Kidney failure related to broad-spectrum antibiotics in critically ill patients: secondary end point results from a 1200 patient randomised trial

Jens-Ulrik Stæhr Jensen, Lars Hein, Bettina Lundgren, Morten Heiberg Bestle, Thomas Mohr, Mads Holmen Andersen, Klaus Julius Thornberg, Jesper Løken, Morten Steensen, Zoë Fox, Hamid Tousi, Peter Søe-Jensen, Anne Øberg Lauritsen, Ditte Gry Strange, Nanna Reiter, Katrin Thormar, Paul Christian Fjeldborg, Kim Michael Larsen, Niels-Erik Drenck, Maria Egede Johansen, Lene Ryom Nielsen, Christian Ostergaard, Jesper Kjær, Jesper Grarup, Jens D Lundgren, Procalcitonin And Survival Study (PASS) Group, Jens-Ulrik Stæhr Jensen, Lars Hein, Bettina Lundgren, Morten Heiberg Bestle, Thomas Mohr, Mads Holmen Andersen, Klaus Julius Thornberg, Jesper Løken, Morten Steensen, Zoë Fox, Hamid Tousi, Peter Søe-Jensen, Anne Øberg Lauritsen, Ditte Gry Strange, Nanna Reiter, Katrin Thormar, Paul Christian Fjeldborg, Kim Michael Larsen, Niels-Erik Drenck, Maria Egede Johansen, Lene Ryom Nielsen, Christian Ostergaard, Jesper Kjær, Jesper Grarup, Jens D Lundgren, Procalcitonin And Survival Study (PASS) Group

Abstract

Objectives: To explore whether a strategy of more intensive antibiotic therapy leads to emergence or prolongation of renal failure in intensive care patients.

Design: Secondary analysis from a randomised antibiotic strategy trial (the Procalcitonin And Survival Study). The randomised arms were conserved from the primary trial for the main analysis.

Setting: Nine mixed surgical/medical intensive care units across Denmark.

Participants: 1200 adult intensive care patients, 18+ years, expected to stay +24 h.

Exclusion criteria: bilirubin >40 mg/dl, triglycerides >1000 mg/dl, increased risk from blood sampling, pregnant/breast feeding and psychiatric patients.

Interventions: Patients were randomised to guideline-based therapy ('standard-exposure' arm) or to guideline-based therapy supplemented with antibiotic escalation whenever procalcitonin increased on daily measurements ('high-exposure' arm).

Main outcome measures: Primary end point: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Secondary end points: (1) delta eGFR after starting/stopping a drug and (2) RIFLE criterion Risk 'R', Injury 'I' and Failure 'F'. Analysis was by intention to treat.

Results: 28-day mortality was 31.8% and comparable (Jensen et al, Crit Care Med 2011). A total of 3672/7634 (48.1%) study days during follow-up in the high-exposure versus 3016/6949 (43.4%) in the 'standard-exposure arm were spent with eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), p<0.001. In a multiple effects model, 3 piperacillin/tazobactam was identified as causing the lowest rate of renal recovery of all antibiotics used: 1.0 ml/min/1.73 m(2)/24 h while exposed to this drug (95% CI 0.7 to 1.3 ml/min/1.73 m(2)/24 h) vs meropenem: 2.9 ml/min/1.73 m(2)/24 h (2.5 to 3.3 ml/min/1.73 m(2)/24 h)); after discontinuing piperacillin/tazobactam, the renal recovery rate increased: 2.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2)/24 h (2.3 to 3.1 ml/min/1.73 m(2) /24 h)). eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in the two groups at entry and at last day of follow-up was 57% versus 55% and 41% versus 39%, respectively.

Conclusions: Piperacillin/tazobactam was identified as a cause of delayed renal recovery in critically ill patients. This nephrotoxicity was not observed when using other beta-lactam antibiotics.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00271752.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare that the trial was funded mainly by the Danish State (Danish Research Council), and all authors state that they have no relationships with companies that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; their spouses, partners or children have no financial relationships that may be relevant to the submitted work, and all authors have no non-financial interests that may be relevant to the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) during 10 days on cefuroxim, piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem. Difference between eGFR in patients receiving piperacillin/tazobactam versus meropenem: day 1 (p=0.78), day 2 (p=0.18), day 3 (p=0.09), day 4 (p=0.008), day 5 (p=0.001), day 6 (p=0.001), day 7 (p=0.0004), day 8 (p=0.005), day 9 (p=0.006) and day 10 (p=0.02).

