Ankle syndesmosis repair and rehabilitation in professional rugby league players: a case series report

Alex James Latham, Peter Charles Goodwin, Ben Stirling, Adam Budgen, Alex James Latham, Peter Charles Goodwin, Ben Stirling, Adam Budgen

Abstract

Background/aim: The distal tibiofibular joint is described as a syndesmosis. Traditionally, severe syndesmotic injuries with diastasis have been treated surgically with screw fixation. This case series details an ankle syndesmosis tightrope repair and an accelerated rehabilitation protocol that reduces the amount of time to return to professional rugby league in the UK. The aim of this study was to describe players' journey from injury, through diagnosis to surgery, rehabilitation and return to participation, detailing time scales and methods used at each stage to highlight the change in current practice.

Methods: Players were identified via a single orthopaedic surgeon in the UK who specialises in ankle syndesmosis repair. Between January 2010 and September 2015, adult men playing full-time professional rugby league in the UK Super League with ankle syndesmosis injuries were identified.

Results: Eighteen players from six different clubs were included. The most common mechanism of injury was forced dorsiflexion/eversion. The average return to participation was 64 days (SD 17.2, range 38-108). This compares favourably to reports of between 120 and 180 days following screw fixation.

Conclusion: Ankle syndesmosis tightrope repair and an accelerated rehabilitation protocol is as safe as traditional methods. The accelerated rehabilitation protocol promotes early weight-bearing and has shown to expedite the return to sport for professional Rugby League players. It is possible to return to sport 2 months after a tightrope repair and accelerated rehabilitation, compared with 3-6 months post screw fixation. This is extremely encouraging for the professional sporting population.

Keywords: Ankle syndesmosis; Distal tibiofibular joint.; High Ankle Sprain; Rehabilitation; Tightrope repair.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Syndesmosis tightrope repair. (Picture courtesy of Laura Latham, March 2016.)

