Protocol for a multi-site pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial: Surgery versus PhysiothErapist-leD exercise for traumatic tears of the rotator cuff (the SPeEDy study)

Chris Littlewood, Julia Wade, Stephanie Butler-Walley, Martyn Lewis, David Beard, Amar Rangan, Gev Bhabra, Socrates Kalogrianitis, Cormac Kelly, Saurabh Mehta, Harvinder Pal Singh, Matthew Smith, Amol Tambe, James Tyler, Nadine E Foster, Chris Littlewood, Julia Wade, Stephanie Butler-Walley, Martyn Lewis, David Beard, Amar Rangan, Gev Bhabra, Socrates Kalogrianitis, Cormac Kelly, Saurabh Mehta, Harvinder Pal Singh, Matthew Smith, Amol Tambe, James Tyler, Nadine E Foster

Abstract

Background: Clinically, a distinction is made between types of rotator cuff tear, traumatic and non-traumatic, and this sub-classification currently informs the treatment pathway. It is currently recommended that patients with traumatic rotator cuff tears are fast tracked for surgical opinion. However, there is uncertainty about the most clinically and cost-effective intervention for patients with traumatic rotator cuff tears and further research is required. SPeEDy will assess the feasibility of a fully powered, multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test the hypothesis that, compared to surgical repair (and usual post-operative rehabilitation), a programme of physiotherapist-led exercise is not clinically inferior, but is more cost-effective for patients with traumatic rotator cuff tears.

Methods: SPeEDy is a two-arm, multi-centre pilot and feasibility RCT with integrated Quintet Recruitment Intervention (QRI) and further qualitative investigation of patient experience. A total of 76 patients with traumatic rotator cuff tears will be recruited from approximately eight UK NHS hospitals and randomly allocated to either surgical repair and usual post-operative rehabilitation or a programme of physiotherapist-led exercise. The QRI is a mixed-methods approach that includes data collection and analysis of screening logs, audio recordings of recruitment consultations, interviews with patients and clinicians involved in recruitment, and review of study documentation as a basis for developing action plans to address identified difficulties whilst recruitment to the RCT is underway. A further sample of patient participants will be purposively sampled from both intervention groups and interviewed to explore reasons for initial participation, treatment acceptability, reasons for non-completion of treatment, where relevant, and any reasons for treatment crossover.

Discussion: Research to date suggests that there is uncertainty regarding the most clinically and cost-effective interventions for patients with traumatic rotator cuff tears. There is a clear need for a high-quality, fully powered, RCT to better inform clinical practice. Prior to this, we first need to undertake a pilot and feasibility RCT to address current uncertainties about recruitment, retention and number of and reasons for treatment crossover.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04027205 ) - Registered on 19 July 2019. Available via.

Keywords: Exercise; Physiotherapy; Randomised controlled trial; Rotator cuff tear; Shoulder; Surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

AR receives educational and research grants from DePuy J&J Ltd. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow chart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schedule of enrolment, interventions and assessments (SPIRIT Statement) [21]

