Long-term cost reduction of routine medications following a residential programme combining physical activity and nutrition in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study

Charlotte Lanhers, Guillaume Walther, Robert Chapier, Bruno Lesourd, Geraldine Naughton, Bruno Pereira, Martine Duclos, Agnès Vinet, Philippe Obert, Daniel Courteix, Frédéric Dutheil, Charlotte Lanhers, Guillaume Walther, Robert Chapier, Bruno Lesourd, Geraldine Naughton, Bruno Pereira, Martine Duclos, Agnès Vinet, Philippe Obert, Daniel Courteix, Frédéric Dutheil

Abstract

Objectives: To demonstrate that lifestyle modifications will reduce the cost of routine medications in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D), through a mechanism involving glycaemic control.

Design: A within-trial cost-medication analysis with a 1-year time horizon.

Setting: Controlled environment within the spa resort of Chatel-Guyon, France.

Participants: Twenty-nine participants (aged 50-70 years) with T2D.

Interventions: A 1-year follow-up intervention, beginning with a 3-week residential programme combining high exercise volume (15-20 hours/week), restrictive diet (-500 kcal/day) and education. Participants continued their routine medication, independently managed by their general practitioner.

Main outcome measures: Number of medications, number of pills, cost of medications and health-related outcomes.

Results: Twenty-six participants completed the 1-year intervention. At 1 year, 14 patients out of 26 (54%) stopped/decreased their medications whereas only 5 (19%) increased or introduced new drugs (χ2=6.3, p=0.02). The number of pills per day decreased by 1.3±0.3 at 12 months (p<0.001). The annual cost of medications for T2D were lower at 1 year (€135.1±43.9) versus baseline (€212.6±35.8) (p=0.03). The regression coefficients on costs of routine medication were 0.507 (95% CI 0.056 to 0.959, p=0.027) for HbA1c and 0.156 (95% CI -0.010 to 0.322, p=0.06) for blood glucose levels. Diabetics patients with HbA1c >6.5% in the highest (last) quartile doubled their routine medication costs (66% vs 33%, p=0.037).

Conclusions: Individuals with T2D reduced routine medication costs following a long-term lifestyle intervention that started with a 3-week residential programme. Combining high exercise volume, restrictive diet and education effectively supported the health of T2D. The main factor explaining reduced medication costs was better glycaemic control, independent of weight changes. Despite limitations precluding generalisability, cost-effective results of reduced medication should contribute to the evidence base required to promote lifestyle interventions for individuals with T2D.

Trial registration number: NCT00917917; Post-results.

Keywords: MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING; NUTRITION & DIETETICS.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsNone declared.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design: a 3-week residential programme with standardised and personalised diet and physical activity, and a 1-year at-home follow-up. 6MWT, 6 min walk test; BP, blood pressure; DXA, densitometry X-ray absorption; HR, heart rate; WC, waist circumference.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of routine pills per day (mean±SE) and annual cost of all medications (scattergram). +, mean; −, median; *p

Figure 3

Annual cost of medications for…

Figure 3

Annual cost of medications for type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, dyslipidemia and…

Figure 3
Annual cost of medications for type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, dyslipidemia and other medications (scattergrams). +, mean; −, median; *p

Figure 4

Relationships between cost of routine…

Figure 4

Relationships between cost of routine medication and clinical and biological parameters (generalised estimating…

Figure 4
Relationships between cost of routine medication and clinical and biological parameters (generalised estimating equations multivariable analyses). *With blood glucose levels: 0.156 (−0.010–0.322), p=0.066; other results were similar.
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Association AD. Diabetes statistics. November 3, 2004.
    1. Chiasson JL, Le Lorier J. Glycaemic control, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. Lancet 2014;384:1906–7. 10.1371/journal.pone.0122795 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Gregg EW, et al. . Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and prediabetes prevalence. Popul Health Metr 2010;8:29 10.1186/1478-7954-8-29 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dobson R, Carter K, Cutfield R, et al. . Diabetes text-message self-management support program (sms4bg): a pilot study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015;3:e32 10.2196/mhealth.3988 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1033–46. 10.2337/dc12-2625 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Show all 31 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Related information
Full text links [x]
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Figure 3
Figure 3
Annual cost of medications for type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, dyslipidemia and other medications (scattergrams). +, mean; −, median; *p

Figure 4

Relationships between cost of routine…

Figure 4

Relationships between cost of routine medication and clinical and biological parameters (generalised estimating…

Figure 4
Relationships between cost of routine medication and clinical and biological parameters (generalised estimating equations multivariable analyses). *With blood glucose levels: 0.156 (−0.010–0.322), p=0.066; other results were similar.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relationships between cost of routine medication and clinical and biological parameters (generalised estimating equations multivariable analyses). *With blood glucose levels: 0.156 (−0.010–0.322), p=0.066; other results were similar.

