A Guide to Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Using Stylet-Driven Pacing Leads
Jan De Pooter, Aurelien Wauters, Frederic Van Heuverswyn, Jean-Benoit Le Polain de Waroux, Jan De Pooter, Aurelien Wauters, Frederic Van Heuverswyn, Jean-Benoit Le Polain de Waroux
Abstract
Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a novel pacing modality which aims to capture the left bundle branch area and avoids the detrimental effects of right ventricular pacing. Current approaches for LBBAP have been developed using lumen-less pacing leads (LLL). Expanding the tools and leads for LBBAP might contribute to a wider adoption of this technique. Standard stylet-driven pacing leads (SDL) differ from current LLL as they are characterized by a wider lead body diameter, are stylet-supported and often have a non-isodiametric extendable helix design. Although LBBAP can be performed safely with SDL, the implant technique of LBBAP differs compared to LLL. In the current overview we describe in detail how different types of SDL can be used to target a deep septal position and provide a practical guide on how to achieve LBBAP using SDL.
Keywords: conduction system pacing; left bundle branch area pacing; lumen-less pacing lead; stylet-driven extendable screw lead; stylet-driven pacing leads.
Conflict of interest statement
JD reports speaker fees and honoraria from Medtronic and Biotronik. AW reports speaker and consultancy fees from Biotronik and Boston Scientific. J-BL reports non-significant speaker fees and honoraria for proctoring and teaching activities from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, and Biotronik. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Copyright © 2022 De Pooter, Wauters, Van Heuverswyn and Le polain de Waroux.
Figures
References
- Abdelrahman M, Subzposh FA, Beer D, Durr B, Naperkowski A, Sun H, et al. . Clinical outcomes of his bundle pacing compared to right ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2018) 71:2319–30. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.048
- Mafi-Rad M, Luermans JG, Blaauw Y, Janssen M, Crijns HJ, Prinzen FW, et al. . Feasibility and acute hemodynamic effect of left ventricular septal pacing by transvenous approach through the interventricular septum. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. (2016) 9:e003344. 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003344
- Salden FCWM, Luermans JGLM, Westra SW, Weijs B, Engels EB, Heckman LIB, et al. . Short-term hemodynamic and electrophysiological effects of cardiac resynchronization by left ventricular septal pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2020) 75:347–59. 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.040
- Teigeler T, Kolominsky J, Vo C, Shepard RK, Kalahasty G, Kron J, et al. . Intermediate-term performance and safety of his-bundle pacing leads: a single-center experience. Heart Rhythm. (2021) 18:743–9. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.12.031
- Zanon F, Abdelrahman M, Marcantoni L, Naperkowski A, Subzposh FA, Pastore G, et al. . Long term performance and safety of His bundle pacing: a multicenter experience. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. (2019) 30:1594–601. 10.1111/jce.14063
- Hou X, Qian Z, Wang Y, Qiu Y, Chen X, Jiang H, et al. . Feasibility and cardiac synchrony of permanent left bundle branch pacing through the interventricular septum. Europace. (2019) 21:1694–702. 10.1093/europace/euz188
- Huang W, Su L, Wu S, Xu L, Xiao F, Zhou X, et al. . A novel pacing strategy with low and stable output: pacing the left bundle branch immediately beyond the conduction block. Can J Cardiol. (2017) 33:1736:e1–3. 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.09.013
- Su L, Wang S, Wu S, Xu L, Huang Z, Chen X, et al. . Long-term safety and feasibility of left bundle branch pacing in a large single-center study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. (2021) 14:e009261. 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009261
- Vijayaraman P, Subzposh FA, Naperkowski A, Panikkath R, John K, Mascarenhas V, et al. . Prospective evaluation of feasibility, electrophysiologic and echocardiographic characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing. Heart Rhythm. (2019) 16:1774–82. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.05.011
- Huang W, Chen X, Su L, Wu S, Xia X, Vijayaraman P. A beginner's guide to permanent left bundle branch pacing. Heart Rhythm. (2019) 16:1791–6. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.06.016
- De Pooter J, Calle S, Timmermans F, Van Heuverswyn F. Left bundle branch area pacing using stylet-driven pacing leads with a new delivery sheath: a comparison with lumen-less leads. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. (2021) 32:439–48. 10.1111/jce.14851
- Zanon F, Marcantoni L, Pastore G, Baracca E. Left bundle branch pacing by standard stylet-driven lead: preliminary experience of two case reports. HeartRhythm case reports. (2020) 6:614–7. 10.1016/j.hrcr.2020.06.005
- Deshmukh P, Casavant DA, Romanyshyn M, Anderson K. Permanent, direct His-bundle pacing: a novel approach to cardiac pacing in patients with normal His-Purkinje activation. Circulation. (2000) 101:869–77. 10.1161/01.CIR.101.8.869
- Zanon F, Baracca E, Aggio S, Pastore G, Boaretto G, Cardano P, et al. . A feasible approach for direct his-bundle pacing using a new steerable catheter to facilitate precise lead placement. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. (2006) 17:29–33. 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.00285.x
- Ravi V, El Baba M, Sharma PS. His bundle pacing: tips and tricks. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. (2021) 44:26–34. 10.1111/pace.14108
- Jastrzebski M, Kiełbasa G, Curila K, et al. . Physiology-based electrocardiographic criteria for left bundle branch capture. Heart Rhythm. (2021) 18:935–43. 10.1101/2020.12.24.20248827
- Jastrzebski M, Kiełbasa G, Curila K, Moskal P, Bednarek A, Rajzer M, et al. . Programmed deep septal stimulation: a novel maneuver for the diagnosis of left bundle branch capture during permanent pacing. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. (2020) 31:485–93. 10.1111/jce.14352
- Wu S, Chen X, Wang S, Xu L, Xiao F, Huang Z, et al. . Evaluation of the criteria to distinguish left bundle branch pacing from left ventricular septal pacing. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. (2021) 7:1166–77. 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.02.018
- Jastrzêbski M. ECG and pacing criteria for differentiating conduction system pacing from myocardial pacing. Arrhyth Electrophysiol Rev. (2021) 10:172–80. 10.15420/aer.2021.26
- Gillis K, O'Neill L, Hilfiker G, Wielandts J-Y, Duytschaever M, Knecht S, et al. . Left bundle branch area pacing using the Boston Scientific Ingevity stylet-driven active fixation lead: a technical report. Acta Cardiol. (2021).
- Gillis K, O'Neill L, Wielandts JY, Hilfiker G, Vlase A, Knecht S, et al. . Left bundle branch area pacing guided by continuous uninterrupted monitoring of unipolar pacing characteristics. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. (2022) 33:299–307. 10.1111/jce.15302
- Jastrzebski M, Moskal P, Hołda MK, Strona M, Bednarek A, Kiełbasa G, et al. . Deep septal deployment of a thin, lumenless pacing lead: a translational cadaver simulation study. Europace. (2020) 22:156–61. 10.1093/europace/euz270
- le Polain de Waroux JB, Wielandts JY, Gillis K, Hilfiker G, Sorgente A, Capulzini L, et al. . Repositioning and extraction of stylet-driven pacing leads with extendable helix used for left bundle branch area pacing. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. (2021). 32:1464–6. 10.1111/jce.15030
Source: PubMed