Reexamining Ophthalmic Drugs, Safety and Tolerability in Phase 1 Clinical Trials

Patricia Muñoz-Villegas, Andrea A Navarro-Sánchez, Alejandra Sánchez-Ríos, Oscar Olvera-Montaño, Leopoldo M Baiza-Durán, Patricia Muñoz-Villegas, Andrea A Navarro-Sánchez, Alejandra Sánchez-Ríos, Oscar Olvera-Montaño, Leopoldo M Baiza-Durán

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability profile of drugs used for treating common eye disorders when applied to normal healthy volunteers (NHVs) as explored in phase 1 trials.

Subjects and methods: A total of 166 NHVs were identified in six phase 1 trials, examined in a retrospective analysis. The primary endpoints were visual comfort (by ocular comfort index, OCI) and safety (laboratory evaluations, vital signs (VS), visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), lissamine green and fluorescein staining, conjunctival hyperemia, chemosis, and adverse events' incidence (AE)).

Results: Compared to baseline, 75.9%, 40.4% and 73.7% of NHV (for lubricant, hypotensive and antibiotic treatments, respectively) improved their OCI score by their final visit. Laboratory evaluations and VS were within normal ranges in 88% of NHV. Similar results were found for VA, corneal and conjunctival staining, and chemosis. IOP decreased significantly in the hypotensive agents' group, trace to mild hyperemia was reported in 32.1%, 27.1%, and 6.8%, respectively. Additionally, lubricant and hypotensive investigational drugs (ID) had a lower risk of incidence of AE than approved drugs (OR 0.856, 95% CI [0.365, 1.999] and 0.636, 95% CI [0.096, 4.197], respectively). Meanwhile, on antibiotic drugs, the risk for ID-related AE was higher (OR 1.313, 95% CI [0.309, 5.583]).

Conclusion: Phase 1 trials are important in order to ensure the safety and tolerability of ophthalmic medications. This study demonstrates that NHVs do not face a significant risk of harm in these studies, since 98% of the reported AE were mild, and all AE were resolved by the end of the study in which they appeared.

Trial registration: This is a retrospective study of six previously conducted clinical trials, registered on clinicaltrials.gov with the following registration IDs: NCT04081610, NCT03524157, NCT03520348, NCT03966365, NCT03965052 and, NCT03519516.

Keywords: healthy volunteer; ophthalmic drug; phase 1 trial; safety; tolerability.

Conflict of interest statement

This study was sponsored by Laboratorios Sophia, S.A. de C.V. (Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico). The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors, but this commercial affiliation did not have any additional role in the data collection.

© 2021 Muñoz-Villegas et al.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Incidence of adverse events (AE) in 166 NHV for approved drugs (AD, upper polar graphs) and investigational drugs (ID, lower polar graphs). A total of 205 adverse events were presented in 59.6% NHV (99/166). For another AE the incidence was lubricant and antibiotic drugs, Chi square test, p = 0.0001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow chart of studies.

