Evaluation of a Multivalent Transcriptomic Metric for Diagnosing Surgical Sepsis and Estimating Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients

Scott C Brakenridge, Uan-I Chen, Tyler Loftus, Ricardo Ungaro, Marvin Dirain, Austin Kerr, Luer Zhong, Rhonda Bacher, Petr Starostik, Gabriella Ghita, Uros Midic, Dijoia Darden, Brittany Fenner, James Wacker, Philip A Efron, Oliver Liesenfeld, Timothy E Sweeney, Lyle L Moldawer, Scott C Brakenridge, Uan-I Chen, Tyler Loftus, Ricardo Ungaro, Marvin Dirain, Austin Kerr, Luer Zhong, Rhonda Bacher, Petr Starostik, Gabriella Ghita, Uros Midic, Dijoia Darden, Brittany Fenner, James Wacker, Philip A Efron, Oliver Liesenfeld, Timothy E Sweeney, Lyle L Moldawer

Abstract

Importance: Rapid and accurate discrimination of sepsis and its potential severity currently require multiple assays with slow processing times that are often inconclusive in discerning sepsis from sterile inflammation.

Objective: To analyze a whole-blood, multivalent, host-messenger RNA expression metric for estimating the likelihood of bacterial infection and 30-day mortality and compare performance of the metric with that of other diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and clinical parameters.

Design, setting, and participants: This prospective diagnostic and prognostic study was performed in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of a single, academic health science center. The analysis included 200 critically ill adult patients admitted with suspected sepsis (cohort A) or those at high risk for developing sepsis (cohort B) between July 1, 2020, and July 30, 2021.

Exposures: Whole-blood sample measurements of a custom 29-messenger RNA transcriptomic metric classifier for likelihood of bacterial infection (IMX-BVN-3) or 30-day mortality (severity) (IMX-SEV-3) in a clinical-diagnostic laboratory setting using an analysis platform (510[k]-cleared nCounter FLEX; NanoString, Inc), compared with measurement of procalcitonin and interleukin 6 (IL-6) plasma levels, and maximum 24-hour sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores.

Main outcomes and measures: Estimated sepsis and 30-day mortality performance.

Results: Among the 200 patients included (124 men [62.0%] and 76 women [38.0%]; median age, 62.5 [IQR, 47.0-72.0] years), the IMX-BVN-3 bacterial infection classifier had an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.90) for discriminating bacterial infection at ICU admission, similar to procalcitonin (0.85 [95% CI, 0.79-0.90]; P = .79) and significantly better than IL-6 (0.67 [95% CI, 0.58-0.75]; P < .001). For estimating 30-day mortality, the IMX-SEV-3 metric had an AUROC of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.66-0.95), which was significantly better than IL-6 levels (0.57 [95% CI, 0.37-0.77]; P = .006), marginally better than procalcitonin levels (0.65 [95% CI, 0.50-0.79]; P = .06), and similar to the SOFA score (0.76 [95% CI, 0.62-0.91]; P = .48). Combining IMX-BVN-3 and IMX-SEV-3 with procalcitonin or IL-6 levels or SOFA scores did not significantly improve performance. Among patients with sepsis, IMX-BVN-3 scores decreased over time, reflecting the resolution of sepsis. In 11 individuals at high risk (cohort B) who subsequently developed sepsis during their hospital course, IMX-BVN-3 bacterial infection scores did not decline over time and peaked on the day of documented infection.

