Symptom Recognition as a Mediator in the Self-Care of Chronic Illness

Barbara Riegel, Maddalena De Maria, Claudio Barbaranelli, Maria Matarese, Davide Ausili, Anna Stromberg, Ercole Vellone, Tiny Jaarsma, Barbara Riegel, Maddalena De Maria, Claudio Barbaranelli, Maria Matarese, Davide Ausili, Anna Stromberg, Ercole Vellone, Tiny Jaarsma

Abstract

Background: The recognition of a symptom is needed to initiate a decision to engage in a behavior to ameliorate the symptom. Yet, a surprising number of individuals fail to detect symptoms and delay in addressing early warnings of a health problem.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that symptom recognition mediates the relationship between monitoring for and management of symptoms of a chronic illness.

Methods: A secondary analysis of existing cross-sectional data. A sample of 1,629 patients diagnosed with one or more chronic conditions was enrolled in the United States (US) (n = 407), Italy (n = 784) and Sweden (n = 438) between March 2015 and May 2019. Data on self-care monitoring, symptom recognition, and self-care management was assessed using the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory. After confirming metric invariance in cultural assessment, we used structural equation modeling to test a mediation model where symptom recognition was conceptualized as the mediator linking self-care monitoring and self-care management with autonomous (e.g., Change your activity level) and consulting behaviors (e.g., Call your healthcare provider for guidance).

Results: Symptom recognition mediated the relation between self-care monitoring and autonomous self-care management behaviors (β = 0.098, β = 0.122, β = 0.081, p < 0.001 for US, Italy, and Sweden, respectively). No mediation effect was found for consulting self-care management behaviors.

Conclusion: Our findings suggests that symptom recognition promotes autonomous self-care behaviors in people with a chronic condition. Self-care monitoring directly affects consulting self-care management behaviors but not through symptom recognition. Further research is needed to fully understand the role of symptom recognition in the self-care process.

Keywords: chronic disease; chronic illness; interoception; mediation analysis; self-care; self-management; symptom perception; symptom recognition.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2022 Riegel, De Maria, Barbaranelli, Matarese, Ausili, Stromberg, Vellone and Jaarsma.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The response to symptoms requires that the symptom is detected, presumably through the behaviors of self-care monitoring. Monitoring involves actively noticing typical symptoms and checking for the presence of bodily changes. Symptom detection precedes perception, which involves becoming consciously aware of the symptom. Once detected and perceived, interpretation and the assignment of meaning occurs, which leads to symptom recognition. Symptom recognition is required before a self-care management response can be expected to occur.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graphic illustration of the way responses to this question can be analyzed.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Direct effects of self-care monitoring on autonomous and consulting self-care management behaviors are shown to occur via item #14 (symptom recognition) in a sample of patients from the United States, Italy, and Sweden (n = 1615). Note that the dashed arrow indicates the direct effects were not statistically significant. The error standard is shown in brackets. Key: SC-CII: Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory; a: p-value 0.05; b: p-value < 0.05; US, United States; ITA, Italy; SWE, Sweden.

