Efficacy of Semaglutide in a Subcutaneous and an Oral Formulation

Juris J Meier, Juris J Meier

Abstract

Despite the benefits of early and effective glycemic control in the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D), achieving glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) targets is challenging in some patients. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) provide effective reductions in HbA1c and body weight. Semaglutide is the only GLP-1RA that is available in both an injectable and oral formulation. The efficacy of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide and once-daily oral semaglutide has been investigated in the global SUSTAIN and PIONEER phase III clinical trial programs in a range of clinical settings, including early T2D managed with diet and exercise only, more established T2D uncontrolled on one to three oral antidiabetic drugs, and advanced disease treated with insulin. Across the SUSTAIN program, once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 1.0 mg reduced HbA1c by 1.5-1.8% after 30-56 weeks, which was significantly more than sitagliptin, liraglutide, exenatide extended release, dulaglutide, canagliflozin, or insulin glargine. Across the PIONEER program, once-daily oral semaglutide 14 mg reduced HbA1c by 1.0-1.4%, significantly more than sitagliptin or empagliflozin, and to a similar extent as liraglutide after 26 weeks. In addition, subcutaneous semaglutide reduced body weight significantly more than all active comparators tested, while oral semaglutide reduced body weight more than sitagliptin and liraglutide, and to a similar extent as empagliflozin. Neither formulation of semaglutide has been associated with an increased risk of hypoglycemia and both improve various measures of health-related quality of life. Semaglutide offers the benefits of a highly effective GLP-1RA in both injectable and oral formulations. Selection of the most appropriate formulation can be made on an individual basis to best suit the patient's preferences and needs.

Keywords: body weight; efficacy; glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA); glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c); oral; semaglutide; subcutaneous; type 2 diabetes.

Conflict of interest statement

JJM has received lecture honoraria and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Berlin-Chemie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi; has received reimbursement of congress participation fees and travel expenses from MSD, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi; and has initiated projects supported by Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi. The author declares that this article received funding from Novo Nordisk. The funder had the following involvement in the article: medical writing support.

Copyright © 2021 Meier.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Reduction in HbA1c with semaglutide and comparators in global glycemic efficacy trials (–, –26, 31, 33). (A) Trials in early T2D (mean duration 3–4 years). (B) Trials in established T2D (mean duration 6–10 years) with incretin-based therapies as comparators. (C) Trials in established T2D (mean duration 6–10 years) with other comparators. (D) Trials in advanced T2D (mean duration 13–15 years). For the SUSTAIN trials shown, HbA1c reduction at study end (weeks 30, 40, 52, or 56) was the primary endpoint. Estimated mean changes from baseline in HbA1c included only data obtained before initiation of any rescue medication or before premature treatment discontinuation. For the PIONEER trials shown, HbA1c reduction at week 26 was the primary endpoint, except for PIONEER 7 where the primary endpoint was achievement of HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at week 52. Estimated mean changes from baseline in HbA1c are regardless of trial product discontinuation or rescue medication (treatment policy estimand). Oral semaglutide 3 mg daily was also tested in PIONEER 1, PIONEER 3, and PIONEER 8; however, this dose is not recommended as a maintenance dose [Rybelsus SPC] and data are not shown (except for in PIONEER 7 as part of a flexible dosing approach in which investigators could increase or decrease the dose of oral semaglutide between 3, 7 and 14 mg according to efficacy and tolerability criteria and clinical judgment). *p < 0.05 for the estimated treatment difference with semaglutide vs. comparator. Cana, canagliflozin; dula, dulaglutide; empa, empagliflozin; ER, extended release; exe, exenatide; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; IGlar, insulin glargine; lira, liraglutide; met, metformin; N, number of randomized patients; pbo, placebo; s.c., subcutaneous; sema, semaglutide; SGLT2i, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor; sita, sitagliptin; SU, sulfonylurea; T2D, type 2 diabetes; TZD, thiazolidinedione.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reduction in body weight with semaglutide and comparators (–, –26, 31, 33). (A) Trials in early T2D (3–4 years). (B) Trials in established T2D (6–10 years) with incretin-based therapies as comparators. (C) Trials in established T2D (6–10 years) with other comparators. (D) Trials in advanced T2D (13–15 years). For the SUSTAIN trials shown, estimated mean changes from baseline in body weight included only data obtained before initiation of any rescue medication or before premature treatment discontinuation. For the PIONEER trials shown, estimated mean changes from baseline in body weight are regardless of trial product discontinuation or rescue medication (treatment policy estimand). Oral semaglutide 3 mg daily was also tested in PIONEER 1, PIONEER 3, and PIONEER 8; however, this dose is not recommended as a maintenance dose [Rybelsus SPC] and data are not shown (except for in PIONEER 7 as part of a flexible dosing approach in which investigators could increase or decrease the dose of oral semaglutide between 3, 7 and 14 mg according to efficacy and tolerability criteria and clinical judgment). *p < 0.05 for the estimated treatment difference with semaglutide vs. comparator. Cana, canagliflozin; dula, dulaglutide; empa, empagliflozin; ER, extended release; exe, exenatide; IGlar, insulin glargine; lira, liraglutide; met, metformin; pbo, placebo; s.c., subcutaneous; sema, semaglutide; SGLT2i, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor; sita, sitagliptin; SU, sulfonylurea; T2D, type 2 diabetes; TZD, thiazolidinedione.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overview of considerations related to the use of subcutaneous and oral formulations of semaglutide. HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin.

