Pharmacodynamics and Outcomes of a De-Escalation Strategy with Half-Dose Prasugrel or Ticagrelor in East Asians Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results from HOPE-TAILOR Trial

Cai-De Jin, Moo-Hyun Kim, Kai Song, Xuan Jin, Kwang-Min Lee, Jong-Sung Park, Young-Rak Cho, Sung-Cheol Yun, Michael S Lee, Cai-De Jin, Moo-Hyun Kim, Kai Song, Xuan Jin, Kwang-Min Lee, Jong-Sung Park, Young-Rak Cho, Sung-Cheol Yun, Michael S Lee

Abstract

East Asians treated with potent P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor) generally experience more intense platelet inhibitory responses resulting in an increased risk of major bleeding. Whether a half-dose de-escalation strategy improves the net clinical benefit in Korean patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains uncertain. A total of 120 patients were pragmatically randomized to either prasugrel (n = 39, 60 mg loading dose (LD)/10 mg maintenance dose (MD)), ticagrelor (n = 40, 180 mg LD/90 mg MD), or clopidogrel (n = 41, 600 mg LD/75 mg MD) followed by a half-dose reduction at 1 month, or conventional dose 75 mg clopidogrel. The primary endpoint was the incidence of optimal platelet reactivity (OPR), defined as a P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value between 85 and 208 (by VerifyNow) at 3 months. Ticagrelor treatment achieved a significantly lower PRU compared with prasugrel and clopidogrel (31.0 ± 34.5 vs. 93.2 ± 57.1 vs. 153.1 ± 69.4), resulting in the lowest rate of OPR (12.5% vs. 48.7% vs. 63.4%). At 9 months, the minor bleeding was significantly higher with potent P2Y12 inhibitors than with clopidogrel (31.6% vs. 12.2%; HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.12-7.75). Only a few patients experienced ischemic complications. In Korean ACS patients, a de-escalation strategy with half-dose ticagrelor and prasugrel from standard dose increased the OPR rate significantly. Half-dose ticagrelor had a lower OPR rate and greater platelet inhibition compared with half-dose prasugrel as well as conventional-dose clopidogrel. Optimal dose reduction strategies for potent P2Y12 inhibitors require further investigation to balance safety and efficacy.

Keywords: East Asians; acute coronary syndrome; half-dose reduction; outcomes; pharmacodynamics; prasugrel; ticagrelor.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flow and overall clinical trial design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Matched-pairs analysis of 1 month versus 3-month pharmacodynamics in each P2Y12 inhibitor group. (a) Prasugrel; (b) ticagrelor; (c) clopidogrel.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cumulative incidence of safety endpoints (composite of BARC type 1 or 2 bleedings). (a) Kaplan–Meier estimate of safety endpoints at 9 months; (b) Landmark analysis at 1 month for safety endpoints.