References

    1. Association AD. Diabetes statistics. November 3, 2004.
    1. Chiasson JL, Le Lorier J. Glycaemic control, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. Lancet 2014;384:1906–7. 10.1371/journal.pone.0122795
    1. Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Gregg EW, et al. . Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and prediabetes prevalence. Popul Health Metr 2010;8:29 10.1186/1478-7954-8-29
    1. Dobson R, Carter K, Cutfield R, et al. . Diabetes text-message self-management support program (sms4bg): a pilot study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015;3:e32 10.2196/mhealth.3988
    1. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1033–46. 10.2337/dc12-2625
    1. Federation ID. Diabetes Atlas Brussels, Belgium: international diabetes federation 2006.
    1. Wang W, McGreevey WP, Fu C, et al. . Type 2 diabetes mellitus in China: a preventable economic burden. Am J Manag Care 2009;15:593–601.
    1. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2015: summary of revisions. Diabetes Care 2015;38:dc15-S003.
    1. Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J. The metabolic syndrome—a new worldwide definition. Lancet 2005;366:1059–62. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67402-8
    1. Crendal E, Walther G, Dutheil F, et al. . Left ventricular myocardial dyssynchrony is already present in nondiabetic patients with metabolic syndrome. Can J Cardiol 2013;30:320–4. 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.10.019
    1. Black AE, Coward WA, Cole TJ, et al. . Human energy expenditure in affluent societies: an analysis of 574 doubly-labelled water measurements. Eur J Clin Nutr 1996;50:72–92.
    1. Dutheil F, Lesourd B, Courteix D, et al. . Blood lipids and adipokines concentrations during a 6-month nutritional and physical activity intervention for metabolic syndrome treatment. Lipids Health Dis 2010;9:148 10.1186/1476-511X-9-148
    1. Dutheil F, Lac G, Lesourd B, et al. . Different modalities of exercise to reduce visceral fat mass and cardiovascular risk in metabolic syndrome: the resolve randomized trial. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:3634–42. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.05.012
    1. Kamel EG, McNeill G, Van Wijk MC. Usefulness of anthropometry and DXA in predicting intra-abdominal fat in obese men and women. Obes Res 2000;8:36–42. 10.1038/oby.2000.6
    1. ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:111–17.
    1. Zhuo X, Zhang P, Gregg EW, et al. . A nationwide community-based lifestyle program could delay or prevent type 2 diabetes cases and save $5.7 billion in 25 years. Health Aff 2012;31:50–60. 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1115
    1. Organisation WH. Diabetes action now: an initiative of the world health organisation and the international diabetes federation. International Diabetes Federation, 2004.
    1. Wing RR. Long-term effects of a lifestyle intervention on weight and cardiovascular risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: four-year results of the look ahead trial. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:1566–75. 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.334
    1. Brun JF, Bordenave S, Mercier J, et al. . Cost-sparing effect of twice-weekly targeted endurance training in type 2 diabetics: a one-year controlled randomized trial. Diabetes Metab 2008;34:258–65. 10.1016/j.diabet.2008.01.010
    1. Boren SA, Fitzner KA, Panhalkar PS, et al. . Costs and benefits associated with diabetes education: a review of the literature. Diabetes Educ 2009;35:72–96. 10.1177/0145721708326774
    1. Umpierre D, Ribeiro PA, Kramer CK, et al. . Physical activity advice only or structured exercise training and association with HbA1c levels in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011;305:1790–9. 10.1001/jama.2011.576
    1. Thomas DE, Elliott EJ, Naughton GA. Exercise for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006:CD002968 10.1002/14651858.CD002968.pub2
    1. Duclos M, Oppert JM, Verges B, et al. . Physical activity and type 2 diabetes. Recommandations of the SFD (francophone diabetes society) diabetes and physical activity working group. Diabetes Metab 2013;39:205–16. 10.1016/j.diabet.2013.03.005
    1. Aspinall SE, Zhao X, Good CB, et al. . FDA warning and removal of rosiglitazone from VA national formulary. Am J Manag Care 2013;19:748–58.
    1. Drucker DJ, Nauck MA. The incretin system: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes. Lancet 2006;368:1696–705. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69705-5
    1. Halimi S. DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 analogues: For whom? Which place for incretins in the management of type 2 diabetic patients? Diabetes Metab 2008;34(Suppl 2):S91–5. 10.1016/S1262-3636(08)73400-1
    1. Yi Y, Philips Z, Bergman G, et al. . Economic models in type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin 2010;26:2105–18. 10.1185/03007995.2010.494451
    1. Picot J, Jones J, Colquitt JL, et al. . Weight loss surgery for mild to moderate obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Obes Surg 2012;22:1496–506. 10.1007/s11695-012-0679-z
    1. Cataneo DC, Kobayasi S, Carvalho LR, et al. . Accuracy of six minute walk test, stair test and spirometry using maximal oxygen uptake as gold standard. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira 2010;25:194–200.
    1. Courteix D, Valente-Dos-Santos J, Ferry B, et al. . Correction: Multilevel approach of a 1-year program of dietary and exercise interventions on bone mineral content and density in metabolic syndrome: the resolve randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 2015;10:e0140307 10.1371/journal.pone.0140307
    1. Courteix D, Valente-Dos-Santos J, Ferry B, et al. . Multilevel approach of a 1-year program of dietary and exercise interventions on bone mineral content and density in metabolic syndrome—the resolve randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 2015;10:e0136491 10.1371/journal.pone.0136491

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다