The impact of integrated prevention and treatment on child malnutrition and health: the PROMIS project, a randomized control trial in Burkina Faso and Mali

Lieven Huybregts, Elodie Becquey, Amanda Zongrone, Agnes Le Port, Regina Khassanova, Lazare Coulibaly, Jef L Leroy, Rahul Rawat, Marie T Ruel, Lieven Huybregts, Elodie Becquey, Amanda Zongrone, Agnes Le Port, Regina Khassanova, Lazare Coulibaly, Jef L Leroy, Rahul Rawat, Marie T Ruel

Abstract

Background: Evidence suggests that both preventive and curative nutrition interventions are needed to tackle child acute malnutrition (AM) in developing countries. In addition to reducing the incidence of AM, providing preventive interventions may also help increase attendance (and coverage) of AM screening, a major constraint in the community-based management of child acute malnutrition (CMAM) model. There is a paucity of evidence-based strategies to deliver integrated preventive and curative interventions effectively and affordably at scale. The aim of the Innovative Approaches for the Prevention of Childhood Malnutrition (PROMIS) study is to assess the feasibility, quality of implementation, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an integrated child malnutrition prevention and treatment intervention package implemented through a community-based platform in Mali and a facility-based platform in Burkina Faso.

Methods/design: The PROMIS intervention entails a comprehensive preventive package offered on a monthly basis to caregivers of children, while children are screened for acute malnutrition (AM). The package consists of behavior change communication on essential nutrition and hygiene actions, and monthly preventive doses of small quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements (SQ-LNS) for children aged 6 to 23.9 months. Positive AM cases are referred to treatment services offered by first-line health services according to the CMAM model. The PROMIS intervention will be evaluated using a mixed methods approach. The impact study encompasses two types of study design: i) repeated cross-sectional surveys conducted at baseline and at endline after 24 months of program implementation and ii) a longitudinal study with a monthly follow-up for 18 months. Primary study impact measures include the incidence and endpoint prevalence of AM, AM screening coverage and treatment compliance. A process evaluation will assess the feasibility and quality of implementation of the intervention guided by country specific program impact pathways (PIPs). Cost-effectiveness analysis will assess the economic feasibility of the intervention.

Discussion: The PROMIS study assesses the effectiveness of an innovative model to integrate prevention and treatment interventions for greater and more sustainable impacts on the incidence and prevalence of AM using a rigorous, theory-based randomized control trial approach. This type of programmatic research is urgently needed to help program implementers, policy makers, and investors prioritize, select and scale-up the best program models to prevent and treat AM and achieve the World Health Assembly goal of reducing childhood wasting to less than 5% globally by the year 2025.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02323815 (registered on December 18, 2014) and NCT02245152 (registered on September 16, 2014).

Keywords: Behavior change communication; Child malnutrition; Prevention; Research protocol; Small quantity lipid-based nutrient supplement.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Household questionnaire items and chronogram of measurements for PROMIS Mali (light blue) and Burkina Faso (orange); abaseline and endline from the repeated cross-sectional surveys

