Process evaluation protocol for a cluster randomised trial of a complex, nurse-led intervention to improve hypertension management in India

Nikhil Srinivasapura Venkateshmurthy, Kevin Mc Namara, Harriet Koorts, Sailesh Mohan, Vamadevan S Ajay, Devraj Jindal, Bhaskara Rao Malipeddi, Ambuj Roy, Nikhil Tandon, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Tony Worsley, Ralph Maddison, Sharleen O'Reilly, Nikhil Srinivasapura Venkateshmurthy, Kevin Mc Namara, Harriet Koorts, Sailesh Mohan, Vamadevan S Ajay, Devraj Jindal, Bhaskara Rao Malipeddi, Ambuj Roy, Nikhil Tandon, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Tony Worsley, Ralph Maddison, Sharleen O'Reilly

Abstract

Introduction: India has high prevalence of hypertension but low awareness, treatment and control rate. A cluster randomised trial entitled 'm-Power Heart Project' is being implemented to test the effectiveness of a nurse care coordinator (NCC) led complex intervention to address uncontrolled hypertension in the community health centres (CHCs). The trial's process evaluation will assess the fidelity and quality of implementation, clarify the causal mechanisms and identify the contextual factors associated with variation in the outcomes. The trial will use a theory-based mixed-methods process evaluation, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Methods and analysis: The process evaluation will be conducted in the CHCs of Visakhapatnam (southern India). The key stakeholders involved in the intervention development and implementation will be included as participants. In-depth interviews will be conducted with intervention developers, doctors, NCCs and health department officials and focus groups with patients and their caregivers. NCC training will be evaluated using Kirkpatrick's model for training evaluation. Key process evaluation indicators (number of patients recruited and retained; concordance between the treatment plans generated by the electronic decision support system and treatment prescribed by the doctor and so on) will be assessed. Fidelity will be assessed using Borrelli et al's framework. Qualitative data will be analysed using the template analysis technique. Quantitative data will be summarised as medians (IQR), means (SD) and proportions as appropriate. Mixed-methods analysis will be conducted to assess if the variation in the mean reduction of systolic blood pressure between the intervention CHCs is influenced by patient satisfaction, training outcome, attitude of doctors, patients and NCCs about the intervention, process indicators etc. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the ethics committees at Public Health Foundation of India and Deakin University. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, national and international conference presentations.

Trial registration number: NCT03164317; Pre-results.

Keywords: India; consolidate framework for implementation research; hypertension; mixed-methods; process evaluation.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The logic model of the m-Power Heart Project. CHC, community health centre; DSS, decision support system; ICMR, Indian Council of Medical Research; NCC, nurse care coordinator; SMS, short messaging service.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Select process evaluation components in relation to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains. CHC, community health centre; NCC, nurse care coordinator.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schema of mixed-methods analysis design. CHCs, community health centres; NCC, nurse care coordinator.

References

    1. Vital Statistics Division, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. Office of the registrar general india. report on medical certification of cause of death. New Delhi: Vital Statistics Division, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, 2013.
    1. Dandona L, Dandona R, Kumar GA, et al. . Nations within a nation: variations in epidemiological transition across the states of India, 1990–2016 in the global burden of disease study. The Lancet 2017;390:2437–60. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32804-0
    1. Prabhakaran D, Jeemon P, Roy A. Cardiovascular diseases in India: current epidemiology and future directions. Circulation 2016;133:1605–20. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.008729
    1. Prabhakaran D, Jeemon P, Sharma M, et al. . The changing patterns of cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors in the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2016. Lancet Glob Health 2018;6:e1339–51. 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30407-8
    1. Geldsetzer P, Manne-Goehler J, Theilmann M, et al. . Diabetes and hypertension in India: a nationally representative study of 1.3 million adults. JAMA Intern Med 2018;178:363–72. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8094
    1. Anchala R, Kannuri NK, Pant H, et al. . Hypertension in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, awareness, and control of hypertension. J Hypertens 2014;32:1170–7. 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000146
    1. Srinivasapura Venkateshmurthy N, Ajay VS, Mohan S, et al. . m-power heart project - a nurse care coordinator led, mhealth enabled intervention to improve the management of hypertension in India: study protocol for a cluster randomized trial. Trials 2018;19:429 10.1186/s13063-018-2813-2
    1. WHO. Guidelines for assessment and management of cardiovascular risk. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2007.
    1. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, et al. . evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA 2014;2014:507–20.
    1. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, et al. . ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2013;2013:2159–219.
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:a1655 10.1136/bmj.a1655
    1. Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, et al. . Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ 2006;332:413–6. 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413
    1. Presseau J, Grimshaw JM, Tetroe JM, et al. . A theory-based process evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial of printed educational messages to increase primary care physicians' prescription of thiazide diuretics for hypertension [ISRCTN72772651]. Implement Sci 2016;11:121 10.1186/s13012-016-0485-4
    1. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, et al. . Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009;4:50 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
    1. Breimaier HE, Heckemann B, Halfens RJ, et al. . The consolidated framework for implementation research (cfir): a useful theoretical framework for guiding and evaluating a guideline implementation process in a hospital-based nursing practice. BMC Nurs 2015;14:43 10.1186/s12912-015-0088-4
    1. Mohan S, Jarhyan P, Ghosh S, et al. . UDAY: A comprehensive diabetes and hypertension prevention and management program in India. BMJ Open 2018;8:e015919 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015919
    1. Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. Evaluating training programs the four levels. San Francisco, USA: Berrett - Koehler Publishers, 2010.
    1. Borrelli B, Sepinwall D, Ernst D, et al. . A new tool to assess treatment fidelity and evaluation of treatment fidelity across 10 years of health behavior research. J Consult Clin Psychol 2005;73:852–60. 10.1037/0022-006X.73.5.852
    1. King N. "Using templates in the thematic analysis of text", in C Cassell & G Symon, Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2004.
    1. Anchala R, Kaptoge S, Pant H, et al. . Evaluation of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a clinical decision support system in managing hypertension in resource constrained primary health care settings: results from a cluster randomized trial. J Am Heart Assoc 2015;4:e001213 10.1161/JAHA.114.001213
    1. Tian M, Ajay VS, Dunzhu D, et al. . A cluster-randomized, controlled trial of a simplified multifaceted management program for individuals at high cardiovascular risk (simcard trial) in rural tibet, China, and Haryana, India. Circulation 2015;132:815–24. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.015373
    1. Ajay VS, Jindal D, Roy A, et al. . Development of a smartphone-enabled hypertension and diabetes mellitus management package to facilitate evidence-based care delivery in primary healthcare facilities in India: the mpower heart project. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5 10.1161/JAHA.116.004343

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다