Orthopaedic surgical treatment delays at a tertiary hospital in sub Saharan Africa: Communication gaps and implications for clinical outcomes

Adeleke O Ifesanya, Olumuyiwa J Ogundele, Joy U Ifesanya, Adeleke O Ifesanya, Olumuyiwa J Ogundele, Joy U Ifesanya

Abstract

Background: Delay in surgical treatment is a source of distress to patients and an important reason for poor outcome. We studied the delay before carrying out scheduled operative orthopaedic procedures and the factors responsible for it.

Materials and methods: This prospective study was carried out between March 2011 and December 2012. Temporal details of the surgical procedures at our hospital were recorded in a proforma including the patients' perception of the causes of the delay to surgery. Based on the urgency of the need for surgery, patients were classified into three groups using a modification of the method employed by Lankester et al. Data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 17.0. Predictors of surgical delay beyond 3 days were identified by logistic regression analysis.

Results: Two hundred and forty-nine patients with a mean age 36.2 ± 19.2 years and M:F ratio 1.3 were recruited. 34.1% were modified Lankester group A, 45.4% group B and 20.5% group C. 47 patients (18.9%) had comorbidities, hypertension being the commonest (22 patients; 8.8%). Median delay to surgery was 4 days (mean = 17.6 days). Fifty percent of emergency room admissions were operated on within 3 days, the figure was 13% for other admissions. Lack of theatre slot was the commonest cause of delay. There was full concordance between doctors and patients in only 70.7% regarding the causes of the delay. In 15.7%, there was complete discordance. Logistic regression analysis confirmed modified Lankester groups B and C (P = 0.003) and weekend admission (P = 0.016) as significant predictors of delay to surgery of >3 days.

Conclusion: Promptness to operative surgical care falls short of the ideal. Theatre inefficiency is a major cause of delay in treating surgical patients in our environment. Theatre facilities should be expanded and made more efficient. There is a need for better communication between surgeons and patients about delays in surgical treatment.

Keywords: Africa; communication; orthopaedic surgery; trauma; treatment delays.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Causes of operative treatment delays for the different modified Lankester groups

References

    1. Novack V, Jotkowitz A, Etzion O, Porath A. Does delay in surgery after hip fracture lead to worse outcomes. A multicenter survey? Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:170–6.
    1. Kato N, Htut M, Taggart M, Carlstedt T, Birch R. The effects of operative delay on the relief of neuropathic pain after injury to the brachial plexus: A review of 148 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:756–9.
    1. Millett PJ, Willis AA, Warren RF. Associated injuries in pediatric and adolescent anterior cruciate ligament tears: Does a delay in treatment increase the risk of meniscal tear? Arthroscopy. 2002;18:955–9.
    1. Pakzad H, Roffey DM, Knight H, Dagenais S, Yelle JD, Wai EK. Delay in operative stabilization of spine fractures in multitrauma patients without neurologic injuries: Effects on outcomes. Can J Surg. 2011;54:270–6.
    1. Fantini MP, Fabbri G, Laus M, Carretta E, Mimmi S, Franchino G, et al. Determinants for surgical delay for hip fracture. Surgeon. 2011;9:130–4.
    1. North JB, Blackford FJ, Wall D, Allen J, Faint S, Ware RS, et al. Analysis of the causes and effects of delay before diagnosis using surgical mortality data. Br J Surg. 2013;100:419–25.
    1. Lankester BJ, Paterson MP, Capon G, Belcher J. Delays in orthopaedic trauma treatment: Setting standards for the time interval between admission and operation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000;82:322–6.
    1. Orosz GM, Hannan EL, Magazinner J, Koval K, Gilbert M, Aufses A, et al. Hip fracture in the older patient: Reasons for delay in hospitalization and timing of surgical repair. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:1336–40.
    1. Perera MT, Silva MA, Shah AJ, Hardstaff R, Bramhall SR, Issac J, et al. Risk factors for litigation following major transectional bile duct injury sustained at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 2010;34:2635–41.
    1. Condon JT. Medical litigation. The aetiological role of psychological and interpersonal factors. Med J Aust. 1992;157:768–70.
    1. Camping EA, Delvin HB, Haile RW, Ingram GS, Lunn JL. London: NCEPOD; 1997. Who operates when? A report of the confidential enquiry into perioperative death.
    1. Jonnalagadda R, Walrond ER, Hariharan S, Walrond M, Prasad C. Evaluation of the reasons for cancellations and delays of surgical procedures in a developing country. Int J CIin Pract. 2005;59:716–20.
    1. Villa S, Barbieri M, Lega S. Restructuring patient flow logistics around patient care needs: Implications and practicalities from three critical cases. Health Care Manag Sci. 2009;12:155–65.
    1. Mak PH, Campbell RC, Irwin MG. The ASA physical status classification: Inter-observer consistency. American Society of Anaesthesiologists. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002;30:633–40.

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다