Apatinib enhances the radiosensitivity of the esophageal cancer cell line KYSE-150 by inducing apoptosis and cell cycle redistribution

Lijun Hu, Fei Sun, Zhiqiang Sun, Xinchu Ni, Jian Wang, Jianlin Wang, Mengyun Zhou, Yue Feng, Ze Kong, Qiu Hua, Jingping Yu, Lijun Hu, Fei Sun, Zhiqiang Sun, Xinchu Ni, Jian Wang, Jianlin Wang, Mengyun Zhou, Yue Feng, Ze Kong, Qiu Hua, Jingping Yu

Abstract

To determine the radiosensitizing effect of apatinib on esophageal cancer cells, and to preliminarily investigate the underlying mechanism, KYSE-150 cells were treated with apatinib, x-ray or apatinib combined with x-ray, and compared with a blank control. It was observed that apatinib significantly inhibited vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion and the proliferation of KYSE-150 cells in a dose-dependent manner. As the concentration of apatinib increased, the radiobiological parameters inactivation dose (D0), quasi domain does (Dq) and survival fraction (SF2) of KYSE-150 cells decreased, while the sensitization enhancement ratio SERD0 increased. The rate of apoptosis in cells treated with apatinib and x-ray was markedly higher compared with those of the blank control, x-ray and apatinib alone groups (P<0.05). The proportion of cells in the G2/M phase was significantly increased in the apatinib, x-ray and combination groups compared with the blank control group (P<0.05). Compared with the control and x-ray groups, combination treatment did not significantly alter the expression level of polyADP-ribose polymerase (PARP), although it significantly increased the expression of cleaved-PARP (P<0.05). Moreover, the expression of cell serine/threonine-protein kinase-2 (CHK2) was downregulated (P<0.05), whilst expression of the phosphorylated form, pCHK2, was significantly increased (P<0.05) in the combination group when compared with the control and x-ray groups. In conclusion, the present study suggested that apatinib increases the radiosensitivity of KYSE-150 esophageal cancer cells by inhibiting VEGF secretion and cell proliferation, and promoting apoptosis and cell cycle redistribution.

Keywords: apatinib; apoptosis; cell cycle; esophageal cancer; radiosensitivity.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Apatinib inhibits VEGF secretion in KYSE-150 cells. KYSE-150 cells were irradiated with (A) 0 Gy and (B) 6 Gy x-ray following treatment with different concentrations of apatinib for 48 h. The VEGF concentration was calculated by ELISA, which indicated that the secretion of VEGF was significantly decreased in apatinib-treated KYSE-150 cells. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, from three independent experiments. *P

Figure 2.

Apatinib inhibits the proliferation rate…

Figure 2.

Apatinib inhibits the proliferation rate of KYSE-150 cells. KYSE-150 cells were treated with…

Figure 2.
Apatinib inhibits the proliferation rate of KYSE-150 cells. KYSE-150 cells were treated with various concentrations of apatinib (0, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 µmol/l) for 24, 48 and 72 h. Cell proliferation rate was calculated using a Cell Counting Kit-8 assay. Apatinib significantly inhibited the proliferation rate of KYSE-150 cells in a time- and dose-dependent manner. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. *P

Figure 3.

Survival fraction of KYSE-150 cells…

Figure 3.

Survival fraction of KYSE-150 cells pretreated with apatinib, followed by irradiation. Apatinib remarkably…

Figure 3.
Survival fraction of KYSE-150 cells pretreated with apatinib, followed by irradiation. Apatinib remarkably increased the radiosensitivity of KYSE-150 cells, with SERD0 of 1.36 for 20 and 40 µmol/l apatinib. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments.

Figure 4.

Effects of apatinib combined with…

Figure 4.

Effects of apatinib combined with x-ray iradiation on apoptosis in KYSE-150 cells. KYSE-150…

Figure 4.
Effects of apatinib combined with x-ray iradiation on apoptosis in KYSE-150 cells. KYSE-150 cells were pretreated with 20 µmol/l apatinib for 48 h prior to irradiation (4 Gy). Following irradiation, the cells were further incubated for 24 h. The apoptosis rate of the cells was analyzed by Annexin V/PI staining and flow cytometry. The apoptosis rates of the apatinib, x-ray and apatinib combined with x-ray groups were higher compared with that of the control group. Representative images of flow cytometric analysis are presented as follows: (A) Control group; (B) apatinib group; (C) radiation alone group; (D) combination group. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. PI, propidium iodide; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; PI, propidium iodide; Q, quadrant.

