Intact value-based decision-making during intertemporal choice in women with remitted anorexia nervosa? An fMRI study

Joseph A. King, Fabio Bernardoni, Daniel Geisler, Franziska Ritschel, Arne Doose, Sophie Pauligk, Konrad Pásztor, Kerstin Weidner, Veit Roessner, Michael N. Smolka, Stefan Ehrlich, Joseph A. King, Fabio Bernardoni, Daniel Geisler, Franziska Ritschel, Arne Doose, Sophie Pauligk, Konrad Pásztor, Kerstin Weidner, Veit Roessner, Michael N. Smolka, Stefan Ehrlich

Abstract

Background: Extreme restrictive food choice in anorexia nervosa is thought to reflect excessive self-control and/or abnormal reward sensitivity. Studies using intertemporal choice paradigms have suggested an increased capacity to delay reward in anorexia nervosa, and this may explain an unusual ability to resist immediate temptation and override hunger in the long-term pursuit of thinness. It remains unclear, however, whether altered delay discounting in anorexia nervosa constitutes a state effect of acute illness or a trait marker observable after recovery.

Methods: We repeated the analysis from our previous fMRI investigation of intertemporal choice in acutely underweight patients with anorexia nervosa in a sample of weight-recovered women with anorexia nervosa (n = 36) and age-matched healthy controls (n = 36) who participated in the same study protocol. Follow-up analyses explored functional connectivity separately in both the weight-recovered/healthy controls sample and the acute/healthy controls sample.

Results: In contrast to our previous findings in acutely underweight patients with anorexia nervosa, we found no differences between weight-recovered patients with anorexia nervosa and healthy controls at either behavioural or neural levels. New analysis of data from the acute/healthy controls sample sample revealed increased coupling between dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and posterior brain regions as a function of decision difficulty, supporting the hypothesis of altered neural efficiency in the underweight state.

Limitations: This was a cross-sectional study, and the results may be task-specific.

Conclusion: Although our results underlined previous demonstrations of divergent temporal reward discounting in acutely underweight patients with anorexia nervosa, we found no evidence of alteration in patients with weight-recovered anorexia nervosa. Together, these findings suggest that impaired valuebased decision-making may not constitute a defining trait variable or “scar” of the disorder.

Conflict of interest statement

V. Roessner has received payment for consulting and writing activities, independent of the current work, from Lilly, Novartis and Shire Pharmaceuticals; lecture honoraria from Lilly, Novartis, Shire Pharmaceuticals and Medice Pharma; and support for research from Shire and Novartis. He has carried out (and is currently carrying out) clinical trials in cooperation with the Novartis, Shire and Otsuka. J. King, F. Bernardoni, D. Geisler, F. Ritschel, A. Doose, S. Pauligk, K. Pásztor, K. Weidner, M. Smolka and S. Ehrlich declare no competing interests.

