Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures of Brain Structure to Predict Antidepressant Treatment Outcome in Major Depressive Disorder

Mayuresh S Korgaonkar, William Rekshan, Evian Gordon, A John Rush, Leanne M Williams, Christine Blasey, Stuart M Grieve, Mayuresh S Korgaonkar, William Rekshan, Evian Gordon, A John Rush, Leanne M Williams, Christine Blasey, Stuart M Grieve

Abstract

Background: Less than 50% of patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) reach symptomatic remission with their initial antidepressant medication (ADM). There are currently no objective measures with which to reliably predict which individuals will achieve remission to ADMs.

Methods: 157 participants with MDD from the International Study to Predict Optimized Treatment in Depression (iSPOT-D) underwent baseline MRIs and completed eight weeks of treatment with escitalopram, sertraline or venlafaxine-ER. A score at week 8 of 7 or less on the 17 item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression defined remission. Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) analysis using the first 50% participants was performed to define decision trees of baseline MRI volumetric and connectivity (fractional anisotropy) measures that differentiated non-remitters from remitters with maximal sensitivity and specificity. These decision trees were tested for replication in the remaining participants.

Findings: Overall, 35% of all participants achieved remission. ROC analyses identified two decision trees that predicted a high probability of non-remission and that were replicated: 1. Left middle frontal volume < 14 · 8 mL & right angular gyrus volume > 6 · 3 mL identified 55% of non-remitters with 85% accuracy; and 2. Fractional anisotropy values in the left cingulum bundle < 0 · 63, right superior fronto-occipital fasciculus < 0 · 54 and right superior longitudinal fasciculus < 0 · 50 identified 15% of the non-remitters with 84% accuracy. All participants who met criteria for both decision trees were correctly identified as non-remitters.

Interpretation: Pretreatment MRI measures seem to reliably identify a subset of patients who do not remit with a first step medication that includes one of these commonly used medications. Findings are consistent with a neuroanatomical basis for non-remission in depressed patients.

Funding: Brain Resource Ltd is the sponsor for the iSPOT-D study (NCT00693849).

Keywords: Biomarker predictors; Decision trees; Diffusion tensor imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Major depressive disorder; Remission; Replication; iSPOT-D.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
iSPOT-D study CONSORT Diagram. Abbreviations: ADMs, antidepressant medications; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; MDD, major depressive disorder; sMRI, structural T1 MRI.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Decision tree for prediction of remission using the DTI measures. Abbreviations: R, remitters; NR, non-remitters; FA, fractional anisotropy; CgC, cingulum portion of the cingulate gyrus; SFOF, superior fronto-occipital fasciculus; SLF, superior longitudinal fasciculus.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Decision tree for prediction of remission using the volumetric measures. Abbreviations: R, remitters; NR, non-remitters.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Significant left middle frontal cluster (shown in red) identified in the whole brain VBM analysis comparing selected non-remitters identified from the volumetric decision tree & all remitted MDD participants. The cluster peak was at (− 40, 14, 43) and comprised of 700 voxels (p 

