Neuromodulation of Inflammation to Treat Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

Stavros Stavrakis, Khaled Elkholey, Lynsie Morris, Monika Niewiadomska, Zain Ul Abideen Asad, Mary Beth Humphrey, Stavros Stavrakis, Khaled Elkholey, Lynsie Morris, Monika Niewiadomska, Zain Ul Abideen Asad, Mary Beth Humphrey

Abstract

Background A systemic proinflammatory state plays a central role in the development of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Low-level transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation suppresses inflammation in humans. We conducted a sham-controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trial to examine the effect of chronic low-level transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on cardiac function, exercise capacity, and inflammation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Methods and Results Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and at least 2 additional comorbidities (obesity, diabetes, hypertension, or age ≥65 years) were randomized to either active (tragus) or sham (earlobe) low-level transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (20 Hz, 1 mA below discomfort threshold), for 1 hour daily for 3 months. Echocardiography, 6-minute walk test, quality of life, and serum cytokines were assessed at baseline and 3 months. Fifty-two patients (mean age 70.4±9.2 years; 70% female) were included (active, n=26; sham, n=26). Baseline characteristics were balanced between the 2 arms. Adherence to the protocol of daily stimulation was >90% in both arms (P>0.05). While the early mitral inflow Doppler velocity to the early diastolic mitral annulus velocity ratio did not differ between groups, global longitudinal strain and tumor necrosis factor-α levels at 3 months were significantly improved in the active compared with the sham arm (-18.6%±2.5% versus -16.0%±2.4%, P=0.002; 8.9±2.8 pg/mL versus 11.3±2.9 pg/mL, P=0.007, respectively). The reduction in tumor necrosis factor-α levels correlated with global longitudinal strain improvement (r=-0.73, P=0.001). Quality of life was better in the active arm. No device-related side effects were observed. Conclusions Neuromodulation with low-level transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation over 3 months resulted in a significant improvement in global longitudinal strain, inflammatory cytokines, and quality of life in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03327649.

Keywords: autonomic modulation; heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; inflammation.

Figures

Figure 1. Device and location of active…
Figure 1. Device and location of active and sham stimulation.
A, The Parasym device was used for stimulation. B, For active stimulation, the ear clip was attached to the tragus, which is innervated by the auricular branch of the vagus nerve. C, For sham control stimulation, the ear clip was attached to the earlobe, which is devoid of vagal innervation.
Figure 2. Screening and enrollment of patients.
Figure 2. Screening and enrollment of patients.
Figure 3. Effect of treatment on the…
Figure 3. Effect of treatment on the co‐primary outcomes.
A, Changes in the ratio of the early mitral inflow Doppler velocity to the early diastolic mitral annulus velocity (E/e′). B, Changes in global longitudinal strain (GLS). The absolute values of GLS are plotted. LLTS indicates low‐level transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation; and ns, nonsignificant. *P<0.05.
Figure 4. Changes in functional outcomes during…
Figure 4. Changes in functional outcomes during the 3 months of treatment.
A, 6‐minute walk distance. B, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) score. LLTS indicates low‐level transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation; and ns, nonsignificant. *P<0.05.
Figure 5. Changes in inflammatory biomarkers during…
Figure 5. Changes in inflammatory biomarkers during the 3 months of treatment.
A, Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α. B, Interleukin (IL)‐8. LLTS indicates low‐level transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation; and ns, nonsignificant. *P<0.05.
Figure 6. Linear association between the interval…
Figure 6. Linear association between the interval change of TNF‐α and the change in absolute GLS.
Logarithmic transformation of TNF‐α was performed to satisfy the modeling assumptions. The association was significant, with 54% of the variation in the change in GLS being explained by the change in TNF‐α levels (r=−0.73, R2=0.54, P=0.001). GLS indicates global longitudinal strain; LLTS, low‐level transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation; and TNF‐α, tumor necrosis factor α.

