Approach, avoidance, and affect: a meta-analysis of approach-avoidance tendencies in manual reaction time tasks

R Hans Phaf, Sören E Mohr, Mark Rotteveel, Jelte M Wicherts, R Hans Phaf, Sören E Mohr, Mark Rotteveel, Jelte M Wicherts

Abstract

Approach action tendencies toward positive stimuli and avoidance tendencies from negative stimuli are widely seen to foster survival. Many studies have shown that approach and avoidance arm movements are facilitated by positive and negative affect, respectively. There is considerable debate whether positively and negatively valenced stimuli prime approach and avoidance movements directly (i.e., immediate, unintentional, implicit, automatic, and stimulus-based), or indirectly (i.e., after conscious or non-conscious interpretation of the situation). The direction and size of these effects were often found to depend on the instructions referring to the stimulus object or the self, and on explicit vs. implicit stimulus evaluation. We present a meta-analysis of 29 studies included for their use of strongly positive and negative stimuli, with 81 effect sizes derived solely from the means and standard deviations (combined N = 1538), to examine the automaticity of the link between affective information processing and approach and avoidance, and to test whether it depends on instruction, type of approach-avoidance task, and stimulus type. Results show a significant small to medium-sized effect after correction for publication bias. The strongest arguments for an indirect link between affect and approach-avoidance were the absence of evidence for an effect with implicit evaluation, and the opposite directions of the effect with self and object-related interpretations. The link appears to be influenced by conscious or non-conscious intentions to deal with affective stimuli.

Keywords: affect; approach; arm movement; avoidance; direct vs. indirect.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Funnel plot for studies concerning Positive Affect, with treatment effects on the x-axis and the standard error on the y-axis. Closed circles are original data, open circles represent filled-in data based on the trim-and-fill method. Dotted lines represent 95% confidence interval around the mean.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Funnel plot for studies concerning Negative Affect, with treatment effects on the x-axis and the standard error on the y-axis. Closed circles are original data, open circles represent filled-in data based on the trim-and-fill method. Dotted lines represent 95% confidence interval around the mean.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Funnel plot for studies concerning both affects combined, with treatment effects on the x-axis and the standard error on the y-axis. Closed circles are original data, open circles represent filled-in data based on the trim-and-fill method. Dotted lines represent 95% confidence interval around the mean.

