Spinal Fusion for Chronic Low Back Pain: A 'Magic Bullet' or Wishful Thinking?

K S Dhillon, K S Dhillon

Abstract

Chronic low back pain is a common, disabling and costly health problem. The treatment of chronic low back is difficult and is often ineffective. For treatment to be effective the cause of the pain has to be established but unfortunately in 80% to 95% of the patients the cause cannot be determined despite the existence of modern imaging techniques. A pathoanatomical diagnosis which fits into a classical disease model where successful treatment can be carried out, can only be made in 5% to 7% of the patients. The back pain in the rest of the patients where no pathoanatomical diagnosis can be made is often labelled, unscientifically, as chronic low back pain. Despite the existence of sophisticated imaging techniques and a plethora of diagnostic test the source of pain in patients with nonspecific back pain cannot be established. There exist no causal relationship between imaging findings of degenerated disc, lumbar facet arthritis, spondylosis, spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis, to the pain in these patients. Surgical treatment of non-specific back pain where no pathoanatomical diagnosis has been established is bound to fail. Therefore the outcome of spinal fusion in these patients can be no better than nonsurgical treatment. Spinal fusion is a major surgery which can be associated with significant morbidity and occasionally with mortality. Yet there is rapid rise in the rates of spinal fusion. There is a growing tension between ethics and conflicts of interest for surgeons. The spine, unfortunately, has been labelled as a profit centre and there are allegations of conflicts of interest in the relationship of doctors with the multi-billion dollar spinal devices industry. The devices industry has a significant influence on not only research publications in peer review journals but also on decisions made by doctors which can have a detrimental effect on the welfare of the patient.

Keywords: Chronic low back pain; spinal fusion.

References

    1. Stanton TR, Latimer J, Maher CG, Hancock MJ. How do we define the condition ‘recurrent low back pain’? A systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2010;19((4)):533–9.
    1. Waddell G. Subgroups within “nonspecific” low back pain. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:395–6.
    1. Freemont AJ. The cellular pathobiology of the degenerated intervertebral disc and discogenic back pain. Rheumatology. 2009;48:5–10.
    1. Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Derby R, Fortin J, Kine G, Bogduk N. The prevalence and clinical features of internal disc disruption in patients with chronic back pain. Spine. 1995;20((17)):1878–83.
    1. Schwarzer AC, Derby R, Aprill CN, Fortin J, Kine G, Bogduk N. Pain from lumbar zygapophysial joints: A test of two models. J Spinal Dis. 1994;7((4)):331–6.
    1. Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Bogduk N. The sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain. Spine. 1995;20((1)):31–7.
    1. Boos N, Hodler J. What help and what confusion can imaging provide? Clin Rheumatol. 1998;12((1)):115–39.
    1. van Tulder MW, Assendelft WJ, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Spinal radiographic findings and non-specific back pain. A systematic review of observational studies. Spine. 1997;22((4)):427–34.
    1. Jarvik JG, Hollingworth W, Heagerty PJ, Haynor DR, Boyko EJ, Deyo RA. Three-Year incidence of low back pain in an initially asymptomatic cohort: Clinical and imaging risk factors. Spine. 2005;30((13)):1541–8.
    1. Carragee EJ. Persistent low back pain. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1891–8.
    1. Jensen MC. Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, Modic MT, Malkasian D, Ross JS. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med. 1994;331((2)):69–73.
    1. Low Back Disorders. American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine; 2007. Chapter 12: Low back complaints in the Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines, 2nd Edition. (Accessed on 8th July 2014)
    1. Sackett DL, Haynes RB. Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: The architecture of diagnostic research. BMJ. 2002;324:539–41.
    1. Carragee EJ, Lincoln T, Parmar VS, Alamin T. A gold standard evaluation of the “discogenic pain” diagnosis as determined by provocative discography. Spine. 2006;31((18)):2115–23.
    1. Carragee EJ, Tanner CM, Yang B, Brito JL, Truong T. False-positive findings on discography: Reliability of subjective concordance assessment during provocative disc injection. Spine. 1999;24(23):2542.
    1. Willems PC, Staal JB, Walenkamp GH, de Bie RA. Spinal fusion for chronic low back pain: systematic review on the accuracy of test for patient selection. Spine J. 2013;13((20)):99–109.
    1. Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Mirza S, Martin BI. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine. 2005;30((12)):1441-5–1446-7. Jun 15.
    1. Department of Health (England) London: DoH; 1998-2003. Hospital episode statistics, 1998-2003.
    1. Fairbank J, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J, Yu l, Barker K, Collins R. for the Spine Stabilisation Trial Group. Randomised controlled trial to compare stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: MRC spine stabilisation trial. BMJ. 2005 doi: 10.1136/.
    1. Brox JI, Nygaard OP, Holm I, Keller A, Ingebrigtsen T, Reikeras O. Four-year follow-up of surgical versus non-surgical therapy for chronic low back pain. Ann Rheum. 2010;69:1643–48.
    1. Mirza SK, Deyo RA. Systematic review of randomized trials comparing lumbar fusion surgery to nonoperative care for treatment of chronic back pain. Spine. 2007;32((7)):816–23.
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Draft Comparative Effectiveness Review. Spinal Fusion for Treating Painful Lumbar Degenerated Discs or Joints. 2012
    1. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BJ, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG. Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar stenosis in older adults. JAMA. 2010;302((13)):1259–1265.
    1. Fritzell P. Ha¨gg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A. (23) Vol. 26. SPINE: 2001. the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain. A multicentre randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group; pp. 2521–34.
    1. Brox JI Sørensen R Friis A. et alRandomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration Spine 200328(17)1913–1921.
    1. Abelson R. The spine as a profit centre. The New York Times. 2006 30spine.html?pagewanted=1&_r=4&ei=5088&en=9c70b96244b5dfc9&ex=1325134800&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss& (Accessed on 12th July 2014)
    1. Martin BI, Mirza SK, Cromstock BA, Gray DT, Krenter W, Deyo RA. Are lumbar spine re-operation rates falling with greater use of fusion surgery and new surgical technology? Spine. 2001;32((19)):2119–26.
    1. Unneeded, risker spinal fusion on the rise. (Accessed on 18th July 2014)
    1. Staff Report on Medtronic’s Influence on InFuse Clinical Studies, Committee on Finance, United States Senate, October. 2012. (Accessed on 23rd July 2014)
    1. Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Weiner BK. A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: emerging safety concerns and lessons learned. The Spine Journal. 2011;11:471–491.
    1. Kelly JE, McNamara AP. Physician-Owned Medical Device Distributors: A controversial business model.
    1. Levinson RD, Inspector General. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Spinal devices supplied by physician owned distributors: Overview of prevalence and use. (Accessed on 12th July 2014)
    1. OSA Technology Sdn Bhd. (Accessed on 15th 2014)

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다