References

    1. Olofin I, McDonald CM, Ezzati M, Flaxman S, Black RE, Fawzi WW, Caulfield LE, Danaei G. Associations of suboptimal growth with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in children under five years: a pooled analysis of ten prospective studies. PLoS One. 2013;8:e64636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064636.
    1. Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, Bhutta ZA, Christian P, De Onis M, Ezzati M, Grantham-Mcgregor S, Katz J, Martorell R, Uauy R. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2013;382:427–451. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X.
    1. World Health Organization. World Food Programme. United Nations System Standing Committee on Nutrition. United Nations Children’s Fund . Community-based management of severe acute malnutrition. 2007. p. 7.
    1. World Health Organization . Technical Note: Supplementary Foods for the Management of Moderate Acute Malnutrition in Infants and Children 6–59 Months of Age. 2012.
    1. World Health Organization . Guideline: Updates on the Management of Severe Acute Malnutrition in Infants and Chilren. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
    1. Rogers E, Myatt M, Woodhead S, Guerrero S, Alvarez JL. Coverage of community-based management of severe acute malnutrition programmes in twenty-one countries. PLoS One. 2015;10:2012–2013.
    1. Ruel MT, Menon P, Habicht JP, Loechl C, Bergeron G, Pelto G, Arimond M, Maluccio J, Michaud L, Hankebo B. Age-based preventive targeting of food assistance and behaviour change and communication for reduction of childhood undernutrition in Haiti: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet. 2008;371:588–595. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60271-8.
    1. Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Rizvi A, Gaffey MF, Walker N, Horton S, Webb P, Lartey A, Black RE. Evidence-based interventions for improvement of maternal and child nutrition: What can be done and at what cost? Lancet. 2013;382:452–477. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60996-4.
    1. Arimond M, Zeilani M, Jungjohann S, Brown KH, Ashorn P, Allen LH, Dewey KG. Considerations in developing lipid-based nutrient supplements for prevention of undernutrition: Experience from the International Lipid-Based Nutrient Supplements (iLiNS) Project. Matern Child Nutr. 2015;11:31–61. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12049.
    1. De-Regil LM, Suchdev PS, Vist GE, Walleser S, Peña-Rosas JP. Home fortification of foods with multiple micronutrient powders for health and nutrition in children under two years of age (Review) Evid Based Child Health. 2013;8:112–201. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1895.
    1. UN Human Development Report 2015 []. Accessed 5 Nov 2016.
    1. World Development Indicators []. Accessed 30 Nov 2016.
    1. ORC Macro. Enquête Démographique et de Santé Du Mali EDSM-V Rapport Préliminaire. Calverton: ORC Macro; 2013.
    1. ORC Macro. Enquête Démographique et de Santé et À Indicateurs Multiples Dur Burkina Faso (EDSBF-MICS IV). Calverton: ORC Macro; 2010.
    1. World Health Organization . World Malaria Report 2015. Geneva: WHO; 2015.
    1. Guyon A, Quinn V, Nielsen J, Stone-Jimenez M. Essential Nutrition Actions and Essential Hygiene Actions Reference Materials on Key Practices: Community Workers. 2015.
    1. Chaparro CM, Dewey KG. Use of lipid-based nutrient supplements (LNS) to improve the nutrient adequacy of general food distribution rations for vulnerable sub-groups in emergency settings. Matern Child Nutr. 2010;6(Suppl 1):1–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2009.00224.x.
    1. Hayes RJ, Bennett S. Simple sample size calculation for cluster-randomized trials. Int J Epidemiology. 1999;28:319–26. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.2.319.
    1. Balique H, Ouattara O, Ag Iknane A. Dix ans d’experience des centres de sante communautaire au Mali. Sante Publique (Paris) 2001;13:35–48. doi: 10.3917/spub.011.0035.
    1. WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards: Length/height-for-Age, Weight-for-Age, Weight-for-Length, Weight-for-Height and Body Mass Index-for-Age: Methods and Development. Geneva; 2006.
    1. Cogill B. Anthropometric Indicators Measurement Guide. Washington D.C.; 2003.
    1. Schmidt W-P, Genser B, Barreto ML, Clasen T, Luby SP, Cairncross S, Chalabi Z. Sampling strategies to measure the prevalence of common recurrent infections in longitudinal studies. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2010;7:5. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-7-5.
    1. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 3. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
    1. Tan-Torres Edejer T, Baltussen R, Adam T, Hutubessy R, Acharya A, Evans DB, Murray C. Making choices in health: WHO guide to cost-effectiveness analysis. Geneva: Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy,World Health Organization; 2003.
    1. Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, Kamlet MS, Russell LB. Recommendations of the panel on cost-effectivenss in health and medicine. J Am Med Assoc. 1996;276(NOVEMBER 1997):1253–1258. doi: 10.1001/jama.1996.03540150055031.
    1. Habicht J-P, Pelto GH. From biological to program efficacy: promoting dialogue among the research, policy, and program communities. Adv Nutr. 2014;5:27–34. doi: 10.3945/an.113.004689.
    1. Bernard RH. Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Lanham: AltaMira Press; 1988.
    1. Pelto PJ. Applied Ethnography: Guidelines for Field Research. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press; 2013.
    1. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.; 2002.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다