References

    1. Carr AJ, Cooper CD, Campbell MK, Rees JL, Moser J, Beard DJ, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [the UK rotator cuff surgery (UKUFF) randomised trial] Health Technol Assess (Rockv) 2015;19(80):1–217.
    1. Ensor K, Kwon Y, DiBeneditto R, Zuckerman J, Rokito A. The rising incidence of rotator cuff repairs. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2013;22(12):1628–1632.
    1. Paloneva J, Lepola V, Äärimaa V, Joukainen A, Ylinen J, Mattila VM. Increasing incidence of rotator cuff repairs--a nationwide registry study in Finland. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:189.
    1. Colvin A, Egorova N, Harrison A, Moskowitz A, Flatow E. National trends in rotator cuff repair. J Bone Jt Surg - Am. 2012;94(3):227–233.
    1. Maffulli N, Longo U. Conservative management for tendinopathy: is there enough scientific evidence? Rheumatology. 2008;47:390–391.
    1. Hospital Episode Statistics. Hospital admitted patient care activity [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Sep 27]. Available from: Hospital Admitted Patient Care Activity, 2015-16.
    1. NHS Improvement. 2019/20 National Tariff Workbook [Internet]. National tariff payment system. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 23]. Available from: .
    1. Kulkarni R, Gibson J, Brownson P, Thomas M, Rangan A, Carr AJ, et al. BESS/BOA patient care pathways: subacromial shoulder pain. Shoulder Elb. 2015;7(2):135–143.
    1. Ryösä A, Laimi K, Äärimaa V, Lehtimäki K, Kukkonen J, Saltychev M. Surgery or conservative treatment for rotator cuff tear: a meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;8288(August):1–7.
    1. Ranebo MC, Björnsson Hallgren HC, Holmgren T, Adolfsson LE. Surgery and physiotherapy were both successful in the treatment of small, acute, traumatic rotator cuff tears: a prospective randomized trial. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2020;29(3):459–470.
    1. Petersen SA, Murphy TP. The timing of rotator cuff repair for the restoration of function. J Shoulder Elb Surg [Internet]. 2011;20(1):62–68. Available from: .
    1. Duncan NS, Booker SJ, Gooding BWT, Geoghegan J, Wallace WA, Manning PA. Surgery within 6 months of an acute rotator cuff tear significantly improves outcome. J Shoulder Elb Surg [Internet]. 2015;24(12):1876–1880. Available from: .
    1. Tan M, Lam PH, Le BT, Murrell GA. Trauma versus no trauma: an analysis of the effect of tear mechanism on tendon healing in 1300 consecutive patients after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;25(1):12–21.
    1. Zhaeentan S, Von Heijne A, Stark A, Hagert E, Salomonsson B. Similar results comparing early and late surgery in open repair of traumatic rotator cuff tears. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(12):3899–3906.
    1. Teunis T, Lubberts B, Reilly B, Ring D. A systematic review and pooled analysis of the prevalence of rotator cuff disease with increasing age. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2014;23:1913–1921.
    1. Yamamoto N, Mineta M, Kawakami J, Sano H, Itoi E. Risk factors for tear progression in symptomatic rotator cuff tears: a prospective study of 174 shoulders. Am J Sports Med 2017;45(11):2524–2531. Available from: .
    1. Kim Y, Kim S, Bae S, Lee H, Jee WH, Park CK. Tear progression of symptomatic full - thickness and partial - thickness rotator cuff tears as measured by repeated MRI. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(17):2073–2080.
    1. Mall NA, Kim HM, Keener JD, Steger-May K, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, et al. Symptomatic progression of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears: a prospective study of clinical and sonographic variables. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2010;92(16):2623–2633.
    1. Russell RD, Knight JR, Mulligan E, Khazzam MS. Structural integrity after rotator cuff repair does not correlate with patient function and pain: a meta-analysis. J Bone Jt Surg 2014;96(4):265–271. Available from: .
    1. Sealey P, Lewis J. Rotator cuff tears: is non-surgical management effective? Phys Ther Rev. 2016;3196(December):0. Available from: .
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche P, Krleža-Jerić K, Hróbjartsson A, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:200–207.
    1. Littlewood C, Bateman M. Rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: a survey of current UK practice. Shoulder Elb. 2015;7:193–204.
    1. Littlewood C, Astbury C, Bush H, Gibson J, Lalande S, Miller C, et al. Development of a physiotherapist-led exercise programme for traumatic tears of the rotator cuff for the SPeEDy study. Physiotherapy. 2020; Available from: .
    1. Sim J, Lewis M. The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of precision and efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(3):301–308.
    1. Dawson J, Rogers K, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. The Oxford shoulder score revisited. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:119–123.
    1. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Jt Surg. 1996;78:593–600.
    1. van Reenen M, Janssen B. EQ-5D-5L User guide basic information on how to use the EQ-5D-5L instrument [Internet]. 2015. Available from: .
    1. Rooshenas L, Elliott D, Wade J, Jepson M, Paramasivan S, Strong S, et al. Conveying equipoise during recruitment for clinical trials: qualitative synthesis of clinicians’ practices across six randomised controlled trials. PLoS Med. 2016;13(10):1–24.
    1. Donovan JL, Rooshenas L, Jepson M, Elliott D, Wade J, Avery K, et al. Optimising recruitment and informed consent in randomised controlled trials: the development and implementation of the Quintet Recruitment Intervention (QRI). Trials. 2016;17(1):283. Available from: .
    1. Wade J, Donovan JL, Athene Lane J, Neal DE, Hamdy FC. It’s not just what you say, it’s also how you say it: opening the “black box” of informed consent appointments in randomised controlled trials. Soc Sci Med 2009;68(11):2018–2028. Available from: .
    1. Wade J, Elliott D, Avery KNL, Gaunt D, Young GJ, Barnes R, et al. Informed consent in randomised controlled trials: development and preliminary evaluation of a measure of Participatory and Informed Consent (PIC) Trials. 2017;18(1):327.
    1. Beard DJ, Rees JL, Cook JA, Rombach I, Cooper C, Merritt N, et al. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression for subacromial shoulder pain (CSAW): a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group, placebo-controlled, three-group, randomised surgical trial. Lancet. 2017;6736(17):1–10.
    1. Wilson C, Rooshenas L, Paramasivan S, Elliott D, Jepson M, Strong S, et al. Development of a framework to improve the process of recruitment to Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs): The SEAR (Screened, Eligible, Approached, Randomised) framework. Trials. 2017;Submitted.
    1. ten Have P. Doing conversation analysis: a practical guide. 2. London, UK: Sage; 2007.

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다