References

    1. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, et al. . Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ (2000) 321:405–12. 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405
    1. Laiteerapong N, Ham SA, Gao Y, Moffet HH, Liu JY, Huang ES, et al. . The legacy effect in type 2 diabetes: impact of early glycemic control on future complications (the Diabetes & Aging Study). Diabetes Care (2019) 42:416–26. 10.2337/dc17-1144
    1. An J, Nichols GA, Qian L, Harrison TN, Li Z, Munis MA, et al. . Time in suboptimal glycemic control over 10 years for patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complicat (2020) 34:107607. 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107607
    1. Davies MJ, D’Alessio DA, Fradkin J, Kernan WN, Mathieu C, Mingrone G, et al. . Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care (2018) 41:2669–701. 10.2337/dci18-0033
    1. Davies MJ, Bianchi C, Del Prato S. Use of incretin-based medications: what do current international recommendations suggest with respect to GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors? Metabolism (2020) 107:154242. 10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154242
    1. Meier JJ. GLP-1 receptor agonists for individualized treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2012) 8:728–42. 10.1038/nrendo.2012.140
    1. Nauck MA, Meier JJ. Management of endocrine disease: are all GLP-1 agonists equal in the treatment of type 2 diabetes? Eur J Endocrinol (2019) 181:R211–34. 10.1530/EJE-19-0566
    1. DeFronzo RA, Triplitt CL, Abdul-Ghani M, Cersosimo E. Novel agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Spectr (2014) 27:100–12. 10.2337/diaspect.27.2.100
    1. Romera I, Cebrián-Cuenca A, Álvarez-Guisasola F, Gomez-Peralta F, Reviriego J. A review of practical issues on the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for the management of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Ther (2019) 10:5–19. 10.1007/s13300-018-0535-9
    1. Nauck MA, Meier JJ. Pioneering oral peptide therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2019) 7:500–2. 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30182-2
    1. Food and Drug Administration . Ozempic® Prescribing Information. Available at: (Accessed September 15, 2020).
    1. European Medicines Agency . Ozempic® Summary of Product Characteristics. Available at: (Accessed September 15, 2020).
    1. Food and Drug Administration . Rybelsus® Prescribing Information. Available at: (Accessed September 15, 2020).
    1. European Medicines Agency . Rybelsus® Summary of Product Characteristics. Available at: (Accessed December 10, 2020).
    1. Smits MM, Van Raalte DH. Safety of semaglutide. [Suppl article].
    1. Sorli C, Harashima SI, Tsoukas GM, Unger J, Karsbøl JD, Hansen T, et al. . Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide monotherapy versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 1): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multinational, multicentre phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2017) 5:251–60. 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30013-X
    1. Ahrén B, Masmiquel L, Kumar H, Sargin M, Karsbøl JD, Jacobsen SH, et al. . Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily sitagliptin as an add-on to metformin, thiazolidinediones, or both, in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 2): a 56-week, double-blind, phase 3a, randomised trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2017) 5:341–54. 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30092-X
    1. Ahmann AJ, Capehorn M, Charpentier G, Dotta F, Henkel E, Lingvay I, et al. . Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus exenatide ER in subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): a 56-week, open-label, randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care (2018) 41:258–66. 10.2337/dc17-0417
    1. Aroda VR, Bain SC, Cariou B, Piletič M, Rose L, Axelsen M, et al. . Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily insulin glargine as add-on to metformin (with or without sulfonylureas) in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 4): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational, phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2017) 5:355–66. 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30085-2
