Inactivating hepatitis C virus in donor lungs using light therapies during normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion

Marcos Galasso, Jordan J Feld, Yui Watanabe, Mauricio Pipkin, Cara Summers, Aadil Ali, Robert Qaqish, Manyin Chen, Rafaela V P Ribeiro, Khaled Ramadan, Layla Pires, Vanderlei S Bagnato, Cristina Kurachi, Vera Cherepanov, Gray Moonen, Anajara Gazzalle, Thomas K Waddell, Mingyao Liu, Shaf Keshavjee, Brian C Wilson, Atul Humar, Marcelo Cypel, Marcos Galasso, Jordan J Feld, Yui Watanabe, Mauricio Pipkin, Cara Summers, Aadil Ali, Robert Qaqish, Manyin Chen, Rafaela V P Ribeiro, Khaled Ramadan, Layla Pires, Vanderlei S Bagnato, Cristina Kurachi, Vera Cherepanov, Gray Moonen, Anajara Gazzalle, Thomas K Waddell, Mingyao Liu, Shaf Keshavjee, Brian C Wilson, Atul Humar, Marcelo Cypel

Abstract

Availability of organs is a limiting factor for lung transplantation, leading to substantial mortality rates on the wait list. Use of organs from donors with transmissible viral infections, such as hepatitis C virus (HCV), would increase organ donation, but these organs are generally not offered for transplantation due to a high risk of transmission. Here, we develop a method for treatment of HCV-infected human donor lungs that prevents HCV transmission. Physical viral clearance in combination with germicidal light-based therapies during normothermic ex-vivo Lung Perfusion (EVLP), a method for assessment and treatment of injured donor lungs, inactivates HCV virus in a short period of time. Such treatment is shown to be safe using a large animal EVLP-to-lung transplantation model. This strategy of treating viral infection in a donor organ during preservation could significantly increase the availability of organs for transplantation and encourages further clinical development.

