Speed-resolved perfusion imaging using multi-exposure laser speckle contrast imaging and machine learning
Martin Hultman, Marcus Larsson, Tomas Strömberg, Ingemar Fredriksson, Martin Hultman, Marcus Larsson, Tomas Strömberg, Ingemar Fredriksson
Abstract
Significance: Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) gives a relative measure of microcirculatory perfusion. However, due to the limited information in single-exposure LSCI, models are inaccurate for skin tissue due to complex effects from e.g. static and dynamic scatterers, multiple Doppler shifts, and the speed-distribution of blood. It has been demonstrated how to account for these effects in laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) using inverse Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms. This allows for a speed-resolved perfusion measure in absolute units %RBC × mm/s, improving the physiological interpretation of the data. Until now, this has been limited to a single-point LDF technique but recent advances in multi-exposure LSCI (MELSCI) enable the analysis in an imaging modality.
Aim: To present a method for speed-resolved perfusion imaging in absolute units %RBC × mm/s, computed from multi-exposure speckle contrast images.
Approach: An artificial neural network (ANN) was trained on a large simulated dataset of multi-exposure contrast values and corresponding speed-resolved perfusion. The dataset was generated using MC simulations of photon transport in randomized skin models covering a wide range of physiologically relevant geometrical and optical tissue properties. The ANN was evaluated on in vivo data sets captured during an occlusion provocation.
Results: Speed-resolved perfusion was estimated in the three speed intervals 0 to 1 mm / s , 1 to 10 mm / s , and > 10 mm / s , with relative errors 9.8%, 12%, and 19%, respectively. The perfusion had a linear response to changes in both blood tissue fraction and blood flow speed and was less affected by tissue properties compared with single-exposure LSCI. The image quality was subjectively higher compared with LSCI, revealing previously unseen macro- and microvascular structures.
Conclusions: The ANN, trained on modeled data, calculates speed-resolved perfusion in absolute units from multi-exposure speckle contrast. This method facilitates the physiological interpretation of measurements using MELSCI and may increase the clinical impact of the technique.
Keywords: artificial neural networks; blood flow; microcirculation; multi-exposure laser speckle contrast imaging.
© 2023 The Authors.
Figures
References
- Boas D. A., Dunn A. K., “Laser speckle contrast imaging in biomedical optics,” J. Biomed. Opt. 15(1), 011109 (2010).JBOPFO10.1117/1.3285504
- Fredriksson I., et al. , “Machine learning in multiexposure laser speckle contrast imaging can replace conventional laser Doppler flowmetry,” J. Biomed. Opt. 24(1), 016001 (2019).JBOPFO10.1117/1.JBO.24.1.016001
- Tew G. A., et al. , “Comparison of laser speckle contrast imaging with laser Doppler for assessing microvascular function,” Microvasc. Res. 82(3), 326–332 (2011).MIVRA610.1016/j.mvr.2011.07.007
- Humeau-Heurtier A., et al. , “Skin perfusion evaluation between laser speckle contrast imaging and laser Doppler flowmetry,” Opt. Commun. 291, 482–487 (2013).OPCOB810.1016/j.optcom.2012.11.054
- Binzoni T., et al. , “Blood perfusion values of laser speckle contrast imaging and laser Doppler flowmetry: is a direct comparison possible?” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 60(5), 1259–1265 (2013).IEBEAX10.1109/TBME.2012.2232294
- Fredriksson I., Larsson M., “On the equivalence and differences between laser Doppler flowmetry and laser speckle contrast analysis,” J. Biomed. Opt. 21(12), 126018 (2016).JBOPFO10.1117/1.JBO.21.12.126018