References

    1. Wei Y, Li H, Wang H, Zhang S, Sun Y. Psychological status of volunteers in a Phase I clinical trial assessed by Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) and Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ). Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:4968–4973. doi:10.12659/MSM.909524
    1. McManus L, Fisher JA. To report or not to report: exploring healthy volunteers’ rationales for disclosing adverse events in Phase I drug trials. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018;9(2):82–90. doi:10.1080/23294515.2018.1469552
    1. Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2000;356(9237):1255–1259. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02799-9
    1. Johnson RA, Rid A, Emanuel E, Wendler D. Risks of phase I research with healthy participants: a systematic review. Clin Trials. 2016;13(2):149–160. doi:10.1177/1740774515602868
    1. Tanihara H, Inoue T; K-115 Clinical Study Group. Phase 1 clinical trials of a selective Rho kinase inhibitor, K-115. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(10):1288–1295. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.323
    1. Teuchner B, Schmid E, Ulmer H, Gottardi W, Nagl M. Tolerability of N-chlorotaurine plus ammonium chloride in the rabbit and human eye–a phase 1 clinical study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246(12):1723–1730. doi:10.1007/s00417-008-0900-x
    1. Ackert J, Mohamed K, Slakter JS, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled trial evaluating the ophthalmic safety of single-dose tafenoquine in healthy volunteers. Drug Saf. 2019;42(9):1103–1114. doi:10.1007/s40264-019-00839-w
    1. Quiroz-Mercado H, Ivri E, Gonzalez-Salinas R, et al. Clinical evaluation of a novel electromechanical topical ocular drug delivery system: two Phase 1 proof of concept studies. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:139–147. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S221749
    1. Buoen C, Bjerrum OJ, Thomsen MS. How first-time-in-human studies are being performed: a survey of phase I dose-escalation trials in healthy volunteers published between 1995 and 2004. J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;45(10):1123–1136. doi:10.1177/0091270005279943
    1. Drugs for Some Common Eye Disorders. JAMA. 2020;323(5):470–471. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.20663
    1. Cai Z, Christianson AM, Ståhle L, Keisu M. Reexamining transaminase elevation in Phase I clinical trials: the importance of baseline and change from baseline. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;65(10):1025–1035. doi:10.1007/s00228-009-0684-x
    1. van den Bogert CA, Souverein PC, Brekelmans CT, et al. Non-publication is common among Phase 1, single-center, not prospectively registered, or early terminated clinical drug trials. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0167709. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167709
    1. Allen EN, Chandler CI, Mandimika N, Leisegang C, Barnes K. Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;1(1):MR000039.
    1. Decullier E, Chan AW, Chapuis F. Inadequate dissemination of phase I trials: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2009;6(2):e1000034. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000034
    1. Gilger BC. Concerns with analysis of correlated eye data. Vet Ophthalmol. 2011;14(3):214. doi:10.1111/j.1463-5224.2011.00893.x
    1. Armstrong RA. Statistical guidelines for the analysis of data obtained from one or both eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013;33(1):7–14. doi:10.1111/opo.12009
    1. Michel M, Sickenberger W, Pult H. The effectiveness of questionnaires in the determination of contact lens induced dry eye. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009;29(5):479–486. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00658.x
    1. Johnson ME, Murphy PJ. Measurement of ocular surface irritation on a linear interval scale with the ocular comfort index. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(10):4451–4458. doi:10.1167/iovs.06-1253
    1. Rosenzweig P, Miget N, Brohier S. Transaminase elevation on placebo during phase I trials: prevalence and significance. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999;48(1):19–23. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00952.x
    1. Szumilas M. Explaining odds ratios. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010;19(3):227–229.
    1. Walker RL, Cottingham MD, Fisher JA. Serial participation and the ethics of Phase 1 healthy volunteer research. J Med Philos. 2018;43(1):83–114.
    1. McAlinden C, Gao R, Wang Q, et al. Rasch analysis of three dry eye questionnaires and correlates with objective clinical tests. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(2):202–210. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.01.005
    1. Zhang X, Vadoothker S, Munir WM, Saeedi O. Ocular surface disease and glaucoma medications: a clinical approach. Eye Contact Lens. 2019;45(1):11–18. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000544
    1. Mottow-Lippa LS, Lippa EA, Naidoff MA, Clementi R, Bjornsson T, Jones K. 008% timolol ophthalmic solution. A minimal-effect dose in a normal volunteer model. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108(1):61–64. doi:10.1001/archopht.1990.01070030067030
    1. Sponsel WE, Mensah J, Kiel JW, et al. Effects of latanoprost and timolol-XE on hydrodynamics in the normal eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130(2):151–159. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(00)00401-3
    1. Breithaupt-Groegler K, Coch C, Coenen M, et al. Who is a ‘healthy subject’?-consensus results on pivotal eligibility criteria for clinical trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;73(4):409–416. doi:10.1007/s00228-016-2189-8
    1. Piton A, Poynard T, Imbert-Bismut F, et al. Factors associated with serum alanine transaminase activity in healthy subjects: consequences for the definition of normal values, for selection of blood donors, and for patients with chronic hepatitis C. MULTIVIRC Group. Hepatology. 1998;27(5):1213–1219. doi:10.1002/hep.510270505
    1. Pacifico L, Ferraro F, Bonci E, Anania C, Romaggioli S, Chiesa C. Upper limit of normal for alanine aminotransferase: quo vadis? Clin Chim Acta. 2013;422:29–39. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2013.03.030
    1. Chan AW, Hróbjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA. 2004;291(20):2457–2465. doi:10.1001/jama.291.20.2457

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다