References

    1. Fitzgerald P.B., Laird A.R., Maller J., Daskalakis Z.J. A meta-analytic study of changes in brain activation in depression. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2008;29(6):683–695.
    1. Fu C.H., Mourao-Miranda J., Costafreda S.G., Khanna A., Marquand A.F., Williams S.C. Pattern classification of sad facial processing: toward the development of neurobiological markers in depression. Biol. Psychiatry. 2008;63(7):656–662.
    1. Fu C.H., Steiner H., Costafreda S.G. Predictive neural biomarkers of clinical response in depression: a meta-analysis of functional and structural neuroimaging studies of pharmacological and psychological therapies. Neurobiol. Dis. 2013;52:75–83.
    1. Gartlehner G., Thaler K., Hill S., Hansen R.A. How should primary care doctors select which antidepressants to administer? Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2012;14(4):360–369.
    1. Goldberg D. The heterogeneity of “major depression”. World Psychiatry. 2011;10(3):226–228.
    1. Greicius M.D., Flores B.H., Menon V., Glover G.H., Solvason H.B., Kenna H. Resting-state functional connectivity in major depression: abnormally increased contributions from subgenual cingulate cortex and thalamus. Biol. Psychiatry. 2007;62(5):429–437.
    1. Grieve S.M., Korgaonkar M.S., Koslow S.H., Gordon E., Williams L.M. Widespread reductions in gray matter volume in depression. NeuroImage Clin. 2013;3:332–339.
    1. Grieve S.M., Korgaonkar M.S., Etkin A., Harris A., Koslow S.H., Wisniewski S. Brain imaging predictors and the international study to predict optimized treatment for depression: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14(1):224.
    1. Hamilton J.P., Etkin A., Furman D.J., Lemus M.G., Johnson R.F., Gotlib I.H. Functional neuroimaging of major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis and new integration of base line activation and neural response data. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2012;169(7):693–703.
    1. Hansen R., Gaynes B., Thieda P., Gartlehner G., Deveaugh-Geiss A., Krebs E. Meta-analysis of major depressive disorder relapse and recurrence with second-generation antidepressants. Psychiatr. Serv. 2008;59(10):1121–1130.
    1. Insel T., Cuthbert B., Garvey M., Heinssen R., Pine D.S., Quinn K. Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2010;167(7):748–751.
    1. Korgaonkar M.S., Grieve S.M., Koslow S.H., Gabrieli J.D.E., Gordon E., Williams L.M. Loss of white matter integrity in major depressive disorder: evidence using tract-based spatial statistical analysis of diffusion tensor imaging. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2011;32:2161–2171.
    1. Korgaonkar M.S., Cooper N.J., Williams L.M., Grieve S.M. Mapping inter-regional connectivity of the entire cortex to characterize major depressive disorder: a whole-brain diffusion tensor imaging tractography study. Neuroreport. 2012:566–571.
    1. Korgaonkar M.S., Grieve S.M., Etkin A., Koslow S.H., Williams L.M. Using standardized fMRI protocols to identify patterns of prefrontal circuit dysregulation that are common and specific to cognitive and emotional tasks in major depressive disorder: first wave results from the iSPOT-D study. Neuropsychopharmacol. Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013;38(5):863–871.
    1. Korgaonkar M.S., Fornito A., Williams L.M., Grieve S.M. Abnormal structural networks characterize major depressive disorder: a connectome analysis. Biol. Psychiatry. 2014;76(7):567–574.
    1. Korgaonkar M.S., Williams L.M., Song Y.S., Usherwood T., Grieve S.M. Diffusion tensor imaging predictors of treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder. Br. J. Psychiatry. 2014;(205):321–328.
    1. Kraemer H.C. Sage Publications; Newbury Park, Calif: 1992. Evaluating Medical Tests: Objective and Quantitative Guidelines.
    1. Labermaier C., Masana M., Muller M.B. Biomarkers predicting antidepressant treatment response: how can we advance the field? Dis. Markers. 2013;35(1):23–31.
    1. Leuchter A.F., Cook I.A., Hamilton S.P., Narr K.L., Toga A., Hunter A.M. Biomarkers to predict antidepressant response. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2010;12(6):553–562.
    1. Li B., Liu L., Friston K.J., Shen H., Wang L., Zeng L.L. A treatment-resistant default mode subnetwork in major depression. Biol. Psychiatry. 2013;74(1):48–54.
    1. Mayberg H.S. Modulating dysfunctional limbic-cortical circuits in depression: towards development of brain-based algorithms for diagnosis and optimised treatment. Br. Med. Bull. 2003;65:193–207.
    1. Mayberg H.S., Brannan S.K., Mahurin R.K., Jerabek P.A., Brickman J.S., Tekell J.L. Cingulate function in depression: a potential predictor of treatment response. Neuroreport. 1997;8(4):1057–1061.
    1. McGrath C.L., Kelley M.E., Holtzheimer P.E., Dunlop B.W., Craighead W.E., Franco A.R. Toward a neuroimaging treatment selection biomarker for major depressive disorder. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(8):821–829.
    1. Mori S., Oishi K., Jiang H., Jiang L., Li X., Akhter K. Stereotaxic white matter atlas based on diffusion tensor imaging in an ICBM template. NeuroImage. 2008;40(2):570–582.
    1. Redlich R., Almeida J.J., Grotegerd D., Opel N., Kugel H., Heindel W. Brain morphometric biomarkers distinguishing unipolar and bipolar depression: a voxel-based morphometry-pattern classification approach. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(11):1222–1230.
    1. Rush A.J., Trivedi M.H., Wisniewski S.R., Nierenberg A.A., Stewart J.W., Warden D. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2006;163(11):1905–1917.
    1. Rush A.J., Wisniewski S.R., Warden D., Luther J.F., Davis L.L., Fava M. Selecting among second-step antidepressant medication monotherapies: predictive value of clinical, demographic, or first-step treatment features. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 2008;65(8):870–880.
    1. Seghier M.L. The angular gyrus: multiple functions and multiple subdivisions. Neuroscientist Rev. J. Bringing Neurobiol. Neurol. Psychiatry. 2013;19(1):43–61.
    1. Teipel S.J., Walter M., Likitjaroen Y., Schonknecht P., Gruber O. Diffusion tensor imaging in Alzheimer's disease and affective disorders. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2014;264(6):467–483.
    1. Thase M.E., Entsuah A.R., Rudolph R.L. Remission rates during treatment with venlafaxine or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Br. J. Psychiatry J. Ment. Sci. 2001;178:234–241.
    1. Tzourio-Mazoyer N., Landeau B., Papathanassiou D., Crivello F., Etard O., Delcroix N. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. NeuroImage. 2002;15:273–289.
    1. Williams L.M., Rush aJ, Koslow S.H., Wisniewski S.R., Cooper N.J., Nemeroff C.B. International Study to Predict Optimized Treatment for Depression (iSPOT-D), a randomized clinical trial: rationale and protocol. Trials. 2011;12:4.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다