Results of an open-label phase 1b study of the ERK inhibitor MK-8353 plus the MEK inhibitor selumetinib in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors

Anastasios Stathis, Anthony W Tolcher, Judy S Wang, Daniel J Renouf, Lin-Chi Chen, Leah H Suttner, Tomoko Freshwater, Andrea L Webber, Tapan Nayak, Lillian L Siu, Anastasios Stathis, Anthony W Tolcher, Judy S Wang, Daniel J Renouf, Lin-Chi Chen, Leah H Suttner, Tomoko Freshwater, Andrea L Webber, Tapan Nayak, Lillian L Siu

Abstract

Aim: We evaluated MK-8353 (small molecule inhibitor of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2) plus selumetinib (mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 inhibitor) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods: This phase 1b, open-label, dose-escalation study (NCT03745989) enrolled adults with histologically/cytologically documented, locally advanced/metastatic solid tumors. MK-8353/selumetinib dose combinations were intended to be investigated in sequence: 50/25, 100/50, 150/75, 200/75, 200/100, and 250/100. Each agent was administered orally BID 4 days on/3 days off in repeating cycles every 21 days. Primary objectives were safety and tolerability and to establish preliminary recommended phase 2 doses for combination therapy.

Results: Thirty patients were enrolled. Median (range) age was 61.5 (26-78) years and 93% had received previous cancer therapy. Among 28 patients in the dose-limiting toxicities [DLT]-evaluable population, 8 experienced DLTs: 1/11 (9%) in the MK-8353/selumetinib 100/50-mg dose level experienced a grade 3 DLT (urticaria), and 7/14 (50%) in the 150/75-mg dose level experienced grade 2/3 DLTs (n = 2 each of blurred vision, retinal detachment, vomiting; n = 1 each of diarrhea, macular edema, nausea, retinopathy). The DLT rate in the latter dose level exceeded the prespecified target DLT rate (~30%). Twenty-six patients (87%) experienced treatment-related adverse events (grade 3, 30%; no grade 4/5), most commonly diarrhea (67%), nausea (37%), and acneiform dermatitis (33%). Three patients (10%) experienced treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. Best response was stable disease in 14 patients (n = 10 with MK-8353/selumetinib 150/75 mg).

Conclusion: MK-8353/selumetinib 50/25 mg and 100/50 mg had acceptable safety and tolerability, whereas 150/75 mg was not tolerable. No responses were observed.

Keywords: ERK inhibitor; MEK inhibitor; MK-8353; Selumetinib; Solid tumors; Tolerability.

Conflict of interest statement

Anastasios Stathis: Consultancy services (institution) to Bayer, Eli Lilly; Advisory (institution): Roche, Janssen; institutional research funding: MSD, AstraZeneca, Roche, AbbVie, Pfizer, Bayer, Novartis, ADC Therapeutics, MEI Therapeutics, Loxo Oncology, Philogen.

Anthony W. Tolcher: ABBVIE, Inc, Aclaris Therapeutics, AGENUS, Inc., ASANA BIOSCIENCES, ASCENTAGE, Axlmmune, Bayer, Blu Print Oncology, Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., GILDE HEALTHCARE PARTNERS, HBM PARTNERS, IDEA Pharma, Immuneering, Immunomet Therapeutics, Inc., Impact Therapeutics US, Inc., Karma Oncology B.V., Kirilys Therapeutics, Inc., Lengo Therapeutics, Inc., Link Immunotherapeutics, Mekanistic Therapeutics, Menarini Ricerche, Mersana, NANOBIOTIX, NervianoMedical Sciences S.r.I. (NMS), Nurix Therapeutics, Ocellaris Pharma, Inc. & Eli Lilly, Partner Therapeutics, Pfizer Inc., Qualigen Therapeutics, PIERRE FABRE, Roche, RYVU THERAPEUTICS, Seattle Genetics, SK Life Science, SOTIO Biotechnology Co., Spirea Limited Inc., Sunshine Guojian Pharmaceutical (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, Transcenta Therapeutics Inc., Trillium Therapeutics Inc., Verastem Oncology, VRISE Therapeutics, Inc., Zentails, ADAGENE, Inc., ARO BIOTHERAPEUTICS, BIOINVENT, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Deka Biosciences, Eleven Bio, ELUCIDA, EMD SERONO/ MERCK KGaA, Hiber Cell, Inc., Ikena Oncology, IMMUNOME, Janssen Global Services, LLC, NBE THERAPEUTICS, Pelican, JAZZ, Pieris Pharma, PYXIS Oncology, Senti Biosciences, Vincerx, ZielBio, Inc., Zymeworks Biopharmaceuticals Inc., MIRATI, Roche.