References

    1. Wiviott S.D., Braunwald E., McCabe C.H., Montalescot G., Ruzyllo W., Gottlieb S., Neumann F.J., Ardissino D., De Servi S., Murphy S.A., et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007;357:2001–2015. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706482.
    1. Wallentin L., Becker R.C., Budaj A., Cannon C.P., Emanuelsson H., Held C., Horrow J., Husted S., James S., Katus H., et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:1045–1057. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0904327.
    1. Capodanno D., Alfonso F., Levine G.N., Valgimigli M., Angiolillo D.J. ACC/AHA Versus ESC Guidelines on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: JACC Guideline Comparison. Pt AJ. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018;72:2915–2931. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.057.
    1. Small D.S., Kothare P., Yuen E., Lachno D.R., Li Y.G., Winters K.J., Farid N.A., Ni L., Jakubowski J.A., Salazar D.E., et al. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prasugrel in healthy Chinese, Japanese, and Korean subjects compared with healthy Caucasian subjects. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2010;66:127–135. doi: 10.1007/s00228-009-0737-1.
    1. Teng R. Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and pharmacogenetic profile of the oral antiplatelet agent ticagrelor. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2012;51:305–318. doi: 10.2165/11630960-000000000-00000.
    1. Saito S., Isshiki T., Kimura T., Ogawa H., Yokoi H., Nanto S., Takayama M., Kitagawa K., Nishikawa M., Miyazaki S., et al. Efficacy and safety of adjusted-dose prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome: The PRASFIT-ACS study. Circ. J. 2014;78:1684–1692. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-13-1482.
    1. Goto S., Huang C.H., Park S.J., Emanuelsson H., Kimura T. Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in Japanese, Korean and Taiwanese patients with acute coronary syndrome--randomized, double-blind, phase III PHILO study. Circ. J. 2015;79:2452–2460. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0112.
    1. Park D.W., Kwon O., Jang J.S., Yun S.C., Park H., Kang D.Y., Ahn J.M., Lee P.H., Lee S.W., Park S.W., et al. Clinically Significant Bleeding with Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Korean Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Intended for Invasive Management: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation. 2019;140:1865–1877. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041766.
    1. Guo L.Z., Kim M.H., Shin E.S., Ann S.H., Jin C.D., Cho Y.R., Park J.S., Park K., Park T.H., Lee M.S., et al. Thienopyridine reloading in clopidogrel-loaded patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: The PRAISE study. Int. J. Cardiol. 2016;222:639–644. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.027.
    1. Jin C.D., Kim M.H., Guo L.Z., Jin E., Shin E.S., Ann S.H., Cho Y.R., Park J.S., Kim S.J., Lee M.S. Pharmacodynamic study of prasugrel or clopidogrel in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome with CYP2C19 genetic variants undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PRAISE-GENE trial) Int. J. Cardiol. 2020;305:11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.01.058.
    1. Choi S.Y., Kim M.H., Cho Y.R., Sung Park J., Min Lee K., Park T.H., Yun S.C. Performance of PRECISE-DAPT Score for Predicting Bleeding Complication During Dual Antiplatelet Therapy. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2018;11:e006837. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006837.
    1. Kim B.K., Hong S.J., Cho Y.H., Yun K.H., Kim Y.H., Suh Y., Cho J.Y., Her A.Y., Cho S., Jeon D.W., et al. Effect of Ticagrelor Monotherapy vs Ticagrelor With Aspirin on Major Bleeding and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The TICO Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020;323:2407–2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7580.
    1. Mehran R., Baber U., Sharma S.K., Cohen D.J., Angiolillo D.J., Briguori C., Cha J.Y., Collier T., Dangas G., Dudek D., et al. Ticagrelor with or without Aspirin in High-Risk Patients after PCI. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019;381:2032–2042. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908419.
    1. Jin C.D., Kim M.H., Bang J., Serebruany V. A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label, Blinded, Endpoint Study Exploring Platelet Response to Half-Dose Prasugrel and Ticagrelor in Patients with the Acute Coronary Syndrome: HOPE-TAILOR Study. Cardiology. 2017;138:201–206. doi: 10.1159/000478000.
    1. van Werkum J.W., van der Stelt C.A., Seesing T.H., Hackeng C.M., ten Berg J.M. A head-to-head comparison between the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and light transmittance aggregometry for monitoring the individual platelet response to clopidogrel in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2006;4:2516–2518. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.02187.x.
    1. Tantry U.S., Bonello L., Aradi D., Price M.J., Jeong Y.H., Angiolillo D.J., Stone G.W., Curzen N., Geisler T., Ten Berg J., et al. Consensus and update on the definition of on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate associated with ischemia and bleeding. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013;62:2261–2273. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.101.
    1. Sibbing D., Aradi D., Alexopoulos D., Ten Berg J., Bhatt D.L., Bonello L., Collet J.P., Cuisset T., Franchi F., Gross L., et al. Updated Expert Consensus Statement on Platelet Function and Genetic Testing for Guiding P2Y(12) Receptor Inhibitor Treatment in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2019;12:1521–1537. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.03.034.