References

    1. Alexopoulos T., Ric F. (2007). The evaluation-behavior link: direct and beyond valence. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 43, 1010–1016 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.017
    1. Bakker M., van Dijk A., Wicherts J. M. (2012). The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7, 543–554 10.1177/1745691612459060
    1. Bakker M., Wicherts J. M. (2011). The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals. Behav. Res. Methods 43, 666–678 10.3758/s13428-011-0089-5
    1. *Bakvis P., Spinhoven P., Zitman F. G., Roelofs K. (2011). Automatic avoidance tendencies in patients with psychogenic non epileptic seizures. Seizure 20, 628–634 10.1016/j.seizure.2011.06.006
    1. Bamford S., Ward R. (2008). Presdispositions to approach and avoid are contextually sensitive and goal dependent. Emotion 8, 174–183 10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.174
    1. Borenstein M., Hedges L. V., Higgins J. P. T., Rothstein H. R. (2009). Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Chichester: Wiley; 10.1002/9780470743386
    1. Cacioppo J. T., Priester J. R., Berntson G. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II: arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65, 5–17 10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.5
    1. Carver C. S., Harmon-Jones E. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: evidence and implications. Psychol. Bull. 135, 183–204 10.1037/a0013965
    1. Castelli L., Zogmaister C., Smith E. R., Arcuri L. (2004). On the automatic evaluation of social exemplars. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 86, 373–387 10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.373
    1. Centerbar D., Clore G. (2006). Do approach-avoidance actions create attitudes? Psychol. Sci. 17, 22–29 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01660.x
    1. *Chen M., Bargh J. A. (1999). Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 25, 215–224 10.1177/0146167299025002007
    1. Clow K. A., Olson J. M. (2010). Conceptual-motor compatibility and homonegativity: approaching and avoiding words associated with homosexuality. Can. J. Behav. Sci. 42, 222–233 10.1037/a0020010
    1. *De Houwer J., Crombez G., Baeyens F., Hermans D. (2001). On the generality of the affective simon effect. Cogn. Emot. 15, 189–206 10.1080/02699930125883
    1. den Dulk P., Heerebout B. T., Phaf R. H. (2003). A computational study into the evolution of dual-route dynamics for affective processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15, 194–208 10.1162/089892903321208132
    1. Duckworth K. L., Bargh J. A., Garcia M., Chaiken S. (2002). The automatic evaluation of novel stimuli. Psychol. Sci. 13, 513–519 10.1111/1467-9280.00490
    1. Dunlap W. P., Cortina J. M., Vaslow J. B., Burke M. J. (1996). Meta-Analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychol. Methods 1, 170–177 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.170
    1. Duval S. J., Tweedie R. (2000). Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56, 455–463 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
    1. Eastwood J. D., Smilek D., Merikle P. M. (2001). Differential attentional guidance, by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion. Percept. Psychophys. 63, 1004–1013 10.3758/BF03194519
    1. Eder A. B. (2011). Control of impulsive emotional behaviour through implementation intentions. Cogn. Emot. 25, 478–489 10.1080/02699931.2010.527493
    1. *Eder A. B., Rothermund K. (2008). When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 137, 262–281 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.262
    1. *Eder A. B., Rothermund K., Proctor R. W. (2010). The prepared emotional reflex: intentional preparation of automatic approach and avoidance tendencies as a means to regulate emotional responding. Emotion 10, 593–598 10.1037/a0019009
    1. Egger M., Smith D. G., Schneider M., Minder C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br. Med. J. 315, 629–634 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
    1. *Enter D., Colzato L. S., Roelofs K. (2012). Dopamine transporter polymorphisms affect social approach-avoidance tendencies. Genes Brain Behav. 11, 1–6 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2012.00791.x
    1. Fishbach A., Shah J. Y. (2006). Self-control in action: implicit dispositions toward goals and away from temptations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 90, 820–832 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.820
    1. Francis G. (2012). The psychology of replication and replication in psychology. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7, 585–594 10.1177/1745691612459520
    1. Frijda N. H. (1986). The Emotions. London: Cambridge University Press
    1. Hedges L. V., Olkin I. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press
    1. Heerebout B. T., Phaf R. H. (2010a). Emergent oscillations in evolutionary simulations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 807–823 10.1162/jocn.2009.21205