Conclusions and relevance: In this diagnostic and prognostic study, a novel, multivalent, transcriptomic metric accurately estimated the presence of bacterial infection and risk for 30-day mortality in patients admitted to a surgical ICU. The performance of this single transcriptomic metric was equivalent to or better than multiple alternative diagnostic and prognostic metrics when measured at admission and provided additional information when measured over time.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Brakenridge reported receiving joint academic-industry Department of Health and Human Services Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) funding from Inflammatix Inc during the conduct of the study. Dr Chen reported being an employee and stock option holder of Inflammatix Inc during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work. Dr Midic reported being an employee and stockholder of Inflammatix Inc during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work. Dr Darden reported receiving grants from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences during the conduct of the study. Dr Fenner reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study. Dr Wacker reported being an employee and stock option holder of Inflammix Inc during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work. Dr Liesenfeld reported being an employee and holder of stock options of Inflammix Inc during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work. Dr Sweeney reported receiving grants from BARDA Division of Research, Innovation, and Ventures (DRIVe); being an employee and shareholder during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work; and being the licensed inventor on several patents pending and issued that cover the InSep test. Dr Moldawer reported a subcontract on BARDA grant to Inflammatix Inc during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.. Flow Diagram for Study Design
Figure 1.. Flow Diagram for Study Design
aInclusion criteria consisted of intensive care unit (ICU) admission from the emergency department nontrauma, postoperative ICU admission, ICU transfer from the emergency department for severe trauma (patients with Injury Severity Scores >15, hemorrhagic shock, and/or severe chest trauma), and inpatient transfer from ward to ICU. bSamples for analysis (procalcitonin and interleukin 6 levels and transcriptomic metric classifiers for the likelihood of bacterial or viral infection and 30-day mortality) were obtained within 6 hours. cScheduled sampling day was within a 24-hour window.
Figure 2.. Transcriptomic Metric Classifiers for the…
Figure 2.. Transcriptomic Metric Classifiers for the Likelihood of Bacterial or Viral Infection (IMX-BVN-3) and 30-day Mortality (Severity) (IMX-SEV-3) Scores
A, Cohort A included patients with suspected sepsis. B, Cohort B included patients at high risk of developing sepsis. C, The crossover cohort included patients at high risk who subsequently developed sepsis. Data are presented in standard box plot format as medians, IQRs, and outliers.
Figure 3.. Area Under the Receiver Operating…
Figure 3.. Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (AUROC) for Discrimination for Bacterial Infection and 30-Day Mortality
Measurements were obtained among all critically ill patients within 12 hours of intensive care unit admission (day 0). A, Total white blood cell (WBC) count. B, Same-day maximum sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score as clinically available comparison metrics. IL-6 indicates interleukin 6.
Figure 4.. Trends of Transcriptomic Metric Classifiers…
Figure 4.. Trends of Transcriptomic Metric Classifiers for the Likelihood of Bacterial or Viral Infection (IMX-BVN-3) Scores
The crossover cohort included 11 patients considered to be at high risk who developed sepsis after admission to the surgical intensive care unit. A, Rise in IMX-BVN-3 scores peaking on the day of sepsis identification and then declining with subsequent intervention. B, Concurrent procalcitonin levels in the same patients. The trends (red lines) are presented using loess smoothing curves with 95% CIs (shaded regions). Dotted lines and points illustrate individual patient values.