Conflict of interest statement

M.Cypel, T.W., S.K. and M.L. are founders of XOR Labs Toronto and M.Cypel, T.W. and S.K are consultants for Lung Bioengineering. J.J.F is consultant for AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Merck and ContraVir. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The customized illumination device and its usage during ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP). a The apparatus depicted with a germicidal UVC lamp, which was designed to be used during EVLP allocated in sequence with other EVLP components, in a closed system. Mounted on a cylindric tube, the light source is inserted into a tubular quartz tube, surrounded by an opaque PVC tube, that prevents light from escaping from the illuminated cavity. b The EVLP system with the illumination device (irradiator). The lungs are placed into a specific organ chamber. The EVLP circuit is composed of a hard-shell reservoir, a leucocyte filter, a membrane oxygenator/heater and a centrifugal pump. The illumination device, conceived to per part of the EVLP circuit, interpolates the centrifugal pump and the pulmonary artery cannula. During EVLP, the perfusate is treated when illuminated in 360° during its passage
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effect of EVLP and light-based therapies (LbT) on HCV RNA levels in HCV NAT + human donor lungs. a Paired study design: Lungs from same donor were separated to 2 distinct EVLP systems under different treatment conditions (n = 3, each): standard EVLP (control) vs. treatment (circuit exchange, UVC or PDT). b Effect of EVLP and associated treatments towards perfusate and lung tissue HCV levels measured by qPCR during 9 h of treatment. Lung tissue and EVLP perfusate measurement results were normalized for percentage of viral load decrease from baseline and presented as mean ± SEM. The two-way ANOVA statistical test was used for analysis. EVLP: ex vivo lung perfusion
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Infectivity studies (UVC) a Schematic illustration of the mini-EVLP circuit: roller pump, external heater and irradiator device. At the start of perfusion, 1.5 million/ml of HCV genotype 2a surrogate (JFH-1) was added to this circuit. b After several minutes of UV treatment in the mini-EVLP circuit, perfusate samples were collected and used for HCV quantification by qPCR. After 30 min of UVC irradiation the qPCR counts of HCV significantly decreased in all timepoints (n = 4, p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA), although virus RNA was still detectable after 180 min of treatment. Black dots represent qPCR results in IU/mL in the control group whereas red triangles represent the qPCR results in the UVC group. Centre line represents mean and bounds of box are standard deviation. c Quantification of infectivity loss using cluster counts. Immunofluorescence assessment of HCV infectivity using a hepatocyte cell line (Huh 7.5). Cells were double-stained with DAPI and HCV anti-core antibody, then infected hepatocytes clusters were counted. Infectivity rates significantly decreased after 15 min of irradiation (n = 4, p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA), demonstrating total infectivity loss after 150 min of treatment, in all 4 replicates used. Black dots represent cluster count results in the control group whereas red triangles represent cluster count in the UVC group. Centre line represents mean and bounds of box are standard deviation. d Representative immunofluorescence picture of infectivity loss in treated perfusate samples. Scale bar = 400 µm
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Infectivity studies (PDT). The perfusion solution in the mini-EVLP circuit was spiked with a set amount of JFH-1 viruses and hepatocyte Huh 7.5 were used as an infectivity assay (n = 4, each group). Methylene Blue (MB) was diluted in different concentrations (1 μM/L, 0.5 μM/L, 0.1 μM/L and 0.01 μM/L) and activated by different light conditions (no light, 660 nm/20 mW/cm² red light and regular room light). A Huh 7.5 hepatocyte cell culture was transfected and stained (DAPI and HCV anti-core Ab). Infected hepatocytes clusters were counted. a In dark conditions, HCV maintained the infectivity potential, regardless the MB dosage. qPCR counts of HCV were stable during the treatment. b Room light exposure promoted virus inactivation in a MB dose-dependent manner (p < 0.001 in all scenarios, one-way ANOVA), despite virus RNA still being detected on qPCR. c Red light demonstrated the maximal inactivation effectiveness, with significant difference in all scenarios (p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA), despite virus RNA still being detected on qPCR. Left panels: Black dots represent qPCR results in IU/mL in the control group whereas qPCR results in different MB concentration are shown in blue (1uM), red (05.uM), green (0.1uM), and white (0.01 uM). (white). Right panels: Black dots represent cluster count results in the control group whereas cluster count results in different MB concentration are shown in blue (1uM), red (05.uM), green (0.1uM), and white (0.01 uM). Centre line represents mean and bounds of box are standard deviation. Centre line represents mean and bounds of box are standard deviation. d Representative picture of infectivity loss in treated perfusate samples. Scale bar = 400 µm
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Pre-clinical large animal safety studies using EVLP/LbT treatments. a Schematic of a pre-clinical EVLP and lung transplantation model, designed to assess potential acute lung injury in donor lungs after LbT applied during EVLP (n = 4, each group): (1) Control (standard EVLP technique); (2) UVC (254 nm; 31 mW/cm²); (3) PDT, using 1μmol/L MB diluted in the perfusion solution associated with red light irradiation (660 nm; 20 mW/cm²). be Lung function parameters after left lung transplantation (N.S. after one-way ANOVA statistical analysis). f Graft inflammatory cytokine assessment in lung tissue after transplantation (N.S. after one-way ANOVA statistical analysis. Error bar indicate standard deviation)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Pre-clinical large animal safety studies using EVLP/LbT treatments. a Lung injury score after transplantation, scale bar = 100 µm. b Cell death assessment (TUNEL) after transplantation, scale bar = 400um (N.S. after one-way ANOVA statistical analysis). MB: methylene blue; CIT: cold ischemia time; PDT: photodynamic therapy; Ultraviolet C (UVC) irradiation; EVLP: ex vivo lung perfusion; LbT: Light based therapy. Error bar indicates standard deviation
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Clonogenic cell assay performed in six-well plates, with clones produced by LL 24 ATCC ® CCL-151™ human fibroblasts. Steen was previously irradiated for 3 h while circulating in the mini-circuit and samples were taking hourly. a Cells were cultured for 12 days in a mixture of fresh Steen and media (control, upper images) and in a mixture of UVC-treated Steen and media (UVC, bottom images). No cytotoxic effect of the UVC was seen. b Survival fraction curves of LL 24 ATCC ® CCL-151™ human fibroblasts (n = 3 replicates). The survival curves derived from clonogenic assays experiments and are not significantly different, when comparing untreated controls with cells plated with irradiated Steen solution, after one-way ANOVA statistical analysis