    1. Heerebout B. T., Phaf R. H. (2010b). Good vibrations switch attention: an affective function for network oscillations in evolutionary simulations. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 10, 217–229 10.3758/CABN.10.2.217
    1. *Heuer K., Rinck M., Becker E. S. (2007). Avoidance of emotional facial expressions in social anxiety: the approach-avoidance task. Behav. Res. Ther. 45, 2990–3001 10.1016/j.brat.2007.08.010
    1. Ioannidis J. P. A., Trikalinos T. A. (2007). An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings. Clin. Trials 4, 245–253 10.1177/1740774507079441
    1. Johnston V. S. (2003). The origin and function of pleasure. Cogn. Emot. 17, 167–179 10.1080/02699930302290
    1. *Jones I. F., Young S. G., Claypool H. M. (2011). Approaching the familiar: on the ability of mere exposure to direct approach and avoidance behavior. Motiv. Emot. 35, 383–392 10.1007/s11031-011-9228-7
    1. *Krieglmeyer R., Deutsch R. (2010). Comparing measures of approach-avoidance behaviour: the manikin task vs. two versions of the joystick task. Cogn. Emot. 24, 810–828 10.1080/02699930903047298
    1. Krieglmeyer R., Deutsch R. (2013). Approach does not equal approach: angry facial expressions evoke approach only when it serves aggression. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 4, 607–614 10.1177/1948550612471060
    1. Lang P. J., Bradley M. M., Cuthbert B. N. (1990). Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex. Psychol. Rev. 97, 377–395 10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.377
    1. Lang P. J., Bradley M. M., Cuthbert B. N. (1996). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Technical Manual and Affective Ratings. Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida
    1. *Lange W. G., Keijsers G., Becker E. S., Rinck M. (2008). Social anxiety and evaluation of social crowds: explicit and implicit measures. Behav. Res. Ther. 46, 932–943 10.1016/j.brat.2008.04.008
    1. *Lavender T., Hommel B. (2007). Affect and action: towards an event-coding account. Cogn. Emot. 21, 1270–1296 10.1080/02699930701438152
    1. *Markman A. B., Brendl C. M. (2005). Constraining theories of embodied cognition. Psychol. Sci. 16, 6–10 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00772.x
    1. *Marsh A. A., Ambady N., Kleck R. E. (2005). The effects of fear and anger facial expressions on approach- and avoidance-related behaviors. Emotion 5, 119–124 10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.119
    1. Maxwell J. S., Davidson R. J. (2007). Emotion as motion: asymmetries in approach and avoidant actions. Psychol. Sci. 18, 1113–1119 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02033.x
    1. *Najmi S., Kuckertz J. M., Amir N. (2010). Automatic avoidance tendencies in individuals with contamination-related obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Behav. Res. Ther. 48, 1058–1062 10.1016/j.brat.2010.06.007
    1. Öhman A. (1986). Face the beast and fear the face: animal and social fears as prototypes for evolutionary analyses of emotion. Psychophysiology 23, 123–145 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00608.x
    1. Öhman A., Mineka S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychol. Rev. 108, 483–522 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.483
    1. Önal-Hartmann C., Pauli P., Ocklenburg S., Güntürkün O. (2012). The motor side of emotions: investigating the relationship between hemispheres, motor reactions and emotional stimuli. Psychol. Res. 76, 311–316 10.1007/s00426-011-0337-4
    1. Paulus A., Wentura D. (2013). Threatening joy: approach and avoidance reactions to emotions are influenced by the group membership of the expresser. Cogn. Emot. 28, 656–677 10.1080/02699931.2013.849659
    1. Phaf R. H., Kan K.-J. (2007). The automaticity of emotional stroop: a meta-analysis. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 38, 184–199 10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.008
    1. *Phaf R. H., Rotteveel M. (2009). Looking at the bright side: the affective monitoring of direction. Emotion 9, 729–733 10.1037/a0016308
    1. Phaf R. H., Rotteveel M. (2012). Affective monitoring: a generic mechanism for affect elicitation. Front. Psychol. 3:47 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00047
    1. Proctor R. W., Zhang Y. (2010). “Mother nature doesn't have a bullet with your name on it”: coding with reference to one's name or object location? J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 46, 336–343 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.010
    1. R Development Core Team. (2010). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; ISBN: 3-900051-07-0. Available online at:
    1. *Reinecke A., Soltau C., Hoyer J., Becker E. S., Rinck M. (2012). Treatment sensitivity of implicit threat evaluation, avoidance tendency and visual working memory bias in specific phobia. J. Anxiety Disord. 26, 321–328 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.12.010
    1. *Rinck M., Becker E. S. (2007). Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 38, 105–120 10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.001