Judy S.Wang: Consultant fees from BioNTech, Stemline/Menarini, Janssen, Kanaph. Speakers’ Bureau fees from AstraZeneca and Eisai. Research Funding paid to institution only from: Takeda, Medimmune, Genentech, AstraZeneca, El Lilly, Lycera, Pfizer, Checkpoint, Agenus, Jacobio, Evelo, Merck, Jounce, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Vedanta, H3 Biomedicine, BioNTech, Phoenix Molecular Designs, Bicycle, Qilu Puget Sound, Xencor, Sanofi, Klus, Treadwell, IGM, PureTech, Erasca, Bayer, BioTheryX, Biosplice, NGM, Cullinan, Astellas, BeiGene, Pinoyr, Taiho, Mirati, Hutchinson MediPharma, Stemline, GSK, TopAlliance, Revolution, Relay, StingThera.

Daniel J. Renouf: Consultancy services: Bayer, Roche, Elevation; Research funding: Roche.

Lin-Chi Chen, Tomoko Freshwater, Andrea L. Webber, Tapan Nayak: Employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA and stockholders in Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.

Leah H. Suttner: Employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.

Lillian L. Siu: Advisory Role/Consultation (self): Amgen, Arvinas, AstraZeneca, Coherus, Hoopika, InteRNA, Janpix, Marengo, Medicenna, Navire, Oncorus, Relay, Roche, Seattle Genetics, Tessa, Voronoi. Research Support (institution): Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, EMD Serono/Merck KGaA, GlaxoSmithKline, Intensity Therapeutics, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Shattucks, Symphogen. Leadership Role (spouse): Treadwell Therapeutics.

© 2023. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(a) Arithmetic mean plasma concentration versus time curves for MK-8353 following oral administration of the combination, (b) arithmetic mean plasma concentration versus time curves for selumetinib following oral administration of the combination, (c) arithmetic mean plasma concentration versus time curves for desmethyl selumetinib following oral administration of the combination, and (d) 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) results in patients treated at a cycle 1, day 1 dose of MK-8353 100 mg + selumetinib 50 mg, MK-8353 150 mg + selumetinib 75 mg, and in patients where the dose reduction occurred before cycle 2, day 4 PET scans. CFB, change from baseline; SD, standard deviation; SUV, standardized uptake value