© 2020 Joule Inc. or its licensors

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Intertemporal choice task. Each of the 90 trials of the main task performed during functional MRI began with the presentation of the larger later (LL) amount and the respective delay (2 s), followed by a fixation period (6 s) and a response window (2 s). During the response window, an exclamation mark presented on the left or right side of the screen indicated which button was mapped to the LL amount for that trial. Decisions for the delayed reward (LL) were mapped to the right button in half of the trials and the left button in the other half. Each trial ended with feedback confirming the decision, followed by a jittered interval with an average duration of 7 s.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Main behavioural results. (A) Logarithmized and z-standardized k values estimated from choice behaviour during the prescan calibration session for patients with weight-recovered anorexia nervosa (recovered) and healthy controls. (B) Rank-transformed and z-standardized area under the curve (AUC) values estimated from choice behaviour during the main task for the recovered and control groups.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Activation of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) during difficult decisions. (A) Regions of the dACC showing greater activation as a function of decision difficulty (hard > easy) in the weight-recovered anorexia nervosa/healthy control sample from the current analyses (red region; main effect of decision difficulty; x = 6, y = 20, z = 46; t = 3.63; 321 voxels), and decreased hard v. easy activation in patients with acute anorexia nervosa relative to healthy controls from our previous analyses (yellow region; group × decision difficulty interaction; x = −10, y = 30, z = 28; t = 3.58; 580 voxels). Findings are shown at a voxel-wise threshold of p < 0.005 to illustrate their overlap (orange region; 92 voxels; pFWE,SVC < 0.05). No other significant main effects or interactions were evident in the recovered/control or acute/control comparisons at this statistical threshold. (B) Mean dACC activation for the recovered and healthy control groups on trials with hard and easy decisions (β estimates ± standard error of the mean). A group × difficulty repeated-measures analysis of variance of the β estimates confirmed that while activation was increased in this region for hard v. easy trials (F1,70 = 11.0; p < 0.001), group activation levels did not generally differ (F1,70 = 0.006; p = NS), and no interaction was evident (F1,70 = 0.023; p = NS). For qualitative comparisons with the acute sample, age-adjusted dACC activation is shown for all study participants in Appendix 1, Fig. S3. FWE = family-wise error; NS = not significant; SVC = small-volume corrected.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Altered functional connectivity of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) during difficult decisions in patients with acute anorexia nervosa. Results pFWE < 0.05, t map) of a generalized psychophysiological interaction analysis of dACC connectivity as a function of decision difficulty (hard > easy) indicating greater coupling with a broad region of the inferior parietal lobule and somatosensory cortex in patients with acute anorexia nervosa relative to healthy controls, as determined by a new analysis of the data originally analyzed in King and colleagues. Note that no group differences in dACC functional connectivity were detected in an analogue analysis of the data from the weight-recovered anorexia-nervosa/healthy control sample at the focus of the current article. FWE = family-wise error.