    1. Rodbard HW, Lingvay I, Reed J, de la Rosa R, Rose L, Sugimoto D, et al. . Semaglutide added to basal insulin in type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 5): a randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2018) 103:2291–301. 10.1210/jc.2018-00070
    1. Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, Eliaschewitz FG, Jódar E, Leiter LA, et al. . Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med (2016) 375:1834–44. 10.1056/NEJMoa1607141
    1. Pratley RE, Aroda VR, Lingvay I, Lüdemann J, Andreassen C, Navarria A, et al. . Semaglutide versus dulaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 7): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2018) 6:275–86. 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30024-X
    1. Lingvay I, Catarig AM, Frias JP, Kumar H, Lausvig NL, le Roux CW, et al. . Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus daily canagliflozin as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 8): a double-blind, phase 3b, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2019) 7:834–44. 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30311-0
    1. Zinman B, Bhosekar V, Busch R, Holst I, Ludvik B, Thielke D, et al. . Semaglutide once weekly as add-on to SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy in type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 9): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2019) 7:356–67. 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30066-X
    1. Capehorn MS, Catarig AM, Furberg JK, Janez A, Price HC, Tadayon S, et al. . Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide 1.0 mg vs once-daily liraglutide 1.2 mg as add-on to 1-3 oral antidiabetic drugs in subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 10). Diabetes Metab (2020) 46:100–9. 10.1016/j.diabet.2019.101117
    1. Zinman B, Aroda VR, Buse JB, Cariou B, Harris SB, Hoff ST, et al. . Efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral semaglutide versus placebo added to insulin ± metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: the PIONEER 8 trial. Diabetes Care (2019) 42:2262–71. 10.2337/dc19-0898
    1. Aroda VR, Rosenstock J, Terauchi Y, Altuntas Y, Lalic NM, Morales Villegas EC, et al. . PIONEER 1: randomized clinical trial of the efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide monotherapy in comparison with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care (2019) 42:1724–32. 10.2337/dc19-0749
    1. Rodbard HW, Rosenstock J, Canani LH, Deerochanawong C, Gumprecht J, Lindberg >SØ, et al. . Oral semaglutide versus empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on metformin: the PIONEER 2 trial. Diabetes Care (2019) 42:2272–81. 10.2337/dc19-0883
    1. Rosenstock J, Allison D, Birkenfeld AL, Blicher TM, Deenadayalan S, Jacobsen JB, et al. . Effect of additional oral semaglutide vs sitagliptin on glycated hemoglobin in adults with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with metformin alone or with sulfonylurea: the PIONEER 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA (2019) 321:1466–80. 10.1001/jama.2019.2942
    1. Pratley R, Amod A, Tetens Hoff S, Kadowaki T, Lingvay I, Nauck M, et al. . Oral semaglutide versus subcutaneous liraglutide and placebo in type 2 diabetes (PIONEER 4): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3a trial. Lancet (2019) 394:39–50. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31271-1
    1. Mosenzon O, Blicher TM, Rosenlund S, Eriksson JW, Heller S, Hels OH, et al. . Efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate renal impairment (PIONEER 5): a placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2019) 7:515–27. 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30192-5
    1. Husain M, Birkenfeld AL, Donsmark M, Dungan K, Eliaschewitz FG, Franco DR, et al. . Oral semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med (2019) 381:841–51. 10.1056/NEJMoa1901118
    1. Pieber TR, Bode B, Mertens A, Cho YM, Christiansen E, Hertz CL, et al. . Efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide with flexible dose adjustment versus sitagliptin in type 2 diabetes (PIONEER 7): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2019) 7:528–39. 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30194-9
