Antidepressant side effects and their impact on treatment outcome in people with major depressive disorder: an iSPOT-D report

Taylor A Braund, Gabriel Tillman, Donna M Palmer, Evian Gordon, A John Rush, Anthony W F Harris, Taylor A Braund, Gabriel Tillman, Donna M Palmer, Evian Gordon, A John Rush, Anthony W F Harris

Abstract

Side effects to antidepressant medications are common and can impact the prognosis of successful treatment outcome in people with major depressive disorder (MDD). However, few studies have investigated the severity of side effects over the course of treatment and their association with treatment outcome. Here we assessed the severity of side effects and the impact of treatment type and anxiety symptoms over the course of treatment, as well as whether side effects were associated with treatment outcome. Participants were N = 1008 adults with a current diagnosis of single-episode or recurrent, nonpsychotic MDD. Participants were randomised to receive escitalopram, sertraline, or venlafaxine-extended release with equal probability and reassessed at 8 weeks regarding Hamilton Rating Scale Depression (HRSD17) and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) remission and response. Severity of side effects were assessed using the Frequency, Intensity, and Burden of Side Effects Rating (FIBSER) scale and assessed at day 4 and weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8. Frequency, intensity, and burden of side effects were greatest at week 2, then only frequency and intensity of side effects gradually decreased up to week 6. Treatment type and anxiety symptoms did not impact the severity of side effects. A greater burden-but not frequency or intensity-of side effects was associated with poorer treatment outcome and as early as 4 days post-treatment. Together, this work provides an informative mapping of the progression of side effects throughout the treatment course and their association with treatment outcome. Importantly, the burden of side effects that are present as early as 4 days post-treatment predicts poorer treatment outcome and should be monitored closely. iSPOT-D: Registry name: ClinicalTrials.gov. Registration number: NCT00693849.

Conflict of interest statement

TAB, DMP, and EG report salaries from Total Brain outside the submitted work. EG is the CMO at Total Brain and holds significant equity and stock options in the company. AWFH reports personal fees from Janssen Australia, Lundbeck Australia, Servier Australia, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company outside the submitted work. AJR has received consulting fees from Akili, Brain Resource Inc., Compass Inc., Curbstone Consultant LLC, Emmes Corp., Holmusk, Inc., Liva-Nova, Johnson & Johnson (Janssen), Sunovion, Takeda USA, and Taj Medical; speaking fees from LivaNova; and royalties from Guilford Press and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (for the Inventory of Depressive Symptoms and its derivatives). He is also named co-inventor on two patents: US Patent No. 7,795,033: Methods to predict the outcome of treatment with antidepressant medication, Inventors: McMahon FJ, Laje G, Manji H, Rush AJ, Paddock S, Wilson AS and US Patent No. 7,906,283: Methods to identify patients at risk of developing adverse events during treatment with antidepressant medication, Inventors: McMahon FJ, Laje G, Manji H, Rush AJ, Paddock S. GT has no conflicts of interest to report.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1. Mean FIBSER score trajectories.
Fig. 1. Mean FIBSER score trajectories.
Note: Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals of the mean.
Fig. 2. Mean FIBSER burden score trajectories…
Fig. 2. Mean FIBSER burden score trajectories for remitters and responders.
A HRSD17 and B QIDS-SR16 remitters and responders. Note: Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals of the mean.