References

    1. Levy MM, Macias WL, Vincent JL, et al. Early changes in organ function predict eventual survival in severe sepsis. Crit Care Med 2005;33:2194–201
    1. Jia X, Malhotra A, Saeed M, et al. Risk factors for ARDS in patients receiving mechanical ventilation for > 48 h. Chest 2008;133:853–61
    1. Rubenfeld GD, Caldwell E, Peabody E, et al. Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1685–93
    1. Kane-Gill SL, Jacobi J, Rothschild JM. Adverse drug events in intensive care units: risk factors, impact, and the role of team care. Crit Care Med 2010;38(Suppl 6):S83–9
    1. Brun-Buisson C, Sollet JP, Schweich H, et al. Treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia with piperacillin-tazobactam/amikacin versus ceftazidime/amikacin: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. VAP Study Group. Clin Infect Dis 1998;26:346–54
    1. Alvarez-Lerma F, Insausti-Ordenana J, Jorda-Marcos R, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of piperacillin/tazobactam versus ceftazidime in association with amikacin for treating nosocomial pneumonia in intensive care patients: a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Intensive Care Med 2001;27:493–502
    1. Marra F, Reynolds R, Stiver G, et al. Piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem: a double-blind, randomized formulary feasibility study at a major teaching hospital. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1998;31:355–68
    1. Paul M, Yahav D, Bivas A, et al. Anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams for the initial, empirical, treatment of febrile neutropenia: comparison of beta-lactams. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;11:CD005197.
    1. Reich G, Cornely OA, Sandherr M, et al. Empirical antimicrobial monotherapy in patients after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation: a randomised, multicentre trial. Br J Haematol 2005;130:265–70
    1. Gomez L, Estrada C, Gomez I, et al. Low-dose beta-lactam plus amikacin in febrile neutropenia: cefepime vs. piperacillin/tazobactam, a randomized trial. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2010;29:417–27
    1. Sato T, Kobayashi R, Yasuda K, et al. A prospective, randomized study comparing cefozopran with piperacillin-tazobactam plus ceftazidime as empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia in children with hematological disorders. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008;51:774–7
    1. Bow EJ, Rotstein C, Noskin GA, et al. A randomized, open-label, multicenter comparative study of the efficacy and safety of piperacillin-tazobactam and cefepime for the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic episodes in patients with hematologic malignancies. Clin Infect Dis 2006;43:447–59
    1. Jensen JU, Hein L, Lundgren B, et al. Procalcitonin-guided interventions against infections to increase early appropriate antibiotics and improve survival in the intensive care unit: a randomized trial. Crit Care Med 2011;39:2048–58
    1. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med 2008;36:296–327
    1. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS international sepsis definitions conference. Crit Care Med 2003;31:1250–6
    1. Hebert C, Villaran R, Tolentino J, et al. Prior antimicrobial exposure and the risk for bloodstream infection with fluconazole-non-susceptible Candida strains. Scand J Infect Dis 2010;42:506–9
    1. Sorkine P, Nagar H, Weinbroum A, et al. Administration of amphotericin B in lipid emulsion decreases nephrotoxicity: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled study in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 1996;24:1311–15
    1. Landersdorfer CB, Kirkpatrick CM, Kinzig M, et al. Inhibition of flucloxacillin tubular renal secretion by piperacillin. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2008;66:648–59
    1. Saitoh H, Oda M, Gyotoku T, et al. A beneficial interaction between imipenem and piperacillin possibly through their renal excretory process. Biol Pharm Bull 2006;29:2519–22
    1. Komuro M, Maeda T, Kakuo H, et al. Inhibition of the renal excretion of tazobactam by piperacillin. J Antimicrob Chemother 1994;34:555–64
    1. Aronoff GR, Sloan RS, Brier ME, et al. The effect of piperacillin dose on elimination kinetics in renal impairment. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1983;24:543–7
    1. Martin JH, Fay MF, Udy A, et al. Pitfalls of using estimations of glomerular filtration rate in an intensive care population. Intern Med J 2011;41:537–43
    1. Bagshaw SM, George C, Dinu I, et al. A multi-centre evaluation of the RIFLE criteria for early acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. Nephrol Dial Transpl 2008;23:1203–10

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다