References

    1. Koselugo (selumetinib) (2021) Full Prescribing Information, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Wilmington, DE,
    1. Dombi E, Baldwin A, Marcus LJ, Fisher MJ, Weiss B, Kim A, Whitcomb P, Martin S, Aschbacher-Smith LE, et al. Activity of selumetinib in neurofibromatosis type 1-related plexiform neurofibromas. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2550–2560. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1605943.
    1. Gross AM, Wolters PL, Dombi E, Baldwin A, Whitcomb P, Fisher MJ, Weiss B, Kim A, Bornhorst M, et al. Selumetinib in children with inoperable plexiform neurofibromas. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1430–1442. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1912735.
    1. Kun E, Tsang YTM, Ng CW, Gershenson DM, Wong KK. MEK inhibitor resistance mechanisms and recent developments in combination trials. Cancer Treat Rev. 2021;92:102137. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102137.
    1. Ciombor KK, Bekaii-Saab T. Selumetinib for the treatment of cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2015;24:111–123. doi: 10.1517/13543784.2015.982275.
    1. Guo YJ, Pan WW, Liu SB, Shen ZF, Xu Y, Hu LL. ERK/MAPK signalling pathway and tumorigenesis. Exp Ther Med. 2020;19:1997–2007. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8454.
    1. Moschos SJ, Sullivan RJ, Hwu WJ, Ramanathan RK, Adjei AA, Fong PC, Shapira-Frommer R, Tawbi HA, Rubino J, et al. Development of MK-8353, an orally administered ERK1/2 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. JCI Insight. 2018;3:e92352. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.92352.
    1. Boga SB, Deng Y, Zhu L, Nan Y, Cooper AB, Shipps GW, Jr, Doll R, Shih NY, Zhu H, et al. MK-8353: discovery of an orally bioavailable dual mechanism ERK inhibitor for oncology. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2018;9:761–767. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.8b00220.
    1. Jaiswal BS, Durinck S, Stawiski EW, Yin J, Wang W, Lin E, Moffat J, Martin SE, Modrusan Z, et al. ERK mutations and amplification confer resistance to ERK-inhibitor therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:4044–4055. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3674.
    1. Decaudin D, El Botty R, Diallo B, Massonnet G, Fleury J, Naguez A, Raymondie C, Davies E, Smith A, et al. Selumetinib-based therapy in uveal melanoma patient-derived xenografts. Oncotarget. 2018;9:21674–21686. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24670.
    1. Flemington V, Davies EJ, Robinson D, Sandin LC, Delpuech O, Zhang P, Hanson L, Farrington P, Bell S, et al. AZD0364 is a potent and selective ERK1/2 inhibitor that enhances antitumor activity in KRAS-mutant tumor models when combined with the MEK inhibitor, selumetinib. Mol Cancer Ther. 2021;20:238–249. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-20-0002.
    1. Ji Y, Li Y, Nebiyou Bekele B. Dose-finding in phase I clinical trials based on toxicity probability intervals. Clin Trials. 2007;4:235–244. doi: 10.1177/1740774507079442.
    1. Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA (2009) From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med 50(1):122S-150S. 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307.
    1. National Institutes of Health. US National Library of Medicine (2021) A Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of MK-8353 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors (MK-8353-001). . Accessed November 16, 2021
    1. Stjepanovic N, Velazquez-Martin JP, Bedard PL. Ocular toxicities of MEK inhibitors and other targeted therapies. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:998–1005. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw100.
    1. Mendez-Martinez S, Calvo P, Ruiz-Moreno O, Pardinas Baron N, Lecinena Bueno J, Gil Ruiz MDR, Pablo L. Ocular adverse events associated with MEK inhibitors. Retina. 2019;39:1435–1450. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002451.
    1. Abdel-Rahman O, ElHalawani H, Ahmed H, Ellithy M. Risk of selected gastrointestinal toxicities in cancer patients treated with MEK inhibitors: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;9:1433–1445. doi: 10.1586/17474124.2015.1087847.
    1. Abdel-Rahman O, ElHalawani H, Ahmed H. Risk of selected dermatological toxicities in cancer patients treated with MEK inhibitors: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis. Future Oncol. 2015;11:3307–3319. doi: 10.2217/fon.15.265.
    1. Abdel-Rahman O, ElHalawani H, Ahmed H. Risk of selected cardiovascular toxicities in patients with cancer treated with MEK inhibitors: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Oncol. 2015;1:73–82. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2015.000802.
    1. Banerji U, Camidge DR, Verheul HM, Agarwal R, Sarker D, Kaye SB, Desar IM, Timmer-Bonte JN, Eckhardt SG, et al. The first-in-human study of the hydrogen sulfate (Hyd-sulfate) capsule of the MEK1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886): a phase I open-label multicenter trial in patients with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:1613–1623. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-2483.
    1. Weekes C, Lockhart A, LoRusso P, Murray E, Park E, Tagen M, Singh J, Sarkar I, Mueller L, et al. A phase Ib study to evaluate the MEK inhibitor cobimetinib in combination with the ERK1/2 inhibitor GDC-0994 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Oncologist. 2020;25:833–e1438. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0292.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다