References

    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. . The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-810. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0287
    1. Cheng MP, Stenstrom R, Paquette K, et al. ; FABLED Investigators . Blood culture results before and after antimicrobial administration in patients with severe manifestations of sepsis: a diagnostic study. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(8):547-554. doi:10.7326/M19-1696
    1. Opal SM, Wittebole X. Biomarkers of infection and sepsis. Crit Care Clin. 2020;36(1):11-22. doi:10.1016/j.ccc.2019.08.002
    1. Pierrakos C, Velissaris D, Bisdorff M, Marshall JC, Vincent JL. Biomarkers of sepsis: time for a reappraisal. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):287. doi:10.1186/s13054-020-02993-5
    1. Ducharme J, Self WH, Osborn TM, et al. . A multi-mRNA host-response molecular blood test for the diagnosis and prognosis of acute infections and sepsis: proceedings from a clinical advisory panel. J Pers Med. 2020;10(4):E266. doi:10.3390/jpm10040266
    1. He YD, Wohlford EM, Uhle F, Buturovic L, Liesenfeld O, Sweeney TE. The optimization and biological significance of a 29-host-immune-mRNA panel for the diagnosis of acute infections and sepsis. J Pers Med. 2021;11(8):735. doi:10.3390/jpm11080735
    1. Safarika A, Wacker JW, Katsaros K, et al. . A 29-mRNA host response test from blood accurately distinguishes bacterial and viral infections among emergency department patients. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2021;9(1):31. doi:10.1186/s40635-021-00394-8
    1. Bauer W, Kappert K, Galtung N, et al. . A novel 29–messenger RNA host-response assay from whole blood accurately identifies bacterial and viral infections in patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected infections: a prospective observational study. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(10):1664-1673. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000005119
    1. Brakenridge SC, Starostik P, Ghita G, et al. . A transcriptomic severity metric that predicts clinical outcomes in critically ill surgical sepsis patients. Crit Care Explor. 2021;3(10):e0554. doi:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000554
    1. Loftus TJ, Mira JC, Ozrazgat-Baslanti T, et al. ; Sepsis and Critical Illness Research Center investigators . Sepsis and Critical Illness Research Center investigators: protocols and standard operating procedures for a prospective cohort study of sepsis in critically ill surgical patients. BMJ Open. 2017;7(7):e015136. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015136
    1. Mira JC, Gentile LF, Mathias BJ, et al. . Sepsis pathophysiology, chronic critical illness, and persistent inflammation-immunosuppression and catabolism syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(2):253-262. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002074
    1. El-Gendy AA, Abbas AM. Effects of warfarin and L-carnitine on hemostatic function and oxidative stress in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J Physiol Biochem. 2014;70(2):535-546. doi:10.1007/s13105-014-0333-4
    1. Sweeney TE, Liesenfeld O, Wacker J, et al. . Validation of inflammopathic, adaptive, and coagulopathic sepsis endotypes in coronavirus disease 2019. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(2):e170-e178. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000004786
    1. Schneider JE, Romanowsky J, Schuetz P, et al. . Cost impact model of a novel multi-mRNA host response assay for diagnosis and risk assessment of acute respiratory tract infections and sepsis in the emergency department. J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2020;7(1):24-34. doi:10.36469/jheor.2020.12637
    1. Mayhew MB, Buturovic L, Luethy R, et al. . A generalizable 29-mRNA neural-network classifier for acute bacterial and viral infections. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1177. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14975-w
    1. Tsalik EL, Henao R, Montgomery JL, et al. ; Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group . Discriminating bacterial and viral infection using a rapid host gene expression test. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(10):1651-1663. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000005085
    1. Sampson D, Yager TD, Fox B, et al. . Blood transcriptomic discrimination of bacterial and viral infections in the emergency department: a multi-cohort observational validation study. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):185. doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01653-3
    1. Sweeney TE, Wong HR, Khatri P. Robust classification of bacterial and viral infections via integrated host gene expression diagnostics. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(346):346ra91. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf7165
    1. Lydon EC, Henao R, Burke TW, et al. . Validation of a host response test to distinguish bacterial and viral respiratory infection. EBioMedicine. 2019;48:453-461. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.09.040
    1. Vincent JL. The clinical challenge of sepsis identification and monitoring. PLoS Med. 2016;13(5):e1002022. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002022
    1. Rhee C, Kadri SS, Danner RL, et al. . Diagnosing sepsis is subjective and highly variable: a survey of intensivists using case vignettes. Crit Care. 2016;20:89. doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1266-9
    1. Amaral C, Antunes W, Moe E, et al. . A molecular test based on RT-LAMP for rapid, sensitive and inexpensive colorimetric detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):16430. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-95799-6
    1. Remmel MC, Coyle SM, Eshoo MW, Sweeney TE, Rawling DC. Diagnostic host gene expression analysis by quantitative reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification to discriminate between bacterial and viral infections. Clin Chem. 2022;68(4):550-560. doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvab275
    1. Sweeney TE, Perumal TM, Henao R, et al. . A community approach to mortality prediction in sepsis via gene expression analysis. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):694. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03078-2
    1. Heffernan AJ, Denny KJ. Host diagnostic biomarkers of infection in the ICU: where are we and where are we going? Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2021;23(4):4. doi:10.1007/s11908-021-00747-0

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다