    1. *Roelofs K., Elzinga B. M., Rotteveel M. (2005). The effects of stress-induced cortisol responses on approach–avoidance behavior. Psychoneuroendocrinology 30, 665–677 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.02.008
    1. *Roelofs K., Minelli A., Mars R. B., van Peer J., Toni I. (2009a). On the neural control of social emotional behavior. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 4, 50–58 10.1093/scan/nsn036
    1. *Roelofs K., van Peer J., Berretty E., Jong P. D., Spinhoven P., Elzinga B. M. (2009b). Hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis hyperresponsiveness is associated with increased social avoidance behavior in social phobia. Biol. Psychiatry 65, 336–343 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.08.022
    1. Rothstein H. R., Sutton A. J., Borenstein M. (2005). Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis. Prevention, Assessment, and Adjustments. New York, NY: Wiley; 10.1002/0470870168
    1. Rotteveel M., de Groot P., Geutskens A., Phaf R. H. (2001). Stronger suboptimal than optimal affective priming? Emotion 1, 348–364 10.1037/1528-3542.1.4.348
    1. *Rotteveel M., Phaf R. H. (2004). Automatic affective evaluation does not automatically predispose for arm flexion and extension. Emotion 4, 156–172 10.1037/1528-3542.4.2.156
    1. Saraiva A. C., Schüür F., Bestmann S. (2013). Emotional valence and contextual affordances flexibly shape approach-avoidance movements. Front. Psychol. 4:933 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00933
    1. Seibt B., Neumann R., Nussinson R., Strack F. (2008). Movement direction or change in distance? self- and object-related approach-avoidance motions. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 44, 713–720 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.013
    1. *Seidel E., Habel U., Finkelmeyer A., Schneider F., Gur R. C., Derntl B. (2010a). Implicit and explicit behavioral tendencies in male and female depression. Psychiatry Res. 177, 124–130 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.02.001
    1. *Seidel E., Habel U., Kirschner M., Gur R. C., Derntl B. (2010b). The impact of facial emotional expressions on behavioral tendencies in women and men. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 36, 500–507 10.1037/a0018169
    1. Solarz A. K. (1960). Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning of eliciting verbal signs. J. Exp. Psychol. 59, 239–245 10.1037/h0047274
    1. Sterne J. A. C., Egger M. (2005). Regression methods to detect publication and other bias in meta-analysis, in Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments, eds Rothstein H. R., Sutton A. J., Borenstein M. (New York, NY: Wiley; ), 99–110
    1. Stins J. F., Roelofs K., Villan J., Kooijman K., Hagenaars M. A., Beek P. J. (2011). Walk to me when I smile, step back when I'm angry: emotional faces modulate whole-body approach-avoidance behaviors. Exp. Brain Res. 212, 603–611 10.1007/s00221-011-2767-z
    1. *Van Dantzig S., Pecher D., Zwaan R. A. (2008). Approach and avoidance as action effects. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 61, 1298–1306 10.1080/17470210802027987
    1. Van Dantzig S., Zeelenberg R., Pecher D. (2009). Unconstraining theories of embodied cognition. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45, 345–351 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.11.001
    1. *Van Peer J. M., Roelofs K., Rotteveel M., van Dijk J. G., Spinhoven P., Ridderinkhof K. R. (2007). The effects of cortisol administration on approach-avoidance behavior: an event-related potential study. Biol. Psychol. 76, 135–146 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.07.003
    1. Viechtbauer W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J. Stat. Softw. 36, 1–48 Available online at:
    1. *Volman I., Roelofs K., Koch S., Verhagen L., Toni I. (2011a). Anterior prefrontal cortex inhibition impairs control over social emotional actions. Curr. Biol. 21, 1766–1770 10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.050
    1. *Volman I., Toni I., Verhagen L., Roelofs K. (2011b). Endogenous testosterone modulates prefrontal-amygdala connectivity during social emotional behavior. Cereb. Cortex 21, 2282–2290 10.1093/cercor/bhr001
    1. Wiers R. W., Eberl C., Rinck M., Becker E. S., Lindenmeyer J. (2011). Re-training automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients' approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychol. Sci. 22, 490–497 10.1177/0956797611400615
    1. Wilkowski B. M., Meier B. P. (2010). Bring it on: angry facial expressions potentiate approach-motivated motor behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 98, 201–210 10.1037/a0017992
    1. Zajonc R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. Am. Psychol. 35, 151–175 10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151
    1. *Zhang Y., Proctor R. W., Wegener D. T. (2012). Approach–avoidance actions or categorization? A matching account of reference valence effects in affective S–R compatibility. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 48, 609–616 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.01.004

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다