Radiological evaluation of anterior lumbar fusion using PEEK cages with adjacent vertebral autograft in spinal deformity long fusion surgeries

Jianqiang Ni, Yanping Zheng, Ning Liu, Xin Wang, Xiutong Fang, Rishabh Phukan, Kirkham B Wood, Jianqiang Ni, Yanping Zheng, Ning Liu, Xin Wang, Xiutong Fang, Rishabh Phukan, Kirkham B Wood

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiographic characteristics of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages packed with adjacent vertebral autograft material in lumbar anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in spinal deformity long fusion surgeries.

Methods: This is a retrospective radiographic study. From April 2008 to April 2012, 40 patients (5 males and 35 females, mean age 67 ± 9 years) with coronal and/or sagittal spine deformities underwent staged corrective surgery combined with lumbar ALIF using PEEK cages at the L3-L4, L4-L5 or L5-S1 segment with posterior long (≥ 4 levels) instrumentation. The mean follow-up time was 27.5 months (13-49 months). We examined the interbody fusion rate and cage subsidence at 3 months postoperatively and final follow-up. Additionally, we evaluated the distance of cage migration at final follow-up and the improvement in lumbar lordosis. The rate of "collapse" of the adjacent vertebra where the autograft was harvested was assessed at the final follow-up. Finally, we examined the cage-related postoperative complications in this series.

Results: Solid interbody fusion was achieved in 96.4 % (81/84) of the levels at the final follow-up. A mild forward cage migration was observed, and the mean migration distance at final follow-up was 0.83 mm in L3/4, 0.36 mm in L4/5 and 0.55 mm in L5/S1. There was cage subsidence observed in 8.3 % (7/84) of the levels. In all patients, the PEEK cage maintained a significant increase in segmental lordosis at all postoperative visits. However, a mild reduction in segmental lordosis still occurred with time. The adjacent lumbar vertebral bodies where the autografts were harvested appeared to be intact in height radiologically at the final follow-up. There were no postoperative complications due to bone harvesting or cage insertion. Proximal junctional kyphosis was found in one patient who underwent a subsequent revision surgery.

Conclusions: The use of lumbar ALIF with PEEK cages and adjacent vertebral autografts in spinal deformity long fusion surgeries is an effective and safe procedure. The allograft filler is safe and effective in maintaining the shape of harvested vertebrae. Additional long-term follow-up studies are needed to further justify its use.

References

    1. Spine J. 2009 Aug;9(8):623-9
    1. Spine J. 2004 Sep-Oct;4(5):527-38; discussion 538-9
    1. Eur Spine J. 1998;7(2):125-31
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Jan;(394):84-91
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Jun 1;23(11):1267-78; discussion 1279
    1. Neurosurgery. 2002 Mar;50(3):510-6; discussion 516-7
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 15;34(20):2126-33
    1. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994 Apr;25(2):287-99
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972 Jun;54(4):756-68
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 Aug;14(8):876-8
    1. Eur Spine J. 2012 Mar;21(3):455-62
    1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Apr;16(4):340-4
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979 Dec;61(8):1143-50
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Jul;18(9):1186-9
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 May 1;27(9):923-8
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jun 1;25(11):1437-46
    1. Eur Spine J. 2000 Feb;9 Suppl 1:S114-8
    1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Dec;5(6):534-9
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 May;91(5):1181-9
    1. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Oct;21(7):459-67
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 20;35(9 Suppl):S86-104
    1. Eur Spine J. 2013 Dec;22(12):2869-75
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Feb 1;26(3):320-34
    1. Eur Spine J. 2006 Sep;15(9):1352-9
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 May 20;35(12):1185-91
    1. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Oct;25(7):362-9
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Dec;18(16):2393-400
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 May 1;31(10):E277-84
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Dec 1;22(23):2748-55
    1. Spine J. 2009 Jun;9(6):434-8
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Dec 1;30(23):2631-6
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Dec 15;24(24):2617-29
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 May 1;31(10):1067-74
    1. Spine J. 2011 Jun;11(6):471-91
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Dec;(225):7-16
    1. Eur Spine J. 1996;5(3):178-82
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Jun 15;20(12):1410-8
    1. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Jun;20(4):278-81
    1. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002 Oct;15(5):337-49
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 May 1;20(9):1055-60
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Mar 15;30(6 Suppl):S60-5

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다