References

    1. Cypel M, et al. Technique for prolonged normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion. J. Heart Lung. Transplant. 2008;27:1319–1325. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2008.09.003.
    1. Valapour M, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2013 annual data report: lung. Am. J. Transplant. 2015;15:1–28. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13200.
    1. Cypel M, et al. Normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion in clinical lung transplantation. New Engl. J. Med. 2011;364:1431–1440. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1014597.
    1. Bennett D, et al. Mortality on the waiting list for lung transplantation in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a single-centre experience. Lung. 2015;193:677–681. doi: 10.1007/s00408-015-9767-x.
    1. Machuca TN, et al. Lung transplantation with donation after circulatory determination of death donors and the impact of ex vivo lung perfusion: DCDD lung transplantation and EVLP. Am. J. Transplant. 2015;15:993–1002. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13124.
    1. Inci I, et al. Ex vivo reconditioning of marginal donor lungs injured by acid aspiration. J. Heart Lung. Transplant. 2008;27:1229–1236. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2008.07.027.
    1. Nakajima D, et al. Lung lavage and surfactant replacement during ex vivo lung perfusion for treatment of gastric acid aspiration–induced donor lung injury. J. Heart Lung. Transplant. 2017;36:577–585. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.11.010.
    1. Machuca TN, et al. Injury-specific ex vivo treatment of the donor lung: pulmonary thrombolysis followed by successful lung transplantation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. Med. 2013;188:878–880. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201302-0368LE.
    1. Ansaldi F. Hepatitis C virus in the new era: Perspectives in epidemiology, prevention, diagnostics and predictors of response to therapy. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014;20:9633. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.9633.
    1. Bajpai M, Gupta E, Choudhary A. Hepatitis C virus: screening, diagnosis, and interpretation of laboratory assays. Asian J. Transfus. Sci. 2014;8:19. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.126683.
    1. Lavanchy D. Evolving epidemiology of hepatitis C virus. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011;17:107–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03432.x.
    1. Fong T, et al. Outcomes after lung transplantation and practices of lung transplant programs in the united states regarding hepatitis c seropositive recipients. Transplantation. 2011;91:1293–1296. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182193cd3.
    1. Durand, C. M. et al. The drug overdose epidemic and deceased-donor transplantation in the united states: a national registry study. Ann. Internal Med. 168, 702–711 (2018).
    1. Tullius SG, Rabb H. Improving the supply and quality of deceased-donor organs for transplantation. New Engl. J. Med. 2018;378:1920–1929. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1507080.
    1. Englum BR, et al. Impact of donor and recipient hepatitis C status in lung transplantation. J. Heart Lung. Transplant. 2016;35:228–235. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.10.012.
    1. Cotler SJ, Jensen DM, Kesten S. Hepatitis C virus infection and lung transplantation: a survey of practices. J. Heart Lung. Transplant. 1999;18:456–459. doi: 10.1016/S1053-2498(98)00053-9.
    1. Reese PP, Abt PL, Blumberg EA, Goldberg DS. Transplanting Hepatitis C–positive kidneys. New Engl. J. Med. 2015;373:303–305. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1505074.
    1. Cypel M, Keshavjee S. Extracorporeal lung perfusion (ex-vivo lung perfusion) Curr. Opin. Organ Transplant. 2016;21:329–335. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000320.
    1. A randomized trial of normothermic preservation in liver transplantation. Nature557, 50–56 (2018).