    1. Nauck MA, Quast DR. Cardiovascular safety and benefits of semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: findings from SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6 [Suppl article].
    1. Aroda VR, Saugstrup T, Buse JB, Donsmark M, Zacho J, Davies MJ. Incorporating and interpreting regulatory guidance on estimands in diabetes clinical trials: the PIONEER 1 randomized clinical trial as an example. Diabetes Obes Metab (2019) 21:2203–10. 10.1111/dom.13804
    1. Jendle J, Birkenfeld AL, Polonsky WH, Silver R, Uusinarkaus K, Hansen T, et al. . Improved treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with once-weekly semaglutide in the SUSTAIN trials. Diabetes Obes Metab (2019) 21:2315–26. 10.1111/dom.13816
    1. Marrero DG, Hilliard ME, Maahs DM, McAuliffe-Fogarty AH, Hunter CM. Using patient reported outcomes in diabetes research and practice: recommendations from a national workshop. Diabetes Res Clin Pract (2019) 153:23–9. 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.05.016
    1. Granhall C, Donsmark M, Blicher TM, Golor G, Søndergaard FL, Thomsen M, et al. . Safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple ascending doses of the novel oral human GLP-1 analogue, oral semaglutide, in healthy subjects and subjects with type 2 diabetes. Clin Pharmacokinet (2019) 58:781–91. 10.1007/s40262-018-0728-4
    1. Overgaard RV, Navarria A, Hertz CL, Ingwersen SH. Similar efficacy and gastrointestinal tolerability versus exposure for oral and subcutaneous semaglutide. Presented at the 55th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. September 17–20, 2019. Barcelona, Spain, Abstract #777.
    1. Nuhoho S, Gupta J, Hansen BB, Fletcher-Louis M, Dang-Tan T, Paine A. Orally administered semaglutide versus GLP-1 RAs in patients with type 2 diabetes previously receiving 1-2 oral antidiabetics: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Diabetes Ther (2019) 10:2183–99. 10.1007/s13300-019-00706-y
    1. Davies M, Pieber TR, Hartoft-Nielsen ML, Hansen OKH, Jabbour S, Rosenstock J. Effect of oral semaglutide compared with placebo and subcutaneous semaglutide on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA (2017) 318:1460–70. 10.1001/jama.2017.14752
    1. Spain CV, Wright JJ, Hahn RM, Wivel A, Martin AA. Self-reported barriers to adherence and persistence to treatment with injectable medications for type 2 diabetes. Clin Ther (2016) 38:1653–64. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.05.009
    1. Brod M, Alolga SL, Meneghini L. Barriers to initiating insulin in type 2 diabetes patients: development of a new patient education tool to address myths, misconceptions and clinical realities. Patient (2014) 7:437–50. 10.1007/s40271-014-0068-x
    1. Khunti K, Millar-Jones D. Clinical inertia to insulin initiation and intensification in the UK: a focused literature review. Prim Care Diabetes (2017) 11:3–12. 10.1016/j.pcd.2016.09.003
    1. Savarese G, Sharma A, Pang C, Wood R, George JT, Soleymanlou N. Patient preferences for newer oral therapies in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes (2020) 69(Suppl 1). 10.2337/db20-2216-PUB
    1. Boye K, Ross M, Mody R, Konig M, Gelhorn H. Patients’ preferences for once-daily oral versus once-weekly injectable diabetes medications: the REVISE study. Diabetes Obes Metab (2020) 23(2):508–19. 10.1111/dom.14244
    1. Igarashi A, Hansen BB, Langer J, Tavella F, Collings H, Davies N, et al. . Preference for oral and injectable GLP-1RA therapy profiles in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a discrete choice experiment. Adv Ther (2020) 38:721–38. 10.1007/s12325-020-01561-1
    1. Hauber AB, Nguyen H, Posner J, Kalsekar I, Ruggles J. A discrete-choice experiment to quantify patient preferences for frequency of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist injections in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin (2016) 32(2):251–62. 10.1185/03007995.2015.1117433
    1. Thieu VT, Robinson S, Kennedy-Martin T, Boye KS, Garcia-Perez LE. Patient preferences for glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor-agonist treatment attributes. Patient Prefer Adherence (2019) 13:561–76. 10.2147/PPA.S187907