References

    1. Lam C, Smeltzer SC. Patterns of symptom recognition, interpretation, and response in heart failure patients: an integrative review. J Cardiovasc Nurs. (2013) 28:348–59. 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3182531cf7
    1. Jurgens CY. The value of patient perception of heart failure symptoms: commentary on physical and psychological symptom biomechanics in moderate to advanced heart failure. J Cardiovasc Nurs. (2016) 31:140–1. 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000233
    1. Lee KS, Oh S. An integrative review of the symptom perception process in heart failure. J Cardiovasc Nurs. (2020) 37:122–33. 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000750
    1. Lee S, Riegel B. State of the science in heart failure symptom perception research: an integrative review. J Cardiovasc Nurs. (2018) 33:204–10. 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000445
    1. Riegel B, Dickson VV, Lee CS, Daus M, Hill J, Irani E, et al. . A mixed methods study of symptom perception in patients with chronic heart failure. Heart Lung. (2018) 47:107–14. 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2017.11.002
    1. Santos GC, Liljeroos M, Dwyer AA, Jaques C, Girard J, Stromberg A, et al. . Symptom perception in heart failure - interventions and outcomes: a scoping review. Int J Nurs Stud. (2020) 116:103524. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103524
    1. Critchley HD, Wiens S, Rotshtein P, Ohman A, Dolan RJ. Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nat Neurosci. (2004) 7:189–95. 10.1038/nn1176
    1. Bonaz B, Lane RD, Oshinsky ML, Kenny PJ, Sinha R, Mayer EA, et al. . Diseases, disorders, and comorbidities of interoception. Trends Neurosci. (2021) 44:39–51. 10.1016/j.tins.2020.09.009
    1. Chen WG, Schloesser D, Arensdorf AM, Simmons JM, Cui C, Valentino R, et al. . The emerging science of interoception: sensing, integrating, interpreting, and regulating signals within the self. Trends Neurosci. (2021) 44:3–16. 10.1016/j.tins.2020.10.007
    1. Riegel B, Jaarsma T, Stromberg A. A middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. (2012) 35:194–204. 10.1097/ANS.0b013e318261b1ba
    1. Riegel B, Jaarsma T, Lee CS, Stromberg A. Integrating symptoms into the middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. (2019) 42:206–15. 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000237
    1. Craig AD. How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2002) 3:655–66. 10.1038/nrn894
    1. Choi S, Roy B, Kumar R, Fonarow GC, Woo MA. Heart failure self-care associated with brain injury in executive control regions. J Cardiovasc Nurs. (2019) 34:433–9. 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000611
    1. Schulz SM. Neural correlates of heart-focused interoception: a functional magnetic resonance imaging meta-analysis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. (2016) 371:20160018. 10.1098/rstb.2016.0018
    1. Lin YK, Hung M, Sharma A, Chan O, Varner MW, Staskus G, et al. . Impaired awareness of hypoglycemia continues to be a risk factor for severe hypoglycemia despite the use of continuous glucose monitoring system in type 1 diabetes. Endocr Pract. (2019) 25:517–25. 10.4158/EP-2018-0527
    1. Hwang JJ, Parikh L, Lacadie C, Seo D, Lam W, Hamza M, et al. . Hypoglycemia unawareness in type 1 diabetes suppresses brain responses to hypoglycemia. J Clin Invest. (2018) 128:1485–95. 10.1172/JCI97696
    1. Roy B, Ehlert L, Mullur R, Freeby MJ, Woo MA, Kumar R, et al. . Regional brain gray matter changes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:9925. 10.1038/s41598-020-67022-5
    1. Woo MA, Macey PM, Fonarow GC, Hamilton MA, Harper RM. Regional brain gray matter loss in heart failure. J Appl Physiol. (2003) 95:677–84. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00101.2003
    1. Woo MA, Kumar R, Macey PM, Fonarow GC, Harper RM. Brain injury in autonomic, emotional, and cognitive regulatory areas in patients with heart failure. J Card Fail. (2009) 15:214–23. 10.1016/j.cardfail.2008.10.020
    1. Woo MA, Ogren JA, Abouzeid CM, Macey PM, Sairafian KG, Saharan PS, et al. . Regional hippocampal damage in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. (2015) 17:494–500. 10.1002/ejhf.241
    1. Riegel B, Barbaranelli C, Sethares KA, Daus M, Moser DK, Miller JL, et al. . Development and initial testing of the self-care of chronic illness inventory. J Adv Nurs. (2018) 74:2465–76. 10.1111/jan.13775
    1. De Maria M, Matarese M, Stromberg A, Ausili D, Vellone E, Jaarsma T, et al. . Cross-cultural assessment of the self-care of chronic illness inventory: a psychometric evaluation. Int J Nurs Stud. (2019) 116:103422. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103422
    1. De Maria M, Vellone E, Ausili D, Alvaro R, Di Mauro S, Piredda M, et al. . Self-care of patient and caregiver DyAds in multiple chronic conditions: A LongITudinal studY (SODALITY) protocol. J Adv Nurs. (2019) 75:461–471. 10.1111/jan.13834