- Parthasarathy A. B., et al. , “Robust flow measurement with multi-exposure speckle imaging,” Opt. Express 16(3), 1975–1989 (2008).OPEXFF10.1364/OE.16.001975
- Shams Kazmi S. M., et al. , “Flux or speed? Examining speckle contrast imaging of vascular flows,” Biomed. Opt. Express 6(7), 2588–2608 (2015).BOEICL10.1364/BOE.6.002588
- Julio C. R.-S.-J., Nelson J. S., Bernard C., “Comparison of Lorentzian- and Gaussian-based approaches for laser speckle imaging of blood flow dynamics,” Proc. SPIE 6079, 607924 (2006).PSISDG10.1117/12.646891
- Rajan V., et al. , “Review of methodological developments in laser Doppler flowmetry,” Lasers Med. Sci. 24(2), 269–283 (2009).10.1007/s10103-007-0524-0
- Duncan D., Kirkpatrick S., Gladish J., “What is the proper statistical model for laser speckle flowmetry?” Proc. SPIE 6855, 685502 (2008).PSISDG10.1117/12.760515
- Fredriksson I., Larsson M., Strömberg T., “Model-based quantitative laser Doppler flowmetry in skin,” J. Biomed. Opt. 15(5), 057002 (2010).JBOPFO10.1117/1.3484746
- Fredriksson I., et al. , “Inverse Monte Carlo in a multilayered tissue model: merging diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and laser Doppler flowmetry,” J. Biomed. Opt. 18(12), 127004 (2013).JBOPFO10.1117/1.JBO.18.12.127004
- Jonasson H., et al. , “Validation of speed-resolved laser Doppler perfusion in a multimodal optical system using a blood-flow phantom,” J. Biomed. Opt. 24(9), 095002 (2019).JBOPFO10.1117/1.JBO.24.9.095002
- Fredriksson I., et al. , “Reduced arteriovenous shunting capacity after local heating and redistribution of baseline skin blood flow in type 2 diabetes assessed with velocity-resolved quantitative laser Doppler flowmetry,” Diabetes 59(7), 1578–1584 (2010).DIAEAZ10.2337/db10-0080
- Fredriksson I., Larsson M., Strömberg T., “Machine learning for direct oxygen saturation and hemoglobin concentration assessment using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy,” J. Biomed. Opt. 25(11), 112905 (2020).JBOPFO10.1117/1.JBO.25.11.112905
- Zherebtsov E., et al. , “Hyperspectral imaging of human skin aided by artificial neural networks,” Biomed. Opt. Express 10(7), 3545–3559 (2019).BOEICL10.1364/BOE.10.003545
- Hultman M., et al. , “Real-time video-rate perfusion imaging using multi-exposure laser speckle contrast imaging and machine learning,” J. Biomed. Opt. 25(11), 116007 (2020).JBOPFO10.1117/1.JBO.25.11.116007
- Svaasand L. O., et al. , “Therapeutic response during pulsed laser treatment of port-wine stains: dependence on vessel diameter and depth in dermis,” Lasers Med. Sci. 10(4), 235–243 (1995).LMSCEZ10.1007/BF02133615
- van Veen R. L. P., Verkruysse W., Sterenborg H. J. C. M., “Diffuse-reflectance spectroscopy from 500 to 1060 nm by correction for inhomogeneously distributed absorbers,” Opt. Lett. 27(4), 246–248 (2002).OPLEDP10.1364/OL.27.000246
- Jonasson H., et al. , “In vivo characterization of light scattering properties of human skin in the 475- to 850-nm wavelength range in a Swedish cohort,” J. Biomed. Opt. 23(12), 121608 (2018).JBOPFO10.1117/1.JBO.23.12.121608
- Draijer M., et al. , “Review of laser speckle contrast techniques for visualizing tissue perfusion,” Lasers Med. Sci. 24(4), 639 (2008).LMSCEZ10.1007/s10103-008-0626-3
- Reynolds L. O., McCormick N. J., “Approximate two-parameter phase function for light scattering,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 70(10), 1206–1212 (1980).JOSAAH10.1364/JOSA.70.001206
- Fredriksson I., Larsson M., Strömberg T., “Optical microcirculatory skin model: assessed by Monte Carlo simulations paired with in vivo laser Doppler flowmetry,” J. Biomed. Opt. 13(1), 014015 (2008).JBOPFO10.1117/1.2854691
- Hultman M., Real-Time Multi-Exposure Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging of Skin Microcirculatory Perfusion, Linköping University Electronic Press; (2021).