Figure 5.

Effects of apatinib and x-ray…

Figure 5.

Effects of apatinib and x-ray on the expression of PARP and cleaved-PARP in…

Figure 5.
Effects of apatinib and x-ray on the expression of PARP and cleaved-PARP in KYSE-150 cells. (A) The protein levels of PARP and cleaved-PARP were determined by western blotting. Lane 1, control group; lane 2, apatinib group; lane 3, x-ray group; and lane 4, combination group. (B) Quantitative analysis of the protein expression of PARP. (C) Quantitative analysis of the protein expression of cleaved-PARP. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. *P#P<0.05 vs. the same index sample treated with 4 Gy x-ray. PARP, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase.

Figure 6.

Effect of combination treatment of…

Figure 6.

Effect of combination treatment of apatinib and x-ray irradiation on cell cycle distribution…

Figure 6.
Effect of combination treatment of apatinib and x-ray irradiation on cell cycle distribution in KYSE-150 cells. KYSE-150 cells were pretreated with 20 µmol/l apatinib for 48 h prior to being exposed to 4 Gy radiation. The cells were incubated for another 24 h following irradiation and cell cycle distribution in the cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. The proportions of cells in the G2/M phase in the apatinib, x-ray and apatinib combined with x-ray groups were significantly higher compared with that of the control group. Representative images of flow cytometric analysis were presented as follows: (A) Control group; (B) apatinib group; (C) radiation alone group; (D) combination group. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. PE, phycoerythrin.

Figure 7.

Effects of apatinib and x-ray…

Figure 7.

Effects of apatinib and x-ray on the expression of CHK2 and pCHK2 in…

Figure 7.
Effects of apatinib and x-ray on the expression of CHK2 and pCHK2 in KYSE-150 cells. (A) The protein levels of CHK2 and pCHK2 were determined by western blotting. Lane 1, control group; lane 2, apatinib group; lane 3, x-ray group; and lane 4, combination group. (B) Quantitative analysis of the protein expression of CHK2. (C) Quantitative analysis of the protein expression of pCHK2. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. *P#P<0.05 vs. the same index sample treated with 4 Gy x-ray. CHK2, serine/threonine-protein kinase-2; p, phosphorylated.
All figures (7)
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ, He J. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:115–132. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Welsh J, Settle SH, Amini A, Xiao L, Suzuki A, Hayashi Y, Hofstetter W, Komaki R, Liao Z, Ajani JA. Failure patterns in patients with esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation. Cancer. 2012;118:2632–2640. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26586. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cellini F, Valentini V. Targeted therapies in combination with radiotherapy in oesophageal and gastroesophageal carcinoma. Curr Med Chem. 2014;21:990–1004. doi: 10.2174/09298673113209990236. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yu J, Liu F, Sun Z, Sun M, Sun S. The enhancement of radiosensitivity in human esophageal carcinoma cells by thalidomide and its potential mechanism. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2011;26:219–227. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2011.0964. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yu JP, Sun SP, Sun ZQ, Ni XC, Wang J, Li Y, Hu LJ, Li DQ. Clinical trial of thalidomide combined with radiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:5098–5103. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.5098. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Show all 15 references
Related information
Full text links [x]
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Apatinib inhibits the proliferation rate of KYSE-150 cells. KYSE-150 cells were treated with various concentrations of apatinib (0, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 µmol/l) for 24, 48 and 72 h. Cell proliferation rate was calculated using a Cell Counting Kit-8 assay. Apatinib significantly inhibited the proliferation rate of KYSE-150 cells in a time- and dose-dependent manner. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. *P

Figure 3.

Survival fraction of KYSE-150 cells…

Figure 3.

Survival fraction of KYSE-150 cells pretreated with apatinib, followed by irradiation. Apatinib remarkably…

Figure 3.
Survival fraction of KYSE-150 cells pretreated with apatinib, followed by irradiation. Apatinib remarkably increased the radiosensitivity of KYSE-150 cells, with SERD0 of 1.36 for 20 and 40 µmol/l apatinib. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments.

Figure 4.

Effects of apatinib combined with…

Figure 4.