    1. Suzuki S, Oura T, Takeuchi M, Boye KS. Evaluation of the impact of once weekly dulaglutide on patient-reported outcomes in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: comparisons with liraglutide, insulin glargine, and placebo in two randomized studies. Health Qual Life Outcomes (2017) 15(1):123. 10.1186/s12955-017-0696-7
    1. Takase T, Nakamura A, Yamamoto C, Nomoto H, Miya A, Dannoura M, et al. . Improvement in treatment satisfaction after switching from liraglutide to dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. J Diabetes Investig (2019) 10(3):699–705. 10.1111/jdi.12906
    1. Qiao Q, Ouwens MJ, Grandy S, Johnsson K, Kostev K. Adherence to GLP-1RA therapy administered by once-daily or once-weekly injection in patients with type 2 diabetes in Germany. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes (2016) 9:201–5. 10.2147/DMSO.S99732
    1. Nguyen H, Dufour R, Caldwell-Tarr A, Nomoto H, Miya A, Dannoura M. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) therapy adherence for patients with type 2 diabetes in a medicare population. Adv Ther (2017) 34(3):658–73. 10.1007/s12325-016-0470-y
    1. Alatorre C, Fernández Landó L, Yu M, Brown K, Montejano L, Juneau P, et al. . Treatment patterns in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: higher adherence and persistence with dulaglutide compared with once-weekly exenatide and liraglutide. Diabetes Obes Metab (2017) 19(7):953–61. 10.1111/dom.12902
    1. Federici MO, McQuillan J, Biricolti G, Losi S, Lebrec J, Richards C, et al. . Utilization patterns of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Italy: a retrospective cohort study. Diabetes Ther (2018) 9(2):789–801. 10.1007/s13300-018-0396-2
    1. Otto T, Myland M, Jung H, Lebrec J, Richter H, Norrbacka K. Utilization patterns of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Germany: a retrospective cohort study. Curr Med Res Opin (2019) 35(5):893–901. 10.1080/03007995.2018.1538011
    1. Merck . Euthyrox Summary of Product Characteristics (2017). Available at: (Accessed June 29, 2020).
    1. Gæde P, Johansen P, Tikkanen CK, Pollock RF, Hunt B, Malkin SJP. Management of patients with type 2 diabetes with once-weekly semaglutide versus dulaglutide, exenatide ER, liraglutide and lixisenatide: a cost-effectiveness analysis in the Danish setting. Diabetes Ther (2019) 10(4):1297–317. 10.1007/s13300-019-0630-6
    1. Johansen P, Chubb B, Hunt B, Malkin SJP, Sandberg A, Capehorn M. Evaluating the long-term cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily liraglutide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in the UK. Adv Ther (2020) 37(5):2427–41. 10.1007/s12325-020-01337-7
    1. Martín V, Vidal J, Malkin SJP, Hallén N, Hunt B. Evaluation of the long-term cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide versus dulaglutide and sitagliptin in the Spanish setting. Adv Ther (2020) 37(10):4427–45. 10.1007/s12325-020-01464-1
    1. Johansen P, Hunt B, Iyer NN, Dang-Tan T, Pollock RF. A relative cost of control analysis of once-weekly semaglutide versus exenatide extended- release and dulaglutide for bringing patients to HbA1c and weight loss treatment targets in the USA. Adv Ther (2019) 36(5):1190–9. 10.1007/s12325-019-00915-8
    1. Hansen BB, Nuhoho S, Ali SN, Dang-Tan T, Valentine WJ, Malkin SJP, et al. . Oral semaglutide versus injectable glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a cost of control analysis. J Med Econ (2020) 23(6):650–8. 10.1080/13696998.2020.1722678
    1. Bain SC, Hansen BB, Malkin SJP, Nuhoho S, Valentine WJ, Chubb B, et al. . Oral semaglutide versus empagliflozin, sitagliptin and liraglutide in the UK: long-term cost-effectiveness analyses based on the PIONEER clinical trial programme. Diabetes Ther (2020) 11(1):259–77. 10.1007/s13300-019-00736-6
    1. Hunt B, Hansen BB, Ericsson Å, Kallenbach K, Ali SN, Dang-Tan T, et al. . Evaluation of the cost per patient achieving treatment targets with oral semaglutide: a short-term cost-effectiveness analysis in the United States. Adv Ther (2019) 36(12):3483–93. 10.1007/s12325-019-01125-y
    1. Jain AB, Ali A, Gorgojo Martínez JJ, Hramiak I, Kavia K, Madsbad S, et al. . Switching between GLP-1 receptor agonists in clinical practice: expert consensus and practical guidance. Int J Clin Pract (2021) 75(2):e13731. 10.1111/ijcp.13731

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다