosc. 2016;49(1):47–55. doi: 10.5946/ce.2016.49.1.47.
    1. Egan TD. Are opioids indispensable for general Anaesthesia? Br J Anaesth. 2019;122:e127–e135. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.02.018.
    1. van Schaik EPC, Blankman P, et al. Hypoxemia during procedural sedation in adult patients: a retrospective observational study. Can J Anaesth. 2021;68(9):1349–1135. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-01992-6.
    1. Dossa F, Medeiros B, et al. Propofol versus Mida-zolam with or without short-acting opioids for sedation in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety, satisfaction, and efficiency outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91(5):1015–1026. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.12.047.
    1. Krystal J, Karper LP, et al. Subanesthetic effects of the noncompetitive NMDA antagonist, ketamine, in humans. Psychotomimetic, perceptual, cognitive, and neuroendocrine responses. Arch Gen Psychatrie. 1994;51:199–214. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950030035004.
    1. Edokpolo LU, Mastriano DJ, et al. Discharge readiness after Propofol with or without Dexmedetomidine for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2019;131:279–286. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002809.
    1. Amri P, Nahrini S, Hajian-Tilaki K, et al. Analgesic effect and Hemody- namic changes due to Dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl during elective colonoscopy: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2018;8(6):e81077.
    1. Dunn LK, Duriex ME. Perioperative use of intravenous lidocaine. Anesthesiology. 2017;126:729–737. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001527.
    1. Forster C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Gast P, et al. Intravenous infusion of lidocaine significantly reduces propofol dose for colonoscopy: a randomised placebo-controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121(5):1059–1064. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.019.
    1. Gecaj-Gashi A, Nikolova-Todorova Z, Ismaili-Jaha V, Gashi M. Intravenous lidocaine suppresses fentanyl-induced cough in children. Cough. 2013;9:20. doi: 10.1186/1745-9974-9-20.
    1. Liu H, Chen M, Lian C, et al. Effect of intravenous administration of lidocaine on the ED50 of propofol induction dose during gastroscopy in adult patients: a randomized, controlled study. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021;46(3):711–716. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13335.
    1. Liu FK, Wan L, Shao LJZ, et al. Estimation of effective dose of propofol mono-sedation for successful insertion of upper gastrointestinal endoscope in healthy, non-obese Chinese adults. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021;46(2):484–491. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13312.
    1. Weibel S, Jelting Y, Pace NL, et al. Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;(6):CD009642.
    1. Chang YC, Liu CL, Liu TP, et al. Effect of perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on acute and chronic pain after breast surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain Practice. 2017;17:336–343. doi: 10.1111/papr.12442.
    1. Ventham NT, Kennedy ED, Brady RR, et al. Efficacy of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2015;39:2220–2234. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3105-6.
    1. Kranke P, Jokinen J, Pace NL, et al. Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(7):CD009642.
    1. Beaussier M, Delbos A, Maurice-Szamburski A, et al. Perioperative use of intravenous Lidocaine. Drugs. 2018;78(12):1229–1246. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0955-x.
    1. Biella G, Sotgiu ML. Central effects of systemic lidocaine mediated by glycine spinal receptors: an iontophoretic study in the rat spinal cord. Brain Res. 1993;603:201–206. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(93)91238-N.
    1. Foo I, Macfarlane AJR, Srivastava D, et al. The use of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative pain and recovery: international consensus statement on efficacy and safety. Anaesthesia. 2021;76(2):238–250. doi: 10.1111/anae.15270.
    1. Meaney ED, Reid L, Srivastava D. A survey on the use of intravenous lidocaine infusion for acute pain in Scottish hospitals. Br J Pain. 2020;2:98–103. doi: 10.1177/2049463719873021.
    1. Liu J, Liu X, Peng LP, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine in propofol-based sedation for ERCP procedures: a prospective, randomized, double -blinded, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;92(2):293–300. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.02.050.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다