Effects of apatinib combined with x-ray iradiation on apoptosis in KYSE-150 cells. KYSE-150…

Figure 4.
Effects of apatinib combined with x-ray iradiation on apoptosis in KYSE-150 cells. KYSE-150 cells were pretreated with 20 µmol/l apatinib for 48 h prior to irradiation (4 Gy). Following irradiation, the cells were further incubated for 24 h. The apoptosis rate of the cells was analyzed by Annexin V/PI staining and flow cytometry. The apoptosis rates of the apatinib, x-ray and apatinib combined with x-ray groups were higher compared with that of the control group. Representative images of flow cytometric analysis are presented as follows: (A) Control group; (B) apatinib group; (C) radiation alone group; (D) combination group. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. PI, propidium iodide; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; PI, propidium iodide; Q, quadrant.

Figure 5.

Effects of apatinib and x-ray…

Figure 5.

Effects of apatinib and x-ray on the expression of PARP and cleaved-PARP in…

Figure 5.
Effects of apatinib and x-ray on the expression of PARP and cleaved-PARP in KYSE-150 cells. (A) The protein levels of PARP and cleaved-PARP were determined by western blotting. Lane 1, control group; lane 2, apatinib group; lane 3, x-ray group; and lane 4, combination group. (B) Quantitative analysis of the protein expression of PARP. (C) Quantitative analysis of the protein expression of cleaved-PARP. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. *P#P<0.05 vs. the same index sample treated with 4 Gy x-ray. PARP, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase.

Figure 6.

Effect of combination treatment of…

Figure 6.

Effect of combination treatment of apatinib and x-ray irradiation on cell cycle distribution…

Figure 6.
Effect of combination treatment of apatinib and x-ray irradiation on cell cycle distribution in KYSE-150 cells. KYSE-150 cells were pretreated with 20 µmol/l apatinib for 48 h prior to being exposed to 4 Gy radiation. The cells were incubated for another 24 h following irradiation and cell cycle distribution in the cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. The proportions of cells in the G2/M phase in the apatinib, x-ray and apatinib combined with x-ray groups were significantly higher compared with that of the control group. Representative images of flow cytometric analysis were presented as follows: (A) Control group; (B) apatinib group; (C) radiation alone group; (D) combination group. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. PE, phycoerythrin.

Figure 7.

Effects of apatinib and x-ray…

Figure 7.

Effects of apatinib and x-ray on the expression of CHK2 and pCHK2 in…

Figure 7.
Effects of apatinib and x-ray on the expression of CHK2 and pCHK2 in KYSE-150 cells. (A) The protein levels of CHK2 and pCHK2 were determined by western blotting. Lane 1, control group; lane 2, apatinib group; lane 3, x-ray group; and lane 4, combination group. (B) Quantitative analysis of the protein expression of CHK2. (C) Quantitative analysis of the protein expression of pCHK2. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. *P#P<0.05 vs. the same index sample treated with 4 Gy x-ray. CHK2, serine/threonine-protein kinase-2; p, phosphorylated.
All figures (7)
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Survival fraction of KYSE-150 cells pretreated with apatinib, followed by irradiation. Apatinib remarkably increased the radiosensitivity of KYSE-150 cells, with SERD0 of 1.36 for 20 and 40 µmol/l apatinib. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Effects of apatinib combined with x-ray iradiation on apoptosis in KYSE-150 cells. KYSE-150 cells were pretreated with 20 µmol/l apatinib for 48 h prior to irradiation (4 Gy). Following irradiation, the cells were further incubated for 24 h. The apoptosis rate of the cells was analyzed by Annexin V/PI staining and flow cytometry. The apoptosis rates of the apatinib, x-ray and apatinib combined with x-ray groups were higher compared with that of the control group. Representative images of flow cytometric analysis are presented as follows: (A) Control group; (B) apatinib group; (C) radiation alone group; (D) combination group. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. PI, propidium iodide; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; PI, propidium iodide; Q, quadrant.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Effects of apatinib and x-ray on the expression of PARP and cleaved-PARP in KYSE-150 cells. (A) The protein levels of PARP and cleaved-PARP were determined by western blotting. Lane 1, control group; lane 2, apatinib group; lane 3, x-ray group; and lane 4, combination group. (B) Quantitative analysis of the protein expression of PARP. (C) Quantitative analysis of the protein expression of cleaved-PARP. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. *P#P<0.05 vs. the same index sample treated with 4 Gy x-ray. PARP, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Effect of combination treatment of apatinib and x-ray irradiation on cell cycle distribution in KYSE-150 cells. KYSE-150 cells were pretreated with 20 µmol/l apatinib for 48 h prior to being exposed to 4 Gy radiation. The cells were incubated for another 24 h following irradiation and cell cycle distribution in the cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. The proportions of cells in the G2/M phase in the apatinib, x-ray and apatinib combined with x-ray groups were significantly higher compared with that of the control group. Representative images of flow cytometric analysis were presented as follows: (A) Control group; (B) apatinib group; (C) radiation alone group; (D) combination group. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. PE, phycoerythrin.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Effects of apatinib and x-ray on the expression of CHK2 and pCHK2 in KYSE-150 cells. (A) The protein levels of CHK2 and pCHK2 were determined by western blotting. Lane 1, control group; lane 2, apatinib group; lane 3, x-ray group; and lane 4, combination group. (B) Quantitative analysis of the protein expression of CHK2. (C) Quantitative analysis of the protein expression of pCHK2. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. *P#P<0.05 vs. the same index sample treated with 4 Gy x-ray. CHK2, serine/threonine-protein kinase-2; p, phosphorylated.