    1. Riegel B, Lee CS, Dickson VV, Carlson B. An update on the self-care of heart failure index. J Cardiovasc Nurs. (2009) 24:485–97. 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181b4baa0
    1. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. The truly remarkable universality of half a standard deviation: confirmation through another look. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. (2004) 4:581–5. 10.1586/14737167.4.5.581
    1. Bollen KA. A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociol Methods Res. (1989) 17:303–16. 10.1177/0049124189017003004
    1. Meredith W. Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika. (1993) 58:525–43. 10.1007/BF02294825
    1. Meade AW, Johnson EC, Braddy PW. Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. J Appl Psychol. (2008) 93:568–92. 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568
    1. Bryne BM. Structural Equation Modeling with EQS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (2006).
    1. Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices and recommendations for organizational research. Org Res Methods. (2000) 3:4–70. 10.1177/109442810031002
    1. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. (1990) 107:238–46. 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
    1. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Eq Model. (1999) 6:1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118
    1. Browne NW, Cudek R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; (1993). p. 136–62.
    1. Enders CK, Bandalos DL. The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Struct Eq Model. (2001) 8:430–57. 10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5
    1. Posey AD. Symptom perception: a concept exploration. Nurs Forum. (2006) 41:113–24. 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2006.00047.x
    1. Lee S . Understanding the heart failure symptom perception process. A dissertation in nursing presented to the faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy. (2021). Dissertation supervisor: Barbara Riegel.
    1. Chatreewatanakul B, Othaganont P, Hickman RL. Early symptom recognition and symptom management among exacerbation COPD patients: a qualitative study. Appl Nurs Res. (2022) 63:151522. 10.1016/j.apnr.2021.151522
    1. Seth AK. Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends Cogn Sci. (2013) 17:565–73. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.007
    1. Skotzko CE, Skotzko CE. Symptom perception in CHF: (why mind matters). Heart Fail Rev. (2009) 14:29–34. 10.1007/s10741-007-9059-5
    1. Unseld M, Zeilinger EL, Fellinger M, Lubowitzki S, Krammer K, Nader IW, et al. . Prevalence of pain and its association with symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety and distress in 846 cancer patients: a cross sectional study. Psychooncology. (2021) 30:504–10. 10.1002/pon.5595
    1. Johansson P, Jaarsma T, Andersson G, Lundgren J. The impact of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy and depressive symptoms on self-care behavior in patients with heart failure: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. (2021) 116:103454. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103454
    1. Taylor S. Using health services. In: Taylor S, editor. Kindler Edition Health Psychology. 10th ed.: Apple Books; (2017) Chapter 8.
    1. Chung JM, Robins RW. Exploring cultural differences in the recognition of the self-conscious emotions. PLoS ONE. (2015) 10:e0136411. 10.1371/journal.pone.0136411
    1. Kirmayer LJ, Young A, Robbins JM. Symptom attribution in cultural perspective. Can J Psychiatry. (1994) 39:584–95. 10.1177/070674379403901002
    1. Landrine H, Klonoff EA. Cultural diversity in causal attributions for illness: the role of the supernatural. J Behav Med. (1994) 17:181–93. 10.1007/BF01858104
    1. Tran P, Tran L. Stroke and heart attack symptom recognition in older US adults by cognitive impairment status. Neuroepidemiology. (2021) 55:245–52. 10.1159/000516343
    1. Riegel B, Barbaranelli C, Carlson B, Sethares KA, Daus M, Moser DK, et al. . Psychometric Testing of the Revised Self-Care of Heart Failure Index. J Cardiovasc Nurs. (2019) 34:183–92. 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000543
    1. Matarese M, Clari M, De Marinis MG, Barbaranelli C, Ivziku D, Piredda M, et al. . The self-care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease inventory: development and psychometric evaluation. Eval Health Prof. (2020) 43:50–62. 10.1177/0163278719856660
    1. Ausili D, Barbaranelli C, Rossi E, Rebora P, Fabrizi D, Coghi C, et al. . Development and psychometric testing of a theory-based tool to measure self-care in diabetes patients: the self-care of diabetes inventory. BMC Endocr Disord. (2017) 17:66. 10.1186/s12902-017-0218-y
    1. Vellone E, Barbaranelli C, Pucciarelli G, Zeffiro V, Alvaro R, Riegel B. Validity and reliability of the caregiver contribution to self-care of heart failure index version 2. J Cardiovasc Nurs. (2020) 35:280–90. 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000655

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다