References

    1. Nigg JT. Annual research review: on the relations among selfregulation, self-control, executive functioning, effortful control, cognitive control, impulsivity, risk-taking, and inhibition for developmental psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017;58:361–83.
    1. O’Hara CB, Campbell IC, Schmidt U. A reward-centred model of anorexia nervosa: a focussed narrative review of the neurological and psychophysiological literature. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;52:131–52.
    1. Kaye WH, Wierenga CE, Bailer UF, et al. Nothing tastes as good as skinny feels: the neurobiology of anorexia nervosa. Trends Neurosci. 2013;36:110–20.
    1. Brooks SJ, Funk SG, Young SY, et al. The role of working memory for cognitive control in anorexia nervosa versus substance use disorder. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1651.
    1. Steinglass JE, Walsh BT. Neurobiological model of the persistence of anorexia nervosa. J Eat Disord. 2016;4:19.
    1. McClelland J, Dalton B, Kekic M, et al. A systematic review of temporal discounting in eating disorders and obesity: behavioural and neuroimaging findings. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;71:506–28.
    1. Madden GJ, Bickel WK. Impulsivity: the behavioral and neurological science of discounting. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2010.
    1. Bickel WK, Marsch LA. Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes. Addiction. 2001;96:73–86.
    1. Steinglass JE, Figner B, Berkowitz S, et al. Increased capacity to delay reward in anorexia nervosa. J Int Neuropsychol Soc JINS. 2012;18:773–80.
    1. Steinglass JE, Lempert KM, Choo T-H, et al. Temporal discounting across three psychiatric disorders: anorexia nervosa, obsessive compulsive disorder, and social anxiety disorder. Depress Anxiety. 2017;34:463–70.
    1. Decker JH, Figner B, Steinglass JE. On weight and waiting: delay discounting in anorexia nervosa pretreatment and posttreatment. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;78:606–14.
    1. Steward T, Mestre-Bach G, Vintró-Alcaraz C, et al. Delay discounting of reward and impulsivity in eating disorders: from anorexia nervosa to binge eating disorder. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2017;25:601–6.
    1. Lempert KM, Phelps EA. The malleability of intertemporal choice. Trends Cogn Sci. 2016;20:64–74.
    1. Lempert KM, Steinglass JE, Pinto A, et al. Can delay discounting deliver on the promise of RDoC? Psychol Med. 2019;49:190–199.
    1. Bartholdy S, Rennalls S, Danby H, et al. Temporal discounting and the tendency to delay gratification across the eating disorder spectrum. Eur Eat Disord. 2017;25:344–50.
    1. Ripke S, Hübner T, Mennigen E, et al. Reward processing and intertemporal decision making in adults and adolescents: the role of impulsivity and decision consistency. Brain Res. 2012;1478:36–47.
    1. Ritschel F, King JA, Geisler D, et al. Temporal delay discounting in acutely ill and weight-recovered patients with anorexia nervosa. Psychol Med. 2015;45:1229–39.
    1. King JA, Geisler D, Bernardoni F, et al. Altered neural efficiency of decision making during temporal reward discounting in anorexia nervosa. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016;55:972–9.
    1. Wierenga CE, Bischoff-Grethe A, Melrose AJ, et al. Hunger does not motivate reward in women remitted from anorexia nervosa. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;77:642–52.
    1. Kable JW, Glimcher PW. The neurobiology of decision: consensus and controversy. Neuron. 2009;63:733–45.
    1. Scheres A, de Water E, Mies GW. The neural correlates of temporal reward discounting. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2013;4:523–45.
    1. Kable JW, Glimcher PW. The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:1625–33.
    1. McClure SM, Laibson DI, Loewenstein G, et al. Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science. 2004;306:503–7.
    1. Ridderinkhof KR, Ullsperger M, Crone EA, et al. The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science. 2004;306:443–7.
    1. Kaye WH, Fudge JL, Paulus M. New insights into symptoms and neurocircuit function of anorexia nervosa. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:573–84.
    1. Frank GKW. Altered brain reward circuits in eating disorders: chicken or egg? Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2013;15:396.
    1. Munkres J. Algorithms for the assignment and transportation problems. J Soc Ind Appl Math. 1957;5:32–8.
    1. Fichter MM, Quadflieg N. Strukturiertes Inventar für anorektische und bulimische Eβstörungen: (SIAB); Fragebogen (SIAB-S) und Interview (SIAB-EX) nach DSM-IV und ICD-10; Handanweisung. GÖttingen, Germany: Hogrefe, Verlag für Psychologie; 1999.
    1. Paul T, Thiel A. Eating disorder inventory–2: EDI-2, German version, manual. GÖttingen, Germany: Hogrefe; 2005.
    1. Hautzinger M, Keller F, Kühner C. BDI-II. Beck Depressions-Inventar. Revision 2. Auflage. Frankfurt: Pearson Assessment; 2009.
    1. Petermann F, Petermann M. HAWIK-IV. Bern: Huber; 2010.
    1. Von Aster M, Neubauer A, Horn R. WIE. Wechsler Intelligenztest fuer Erwachsene. Frankfurt: Harcourt Test Sevices; 2006.