    1. Mohr H, et al. Blood components: a novel approach to pathogen reduction in platelet concentrates using short-wave ultraviolet light: UVC irradiation for pathogen reduction in PCs. Transfusion. 2009;49:2612–2624. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02334.x.
    1. Dai T, Vrahas MS, Murray CK, Hamblin MR. Ultraviolet C irradiation: an alternative antimicrobial approach to localized infections? Expert Rev. Anti. Infect. Ther. 2012;10:185–195. doi: 10.1586/eri.11.166.
    1. Steinmann E, et al. Two pathogen reduction technologies-methylene blue plus light and shortwave ultraviolet light-effectively inactivate hepatitis C virus in blood products: inactivation of hcv in blood products. Transfusion. 2013;53:1010–1018. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03858.x.
    1. Floyd RA, Schneider JE, Jr., Dittmer DP. Methylene blue photoinactivation of RNA viruses. Antivir. Res. 2004;61:141–151. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2003.11.004.
    1. Müller-Breitkreutz K, Mohr H. Hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus RNA degradation by methylene blue/light treatment of human plasma. J. Med. Virol. 1998;56:239–245. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9071(199811)56:3<239::AID-JMV11>;2-9.
    1. Bachmann B, Knüver-Hopf J, Lambrecht B, Mohr H. Target structures for HIV-1 inactivation by methylene blue and light. J. Med. Virol. 1995;47:172–178. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890470211.
    1. Khan B, et al. Successful lung transplantation from hepatitis c positive donor to seronegative recipient. Am. J. Transplant. 2017 doi: 10.1111/ajt.14137.
    1. Moutaoufik MT, et al. UVC-induced stress granules in mammalian cells. PLoS. One. 2014;9:e112742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112742.
    1. Smith DB, et al. Variation of the hepatitis C virus 5′ non-coding region: implications for secondary structure, virus detection and typing. J. General. Virol. 1995;76:1749–1761. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-76-7-1749.
    1. Dai T, Vrahas MS, Murray CK, Hamblin MR. Ultraviolet C irradiation: an alternative antimicrobial approach to localized infections? Expert. Rev. Anti. Infect. Ther. 2012;10:185–195. doi: 10.1586/eri.11.166.
    1. Wakita, T. in Hepatitis C: Methods and Protocols Vol. 510, 2nd edn (ed. Tang, E.) 305–327 (Humana Press, 2009).
    1. Lindenbach BD, et al. Cell culture-grown hepatitis C virus is infectious in vivo and can be recultured in vitro. PNAS. 2006;103:3805–3809. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0511218103.
    1. Pietschmann T, et al. Construction and characterization of infectious intragenotypic and intergenotypic hepatitis C virus chimeras. PNAS. 2006;103:7408–7413. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504877103.
    1. Mariscal A, et al. Pig lung transplant survival model. Nat. Protoc. 2018;13:1814–1828. doi: 10.1038/s41596-018-0019-4.
    1. Maverakis E, et al. Light, Including Ultraviolet. J. Autoimmun. 2010;34:J247–J257. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2009.11.011.
    1. Feld JJ, et al. Sofosbuvir and Velpatasvir for HCV Genotype 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 Infection. New Engl. J. Med. 2015;373:2599–2607. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1512610.
    1. Helfritz, F. A. et al. Methylene blue treatment of grafts during cold ischemia time reduces the risk of hepatitis c virus transmission. J. Infect. Dis. 218, 1711–1721 (2018).
    1. Machuca TN, Cypel M. Ex vivo lung perfusion. J. Thorac. Dis. 2014;6:1054–1062.
    1. Cypel M, et al. Experience with the first 50 ex vivo lung perfusions in clinical transplantation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2012;144:1200–1207. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.08.009.
    1. Sundaresan S, Trachiotis GD, Aoe M, Patterson GA, Cooper JD. Donor lung procurement: Assessment and operative technique. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1993;56:1409–1413. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(93)90699-I.
    1. Franken NAP, Rodermond HM, Stap J, Haveman J, van Bree C. Clonogenic assay of cells in vitro. Nat. Protoc. 2006;1:2315–2319. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.339.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다