References

    1. Cohen JB, Schrauben SJ, Zhao L, Basso MD, Cvijic ME, Li Z, Yarde M, Wang Z, Bhattacharya PT, Chirinos DA, et al. Clinical phenogroups in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: detailed phenotypes, prognosis, and response to spironolactone. JACC Heart Fail. 2020;8:172–184. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.09.009
    1. Shah SJ, Katz DH, Selvaraj S, Burke MA, Yancy CW, Gheorghiade M, Bonow RO, Huang CC, Deo RC. Phenomapping for novel classification of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2015;131:269–279. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010637
    1. Packer M, Lam CSP, Lund LH, Maurer MS, Borlaug BA. Characterization of the inflammatory‐metabolic phenotype of heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction: a hypothesis to explain influence of sex on the evolution and potential treatment of the disease. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22:1551–1567. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1902
    1. Franssen C, Chen S, Unger A, Korkmaz HI, De Keulenaer GW, Tschöpe C, Leite‐Moreira AF, Musters R, Niessen HWM, Linke WA, et al. Myocardial microvascular inflammatory endothelial activation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. JACC Heart Fail. 2016;4:312–324. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.10.007
    1. Glezeva N, Baugh JA. Role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and its potential as a therapeutic target. Heart Fail Rev. 2014;19:681–694. doi: 10.1007/s10741-013-9405-8
    1. Westermann D, Lindner D, Kasner M, Zietsch C, Savvatis K, Escher F, von Schlippenbach J, Skurk C, Steendijk P, Riad A, et al. Cardiac inflammation contributes to changes in the extracellular matrix in patients with heart failure and normal ejection fraction. Circ Heart Fail. 2011;4:44–52. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.109.931451
    1. Paulus WJ, Tschope C. A novel paradigm for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: comorbidities drive myocardial dysfunction and remodeling through coronary microvascular endothelial inflammation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:263–271. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.092
    1. Borovikova LV, Ivanova S, Zhang M, Yang H, Botchkina GI, Watkins LR, Wang H, Abumrad N, Eaton JW, Tracey KJ. Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates the systemic inflammatory response to endotoxin. Nature. 2000;405:458–462. doi: 10.1038/35013070
    1. Huston JM, Tracey KJ. The pulse of inflammation: heart rate variability, the cholinergic anti‐inflammatory pathway and implications for therapy. J Intern Med. 2011;269:45–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02321.x
    1. Pavlov VA, Tracey KJ. Neural circuitry and immunity. Immunol Res. 2015;63:38–57. doi: 10.1007/s12026-015-8718-1
    1. Wang H, Yu M, Ochani M, Amella CA, Tanovic M, Susarla S, Li JH, Wang H, Yang H, Ulloa L, et al. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha7 subunit is an essential regulator of inflammation. Nature. 2003;421:384–388. doi: 10.1038/nature01339
    1. Koopman FA, Chavan SS, Miljko S, Grazio S, Sokolovic S, Schuurman PR, Mehta AD, Levine YA, Faltys M, Zitnik R, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation inhibits cytokine production and attenuates disease severity in rheumatoid arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:8284–8289. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1605635113
    1. Stavrakis S, Humphrey MB, Scherlag B, Iftikhar O, Parwani P, Abbas M, Filiberti A, Fleming C, Hu Y, Garabelli P, et al. Low‐level vagus nerve stimulation suppresses post‐operative atrial fibrillation and inflammation: a randomized study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3:929–938. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.02.019
    1. Peuker ET, Filler TJ. The nerve supply of the human auricle. Clin Anat. 2002;15:35–37. doi: 10.1002/ca.1089
    1. Stavrakis S, Humphrey MB, Scherlag BJ, Hu Y, Jackman WM, Nakagawa H, Lockwood D, Lazzara R, Po SS. Low‐level transcutaneous electrical vagus nerve stimulation suppresses atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:867–875. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.026
    1. Stavrakis S, Stoner JA, Humphrey MB, Morris L, Filiberti A, Reynolds JC, Elkholey K, Javed I, Twidale N, Riha P, et al. TREAT AF (Transcutaneous Electrical Vagus Nerve Stimulation to Suppress Atrial Fibrillation): a randomized clinical trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6:282–291. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.11.008
    1. Zhou L, Filiberti A, Humphrey MB, Fleming CD, Scherlag BJ, Po SS, Stavrakis S. Low‐level transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation attenuates cardiac remodelling in a rat model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Exp Physiol. 2019;104:28–38. doi: 10.1113/EP087351
    1. Tran N, Asad Z, Elkholey K, Scherlag BJ, Po SS, Stavrakis S. Autonomic neuromodulation acutely ameliorates left ventricular strain in humans. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2019;12:221–230. doi: 10.1007/s12265-018-9853-6
    1. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Falk V, González‐Juanatey JR, Harjola V‐P, Jankowska EA, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2129–2200. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128