References

    1. Malhi GS, Mann JJ. Depression. Lancet. 2018;392:2299–312. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31948-2.
    1. Craske MG, Stein MB. Anxiety. Lancet. 2016;388:3048–59. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30381-6.
    1. Wang SM, Han C, Bahk WM, Lee SJ, Patkar AA, Masand PS, et al. Addressing the side effects of contemporary antidepressant drugs: a comprehensive review. Chonnam Med J. 2018;54:101–12. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2018.54.2.101.
    1. Moret C, Isaac M, Briley M. Problems associated with long-term treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. J. Psychopharmacol. 2009;23:967–74. doi: 10.1177/0269881108093582.
    1. Jakobsen JC, Katakam KK, Schou A, Hellmuth SG, Stallknecht SE, Leth-Møller K, et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus placebo in patients with major depressive disorder. A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;7:58.. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1173-2.
    1. Saveanu R, Etkin A, Duchemin AM, Goldstein-Piekarski A, Gyurak A, Debattista C, et al. The international Study to Predict Optimized Treatment in Depression (iSPOT-D): outcomes from the acute phase of antidepressant treatment. J Psychiatr Res. 2015;61:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.12.018.
    1. Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, Warden D, Ritz L, et al. Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:28–40. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.28.
    1. Ionescu DF, Niciu MJ, Richards EM, Zarate CA, Jr. Pharmacologic treatment of dimensional anxious depression: a review. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2014. 10.4088/PCC.13r01621.
    1. Ionescu DF, Niciu MJ, Henter ID, Zarate CA. Defining anxious depression: a review of the literature. CNS Spectr. 2013;18:252–60. doi: 10.1017/S1092852913000114.
    1. Braund TA, Palmer DM, Williams LM, Harris AW. Characterising anxiety in major depressive disorder and its use in predicting antidepressant treatment outcome: an iSPOT-D report. Aust NZ J Psychiatry. 2019. 10.1177/0004867419835933.
    1. Gaspersz R, Nawijn L, Lamers F, Penninx B. Patients with anxious depression: overview of prevalence, pathophysiology and impact on course and treatment outcome. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2018;31:17–25. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000376.
    1. Fava M, Rush AJ, Alpert JE, Balasubramani GK, Wisniewski SR, Carmin CN, et al. Difference in treatment outcome in outpatients with anxious versus nonanxious depression: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165:342–51. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06111868.
    1. Chan HN, Rush AJ, Nierenberg AA, Trivedi M, Wisniewski SR, Balasubramani GK, et al. Correlates and outcomes of depressed out-patients with greater and fewer anxious symptoms: a CO-MED report. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012;15:1387–99. doi: 10.1017/S1461145711001660.
    1. Gaspersz R, Lamers F, Kent JM, Beekman A, Smit JH, van Hemert AM, et al. Anxious distress predicts subsequent treatment outcome and side effects in depressed patients starting antidepressant treatment. J Psychiatr Res. 2017;84:41–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.09.018.
    1. Shankman SA, Gorka SM, Katz AC, Klein DN, Markowitz JC, Arnow BA, et al. Side effects to antidepressant treatment in patients with depression and comorbid panic disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2017;78:433–40. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m10370.
    1. Williams LM, Rush AJ, Koslow SH, Wisniewski SR, Cooper NJ, Nemeroff CB, et al. International Study to Predict Optimized Treatment for Depression (iSPOT-D), a randomized clinical trial: rationale and protocol. Trials. 2011;12:4.. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-4.
    1. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59:22–33.
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Vol. 4. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
    1. Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960;23:56–62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56.
    1. Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Ibrahim HM, Carmody TJ, Arnow B, Klein DN, et al. The 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;54:573–83. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01866-8.
    1. Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Ibrahim HM, Carmody TJ, Biggs MM, Suppes T, et al. The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (IDS-C) and Self-Report (IDS-SR), and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) and Self-Report (QIDS-SR) in public sector patients with mood disorders: a psychometric evaluation. Psychol Med. 2004;34:73–82. doi: 10.1017/s0033291703001107.
    1. Trajković G, Starčević V, Latas M, Leštarević M, Ille T, Bukumirić Z, et al. Reliability of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: a meta-analysis over a period of 49 years. Psychiatry Res. 2011;189:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.12.007.
    1. Cameron IM, Crawford JR, Cardy AH, du Toit SW, Lawton K, Hay S, et al. Psychometric properties of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR) in UK primary care. J Psychiatr Res. 2013;47:592–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.01.019.
    1. Wisniewski SR, Rush AJ, Balasubramani GK, Trivedi MH, Nierenberg AA. Self-rated global measure of the frequency, intensity, and burden of side effects. J Psychiatr Pract. 2006;12:71–9. doi: 10.1097/00131746-200603000-00002.
    1. Brown EG, Wood L, Wood S. The medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA) Drug Saf. 1999;20:109–17. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199920020-00002.
    1. Cleary P, Guy W. Factor analysis of the Hamilton Depression Scale. Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1977;1:115–20.
    1. Lovibond PF. Long-term stability of depression, anxiety, and stress syndromes. J. Abnorm Psychol. 1998;107:520–6. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.107.3.520.
    1. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. 2nd ed. Sydney, NSW: Psychology Foundation; 1995.
    1. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. In: Parzen E, Tanabe K, Kitagawa G, editors. Selected papers of Hirotugu Akaike. New York, NY: Springer; 1974. p. 215–22.
    1. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat. 1978;6:461–4. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176344136.
    1. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1979;6:65–70.
    1. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.
    1. Bates D, Machler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67:1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
    1. Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest Package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw. 2017;82:1–26. doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13.
    1. Lenth R. mmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. 2019. Retrieved from .
    1. Sansone RA, Sansone LA. Antidepressant adherence: are patients taking their medications? Innov Clin Neurosci. 2012;9:41–6.
    1. Stahl SM. Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: neuroscientific basis and practical application. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
    1. McClintock SM, Haley C, Bernstein IH. Psychometric considerations of depression symptom rating scales. Neuropsychiatry. 2011;1:611–23. doi: 10.2217/Npy.11.59.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다