    1. Kromeyer-Hauschild K, Wabitsch M, Kunze D, et al. Perzentile für den Body-mass-Index für das Kindes- und Jugendalter unter Heranziehung verschiedener deutscher Stichproben. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd. 2001;149:807–18.
    1. Hemmelmann C, Brose S, Vens M, et al. Percentiles of body mass index of 18–80-year-old German adults based on data from the Second National Nutrition Survey. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1946;2010:848–52.
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) — a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–81.
    1. Koffarnus MN, Deshpande HU, Lisinski JM, et al. An adaptive, individualized fMRI delay discounting procedure to increase flexibility and optimize scanner time. Neuroimage. 2017;161:56–66.
    1. McLaren DG, Ries ML, Xu G, et al. A generalized form of context-dependent psychophysiological interactions (gPPI): a comparison to standard approaches. Neuroimage. 2012;61:1277–86.
    1. Tomasi D, Wang G-J, Volkow ND. Energetic cost of brain functional connectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:13642–7.
    1. Bodell LP, Keel PK, Brumm MC, et al. Longitudinal examination of decision-making performance in anorexia nervosa: before and after weight restoration. J Psychiatr Res. 2014;56:150–7.
    1. Foerde K, Steinglass JE. Decreased feedback learning in anorexia nervosa persists after weight restoration. Int J Eat Disord. 2017;50:415–23.
    1. Tchanturia K, Liao P-C, Uher R, et al. An investigation of decision making in anorexia nervosa using the Iowa Gambling Task and skin conductance measurements. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007;13:635–41.
    1. Lindner SE, Fichter MM, Quadflieg N. Decision-making and planning in full recovery of anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 2012;45:866–75.
    1. Wu M, Brockmeyer T, Hartmann M, et al. Reward-related decision making in eating and weight disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence from neuropsychological studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;61:177–96.
    1. Guillaume S, Gorwood P, Jollant F, et al. Impaired decision-making in symptomatic anorexia and bulimia nervosa patients: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2015;45:3377–91.
    1. Oberndorfer TA, Kaye WH, Simmons AN, et al. Demand-specific alteration of medial prefrontal cortex response during an inhibition task in recovered anorexic women. Int J Eat Disord. 2011;44:1–8.
    1. Ehrlich S, Geisler D, Ritschel F, et al. Elevated cognitive control over reward processing in recovered female patients with anorexia nervosa. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2015;40:307–15.
    1. Ritschel F, Geisler D, King JA, et al. Neural correlates of altered feedback learning in women recovered from anorexia nervosa. Sci Rep. 2017;7:5421.
    1. Geisler D, Ritschel F, King JA, et al. Increased anterior cingulate cortex response precedes behavioural adaptation in anorexia nervosa. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42066.
    1. Bernardoni F, Geisler D, King JA, et al. Altered medial frontal feedback learning signals in anorexia nervosa. Biol Psychiatry. 2018;83:235–43.
    1. King JA, Frank GKW, Thompson PM, et al. Structural neuroimaging of anorexia nervosa: future directions in the quest for mechanisms underlying dynamic alterations. Biol Psychiatry. 2018;83:224–34.
    1. Danner UN, Sanders N, Smeets PAM, et al. Neuropsychological weaknesses in anorexia nervosa: set-shifting, central coherence, and decision making in currently ill and recovered women. Int J Eat Disord. 2012;45:685–94.
    1. Srinivasagam NM, Kaye WH, Plotnicov KH, et al. Persistent perfectionism, symmetry, and exactness after long-term recovery from anorexia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152:1630–4.
    1. Schmidt U, Treasure J. Anorexia nervosa: valued and visible. A cognitive-interpersonal maintenance model and its implications for research and practice. Br J Clin Psychol. 2006;45:343–66.
    1. Cowdrey FA, Filippini N, Park RJ, et al. Increased resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network in recovered anorexia nervosa. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35:483–91.
    1. Boehm I, Geisler D, Tam F, et al. Partially restored resting-state functional connectivity in women recovered from anorexia nervosa. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2016;41:377–85.
    1. Vetter NC, Steding J, Jurk S, et al. Reliability in adolescent fMRI within two years—a comparison of three tasks. Sci Rep. 2017;7:2287.
    1. von Schwanenflug N, Müller DK, King JA, et al. Dynamic changes in white matter microstructure in anorexia nervosa: findings from a longitudinal study. Psychol Med. 2019;49:1555–64.
    1. Bang L, Rø Ø, Endestad T. Normal gray matter volumes in women recovered from anorexia nervosa: a voxel-based morphometry study. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:144.
    1. MacDuffie KE, Strauman TJ. Understanding our own biology: the relevance of auto-biological attributions for mental health. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2017;24:50–68.
    1. Brockmeyer T, Friederich H-C, Schmidt U. Advances in the treatment of anorexia nervosa: a review of established and emerging interventions. Psychol Med. 2018;48:1228–56.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다