    1. Butler J, Hamo CE, Udelson JE, Pitt B, Yancy C, Shah SJ, Desvigne‐Nickens P, Bernstein HS, Clark RL, Depre C, et al. Exploring new endpoints for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circ Heart Fail. 2016;9:9–17. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003358
    1. Rector TS, Kubo SH, Cohn JN. Validity of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire as a measure of therapeutic response to enalapril or placebo. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71:1106–1107. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90582-W
    1. Mordi IR, Singh S, Rudd A, Srinivasan J, Frenneaux M, Tzemos N, Dawson DK. Comprehensive echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance evaluation differentiates among heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients, hypertensive patients, and healthy control subjects. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:577–585. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.05.022
    1. Senni M, Paulus WJ, Gavazzi A, Fraser AG, Diez J, Solomon SD, Smiseth OA, Guazzi M, Lam CSP, Maggioni AP, et al. New strategies for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the importance of targeted therapies for heart failure phenotypes. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2797–2815. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu204
    1. Kraigher‐Krainer E, Shah AM, Gupta DK, Santos A, Claggett B, Pieske B, Zile MR, Voors AA, Lefkowitz MP, Packer M, et al. Impaired systolic function by strain imaging in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:447–456. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.052
    1. Halliday BP, Senior R, Pennell DJ. Assessing left ventricular systolic function: from ejection fraction to strain analysis. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:789–797. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa587
    1. Paulus WJ, Zile MR. From systemic inflammation to myocardial fibrosis: the heart failure with preserved ejection fraction paradigm revisited. Circ Res. 2021;128:1451–1467. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318159
    1. Obokata M, Kane GC, Reddy YN, Olson TP, Melenovsky V, Borlaug BA. Role of diastolic stress testing in the evaluation for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a simultaneous invasive‐echocardiographic study. Circulation. 2017;135:825–838. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024822
    1. Hamdani N, Franssen C, Lourenço A, Falcão‐Pires I, Fontoura D, Leite S, Plettig L, López B, Ottenheijm CA, Becher PM, et al. Myocardial titin hypophosphorylation importantly contributes to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a rat metabolic risk model. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6:1239–1249. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000539
    1. Hulsmans M, Sager HB, Roh JD, Valero‐Muñoz M, Houstis NE, Iwamoto Y, Sun Y, Wilson RM, Wojtkiewicz G, Tricot B, et al. Cardiac macrophages promote diastolic dysfunction. J Exp Med. 2018;215:423–440. doi: 10.1084/jem.20171274
    1. Huffman WJ, Subramaniyan S, Rodriguiz RM, Wetsel WC, Grill WM, Terrando N. Modulation of neuroinflammation and memory dysfunction using percutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in mice. Brain Stimul. 2019;12:19–29. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.10.005
    1. Rocha‐Resende C, Weinheimer C, Bajpai G, Adamo L, Matkovich SJ, Schilling J, Barger PM, Lavine KJ, Mann DL. Immunomodulatory role of non‐neuronal cholinergic signaling in myocardial injury. JCI Insight. 2019;5:5–23. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.128961
    1. Woolley RJ, Ceelen D, Ouwerkerk W, Tromp J, Figarska SM, Anker SD, Dickstein K, Filippatos G, Zannad F, Metra M, et al. Machine learning based on biomarker profiles identifies distinct subgroups of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021;23:983–991. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2144
    1. Van Tassell BW, Arena R, Biondi‐Zoccai G, McNair Canada J, Oddi C, Abouzaki NA, Jahangiri A, Falcao RA, Kontos MC, Shah KB, et al. Effects of interleukin‐1 blockade with anakinra on aerobic exercise capacity in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (from the D‐HART pilot study). Am J Cardiol. 2014;113:321–327. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.08.047
    1. Van Tassell BW, Trankle CR, Canada JM, Carbone S, Buckley L, Kadariya D, Del Buono MG, Billingsley H, Wohlford G, Viscusi M, et al. IL‐1 Blockade in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circ Heart Fail. 2018;11:e005036. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.005036
    1. Wolsk E, Kaye D, Borlaug BA, Burkhoff D, Kitzman DW, Komtebedde J, Lam CSP, Ponikowski P, Shah SJ, Gustafsson F. Resting and exercise haemodynamics in relation to six‐minute walk test in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018;20:715–722. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.976
    1. Sanderson JE. Factors related to outcome in heart failure with a preserved (or normal) left ventricular ejection fraction. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2016;2:153–163. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcw026

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다