Tissue Adhesive for Wound Closure Reduces Immediate Postoperative Wound Dressing Changes After Primary TKA: A Randomized Controlled Study in Simultaneous Bilateral TKA

Kirill Gromov, Anders Troelsen, Sofie Raaschou, Håkon Sandhold, Christian Skovgaard Nielsen, Henrik Kehlet, Henrik Husted, Kirill Gromov, Anders Troelsen, Sofie Raaschou, Håkon Sandhold, Christian Skovgaard Nielsen, Henrik Kehlet, Henrik Husted

Abstract

Background: Prolonged wound drainage after TKA is associated with increased risk of infection. To decrease wound drainage, tissue adhesive has been suggested as an adjunct to wound closure after TKA; however, no studies of which we are aware have investigated the effect of tissue adhesive in a modern fast-track TKA setting.

Questions/purposes: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of wound closure using a high-viscosity tissue adhesive in simultaneous bilateral TKA with respect to (1) postoperative wound drainage, measured as number of dressing changes in the first 72 hours postoperatively; and (2) wound healing assessed using the ASEPSIS score.

Methods: Thirty patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA were included in the study. The left knee was randomized to receive either standard three-layer closure with staples or the same closure supplemented with tissue adhesive with the opposite treatment used on the contralateral knee. One patient underwent a constrained TKA and underwent revision 2 days after the index procedure and was therefore excluded leaving 29 patients (58 knees) for analysis. Sixty-two percent (n = 18) were female. Mean age was 64 years (range, 42-78 years). Mean body mass index was 28 kg/m (range, 21-38 kg/m). Postoperative wound drainage was evaluated as drainage resulting in a dressing change. The wound dressing was changed if it was soaked to the borders of the absorbable dressing at any point. The nurses changing the dressing were blinded to treatment allocation up to the first dressing change. The number of dressing changes during the first 72 hours postoperatively was recorded. The secondary study endpoint was the ASEPSIS score, which is a clinical score assessing wound healing. ASEPSIS score, measured by a nurse not involved in the treatment, was compared between the groups at 3 weeks followup.

Results: Knees with tissue adhesive underwent fewer dressing changes (median, 0; interquartile range [IQR], 0-1) compared with the contralateral knee (IQR, 1-2; difference of medians, one dressing change; p = 0.001). A total of 59% of knees in the intervention group did not undergo any dressing changes before discharge, whereas 24% of knees in the control group did not undergo any dressing changes before discharge (p = 0.02). The knees in the intervention group and the control group did not differ with respect to ASEPSIS score at 3 weeks.

Conclusions: Tissue adhesive as an adjunct to standard wound closure after primary TKA reduced the number of dressing changes after surgery, but did not change the appearance or healing of the wound at 3 weeks based on the ASEPSIS scores. Whether the small differences observed here in terms of the number of dressing changes performed will justify the additional costs associated with using this product or whether there are other differences associated with the use of tissue adhesive that may prove important such as patient preferences or longer term differences in wound healing or infection should be studied in the future.

Level of evidence: Level I, therapeutic study.

Conflict of interest statement

Each author certifies that neither he or she, nor any member of his or her immediate family, has funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Thirty-two patients were screened for eligibility, 30 patients were included and randomized, and 29 patients were included in the final analysis.
Fig. 2 A-B
Fig. 2 A-B
Image of a wound presentation the day after surgery on the same patient. (A) This wound did not require a dressing change, whereas (B) this wound required a dressing change.

