Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range
Xiang Wan, Wenqian Wang, Jiming Liu, Tiejun Tong, Xiang Wan, Wenqian Wang, Jiming Liu, Tiejun Tong
Abstract
Background: In systematic reviews and meta-analysis, researchers often pool the results of the sample mean and standard deviation from a set of similar clinical trials. A number of the trials, however, reported the study using the median, the minimum and maximum values, and/or the first and third quartiles. Hence, in order to combine results, one may have to estimate the sample mean and standard deviation for such trials.
Methods: In this paper, we propose to improve the existing literature in several directions. First, we show that the sample standard deviation estimation in Hozo et al.'s method (BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13, 2005) has some serious limitations and is always less satisfactory in practice. Inspired by this, we propose a new estimation method by incorporating the sample size. Second, we systematically study the sample mean and standard deviation estimation problem under several other interesting settings where the interquartile range is also available for the trials.
Results: We demonstrate the performance of the proposed methods through simulation studies for the three frequently encountered scenarios, respectively. For the first two scenarios, our method greatly improves existing methods and provides a nearly unbiased estimate of the true sample standard deviation for normal data and a slightly biased estimate for skewed data. For the third scenario, our method still performs very well for both normal data and skewed data. Furthermore, we compare the estimators of the sample mean and standard deviation under all three scenarios and present some suggestions on which scenario is preferred in real-world applications.
Conclusions: In this paper, we discuss different approximation methods in the estimation of the sample mean and standard deviation and propose some new estimation methods to improve the existing literature. We conclude our work with a summary table (an Excel spread sheet including all formulas) that serves as a comprehensive guidance for performing meta-analysis in different situations.
Figures
References
- Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts: treatments for myocardial infarction. J Am Med Assoc. 1992;268:240–248. doi: 10.1001/jama.1992.03490020088036.
- Cipriani A, Geddes J. Comparison of systematic and narrative reviews: the example of the atypical antipsychotics. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2003;12:146–153. doi: 10.1017/S1121189X00002918.
- Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-13.
- Triola M. F. Elementary Statistics, 11th Ed. 2009.
- Hogg RV, Craig AT. Introduction to Mathematical Statistics. Maxwell: Macmillan Canada; 1995.
- David HA, Nagaraja HN. Order Statistics, 3rd Ed. 2003.
- Blom G. Statistical Estimates and Transformed Beta Variables. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1958.
- Harter HL. Expected values of normal order statistics. Biometrika. 1961;48:151–165. doi: 10.1093/biomet/48.1-2.151.
- Cramér H. Mathematical Methods of Statistics. 1999.
- Bland M. International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research, in press. 2014. Estimating mean and standard deviation from the sample size, three quartiles, minimum, and maximum.
- Liu T, Li G, Li L, Korantzopoulos P. Association between c-reactive protein and recurrence of atrial fibrillation after successful electrical cardioversion: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1642–1648. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.12.042.
- Zhu A, Ge D, Zhang J, Teng Y, Yuan C, Huang M, Adcock IM, Barnes PJ, Yao X. Sputum myeloperoxidase in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur J Med Res. 2014;19:12. doi: 10.1186/2047-783X-19-12.
- Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2008.
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:
Source: PubMed