- Briers D., et al. , “Laser speckle contrast imaging: theoretical and practical limitations,” J. Biomed. Opt. 18(6), 066018 (2013).JBOPFO10.1117/1.JBO.18.6.066018
- Tenland T., et al. , “Spatial and temporal variations in human skin blood flow,” Int. J. Microcir. Clin. Exp. 2(2), 81–90 (1983).IMCEDT
- Caspary L., Creutzig A., Alexander K., “Biological zero in laser Doppler fluxmetry,” Int. J. Microcirc. Clin. Exp. 7(4), 367–371 (1988).IMCEDT
- Dremin V., et al. , “Dynamic evaluation of blood flow microcirculation by combined use of the laser Doppler flowmetry and high-speed videocapillaroscopy methods,” J. Biophotonics 12(6), e201800317 (2019).10.1002/jbio.201800317
- Kernick D. P., Tooke J. E., Shore A. C., “The biological zero signal in laser Doppler fluximetry - origins and practical implications,” Pflugers Arch. 437(4), 624–631 (1999).10.1007/s004240050826
- Jonasson H., et al. , “Normative data and the influence of age and sex on microcirculatory function in a middle-aged cohort: results from the SCAPIS study,” Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 318(4), H908–H915 (2020).10.1152/ajpheart.00668.2019
- Ghijsen M. T., et al. , “Quantitative real-time optical imaging of the tissue metabolic rate of oxygen consumption,” J. Biomed. Opt. 23(3), 036013 (2018).JBOPFO10.1117/1.JBO.23.3.036013
- Hultman M., et al. , “A 15.6 frames per second 1-megapixel multiple exposure laser speckle contrast imaging setup,” J. Biophotonics 11(2), e201700069 (2017).10.1002/jbio.201700069
- Dragojević T., et al. , “High-speed multi-exposure laser speckle contrast imaging with a single-photon counting camera,” Biomed. Opt. Express 6(8), 2865–2876 (2015).BOEICL10.1364/BOE.6.002865
- Cracowski J.-L., Roustit M., “Human skin microcirculation,” Compr. Physiol. 10, 1105–1154 (2020).10.1002/cphy.c190008
- Yuan S., et al. , “Determination of optimal exposure time for imaging of blood flow changes with laser speckle contrast imaging,” Appl. Opt. 44(10), 1823–1830 (2005).APOPAI10.1364/AO.44.001823
- Stefanovska A., Bracic M., Kvernmo H.D., “Wavelet analysis of oscillations in the peripheral blood circulation measured by laser Doppler technique,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 46(10), 1230–1239 (1999).IEBEAX10.1109/10.790500
- Fredriksson I., et al. , “Vasomotion analysis of speed resolved perfusion, oxygen saturation, red blood cell tissue fraction, and vessel diameter: novel microvascular perspectives,” Skin Res. Technol. 28(1), 142–152 (2022).10.1111/srt.13106
- Jonasson H., et al. , “Skin microvascular endothelial dysfunction is associated with type 2 diabetes independently of microalbuminuria and arterial stiffness,” Diabetes Vasc. Dis. Res. 14(4), 363–371 (2017).10.1177/1479164117707706
- Ince C., et al. , “The endothelium in sepsis,” Shock 45(3), 259–270 (2016).10.1097/SHK.0000000000000473
- Goldman D., Bateman R. M., Ellis C. G., “Effect of decreased O2 supply on skeletal muscle oxygenation and O2 consumption during sepsis: role of heterogeneous capillary spacing and blood flow,” Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 290(6), H2277–H2285 (2006).10.1152/ajpheart.00547.2005
Source: PubMed