References

    1. Andersen LØ, Husted H, Otte KS, Kristensen BB, Kehlet H. A compression bandage improves local infiltration analgesia in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop . 2008;79:806–811.
    1. Ashby E, Haddad FS, O’Donnell E, Wilson AP. How will surgical site infection be measured to ensure 'high quality care for all'? J Bone Joint Surg Br . 2010;92:1294–1299.
    1. Byrne DJ, Napier A, Cuschieri A. Validation of the ASEPSIS method of wound scoring in patients undergoing general surgical operations. J R Coll Surg Edinb . 1988;33:154–155.
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, Dickersin K, Hrobjartsson A, Schulz KF, Parulekar WR, Krleza-Jeric K, Laupacis A, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586.
    1. Dumville JC, Coulthard P, Worthington H V, Riley P, Patel N, Darcey J, Esposito M, van der Elst M, van Waes OJF. Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev . 2014;11:CD004287.
    1. Durando D, Porubsky C, Winter S, Kalymon J, O’Keefe T, LaFond AA. Allergic contact dermatitis to Dermabond (2-octyl cyanoacrylate) after total knee arthroplasty. Dermatitis. 2014;25:99–100.
    1. El-Gazzar Y, Smith DC, Kim SJ, Hirsh DM, Blum Y, Cobelli M, Cohen HW. The use of Dermabond® as an adjunct to wound closure after total knee arthroplasty: examining immediate post-operative wound drainage. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:553–556.
    1. George J, Piuzzi NS, Ng M, Sodhi N, Khlopas AA, Mont MA. Association between body mass index and thirty-day complications after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:865–871.
    1. Gromov K, Troelsen A, Stahl Otte K, Ørsnes T, Husted H. Morbidity and mortality after bilateral simultaneous total knee arthroplasty in a fast-track setting. Acta Orthop . 2016;87:286–290.
    1. Husted H. Fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty: clinical and organizational aspects. Acta Orthop Suppl . 2012;83:1–39.
    1. Husted H, Solgaard S, Hansen TB, Søballe K, Kehlet H. Care principles at four fast-track arthroplasty departments in Denmark. Dan Med Bull . 2010;57:A4166.
    1. Jaberi FM, Parvizi J, Haytmanek CT, Joshi A, Purtill J. Procrastination of wound drainage and malnutrition affect the outcome of joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res . 2008;466:1368–1371.
    1. Jones CW, Spasojevic S, Goh G, Joseph Z, Wood DJ, Yates PJ. Wound discharge after pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in lower limb arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:224–229.
    1. Khan F, Ng L, Gonzalez S, Hale T, Turner-Stokes L. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation programmes following joint replacement at the hip and knee in chronic arthropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev . 2008;2:CD004957.
    1. Khan RJK, Fick D, Yao F, Tang K, Hurworth M, Nivbrant B, Wood D. A comparison of three methods of wound closure following arthroplasty: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br . 2006;88:238–242.
    1. Khurana A, Parker S, Goel V, Alderman PM. Dermabond wound closure in primary hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg . 2008;74:349–353.
    1. Livesey C, Wylde V, Descamps S, Estela CM, Bannister GC, Learmonth ID, Blom AW. Skin closure after total hip replacement: a randomised controlled trial of skin adhesive versus surgical staples. J Bone Joint Surg Br . 2009;91:725–729.
    1. Nakano N, Matsumoto T, Ishida K, Tsumura N, Muratsu H, Hiranaka T, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M. Factors influencing the outcome of deep infection following total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2015;22:328–332.
    1. Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Chen AF. Proceedings of the International Consensus on Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Bone Joint J . 2013;95:1450–1452.
    1. Patel VP, Walsh M, Sehgal B, Preston C, DeWal H, Di Cesare PE. Factors associated with prolonged wound drainage after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:33–38.
    1. Peel TN, Dowsey MM, Daffy JR, Stanley PA, Choong PF, Buising KL. Risk factors for prosthetic hip and knee infections according to arthroplasty site. J Hosp Infect . 2011;79:129–133.
    1. Saleh K, Olson M, Resig S, Bershadsky B, Kuskowski M, Gioe T, Robinson H, Schmidt R, McElfresh E. Predictors of wound infection in hip and knee joint replacement: results from a 20 year surveillance program. J Orthop Res . 2002;20:506–515.
    1. Scuderi GR. Avoiding postoperative wound complications in total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018. Feb 21. [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Siah CJ, Childs C. A systematic review of the ASEPSIS scoring system used in non-cardiac-related surgery. J Wound Care. 2012;21:124–130.
    1. Wilson AP, Treasure T, Sturridge MF, Grüneberg RN. A scoring method (ASEPSIS) for postoperative wound infections for use in clinical trials of antibiotic prophylaxis. Lancet. 1986;1:311–313.
    1. Wilson APR, Gibbons C, Reeves BC, Hodgson B, Liu M, Plummer D, Krukowski ZH, Bruce J, Wilson J, Pearson A. Surgical wound infection as a performance indicator: agreement of common definitions of wound infection in 4773 patients. BMJ. 2004;329:720.
    1. Zmistowski B, Karam JA, Durinka JB, Casper DS, Parvizi J. Periprosthetic joint infection increases the risk of one-year mortality. J Bone Joint Surg Am . 2013;95:2177–2184.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다