References

    1. Hermans JJ, Beumer A, de Jong TA, et al. . Anatomy of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in adults: a pictorial essay with a multimodality approach. J Anat 2010;217:633–45.10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01302.x
    1. Warner SJ, Fabricant PD, Garner MR, et al. . The measurement and clinical importance of syndesmotic reduction after operative fixation of rotational ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015;97:1935–44.10.2106/JBJS.O.00016
    1. Al-azzani WAK, Sabah T, Paringe V, et al. . Evaluation of ankle tightrope syndesmosis fixation. J Foot Ankle Surg Asia Pacific 2014;1:1–4.10.5005/jp-journals-10040-1001
    1. Mak MF, Gartner L, Pearce CJ. Management of syndesmosis injuries in the elite athlete. Foot Ankle Clin 2013;18:195–214.10.1016/j.fcl.2013.02.002
    1. Thormeyer JR, Leonard JP, Hutchinson M. Syndesmotic injuries in athletes, an international perspective on topics in sports medicine and sports injury In: Kenneth D, Zaslav R, InTech. ed, 2012. ISBN: 978-953-51-0005-8 .
    1. Miller TL, Skalak T. Evaluation and treatment recommendations for acute injuries to the ankle syndesmosis without associated fracture. Sports Med 2014;44:179–88.10.1007/s40279-013-0106-1
    1. Hsu AR, Garras DN, Lee S. Syndesmotic injuries in athletes. Oper Tech Sports Med 2014;22:270–81.10.1053/j.otsm.2014.09.003
    1. Hunt KJ, Phisitkul P, Pirolo J, et al. . High ankle sprains and syndesmotic injuries in athletes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2015;23:661–73.10.5435/JAAOS-D-13-00135
    1. Porter DA, Jaggers RR, Barnes AF, et al. . Optimal management of ankle syndesmosis injuries. Open Access J Sports Med 2014;5:173–82.10.2147/OAJSM.S41564
    1. Sman AD, Hiller CE, Rae K, et al. . Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for ankle syndesmosis injury. Br J Sports Med 2015;49:323–9.10.1136/bjsports-2013-092787
    1. Wright RW, Barile RJ, Surprenant DA, et al. . Ankle syndesmosis sprains in national hockey league players. Am J Sports Med 2004;32:1–5.10.1177/0363546504264581
    1. Gerber JP, Williams GN, Scoville CR, et al. . Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int 1998;19:653–60.10.1177/107110079801901002
    1. Sman AD, Hiller CE, Rae K, et al. . Prognosis of ankle syndesmosis injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2014;46:671–7.10.1249/MSS.0000000000000151
    1. Cottom JM, Hyer CF, Philbin TM, et al. . Transosseous fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: comparison of an interosseous suture and endobutton to traditional screw fixation in 50 cases. J Foot Ankle Surg 2009;48:620–30.10.1053/j.jfas.2009.07.013
    1. Sagi HC, Shah AR, Sanders RW. The functional consequence of syndesmotic joint malreduction at a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 2012;26:439–43.10.1097/BOT.0b013e31822a526a
    1. Jelinek JA, Porter DA. Management of unstable ankle fractures and syndesmosis injuries in athletes. Foot Ankle Clin 2009;14:277–98.10.1016/j.fcl.2009.03.003
    1. Naqvi GA, Shafqat A, Awan N. Tightrope fixation of ankle syndesmosis injuries: clinical outcome, complications and technique modification. Injury 2012;43:838–42.10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.002
    1. Qamar F, Kadakia A, Venkateswaran B. An anatomical way of treating ankle syndesmotic injuries. J Foot Ankle Surg 2011;50:762–5.10.1053/j.jfas.2011.07.001
    1. Konor MM, Morton S, Eckerson JM, et al. . Reliability of three measures of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2012;7:279–87.
    1. Takao M, Ochi M, Oae K, et al. . Diagnosis of a tear of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. J Bone Joint Surg 2003;85:324–9.10.1302/0301-620X.85B3.13174
    1. Naqvi GA, Shafqat A, Awan N. Tightrope fixation of ankle syndesmosis injuries: clinical outcome, complications and technique modification. Injury 2012;43:838–42.10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.002
    1. Qamar F, Kadakia A, Venkateswaran B. An anatomical way of treating ankle syndesmotic injuries. J Foot Ankle Surg 2011;50:762–5.10.1053/j.jfas.2011.07.001
    1. Rigby RB, Cottom JM. Does the arthrex TightRope® provide maintenance of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis? A 2-year follow-up of 64 TightRopes® in 37 patients. J Foot Ankle Surg 2013;52:563–7.10.1053/j.jfas.2013.04.013
    1. Naqvi GA, Cunningham P, Lynch B, et al. . Fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries: comparison of tightrope fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy of syndesmotic reduction. Am J Sports Med 2012;40:2828–35.10.1177/0363546512461480
    1. Willmott HJ, Singh B, David LA. Outcome and complications of treatment of ankle diastasis with tightrope fixation. Injury 2009;40:1204–6.10.1016/j.injury.2009.05.008
    1. Mulligan EP. Evaluation and management of ankle syndesmosis injuries. Phys Ther Sport 2011;12:57–69.10.1016/j.ptsp.2011.03.001
    1. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DA, et al. . The CARE group. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. Global Adv Health Med 2013;2:38–43.
    1. Sikka RS, Fetzer GB, Sugarman E, et al. . Correlating MRI findings with disability in syndesmotic sprains of NFL players. Foot Ankle Int 2012;33:371–8.10.3113/FAI.2012.0371
    1. Comerford MJ. Screening to identify injury and performance risk: movement control testing- the missing piece of the puzzle. Sport Ex Medicine 2006:21–6.
    1. Morgan C, Kanopinski M, Dunn A. Conservative management of syndesmosis injuries in elite football- an injury on the increase or an increase in recognition. Sports Med J 2014:602–13.
    1. Fuller CW, Molloy MG, Bagate C, et al. . Consensus statement on injury definitions and data collection procedures for studies of injuries in rugby union. Clin J Sport Med 2007;17:177–81.10.1097/JSM.0b013e31803220b3
    1. Konor MM, Morton S, Eckerson JM, et al. . Reliability of three measures of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2012;7:279–87.
    1. Gribble PA, Hertel J, Plisky P. Using the star excursion balance test to assess dynamic postural-control deficits and outcomes in lower extremity injury: a literature and systematic review. J Athl Train 2012;47:339–57.10.4085/1062-6050-47.3.08
    1. Hodgson P, Thomas R. Avoiding suture knot prominence with suture button along distal fibula: technical tip. Foot Ankle Int 2011;32:908–9.10.3113/FAI.2011.0908
    1. Storey P, Gadd RJ, Blundell C, et al. . Complications of suture button ankle syndesmosis stabilization with modifications of surgical technique. Foot Ankle Int 2012;33:717–21.10.3113/FAI.2012.0717
    1. Degroot H, Al-Omari AA, El Ghazaly SA. Outcomes of suture button repair of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 2011;32:250–6.10.3113/FAI.2011.0250
    1. Wolf BR, Amendola A. Syndesmosis injuries in the athlete: when and how to operate. Curr Opin Orthop 2002;13:151–4.10.1097/00001433-200204000-00013
    1. van Dijk CN, Longo UG, Loppini M, et al. . Classification and diagnosis of acute isolated syndesmotic injuries: esska-afas consensus and guidelines. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016;24:1200–16.10.1007/s00167-015-3942-8
    1. Kortekangas T, Savola O, Flinkkilä T, et al. . A prospective randomised study comparing TightRope and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy and maintenance of syndesmotic reduction assessed with bilateral computed tomography. Injury 2015;46:1119–26.10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.004
    1. Hicks C. Research methods for clinical therapists. 4th edn Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2004.

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다