References

    1. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ, He J. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:115–132. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338.
    1. Welsh J, Settle SH, Amini A, Xiao L, Suzuki A, Hayashi Y, Hofstetter W, Komaki R, Liao Z, Ajani JA. Failure patterns in patients with esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation. Cancer. 2012;118:2632–2640. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26586.
    1. Cellini F, Valentini V. Targeted therapies in combination with radiotherapy in oesophageal and gastroesophageal carcinoma. Curr Med Chem. 2014;21:990–1004. doi: 10.2174/09298673113209990236.
    1. Yu J, Liu F, Sun Z, Sun M, Sun S. The enhancement of radiosensitivity in human esophageal carcinoma cells by thalidomide and its potential mechanism. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2011;26:219–227. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2011.0964.
    1. Yu JP, Sun SP, Sun ZQ, Ni XC, Wang J, Li Y, Hu LJ, Li DQ. Clinical trial of thalidomide combined with radiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:5098–5103. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.5098.
    1. Tian S, Quan H, Xie C, Guo H, Lu F, Xu Y, Li J, Lou L. YN968D1 is a novel and selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 tyrosine kinase with potent activity in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Sci. 2011;102:1374–1380. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.01939.x.
    1. Leith JT, Davis PJ, Mousa SA, Hercbergs AA. In vitro effects of tetraiodothyroacetic acid combined with X-irradiation on basal cell carcinoma cells. Cell Cycle. 2017;16:367–373. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2016.1269044.
    1. Ghorai A, Sarma A, Bhattacharyya NP, Ghosh U. Carbon ion beam triggers both caspase-dependent and caspase-independent pathway of apoptosis in HeLa and status of PARP-1 controls intensity of apoptosis. Apoptosis. 2015;20:562–580. doi: 10.1007/s10495-015-1107-3.
    1. Rahmanian N, Hosseinimehr SJ, Khalaj A. The paradox role of caspase cascade in ionizing radiation therapy. J Biomed Sci. 2016;23:88. doi: 10.1186/s12929-016-0306-8.
    1. Lin Y, Zhai E, Liao B, Xu L, Zhang X, Peng S, He Y, Cai S, Zeng Z, Chen M. Autocrine VEGF signaling promotes cell proliferation through a PLC-dependent pathway and modulates apatinib treatment efficacy in gastric cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:11990–12002.
    1. Lin YC, Liu CY, Kannagi R, Yang RB. Inhibition of endothelial SCUBE2 (Signal Peptide-CUB-EGF Domain-Containing Protein 2), a novel VEGFR2 (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2) coreceptor, suppresses tumor angiogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2018;38:1202–1215. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.310506.
    1. Morgan MA, Lawrence TS. Molecular pathways: Overcoming radiation resistance by targeting DNA damage response pathways. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:2898–2904. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3229.
    1. Manic G, Obrist F, Sistigu A, Vitale I. Trial watch: Targeting atm-chk2 and atr-chk1 pathways for anticancer therapy. Mol Cell Oncol. 2015;2:e1012976. doi: 10.1080/23723556.2015.1012976.
    1. Zhou N, Liu C, Hou H, Zhang C, Liu D, Wang G, Liu K, Zhu J, Lv H, Li T, Zhang X. Response to apatinib in chemotherapy-failed advanced spindle cell breast carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7:72373–72379. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12568.
    1. Song Z, Yu X, Lou G, Shi X, Zhang Y. Salvage treatment with apatinib for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2017;10:1821–1825. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S113435.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다