    1. Mehran R., Rao S.V., Bhatt D.L., Gibson C.M., Caixeta A., Eikelboom J., Kaul S., Wiviott S.D., Menon V., Nikolsky E., et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: A consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011;123:2736–2747. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449.
    1. Lee J.H., Ahn S.G., Park B., Park S.W., Kang Y.S., Lee J.W., Youn Y.J., Ahn M.S., Kim J.Y., Yoo B.S., et al. A pharmacodynamic study of the optimal P2Y12 inhibitor regimen for East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2015;30:620–628. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2015.30.5.620.
    1. Lee Y.S., Jin C.D., Kim M.H., Guo L.Z., Cho Y.R., Park K., Park J.S., Park T.H., Kim Y.D. Comparison of Prasugrel and Ticagrelor Antiplatelet Effects in Korean Patients Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Circ. J. 2015;79:1248–1254. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0270.
    1. Yokoi H., Kimura T., Isshiki T., Ogawa H., Ikeda Y. Pharmacodynamic assessment of a novel P2Y12 receptor antagonist in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Thromb. Res. 2012;129:623–628. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.11.023.
    1. Alexopoulos D., Xanthopoulou I., Gkizas V., Kassimis G., Theodoropoulos K.C., Makris G., Koutsogiannis N., Damelou A., Tsigkas G., Davlouros P., et al. Randomized assessment of ticagrelor versus prasugrel antiplatelet effects in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2012;5:797–804. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.972323.
    1. Park D.W., Lee P.H., Jang S., Lim H.S., Kang D.Y., Lee C.H., Ahn J.M., Yun S.C., Park S.W., Park S.J. Effect of Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel on Platelet Inhibition in Acute Coronary Syndromes. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018;71:1594–1595. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.010.
    1. Schupke S., Neumann F.J., Menichelli M., Mayer K., Bernlochner I., Wohrle J., Richardt G., Liebetrau C., Witzenbichler B., Antoniucci D., et al. Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019;381:1524–1534. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908973.
    1. Dewilde W.J.M., Oirbans T., Verheugt F.W.A., Kelder J.C., De Smet B.J.G.L., Herrman J.-P., Adriaenssens T., Vrolix M., Heestermans A.A.C.M., Vis M.M., et al. Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: An open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;381:1107–1115. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62177-1.
    1. Urban P., Mehran R., Colleran R., Angiolillo D.J., Byrne R.A., Capodanno D., Cuisset T., Cutlip D., Eerdmans P., Eikelboom J., et al. Defining High Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circulation. 2019;140:240–261. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040167.
    1. Sorrentino S., Sartori S., Baber U., Claessen B.E., Giustino G., Chandrasekhar J., Chandiramani R., Cohen D.J., Henry T.D., Guedeney P., et al. Bleeding Risk, Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Cessation, and Adverse Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The PARIS Registry. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2020;13:e008226. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008226.
    1. Kim M.H., Cho S.Y., Serebruany V. De-Escalation of Dual Antiplatelet Regimens in East Asian Patients Undergoing Coronary Intervention. Am. J. Ther. 2020;27:e611–e612. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001237.
    1. Aradi D., Kirtane A., Bonello L., Gurbel P.A., Tantry U.S., Huber K., Freynhofer M.K., ten Berg J., Janssen P., Angiolillo D.J., et al. Bleeding and stent thrombosis on P2Y12-inhibitors: Collaborative analysis on the role of platelet reactivity for risk stratification after percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur. Heart J. 2015;36:1762–1771. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv104.
    1. Huo Y., Jeong Y.H., Gong Y., Wang D., He B., Chen J., Fu G., Chen Y., Li J., Li Y., et al. 2018 update of expert consensus statement on antiplatelet therapy in East Asian patients with ACS or undergoing PCI. Sci. Bull. 2019;64:166–179. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2018.12.020.
    1. Cuisset T., Deharo P., Quilici J., Johnson T.W., Deffarges S., Bassez C., Bonnet G., Fourcade L., Mouret J.P., Lambert M., et al. Benefit of switching dual antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome: The TOPIC (timing of platelet inhibition after acute coronary syndrome) randomized study. Eur. Heart J. 2017;38:3070–3078. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx175.
    1. Sibbing D., Aradi D., Jacobshagen C., Gross L., Trenk D., Geisler T., Orban M., Hadamitzky M., Merkely B., Kiss R.G., et al. Guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (TROPICAL-ACS): A randomised, open-label, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2017;390:1747–1757. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32155-4.
    1. Angiolillo D.J., Rollini F., Storey R.F., Bhatt D.L., James S., Schneider D.J., Sibbing D., So D.Y.F., Trenk D., Alexopoulos D., et al. International Expert Consensus on Switching Platelet P2Y12 Receptor-Inhibiting Therapies. Circulation. 2017;136:1955–1975. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031164.
    1. Kupka D., Sibbing D. De-Escalation of P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitor Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Korean Circ. J. 2018;48:863–872. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0255.
    1. Kim H.S., Kang J., Hwang D., Han J.K., Yang H.M., Kang H.J., Koo B.K., Rhew J.Y., Chun K.J., Lim Y.H., et al. Prasugrel-based de-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS): An open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised trial. Lancet. 2020;396:1079–1089. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31791-8.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다